FrameworkWhile there is no one definition of Computational Thinking and its components that is generallyaccepted across all disciplines and contexts [5], it is generally agreed that CT practices arevaluable not only for those interested in careers related to computing but also for everyoneengaging with the ubiquitous computing of modern society. The K-12 Computing ScienceFramework [6], a joint work by computer science education organizations including ACM,Code.org, and CSTA, highlights that while computer science offers “unique opportunities fordeveloping computational thinking,” CT practices are also “explicitly [...] and implicity”referenced in the standards frameworks of other disciplines, such as math and science.Simultaneously, various education
scientificand engineering practices (SEP) as core components of student learning (NGSS Lead States,2013). These practices include critical thinking, problem-solving, and the application ofengineering principles, all of which are crucial for preparing students for future careers and forenhancing their ability to engage with the world around them. However, despite these broadmandates, there remains a striking lack of research on how students with ID and ESN, who mayneed pervasive and ongoing support in academic and daily living activities, engage withengineering practices. This gap in both research and instructional practice leaves many studentswith disabilities excluded from fully participating in engineering learning opportunities.Current State of
Paper ID #46991Analysis of Client Letters Embedded in Pre-College STEM Integration Curricula(Fundamental)Christine H. McDonnell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Christine H. McDonnell is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Christine is interested in exploring the connections between integrated STEM education in K-12 classroom settings and the impact on student learning, career interests, and reducing premature departure from STEM pathways.Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Emily M. Haluschak is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education
after completing a post- doctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these institutions. Specifi- cally, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educational and global change. ©American Society for Engineering Education
their educators. Her research focuses on articulating frameworks for precollege engineering education.Dr. Darshita N. Shah, The Pennsylvania State University Darshita (Dipa) Shah is the Curriculum Director for Youth Engineering Solutions at The Pennsylvania State University. Dipa has spent her career grappling with the challenge of how to best design motivating and engaging curriculum materials for students across the K-16 spectrum that can be practically imple- mented across the rich variety of our nation’s educational contexts. Most recently, Dipa was the senior associate director with MIT’s Teaching and Learning Lab where she facilitated workshops for campus educators on how to design curricular materials
theengineering design process [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. However, for students to reap the fullbenefits of BID integration in pre-college, it is important first to prepare teachers who are willing andwell-prepared to teach BID in pre-college engineering [11], [27]. Therefore, exploring teachers’understanding and perception of BID integration in engineering is essential for BID to become anintegral part of the pre-college curricula.Teacher PerceptionsTeachers significantly influence student learning in the classroom since they play a vital role in students'achievement, subject selection, and future career choices. Teachers’ perceptions and understanding ofcurricula influence how they teach. Studies have shown that teachers’ beliefs and