Engineeringstudents, art and art education undergraduate and graduate students and art specialists,collaborated in the planning and implementation of all art club activities. Activities. Because origami as an art form can be mechanistic (somewhat analogous tomemorization) for novices, the partners adopted a theme-based approach to the content. Thisapproach encourages conceptual connections across disciplines and is consistent with the contentstandards in all of the STEM disciplines. (By outlining a sample of weekly activities, learninggoals and methods, figure 7 provides a glimpse into how this theme-based integration strategywas enacted within the art club.) The theme-based approach was intended to support origami-related learning experiences that
camp.1 In designing the camp, theneeds and interests of teenage girls were identified first. Our planning team identified these topthree factors: 1) they (teenage girls) had little contact with women in engineering fields, 2) theyare flocking to professions where they feel they can make meaningful contributions to society,medicine, justice, and prosperity, and 3) they do not want to work in a cubicle, isolated fromother people. Taking into account the general needs and interests, four message themes weredeveloped as guiding principles: 1) Engineers help the world, 2) Engineers think creatively, 3)Engineers enjoy working with others, and 4) Engineers earn a good living. Finally, methods toachieve the messages were selected that included
steps crucial to the success of this program. First, we installed all the requiredsoftware. Since the S2 can be programmed using its own graphical user interface, weinstalled this software onto the computers we planned to use. The link to this softwarewas obtained from the vendor’s website. We chose the GUI because research [10] hasshown that it is easier to use than its text-based counterpart.Our most important step was to conceive design ideas for our art catalogue. An initialbrainstorming session was used to formulate possible projects and determine theworkflow for the activities. After each activity was conceived, we figured out the stepsrequired to accomplish its goal. We also studied the tutorials in order to understand howto manipulate
selected engineering at 5-10 times the rate oftypical students8. Though this report concluded women were not well-represented, they expectedthe implementation of Biomedical Engineering PLTW courses would attract females at highernumbers, thereby increasing the participation of women in engineering university programs.This study also found that 80% of PLTW students planned to go to college, compared to 63% oftheir peers. Further, 90% indicated they knew what they wanted to major in because of theirPLTW experience and 80% indicated their PLTW experience would significantly assist theirsuccess in their postsecondary education8. This comprehensive report suggests further evidencePLTW increases the quantity, quality and diversity of engineering
looking for images rather than by looking for words. Table 4 indicates the number oftimes that groups read images versus texts, as observed during group meetings as an indicated ininterviews about participants’ individual search processes using their Internet search historiesrelated to the project. “Google Image” was used as a search engine more often than “Google”was. (We did not notice the participants using any other search engines, such as Bing or Yahoo.)The following examples illustrate the participants’ search strategies.Members of Group One attended a school that did not have any wheelchair-accessible doors, andthey had designed a basic plan for a wheelchair accessible door. To estimate costs for their door,Miguel went to Google Images and
settings. Students identify whatthey know and what they need to learn, plan how they will learn more, conduct research, anddeliberate over the findings together in an attempt to structure and solve a challenge or problem.This study explores students’ perspectives on the STEM-ID curriculum regarding what they havefound challenging, engaging, and academically useful, specifically related to their coremathematics and science courses. This study is guided by the following evaluation questions:1) What are students’ perceptions of the STEM-ID curriculum?2) What are students’ perceptions of key components of the curriculum such as collaboration?3) To what extent do STEM-ID students make connections between the STEM-ID curriculum and core science and
support for the belief that high schoolcontext is a crucial factor in determining future plans to pursue STEM.6,9 Currently, only 13% ofhigh school females express interest in STEM,16 and only 1%-4% express interest inengineering,8 but the gender gap can be reduced by 25% or more in schools which support girls’interests in STEM.9 Further, it has been shown that outreach programs targeting certain factorshave been effective for the recruitment of women to STEM.7 In literature, attempts to identify factors influencing recruitment and retention of women inSTEM have converged to several themes. The first major issue is that of actual versus perceivedability in STEM. Although mathematical abilities are now roughly equal for male and femalestudents
