showed not only a high degree ofsatisfaction among the graduate student population, but also a general improvement of skills ineach of the three main focus areas.IntroductionAlthough industry requires young Ph.D.s. with well-rounded professional skills,1 many newgraduates lack these skills. First, with large number graduate students matriculating frominternational undergraduate programs, many students lack the ABET-required skills such asworking in multidisciplinary teams; understanding professional and ethical responsibility; andunderstanding the economic, environmental, and societal impact of their decisions.2,3Communications skills are also an issue.4 Second, for many universities the typical target forplacement of doctoral students is in
socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 2006. 54: p. 723-740.8. Blackmore, K. and K. Nesbitt. Identifying Risks for Cross-Disciplinary Higher Degree Research Students. in Proc. Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference. 2008. Wollongong, Australia.9. Vanstone, M., et al., Interdisciplinary Doctoral Research Supervision: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, in press 2013.10. Goodyear, R., C. Crego, and M. Johnston, Ethical Issues in the Supervision of Student Research: A Study of Critical Incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1992. 23(3): p. 203-210.11. Nisselle, A. and R. Duncan, Multiple supervisors from multiple disciplines: Lessons from the past as
success of the project. For example, Robert originally did not evaluate eachindividual’s strengths and instead assigned each person parts without a specific direction. Helater found that the roles had to be redistributed because group members did not know how to dotheir parts, so the tasks were then divided by strengths and were more successfully completed.Similarly, Stanley noted that when delegating tasks for their virtual team project, pairing teammembers with tasks that fit their major helped in keeping the project going smoothly by havingcomputer science majors complete the website and the mechanical engineering majors focus onproduct design and feasibility. When team member strengths and weaknesses, work ethic, andcommunication expectations
mentioned, to be due to large amounts of focus in courses outside of the“pure” engineering courses of math and science, and the integration of multiple areas ofstudy into one that is typically considered difficult. Almost any fundamental course in thefield of engineering requires knowledge of math, science, coding, and ethical restraints,proper handling of which in turn begs a deeper understanding than the surface-level,simplified “sum of its parts.” The LL program’s intended design was to adjoin theseseemingly separate modes of thinking, and present math and science in the context ofengineering, and vice versa. Integrating active learning as well as shifted contexts of thestandard topics in core and first-year engineering courses was designed to
andTechnology (ABET), “engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs.” The aim is to optimize time and materials while still producing aquality product through “establishment of objectives and criteria, synthesis, analysis,construction, testing and evaluation.” Engineers must be aware of the realistic constraints of theirproject, such as, “economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact.” Adiagram showing the details of the process is shown on Figure 3. Following the engineeringdesign process is crucial to finishing a project successfully.Schools with ABET accreditation, such as CSULA, include the engineering design process invarious courses throughout the curriculum
% MACT 0% 1-33% 34-100% Figure 18 – Passing Rates for High Socioeconomic Students with SI Attendance by Math ACT4.4 Minority Cross-Group Examination What about the overlap between students who fit into multiple underrepresented groups?Little difference is found between the gender minority and the ethnic minority, with 4.2% of thepopulation being female and of an ethic minority. Further overlap is found when examiningsocioeconomic status. Figures 19 and 20 show students of low and high socioeconomic statusbroken down by ethnic minority. In addition to the ethnic minority overlap, females make up23.1% of LSES students and 16.1% of
level.University of Arizona Student Chapter. Here, at the University of Arizona, the ASEE chapterwas formed on an interdisciplinary model that includes a network of faculty, staff, and studentsfrom several disciplines across the university. The purpose of this cross-college, interdisciplinaryapproach is to promote engineering education at all levels. The mission of the ASEE Chapter atUniversity of Arizona are as follows: 1. To encourage collaboration between engineering undergraduate and graduate students through service, research, and professional development opportunities 2. To encourage and prepare engineering graduate students to pursue careers in academia 3. To increase awareness and understanding of societal, ethical, and public policy
top work, and he said there were, but he wanted me to learn something new” (Peyton)Role Model The participant looks up to “My advisor is super good at his or her mentor and tries to technical stuff. He's just the embody their qualities and most smart person ever.” work ethic. (Kelly)Student Mentorship The participant himself or “They’re awesome. I really herself takes on the role of a enjoy my current lab. Um I mentor
sure thateverybody finds a thing, but rather about making it accessible and easy to use and remix andshare once it's found. Radical transparency is not a magic bullet -- it's not an "if you build it, theywill come" route to millions of readers. But it is a way to give the readers you get an opportunityand a choice to engage more deeply with a work on their own terms. What surprised me was how foreign (and consequently scary due to being an unknown)transparency was to so many people in academia. The mode of sharing that I'd taken for grantedin the open source context was much more constrained by data privacy concerns in the scholarlyrealm. There are good reasons for this; ethics are vital, and sometimes preserving privacy is theright
student’s motivation toward being both aSTEM student and a student-athlete. Commonalities and differences across the interviews arethen discussed to highlight the time management and coping mechanisms used by this selectgroup of students. Finally, a set of best practices is proposed.This work has been approved by the Office of Research Ethics at the University of Waterloo.Literature ReviewThis paper leverages many ideas already established within the education and engineering-education literature including: expectancy-value theory14, subjective task values15,procrastination modeling9, 20, and time management strategies21, 22. The following sectionprovides a brief description of each of these topics respectively
FIU students participating in the Florida-Georgia Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (FGLSAMP). She is a past adviser of the Women in Computer Science (WICS) student club. From 2008 to 2010, Ms. Solis was a programmer analyst at the Department of the Attorney General in Hawaii, a member of the team revamping the State Juvenile Justice Information System. Her research and instructional Interests include software development, computer ethics and student success and development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of Social and Programmatic Experiences on Students’ Interest in Pursuing a Graduate Degree in a
their own language. This was done in two rounds to ensure proper alignment ofthe interview questions with the analytic framework described above.1 Active debate regarding the difficulty and ethics of conducting interviews across powerdifferentials, including race, gender and class, continues in scholarly discussions of interviewmethodologies [16-19]. O’Brien [17] argues that race-matching alone is insufficient inaccounting for the multiple layers of difference and power differentials that exist betweenresearcher and interviewee. Instead, she contends that the most important objective for theresearcher is instead to “activate” race by addressing it specifically, indicating to intervieweesthat it is acceptable to discuss race openly (p. 79). In
] inspired by my mentor so I want to be a research professor and doresearch in academic. In academia, I think the main goal is how to develop a new method toimprove our life and make the environment better, and it is quite different than the industry. Sothe graduate school is necessary for my dream, and I will look for a post-doc position aftergraduate school. I think this program [will] really help me to develop my academic resume andacademic/personal statement, and provide abundant information about what we should knowbefore applying for graduate school, like NSF graduate fellowship, [responsible conduct ofresearch], research ethic, etc. I had never known some of the information after the seminars, andthey are very useful!”This post prompted a
program, theory vs. application (hands-on), 2) faculty issues such astenure and reward systems and staying current with field and pedagogy, 3) specific curriculumcontent issues of communications, teamwork, technology use, ethics and 4) concern regardingstudent preparation and retention of information. Objective 3 Students will be able to recognize the options for types of instructionalapproaches.. Results from a pair of questions related to types of instructional approaches theypreferred as a student and then how they are or have been teaching demonstrate that a gap doesexist between the two (Figure 2). The largest gap occurs in the areas of active learning exercisesand laboratory