(classroom scale) Discuss the application of STEM strategies as part of the implementation of engineering problem-based learning experiences. The engineering process as the application of scientific and mathematical knowledge to obtain a solution. Examine STEM issues from a6 scientific vs. engineering Effectively address controversial STEM issues within the local perspective. community (e.g. addressing sociocultural, moral and ethical aspects of the STEM solution). Discuss the importance of an economic
topics in my lesson plans.” The teachers werealso asked to rate the availability of resources in their school. On the question of “Whenit comes to children online, it should be up to parents, not teachers, to teach cybersafety, cyber bullying and cyber security,” all teachers except 4 agreed with the item.Also, on the item “My school/school district does an adequate job of preparing studentsregarding cyber ethics, online safety, and computer security issues,” only two peopleagreed.The results indicate that the only solution to teachers being able to promotecybersecurity topics in their schools is to get support from their schools whichaccording to the results is not available. Teachers seemed to have a good understandingof the basic
College (1988) and holds a PhD in developmental psychology from Teachers College, Columbia University (1999). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Observing empathy in informal engineering activities with girls ages 7-14 (RTP, Diversity)BackgroundResearch and policy shifts in engineering education have identified socioemotional skills likeempathy as a fundamental and often neglected part of engineering practice [1]-[2]. This workargues that solving complex engineering challenges with societal and ethical implicationsrequires engineers to empathize with clients and colleagues whose perspectives and needs mightdiffer from their own [1]-[4]. Humanistic
sense of competition appeals to many underrepresented populationsin engineering.Engineering discourse is a discursive complex [4] that is made up of several types of engineeringdiscourses – scientific discourse of engineering, the management discourse of engineering, andother possible discourses such as ethics [5]. Engineering discourse includes the collection ofwords, visuals, and narratives through which engineers communicate [6]. The collection ofwords used includes the steps of the engineering design process and terms such as criteria andconstraints for elementary school students. The engineering design process is an example of anengineering design routine that contributes to engineering discourse [7]. It is an explorativeroutine which is
, “Service learning: A positive approach to teaching engineering ethics and social impact of technology,” age, vol. 5, p. 2, 2000.[15] E. Tsang, C. D. Martin, and R. Decker, “Service Learning as a Strategy for Engineering Education for the 21 st Century,” in 1997 Annual Conference, 1997, pp. 2–355.[16] L. J. Bottomley and E. A. Parry, “Assessment of an engineering outreach program: Hands on engineering,” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE 2002, 2002.[17] D. E. Giles Jr and J. Eyler, “The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes,” Journal of adolescence, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 327–339, 1994.[18] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. Canney, “Impacts of service
blood borne pathogens. After the training, the participantsbegan working in their assigned laboratories. Over the course of the 6- week, summer program,students also attended didactic sessions and participated in discussions of research ethics,scientific misconduct, and the appropriate use of animals in research. In addition, the studentsparticipated in regular lab meetings with their research teams, and attended a workshop onpreparation and delivery of a 10-minute scientific talk.Throughout the program, the group also participated in enjoyable social and educational eventson weekends and evenings. These events included movie nights, a visit to a local museum, pizzaand burger nights at local restaurants, a visit to a research barn to observe an
. On-campus housing is provided to the Scholars. A resident coordinator is present at all times to handle logistical, operational, and emergency matters. Multifaceted daily activities are administered, including lectures on mathematics, science, communications, social justice and ethics (e.g., construction of racial identity, identifying inequalities), workshops on technical writing, coding, robotics, and resume building, hands-on team challenges (projects), professional tours, social and shopping trips, and personal time. All projects are team-based where two to three Scholars collaborate under the guidance of ambassadors. Each project is a challenge for which each team must
mechanical engineering through team- oriented projects. Table 3. Programs implemented by AmbassadorsIn addition to providing an overview of their projects and who the intended populations are, theAmbassadors provided further details on their plans, purpose and passion surrounding theirideas. The first ambassador showed excitement around being able to empower other girls andbuild their confidence: “I would like to spread my passion for STEAM and my passion for empowering girls so they can learn to believe that all they need is knowledge, confidence, strong work ethics and determination to achieve anything they want in any field they want. I will
was developed by graduate students, under the supervision of the Education &Outreach Staff Director (Mrs. Risa Hartman) and included statistics, fundamentals ofnanotechnology and ethics classes to offer a wide range of useful preliminary information. Thesafety training (combination of online and onsite) for a total of four hours, under the guidanceand supervision of trained laboratory graduate students, allowed YSs to learn about laboratoryprocedures. During the final day of bootcamp, mentors held a formal meeting with their scholarsto discuss details, plans and expectations about the specific project.During weeks 2-6, students worked on their project daily, performing original research under thesupervision of their graduate mentor
