- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Nicole Adia Jefferson, Virginia Tech ; Jeremi S. London, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
on First Doctoral Degree Milestones Work In Progress: Bridging the Gap in Doctoral Engineering Education: Critically Investigating Factors Influencing Performance Outcomes on First Doctoral Degree MilestonesAbstract It is well documented that Black students tend to enroll and complete engineering Ph.D.sat disproportionately lower rates than their peers. What is less understood are the most criticalfactors influencing their success at critical junctures in the Ph.D. program. Existing scholarshipon the socialization processes embedded in pursuing a graduate degree are based on the premisethat transitioning into a hyper-specialized area is challenging. One of the most challengingaspects of
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lindsey Pegram, "Be A Maker (BeAM)" Makerspace in the Department of Applied Physical Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Maria Christine Palmtag; Anna Engelke, UNC-Chapel Hill / North Carolina State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
. Each community cohort consists of an experienced Program Specialist facilitator andthree to four new Program Assistants. In total, 18 new staff members have participated for a fullyear in the program. Each cohort meets weekly for three hours in the Makerspace, and new staffrotate to a new tool domain every six weeks. During the sessions, the participants would practicenew skills through structured projects, design activities, and opportunities for peer teaching. Atthe time of writing this publication, new staff had completed two successful six-week rotationsof the CoP program and a third rotation is in process. CoP facilitators monitored the programthrough multiple assessment methods, including participant self-assessment through pre- andpost
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Resources
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Katherine Drinkwater, Duke University; Karis Boyd-Sinkler, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
should join, and any differences between the two.The research questions that guided this study were: RQ1: How do undergraduate engineering students perceive the amount of time spent engaging in engineering clubs? RQ2: Why are undergraduate engineering students motivated to join engineering clubs? RQ3: What are the perceived benefits of engineering club participation?Students are motivated to join engineering clubs to find community with peers [3], applyknowledge to real-world settings [4], prepare for their careers [5], develop new skills [6], [7],and pursue personal interests [8]. Design clubs (both competition and impact-focused teams)provide additional opportunities to practice the design process [9], manufacture parts
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kathryn Christopher, Grand Valley State University and Western Michigan University; C.J. Witherell, Grand Valley State University; Aziz Gram Sarhan
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
classrooms to help with student engagement andknowledge retention.IntroductionResearch shows that student success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields can be correlated not only to their innate ability and intelligence but also to theirself-efficacy and implicit beliefs (growth mindset) [1, 2]. Many students enter their courses at theuniversity level with the belief that their peers are only doing well because they are more intelligentor more naturally gifted. While there may always a few students with greater natural ability, thereason for most engineering students’ success appears to be their ability to learn, grow, and adjustbased on feedback and criticism instead of crumbling under pressure.Providing students with
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mei-Yun Lin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Hsinju Chen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Leah Espenhahn; Erin Marie Raftery; Alyssa Huang; Mayura Kulkarni
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
Technology, only 25% of engineering degrees, includingBachelor’s, Master’s, and Ph.D., were awarded to women in US institutions [1]. Theunderrepresentation of women in engineering may be due to a lack of diversity when recruitingstudents, as well as the fact that women have higher attrition rates than their men peers, so-called“the leaky pipeline” [2, 3, 4].Many studies have attempted to understand this high attrition rate of women students inengineering careers. Some suggest that women students have fewer opportunities to develop theirengineering interests or chances to be recognized as engineers compared with their mencounterparts [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Others note that women students face additional professionaldevaluation and chilly climates in
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Duncan H. Mullins, State University of New York, Buffalo ; AraOluwa Adaramola, Purdue University, West Lafayette
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
able to make the most impact. 5DATA CONSTRUCTION & COLLECTIONWe studied our experiences across one semester as faculty apprentices. At the beginning of thesemester, we decided to write individual weekly reflections and meet monthly via videoconference to co-write joint reflections. In addition, we co-created a list of guiding writingprompts focused on our learning experience and metacognitive reflections.In our monthly meetings, we discussed and reflected on our experiences. These meetingsallowed us to have the unique perspective of a peer who was in the same space. We recordedthese Zoom meetings, which served as a primary data source for our