York: Basic Books.26. Quental, D., C. Reidsema, and L. Kavanagh. Fostering ownership of learning in engineering education. in 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Engineering the Knowledge Economy: Collaboration, Engagement & Employability. 2014. School of Engineering & Advanced Technology, Massey University.27. Milner-Bolotin, M., The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students' interest, ownership, and motivation. 2001, The University of Texas at Austin.28. Downie, M. and P. Moore, Closing the Gap: Schools Forge a Bridge to Community--In California: Comprehensive Services and Realistic Planning
asreports from the National Research Council and the National Science Foundation), websites,scholarly articles, and popular media to understand how NGSS fits within common culturalconstructions of the purposes and goals of science and engineering education.FindingsThe Appendix D case study designed to assist teachers of “economically disadvantaged students”is presented as a vignette. This means that it is not a full transcript of the associated videofootage that the authors viewed for comparative purposes. The vignette summarizes oneteacher's lesson plans that NGSS presents as exemplary for its attention to student “culture,”“sense of place,” and “funds of knowledge.” The vignette specifically calls out several instances,which allege to embody the
Paper ID #15803Robotics in K-12 Formal and Informal Learning Environments: A Review ofLiteratureMr. Nicholas Alexander Bascou, University of Pittsburgh Graduated from the University of Pittsburgh in 2016 with a B.A. in Anthropology and a B.S. in Biology and Chemistry. Research experience includes the use of robotics in K-12 education at the University of Pittsburgh’s Learning Research and Development Center and research into neural pathways involved in the onset and treatment of Schizophrenia at the Anthony Grace Lab at the University of Pittsburgh. Future plans include the pursuit of an M.D. and PhD in biological
.79 – .88 9 .96Creative Thinking Self-Efficacy Pre-Test 1199 5.81 2.23 .70 – .84 12 .96 Post-Test 471 6.34 2.36 .77 – .91 12 .98In anticipation of the statistical analyses planned (correlation and t tests) these data screeningprocedures helped ensure that statistical assumptions were met and conclusions drawn might beaccurate. Ensuing hypotheses were tested using a significance level of α = 0.05 and are reportedwith effect sizes (Cohen’s d).Relationship Between Engineering Design Self-Efficacy and Creative Thinking Self-EfficacyAs previously stated, we hypothesized that design self-efficacy and creative thinking
the high school level. With the extra instructional time, high school ENGR 102students enhance their learning through multiple authentic and carefully planned projects.Towards the end of the school year, high school ENGR 102 students prepare the solar ovenproject in much the same way as their undergraduate counterparts.The design and delivery of an introduction to engineering curriculum is important as it is the firstcontact with the field of engineering for many students. Pre-college, engineering programs havebeen shown to attract students to engineering and other STEM careers (Crisp, Amaury &Taggart, 2009; Delci, 2002; Yelamarthi & Mawasha, 2008). Our goal is for our teachers to offervaried, hands-on projects in their engineering
feasibility of their design ideas [73]. Others present interpreted vignettes ofclassroom activity and detail methods such as interaction analysis [74] or ethnography [75]. Forinstance, in such research conducted in an elementary school, we see how students are able toidentify and frame engineering problems in their own school that affect the students, and alsothat even young students can make predictions and plan testing of their prototypes when they aredesigning with contexts they understand in mind [76]. And in research conducted using a gamein which girls role-played as mechanical engineers, the girls developed engineering skills andknowledge, and these were particularly supported by having a client and reflecting on progress ina notebook [10
on the process of defining and solving a problem, not on getting the “right” answer. They learn how to apply STEM knowledge, skills, and habits of mind to make the world a better place through innovation. PLTW students say that PLTW Engineering influenced their post-secondary decisions and helped shape their future. PLTW students are shown to study engineering and other STEM disciplines at a rate significantly higher than their non-PLTW peers. Even for students who do not plan to pursue engineering after high school, the PLTW Engineering program provides opportunities to develop highly transferable skills in critical thinking, collaboration, and problem solving, which are relevant for any
typical lessons, when designing for failure,one would plan to engage in sustained inquiry after failure is encountered (Tawfik et al., 2015).Failure in engineering educationWhen practicing engineers engage in designing small physical products (the kind of designingmost similar to many tasks given to elementary students), they create and test models of theirdesigns. Initial “models” may include mathematical models, then later digital models, andfinally, sometimes, physical models (possibly prototypes, at full scale or model scale). Practicingengineers create and test these constructions, then use the previous test results as feedback toiterate and improve their design. In this way, interpreting failure (in the broad sense of notacceptably meeting