the potential ofthis approach for increasing (1) learners’ capacities to engage in both far transfer (innovation)and direct application (efficiency) and (2) the formation of STEM identity. This new study willuse a mixed methods approach, including a quasi-experimental research design incorporatingboth quantitative and qualitative data analytic methods. A combination of measures includingstandards-based science unit tests, existing district student and administrative data sources,student pre-post surveys, and a preparation for future learning (PFL) assessment tool.VI. ConclusionsWe have applied the theory of Imaginative Education to develop Through My Window, atransmedia learning environment for engineering education. Evidence indicates that
for K-12 Engineering Education? National Academies Press.27. Museum of Science. Engineering is Elementary. Available from: http://www.eie.org/eie- curriculum.28. Massachusetts Department of Education, (2006) Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework, Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.29. Kucuk, S. and B. Sisman, (2017) “Behavioral patterns of elementary students and teachers in one- to-one robotics instruction,” Computers and Education, 111: p. 31-43.30. Liu, E.Z.-F., et al., (2013) “An analysis of teacher-student interaction patterns in a robotics course for kindergarten children: A pilot study,” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
engaged secondary students in hands-on engineering challenges, reaching over 17,600 students. She partnered with funders, such as AT&T, NASA, Accen- ture, Genzyme, and the National Science Foundation, and created inquiry-based STEM programs that inspired and challenged diverse students with a variety of learning styles, often in underrepresented and underserved communities. The Massachusetts high tech community recognized Fougere as a Mass Tech Woman to Watch and Carnegie Corporation/100kin10 appointed her as one of 20 national Fellow. She advised the Society of Women Engineers and Graduate Women in Engineering and Science. She actively collaborated with the Engineering and Education Faculty at BU and beyond and
improving the culture and environment of undergraduate education experience for all students, particularly those from underrepresented groups.Mrs. Risa D Hartman, The University of Texas at Austin, NASCENT Center Risa Hartman oversees multiple Education and Outreach programs at the University of Texas at Austin. Her roles include: Staff Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Dynamics and Control of Materials, a Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) and as the Pre-college Ed- ucation Director for the NASCENT Engineering Research Center focused on nanomanufacturing. She manages programs in the areas of graduate student traineeship and career development, undergraduate research, Research
efforts have significantly more training for science education and, practices in quantitative methods, 86-99.anecdotally, we have observed that imbues a science-oriented lens whereby the distinctions and[14] Pleasants, J. & Olson, J.K. (2019) "Refining an Instrument and Studying Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Scope of Engineering," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER): 9(2).[15] Pleasants, J., Olson, J. K., & De La Cruz, I. (2020). Accuracy of Elementary Teachers’ Representations of the Projects and Processes of Engineering: Results of a Professional Development Program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1-22.[16] Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus
engineering-based integrated STEM. Compulsorycoursework driven by a teacher’s need to address specific academic standards in science andassociated with grades for students is likely to create a different environment for studentinteractions than elective, non-graded, informal experiences. In addition, existing studies oftenuse quantitative analyses to investigate associations between motivation, context, andengagement [28]. With small group work ubiquitous with STEM, the affordances and limitationsof small group activities must be considered.This study addresses the gap in the literature to explore the following research questions: 1) What differences, if any, are seen in the engineering practices middle school girls and boys display during
byextensive field testing, materials design, and a research program, of which this study is a part.The curriculum units foster opportunities for middle-school children in OST settings to becomeengineers and solve problems that are identified as “personally meaningful and globallyrelevant” [20]. Each unit has been developed to include fourteen Curricular Design Principles forInclusivity [21], identified through previous research studies to support student learning, in fouroverarching categories: Set learning in a real-world context, present design challenges that areauthentic to engineering practice, scaffold student work, and demonstrate that everyone canengineer. The Curricular Design Principles are detailed under Findings in Table 3. There
simulated classroom environments can be used to help inservice and preservice elementary teachers learn to lead argumentation discussions in science and engineering.Dr. Jamie Mikeska, Educational Testing Service Jamie Mikeska is a Research Scientist in the Student and Teacher Research Center at Educational Testing Service (ETS). Jamie completed her Ph.D. in the Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to
situated in the Engineering for US All (e4usa): A National Pilot Programfor High School Engineering Course and Database program, a new pre-college engineeringinitiative funded in 2018 by the National Science Foundation. The program aims to demystifyengineering for all high school students as an avenue to engineering literacy and a means ofenhancing potential engineering pathways [17]. The e4usa course was intentionally designed tobe inclusive by providing engineering design experiences relating to student fields of interest inlocal and global contexts. The course objectives are broken down into four major threads andwoven through seven units. The four threads include: a) discovery of the discipline ofengineering and engineering identity, b
