, industry or government collaboration, and/or travel.Discussion topics will also include process requirements of applying, conducting, anddocumenting the outcomes of the sabbatical.The suggested layout of the panel session is: • 5-minute introduction of panel topic and panelists • Overview of each panelist’s sabbatical activity (5 minutes each) • Brief whole group Q&A session to engage audience and panelists • Small group activities with documentation of Q&A: o What resources did you find helpful in planning your sabbatical? o What was the timeframe of planning, applying for, conducting, and documenting your sabbatical? o What were the requirements of your sabbatical
evolution is not without barriers to entry andassociated risks.The objective of this paper is to share the experiences of three established civil engineeringfaculty and their mentor who are within two years of receiving their first NSF grants to supportEER projects at their home institution. Barriers to entry, challenges, and the lessons learnedassociated with their growth as emerging engineering education researchers are discussed.Strategies and resources are provided to assist new engineering educators to: lobby forinstitutional support, secure initial extramural funding, initiate collaborations, formulate short-and long-term career plans, build an Individual Development Plan (IDP), and develop aneffective mentor-mentee relationship with an
came prepared to discuss the module content,regardless of whether they overtly responded to the questions in the forum, it seemed to be areasonable decision to eliminate the “mandatory” nature of the forum post activity. This wasreinforced by participants’ feedback that indicated they saw these written posts as “make work”tasks.To better serve the needs of the GTA participants, the Nature of Learning module (T1M2) inthe original professor PD program was divided into two parts. Part A focused on lessonintroduction and the first 5 minutes whereas Part B emphasized lesson planning and creatingeffective learning outcomes. It should be noted that the concept of a lesson plan and a lessonplan template were provided in the program orientation session
wrong? Was it something related to the equipment? Was a step of the protocol missed?Were our tools and techniques not sufficiently accurate? Were conditions different than in thecited literature study?) Some errors can be quite subtle, while others are very well-known. Thestudents can also be asked for suggestions on how to improve the experiment or minimize theidentified errors.Another way to combat “bad” data is to have backup or example data sets available for studentsto use for reports. These data can be acquired while TAs are preparing for the lab, or they can begenerated from previous semesters if available. While it does not have to be perfect, the exampledata set will hopefully be more representative of the planned experiment’s expected
level of the assignment, acknowledging thediverse needs of students. Late Assignment Policy • Quizzes—need to be done on time; no make-up; for absences due to academic activities, let the instructor know before the quiz. • Applications and other assignments—1 to 2 days late, email the instructor; more than 2 days, email the instructor and tell them when you expect to get it done. • End Assessments—you must email the instructor and clear it with them first; make and communicate a plan of when it will be finished.Quizzes have the least impact on the grade and, thus, the least room for variation. Theyare also formative for the instructor to ensure students understand material
technological tools andbeing attentive to updates of those technological advances. These are very important since thesuccess of these resources in learning depends on their practical and appropriate use.Maybe the most advanced and established program in instructor training for COILexperiences in the world is the agenda of the Suny COIL Center of the Purchase Collegecampus at the State University of New York. This program was a pioneer and initiallydeveloped a COIL Course Orientation (CCO) of 5 weeks, introducing COIL designs and aseries of recommendations about what works and what does not in COIL [18]. In addition,this same center offers diverse training options for developing a COIL course for customizedor group online classes, support for planning
provide feedback to students - somestudents changed their representation to be design process while others did not. Paige emailedthe students who were still representing design products so they could meet outside the seminarand she could better explain the difference.Value: Diversity. The point of the following example is to demonstrate that a shared value ofincluding diverse perspectives can occur alongside different interpretations of what constitutesdiverse perspectives. As mentioned in the previous section, week 8 was a new addition to theDear Design curriculum. Fiona was excited about the responses she had received from hercolleagues, noting in her reflections that, “my plan was to ask experts to say what they thought was important and
preparation.2.1.1 Designing effective syllabiSyllabi serve as a contract between instructor and students. New faculty members should ensurethat their syllabi communicate course objectives, learning outcomes, grading criteria, and policiesin a transparent and accessible manner. Providing students with an alternative lecture schedulecan also show an outlining key date for assignments, exams, and other important milestones. Thisclarity enables students to plan their study schedule effectively, manage their time efficiently, andstay on track with coursework.2.1.2 Laboratory Design and real-world connectionDesigning laboratories with stronger connections to real-world examples and theoretical knowledgeinvolves several strategies, including selecting
Materials Science and Engineering Theater Electrical & Computer Engineering 3 pre-tenure Energy 3 Civil Engineering Clinical Psychology City and Regional Planning 1 tenured Mechanical Engineering 3 pre-tenure Movement 4 Music STEM Education Agricultural Education 1 tenured Astronomy 4 pre
alone and keeps personal matters private. As a highly organized person,every event is meticulously planned before acting, even if it is for fun. Systematiccommunicators are distinguished by their frugal and prudent approach. They have very highexpectations for themselves and others, which can manifest as a critical and pessimisticapproach to communication. How do you communicate with someone who is SY? - Toeffectively communicate with a systematic person, avoid small talk about personal matters. Itis critical not to rush and to give the person time and space to think about the situation athand. Because the systematic communicator is likely to be skeptical of what you say, beprepared to provide detailed answers backed up by precise data. Also
and engage with seven othercase studies worked well within our given timeframe of nine weeks. We planned that studentswould dedicate three hours each week to this task over nine weeks. For larger classes, werecommend assigning students 6–8 case study discussions, assuming students have three hoursper week to work on the assignment. If less than nine weeks are available, adjustments to thetimeframes should be made accordingly. To help adjust to different scenarios, the followingequations can be used to adapt the approach. The crucial factor is how much time students haveto work on the assignment. We use hours per week (HW) in the following equations: 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎
describes the relationship between these factors, where perceived ease ofuse and perceived usefulness are predictors of behavioral intention to use, and behavioralintention to use predicts actual use [17]. In the TAM model, perceived usefulness is defined as the degree to which an individualbelieves that using a system would enhance their performance, perceived ease of use is definedas the degree to which a person believes that using a system would be free of physical or mentaleffort, behavioral intention to use is defined as the cognitive processes, plans, and motivations anindividual has to perform a behavior, and actual use is defined as the specific use of atechnology, including how frequency of use, time spent using it, and more [17