Sciences: Lessons for TA Training,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 24–29, Apr. 2007.[7] A. E. Austin, H. Campa III, C. Pfund, D. L. Gillian-Daniel, R. Mathieu, and J. Stoddart, “Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2009, no. 117, pp. 83–95, 2009, doi: 10.1002/tl.346.[8] L. M. Minshew, A. A. Olsen, and J. E. McLaughlin, “Cognitive Apprenticeship in STEM Graduate Education: A Qualitative Review of the Literature,” AERA Open, vol. 7, p. 23328584211052044, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/23328584211052044.[9] T. N. Garland, “A Training Program for Graduate Teaching Assistants: The Experiences of One Department,” Teach. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 487–503, 1983, doi
phase.References[1] J. Qadir, K. L. A. Yau, M. A. Imran, and A. Al-Fuqaha, “Engineering education, moving into 2020s: Essential competencies for effective 21st century electrical & computer engineers,” in IEEE Frontiers in Edu. Conf., Uppsala, Sweden, Oct 21-24, 2020, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274067.[2] R. L. Duyff, “The value of lifelong learning: Key element in professional career development,” J. of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 538-543, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00135-2.[3] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022-2023”. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting
. Perry’s current work centers on understandinGrace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Grace Panther is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln where she conducts discipline-based education research. Her research interests include faculty change, 3D spatial visualization, gender inclusive teamwork, and studying authentic engineering practice. Dr. Panther was awarded an NSF CAREER award in 2024. Dr. Panther has experience conducting workshops at engineering education conferences both nationally and internationally, has been a guest editor for a special issue of European Journal of Engineering Education on inclusive learning
courses; conscientiousness showed significant positiverelationships with all five of the online course impression factors, while agreeableness andopenness had positive relationships with value to career [6]. Of the demographic variables, workexperience was significant for all online course impression factors except for online coursepreference [6]. In Rivers, 2021 [13], the author examined the role of personality traits and onlineacademic self-efficacy in acceptance, actual use, and achievement in online learning [13]. Thestudy defined personality as “dimensions of individual differences in tendencies to showconsistent patterns of thoughts, feelings, and actions,” and to measure specific personality traits,the study used the five-factor