Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying results 61 - 67 of 67 in total

A Framework for the Classroom Use of Science-Fiction to Enhance Ethical Design Skills among Engineering Sudents

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 3: Student Innovative Practice
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elyas Masrour
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
drone technology when it Park showed us a glimpse unsatisfied with the energy deliveries occur each comes to use of force. into a reality where company providing you day worldwide. As this Additionally, we will biological tech goes awry, electricity, it is very number expands, we examine the evolving into 2022’s unlikely that you could must consider what differences between Jurassic World: switch to another company, this technology could violent and Dominion, a dystopian because your home, mean for the future. non-violent
Relevance Score: 0.00532869

Board 190: Work in Progress: A Pilot Study on Faculty Perceptions of the Impact of COVID-19 on Undergraduate Engineering Student Readiness

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Fitzpatrick, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Professor A’s course.Professor A explained the increasing struggle that students are having with their ability to solvesuch problems; the process of translating a word problem, selecting the proper formula(s), andexecuting those formulas has become more difficult for students, according to Professor A. Thislack in problem-solving proficiency, along with unit conversion difficulties, is important torecognize and understand as these are key components of engineering. In addition to gapsnoticed in the chemical engineering course, Professor A has also noticed greater difficulties instudents’ ability to utilize basic algebra and trigonometry skills compared to pre-pandemicstudents, amongst students in the engineering readiness course.Student Behavioral
Relevance Score: 0.00532869

Differences in Attitudes and Self-efficacy Toward Programming of Students in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Programs

Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xinyi Ma, University of Toronto; Janet Lam, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
, 2015.[6] O. Ozyurt, “An analysis on distance education computer programming students’ attitudes regarding programming and their self-efficacy for programming,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2015.[7] M. S. Gunbatar, “Examination of undergraduate and associate degree students’ computer programming attitude and self-efficacy according to thinking style, gender and experience,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 354–373, 2018.[8] M. Derya GURER, I. Cetin, and E. Top, “Factors affecting students’ attitudes toward computer programming,” Informatics in Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 281–296, 2019.[9] D. Ronan and D. Cenk Erdil, “Impact on computing
Relevance Score: 0.00532869

Generative Learning in Two Community-Based Experiential Undergraduate Courses

Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 4: Project-based Learning
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maryann Renee Hebda, Baylor University; Morgan R Castillo, Baylor University; Tracey Sulak, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for- states-by-states[11] Partnership for 21st Century Skills, “P21 framework definitions.” Accessed: Mar. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.battelleforkids.org/insights/p21-resources/[12] A. Srivastava and S. B. Thomson, “Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Policy Research.” Rochester, NY, Jan. 02, 2009. Accessed: Mar. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2760705[13] R. E. Mayer, “Cognitive theory of multimedia learning,” The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, vol. 41, pp. 31–48, 2005.Table 1Evidence of Generative Learning Strategies in EDII and SL GP Strategy Definition
Relevance Score: 0.00532869

Student-Led Makerspace Workshop Platform

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 3: Student Innovative Practice
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adam J Murrison, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Cameron Wian, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sydney Kerivan, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Jakob Sperry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
://ijamm.pubpub.org/pub/toxza3uc/release/3.A. M. Davis, “Current trends and goals in the development of makerspaces at New England College and Research Libraries,” Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 94–117, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i2.9825A. Noel, L. Murphy, and A. S. Jariwala, “Sustaining a diverse and inclusive culture in a student run Makerspace,” IJAMM, 30-Mar-2020. [Online]. Available: https://ijamm.pubpub.org/pub/1utndj5p. ⚜️“Canvas by Instructure,” Instructure. [Online]. Available: https://www.instructure.com/canvas.Cole, “Understanding and teaching the BSA's teaching edge method ,” ScoutSmarts, 29-Dec-2022. [Online
Relevance Score: 0.004709941

An Approach to Understanding Problem Solving Using Multiple Solution Methods

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Resources
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hao Li, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Anette Hosoi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
," Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 10, pp. 213-250, 1997.[4] M. Svinicki, "A guidebook on conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education," Rigorous Research in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1-53, 2010.[5] A. Bahar and C. Maker, "Cognitive backgrounds of problem solving: A comparison of open-ended vs. closed mathematics problems," Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1531-1546, 2015.[6] R. Foshay and J. Kirkley, "Principles for teaching problem solving," PLATO Learning, Bloomington, MN, 1998.[7] B. Linder, Understanding estimation and its relation to engineering education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.[8] S. Shakerin, "The art of
Relevance Score: 0.004662604

Board 174: Fostering Inclusivity and Engagement while Learning by Doing: A New Paradigm in Engineering Education Based on Student-Designed, Student-Taught Courses

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz; Qingyuan Cao, University of California, Santa Cruz; Matthew Kaltman, University of California, Santa Cruz; Khanh Tran, University of California, Santa Cruz; Miguel Robles Hernandez, University of California, Santa Cruz; Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
, Greenwich, CT, 2020. [6] J. M. Lang. Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. Jossey-Bass, London, England, 2nd edition, 2021. [7] M. C. Lovett, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, S. A. Ambrose, and M. K. Norman. How learning works: Eight research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass, London, England, 2nd edition, 2023. [8] R. McDaniel. Active learning, Jun 2016. [9] Baskin School of Engineering. End of course survey on student experience in experiential design courses, 2023. Unpublished data.[10] M. T. Owens and K. D. Tanner. Teaching as brain changing: Exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 16(2), Summer 2017.[11] D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman
Relevance Score: 0.0039965175