“organize and execute courses of action required to dealwith prospective situations that contain many ambiguous, unpredictable, and often stressful,elements” [8]. The development of self-efficacy relies on four key components [9]: performance accomplishments: when individuals experience direct success; vicarious learning: wherein learning results from observing successful peers perform tasks, also known as modeling; verbal persuasion: led by verbal persuasion that an individual can perform a task; and emotional arousal: anxiety filled situations can weaken confidence, therefore efforts to reduce anxiety is vital for strong self-efficacy.When all four components are addressed, teachers develop strong self-efficacy
examines the self-reported reflections of121 preservice elementary teachers after participating in an exemplar lesson, then writing andteaching a modified or original engineering design lesson (an “Engineering Mini Unit”) to K-6students as part of their school-based field experience. The first section of this paper highlightsthe research done on the needs of preservice elementary teachers. Next, the paper describes thecontext in which the preservice teachers learned about engineering design through first-handparticipation in engineering design and the teaching of an engineering design lesson. Then thepaper examines the qualitative approach to analyzing the preservice teachers’ responses to fourquestions constructed to help them reflect on their
hole. Mom: OK. So this is down the hole. [Mom is writing the proposition given by Rose on the card]. Rose: [Rose is sorting the cards to find the next proposition on the right card]. Out [of] the hole. Mom: Hmmm… [Mom corrected Rose by stating “Out of the hole”] ...Rose continues to look for other cards to find the right propositions. Rose: In the trees… Over the water [Rose was not sure about the right proposition and wanted to confirm it with Mom. However, Mom was not sure either. Therefore, Mom needed to confirm the right proposition by looking at the story sequencing in the book] Mom: Let’s see…Let’s go back in the story…Let’s see what happened. [Mom found the correct
, stereotype threat, andfeelings of isolation, which can undermine their confidence and engender a fixed mindset [2][3].Such gatherings inspire women that they can be successful in pursing satisfying careers in atraditionally male-dominated field [4]. They boost women’s confidence, help them buildnetworks of peers and mentors to help them navigate difficult situations, and encourage them toassume leadership roles in changing the face of computing and creating transformativetechnologies [5][6]. Although not as well known as GHC, the ACM Richard Tapia Celebrationof Diversity in Computing (often just called “Tapia”) serves similar goals as GHC but for allunderrepresented minorities in computing regardless of gender.1 Tapia highlights the critical
over time. We engaged in peer scrutiny of our findings witheach graduate coordinator to ensure trustworthiness in our work [20]. We then propose a modelof STEAM service-learning efforts synthesized from these findings.Part I. Findings from reflective accountsConceptualizing leadershipConsideration. Graduate outreach coordinators held different definitions of their responsibilitiesas an outreach leader. Some viewed the role as strategic and established foundational pieces ofthe program or ways they could extend and grow the program during their leadership tenure. Onthe other end of the spectrum, some graduate coordinators were more executional in theirapproach and focused on the work they would do with undergraduate students and
1 Argument from presented. Evidence Distinguish among facts, reasoned judgment based on research findings, 0 and speculation in an explanation. Respectfully provide and receive critiques from peers about a proposed 0 procedure, explanation, or model by citing relevant evidence and posing specific questions. Construct and/or support an argument with evidence, data, and/or a 0 model. Use data to evaluate claims about cause and effect. 1 Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a
, engineers, ambassadors, or role models)directing affirming comments towards students or explicitly telling them they could be engineers[11], or in more subtle ways, like peers seeking one’s help with engineering.Gendered Engineering Identity Development. Though this paper primarily utilizes Godwin andcolleagues’ [8] work to conceptualize our emergent findings, other researchers have createdframeworks to focus on specific populations of students. Capobianco and colleagues et al. [2]focus on the formation of engineering identity in female students, identifying girls’ sense ofacademic identity, school identity, occupational identity, and engineering aspirations as shapingtheir engineering identities, with academic identity and engineering aspirations
CollectionStudents’ Pre and Post SurveysOn the first day of the engineering camp, the students completed a pre-survey that includeddemographic information and the STEM-CIS (Career Interest Survey) based on the work of Kier,Blanchard, Osborne, & Albert [9]. The STEM-CIS consisted of 44 questions that took the formof a 5-point Likert scale from ‘Strongly Agree’ to ‘Strongly Disagree’. The 44 questions weredivided up into four sets of 11 questions based on the four areas of STEM. An example questionwas “I am interested in careers that involve engineering”.Based on the work of Talton and Simpson [10], four more questions were in the pre-survey in theform of a 5-point Likert scale that looked into peer perceptions of science. An example questionwas, “My best
, student- centered online learning environments for educators.Dr. Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Dr. Roehrig is a professor of STEM Education at the University of Minnesota. Her research explores issues of professional development for K-12 science teachers, with a focus on beginning teachers and implementation of integrated STEM learning environments. She has received over $30 million in federal and state grants and published over 80 peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters. She is a former board member of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching and past president of the Association for Science Teacher Education.Dr. Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen, St. Catherine University