onintroducing students to engineering, the focus of such interventions and studies has shifted toconstructs that researchers believe will be better predictors of students choosing to pursueengineering as a college major and/or career (Hynes et al., 2017). Those include identity,perceptions of engineering, attitudes and beliefs toward engineering, self-efficacy in engineering,and interest in engineering. One factor that has been consistently cited among those conductingresearch and evaluation of such programs is students’ perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs towardengineering (Hynes et al., 2017). There have been mixed results with respect to the extent towhich in-school and out-of-school engineering programs are able to increase students’perceptions
(Table 4), as it required too much interpretation by theobserver to score it consistently; this reduced the number of items to 13.Step 4: Second pilot, review, and revisions.After a year of developing the protocol items and item levels, the coding team (composed of fourgraduate students and two post-doctoral researchers) participated in intensive training with thePIs on using the STEM-OP. Part of this was done as two new post-doctoral researchers and onenew graduate student replaced graduating members of our project team. This training was alsointended to help all of us further refine our own understanding of the 13 items to improve ourability to score reliably. The training included various iterations of (1) collectively watching avideo and
) development,” Education Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, 2008. 7. J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, 1991. 8. S. R. McKay, L. Millay, E. Allison, E. Byerssmall, M. C. Wittmann, M. Flores, J. Frattini, B. Kumpa, C. A. Lambert, E. A. Pandiscio, and M. K. Smith, “Investing in Teachers’ Leadership Capacity: A Model from STEM Education,” Maine Policy Review, pp. 54 – 63, 2018. 9. G. V. Caprara, C. Barbaranelli, P. Steca, and P. S. Malone, “Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 473 – 490, 2006. 10. D
underrepresented groups, is paramount to meet the needs of the currentand future generations1. Though the United States is in a demographic shift with an increasingpopulation of ethnic minorities, they remain heavily underrepresented in the science andengineering fields2. In order to decrease this gap within the growing population, the countrywould need to increase the number of underrepresented students pursuing engineering by three-fold1. Researchers suggest that one way to meet this demand and increase the pipeline of womenand minorities is to focus on K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)preparatory programs2. In fact, Arizona, the setting for this research study, has a large Latinxpopulation (30%) and offers an opportunity to
girls who alsohad a passion for engineering. Meeting the other Ambassadors in video discussions in early falland then being at the SWE Conference a short time later boosted her confidence in herself assomeone who could be an engineer. One of her peers gained confidence at the SWE Conferenceas well. She was bolstered by meeting female college students majoring in Engineering andfemale adult professionals working in Engineering at SWE. As she described it, she came to seeher future self in them. “I've gotten more excited about just my identity as an engineer.”One Ambassador described gaining confidence because she was taking on the role of teachingand guiding other girls in learning about engineering. She felt motivated because she knew
and ContextResearch design. This pilot study employed a convergent parallel mixed methods approach [31]to analyze counselors’ reactions and ongoing professional development needs with regard topreparing and informing students about science and engineering career pathways. Pilotqualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously to determine school counselorpractices and constraints related to STEM advisement.Conceptual framework. The theoretical basis for the professional development design isderived from two psychosocial theories that explain academic and career choices. The theory ofplanned behavior suggests that students make academic decisions based upon their self-efficacyand sense of controllability [32]. That is, career
school’s premises.EmbodimentParticipant Structures. Participating youth were organized into small groups with clearlyassigned roles, such as UAV pilot, safety officer, and spotter. These roles were rotatedthroughout the semester and every youth had a chance to play each of these roles. Each group ofyouth was supported by a dedicated STEM coach and another adult volunteer from the IHADprogram. Two undergraduate and one graduate student from the engineering program at theUniversity of Colorado were recruited to serve as STEM coaches who facilitated the program.Each coach participated in a professional development program designed to familiarize themwith UAVs, the overall curriculum, the engineering design practices being emphasized in thecurriculum
, educators and policy makers have expressed growing concerns over thelevels of math and science achievement among American students and the gradual decline in thenumbers of young people moving into science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)careers [1], [2], [3]. These concerns have led to the development of new standards for scienceand technology education [4], [5], [6], policy initiatives aimed at promoting science andtechnology education [7], [8],[9], and to a growing body of research on math and sciencelearning and the pathways leading to STEM-related careers [10], [11]. While the picture oflooming shortages of scientists and engineers has been challenged and recent studies haveindicated that American students are taking more science and