program onthe students’ affective and learning experience. To this end, a survey was administered to theeight students who participated in the program, after completion of the projects. All studentsparticipated in the survey, and the results revealed that 62.5% of the students reported beingextremely satisfied with the robotics program, including working with their peers and interactingwith the faculty. The students expressed that they found the academic program experienceenjoyable and useful in helping them to identify their future college interests and majors.IntroductionEducational robotics offers a stimulating and enjoyable environment for young individuals, whilesimultaneously introducing them to technological advancements. A growing number
. This approach encourages motivation through emotionallearning and emphasizes collaborative, integrative, and constructive learning. The approachintegrates placed-based learning with journaling and sketching to foster observation, curiosity,imagination, and creativity while also employing rigorous homework practices that involvecritical reading and reflective, analytical, and critical writing. The approach of providing studentswith cumulative and integrated transdisciplinary learning content, equips them with thenecessary knowledge and heuristic abilities to work effectively in HDT teams, even before theyembark on their design projects.Pedological MethodologyLearning methodologies in Holistic Engineering (HE) draw on numerous established
peer questions help eliminate holes in the work and foster understanding [15].The final three assessment categories include building a technical paper (section by section). Forexample, the student submits a draft of the Introduction section; during the next submission, theysubmit revisions of the Introduction and a draft of the Methods. Each iteration is weighted moreas they are further in the process of developing these writing skills. At the end of the year,students are required to present a poster, which they created, at the Science and EngineeringSymposium at the end of the academic year (NGSS RST.11-12.7, RST.11-12.8, and RST.11-12.9).Advanced Research: Engineering and Thesis Research: Engineering Courses (1 year / each)Upper-level
in the zone of proximal development (ZPD) due to socialinteraction. The zone of proximal development (ZPD) has been defined as "the distance betweenthe actual developmental level as determined by independent problem solving and the level ofpotential development as determined through problem-solving under adult guidance or incollaboration with more capable peers" [31, p. 86].Play and unstructured, informal activities stimulate children’s social interaction and influencetheir learning and knowledge construction [31]. These learning environments also promote socialconstructivist views of teaching and learning [33], where learning occurs collaboratively in smallgroups. In such informal settings, assistance from a more knowledgeable other, the
perceptions of engineering and to evaluate these programs and activities [3]. The Draw a ScientistTest (DAST) [4] and Draw an Engineer Test (DAET) [5] are two tools that use drawings to assess howstudents see themselves as engineers before they are able to articulate their thoughts in writing. Roboticsis an engineering discipline that suffers from a distinct lack of diversity both in who participates in K12programs and later who enters traditional engineering majors associated with robotics [6]. Recently, softrobotics, the sub-discipline focused on soft material designs for wearable robots, has been used as aplatform to attract more students to robotics with new materials [7], bioinspired designs [8], and human-centered applications [9]–[11]. To
throughout our state’s counties. Weestablished a relationship with 4-H youth development, specifically curriculum developers andSTEM specialists, to start sharing existing lesson plans and resources with their agents and clubs.For example, we became very involved with an energy-based summer program that had beenrunning for over twenty-five years, even to the point of traveling the state during 2021 to take thesummer program to different counties. We also started working with 4-H to write grants, andwere awarded a grant from the Office of Naval Research for workforce development thatexpands existing outreach programs to Western TN.This grant is one of several grants, both internal and external, that we received after we started towork synergistically
interestedto study for a university degree?”, and “why are you interested in learning about robotics? Whatare your career goals?”. The answers would help demonstrate the students’ writing and technicalskills, previous involvements, and interests. The students are selected from schools all aroundQatar that are interested in robotics and have shown to possess great group dynamics. Typically,the students are selected based on their performance in previous interactions from the STEMactivities and programs hosted by the university where the outstanding and skilled students areidentified and invited to be participate. However, there are instances where the students reach outto participate in such programs or schools would nominate their high-achieving
underrepresented students must develop together in the class activities. CRPempowers the teachers' role as a designer in implementing policies and sociocultural research fordeveloping three main competencies in classrooms. The first competence that CRP teachers haveis student learning. Ladson-Billings redefined this term in 2021. She writes that it means howmuch the student grows in one scholarly period that begins in the fall and finishes in the spring-measuring this individual growth. CRP highlights this growth and avoids demerits of thestandards test; CRP considers that standardized tests do not measure other meaningful learningthat students could have acquired during the academic year. The second competence, CulturalCompetence in the context of CRP