responsibility, ethics, and diversity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Mentoring Correlates to Characteristics of University K-12 Outreach Programs: Survey Findings (Fundamental)AbstractEffective mentorship between faculty and undergraduate students has been recognized by theNational Academies as an avenue to address issues of diversity and identity in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Mentoring relationships may also form inother contexts, such as between undergraduates and K-12 students in K-12 STEM outreachprograms. A survey was administered to university faculty / staff who coordinate K-12 STEMoutreach programs to
to surpass their course grades, particularly for lower-achieving students [17], [19], [20]. For this work, we assessed whether this trend continuedduring the modified Fall 2020 offering (70 students over 3 classes in Quadmester 1, 66 inQuadmester 2 (data not used)). Similar to student grade data analysis, student surveys thatfocused on student learning attitudes and perceptions were administered, and responses werecompared to responses from previous in-person offerings.All data collection involving students was approved by the University of Toronto HealthSciences Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 34825) and the Toronto District School BoardExternal Research Review Committee (Protocol # 2017-2018-20). Parental consent to datacollection was
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020What will you do to help elementary students who struggle in the engineering design process? Analysis of teachers’ reflections. (Fundamental)IntroductionThe next generation of STEM workers and leaders requires knowledge and skills in order toeffectively contribute and compete in the global workforce [1], [2]. More importantly, thesustainability of our planet requires citizens who can work collaboratively to think critically,make ethical and moral decisions, and solve problems [3]. The science and engineering practicesdescribed by the Next Generation Science Standards [4] can provide a framework for teachers toengage their students in
personnel responsibilities in the organized deployment of IBBME Discovery Position Roles and Responsibilities Faculty Supervisor ● Overarching program vision and progression ● Acquisition and administration of funding ● Liaison with IBBME director and high school/school board administrations in support of Graduate Student Head ● Correspond on research publication and ethical research approvals ● Oversee graduate student skill development and facilitation of graduate professional skills (GPS) designation Graduate Student ● Overall supervision of program operation Head ● Liaison between
, causeslearners to appreciate the contribution of engineering in our culture, assists learners inrecognizing the ethical and moral values that engineers need to demonstrate, and aids in theteaching and learning of engineering instruction. However, NOE teaching is not an easy task,and a lack of NOE understanding also raises many issues and obstacles for science teachers toincorporate NOE in science instruction. Science teachers need training to fulfill the requirementsdescribed in the NGSS and to inform teachers about NOE aspects. To meet this goal, weprovided a professional development that focuses on NOE and the engineering design processduring summer 2017 in a southwestern research institute. Using the cognitive apprenticeshipmodel, secondary science
engineering basedapproaches to develop functionally and physiologically analogous models of human organs [42],[43]. Modeling of preclinical screening of pharmaceuticals commonly requires in-vivo techniques.Even as the in-vivo techniques are currently indispensable, they suffer from myriad limitations,e.g., low throughput, long trial periods, ethical concerns, and complications associated with cross-species result transfer and validation. As a result, in-vitro models for screening of pharmaceuticalsare gaining increasing attention to create devices with high throughputs and improve the efficiencyof preclinical trials. Nonetheless, some in-vitro models (e.g., those based on microfluidics) mayfail to replicate conditions present in the body and thus
; an example of Axis 7: Engineering’s Ethical Implications. These engineeringexperiences and many others like them occurring throughout the rocket module were unique andvaluable for high school students. The general lack of student recognition revealed by theirsurveys that they were, in fact, doing engineering may arise from the conflation of engineeringwith science endemic in schools identified by Pleasants and Olson [2]. The instructor could havedone a better job illuminating for students these “engineering teaching moments” as theyoccurred. Our own research contains examples of advanced projects adapted for high school thatfailed to hold student interest and attention because they were not designed or implemented withthe P-12 environment in
, it allows for the solution to viewed as something realistic,usable, and practical, resulting in greater overall success [6]. As an engineer, it is important tolearn about those the project will impact to ensure that the product will meet their needs. Byasking students to consider the needs of others and providing realistic environments to practiceempathy in engineering design challenges, researchers hoped to achieve two outcomes: first,increased retention and initial registration in STEM-based classes after participating in theprogram, and second, greater overall success in designing and creating solutions.The empathy connections made in the program drew heavily from education research, includingNoddings’ ethics of care and Dweck’s growth