for the educational context for this study. Failure forthis study was defined as not implementing NE, which would ultimately mean students not beingable to learn hands-on engineering integrated with reading and writing. Terms Chances of Failure(CoF) and Impact of Failure (IoF) were used to measure the probability and impact of potentialfailure. Additionally, since the goal was to recognize which factors out of the 10 acted as barriersfor NE, the term Barrier Index (BI) was used to signify multiplication result from CoF and IoFvalues.First section of the questionnaire included questions around the 10 factors to gauge CoF based onthe situations and perceptions of teachers. For each of the 10 factors, a corresponding questionwas included in the
,including during their pre-college careers. Radunzel et al.’s recent study [7, p. 1] found that“students with both expressed and measured interest in STEM were more likely to persist andcomplete a STEM degree than those with either expressed or measured interest only, as well asthose with no interest in STEM.” Furthermore, research is investigating the troubling phenomenaof extended time to finish college and higher drop-out rates for STEM programs as compared toothers [e.g., 8].STEM by the numbersPines [9] writes that “one of the greatest and most enduring strengths of the United States hasbeen its ability to attract global talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) to bolster its economic and technological competitiveness
construct and modifying sessions to fit the needs of different audiences. An additionalchallenge was that we were given widely varying amounts of time to present the sessions. Thismeant that it was very important to have clear learning objectives.As an example, the learning objectives for a session for K-8 teachers and a session for highschool counselors are compared in Table 1. To make the table readable, we do not write out thefull learning objective. We placed verbs from different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy [1] toindicate how the learning objectives differ for each audience, because different audiences requiredifferent depths of understanding. In addition, each topic is given a level of importance for theparticular audience, indicated by low
, the framework was also evaluated by peers andexperts at different times.Figure 1. Research approach and development of the framework 6Development of the FrameworkA team of professors of engineering education and graduate researchers from communication,education, and engineering developed this framework. Figure 1 shows the structure of thedevelopment of the framework. Before the development of the framework, the study hadcompared and mapped ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes and EAB Criterion 2: StudentLearning (p 15-16) Objectives to illustrate and visualize potential differences (Refer to Table 2).Overall, the ABET criterion emphasized abilities
education in Pennsylvaniaincluded condensing some of the standards, aligning with the Pennsylvania Career Readinessstandards, providing connections to content and practices from other standards (e.g., PA CoreStandards: Reading and Writing in Science and Technical Areas, PA Core Standards andPractices: Math), providing clarification statements for each standard similar to the format usedin the Next Generation Science Standards [2], and providing exemplars of Pennsylvania specificcontexts in which the standards could be applied. This paper will provide an overview of theapproved T&E standards that school districts in Pennsylvania must align instruction with by the2025-2026 academic year. These standards have resulted in T&E questions being
, fromall-or-nothing language to degree of certainty. Both Analytic and Cognition were selected basedon their relationship to the mind. Meanwhile, Clout “refers to the relative social status,confidence, or leadership that people display through their writing or talking,” [32, para. 15] andTone pertains to the degree of positive or negative emotional associations. Clout and Tone werechosen for the social elements that may shape the development of HoM. Analysis for the fourdimensions were processed for every HoM such that the dimensional scores can be comparedacross HoM. Upon reviewing the results, Analytic and Clout emerged as the two mostmeaningful dimensions.Moreover, LIWC has a Word Count (WC) function that orders individual words from highest
impacted by a problem more than others. • Engineers can use computational tools to frame a problem. • Scientists may consider one or more characteristics when defining “heatwave.” • A data visualization can be useful for summarizing a large dataset. • A computer has to be provided with an algorithm (a set of instructions) written by a human in order to produce a data visualization. • A human’s experiences and beliefs may influence algorithms that they write. (YES, 2023b, p. 7)As students work toward these educational goals, they learn ways that CT informs the details oftheir own technology and some of the broader ramifications of CT and engineering in society.Medicine Cooler Alarm: In this two-lesson module, students think
to the youth participating in engineering outreach.Keywords: Role models, engineering education, outreach, elementary, career planningIntroductionIn this paper, we use data from a three-year study of an engineering outreach program tochallenge the notion that youth engaged in engineering outreach programming readily take upnear-age peers or adults as role models. This is not to say that this does not occur in certaincases, but we do not think that it occurs as readily nor at the magnitude that we and others in thefield have believed that it does.Outreach programs for youth often attempt to position adults as role models, usually with thegoal of inspiring youth by messaging that they, too, can be like the role model or do what theydo. In
author supported the firstauthor in writing and editing this paper.Results All pre-camp and post-camp survey items were compared between Camps #1 and #2 to see ifthere were any items with statistically significant differences. In the comparison of pre-surveysbetween the Nomination Camp and Self-Selection Camp, six items showed a statisticallysignificant difference change: 1. Engineers mainly work on machines and computers. (p = .012) 2. Engineers mainly work on things that have nothing to do with me. (p = .012) 3. More time should be spent on hands-on projects in science or technology activities in school. (p = .000) 4. I would like to (or already do) belong to a science or technology activities club. (p = .009) 5. How