sliding mode control, image processing, machine learning and energy management. He won the excellent teaching assistant award in National Chiao Tung university, 2016.Prof. Yon-Ping Chen, National Chiao Tung University Yon-Ping Chen received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from National Taiwan University, Tai- wan, in 1981, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington, USA, in 1986 and 1989, respectively. He is currently a Distinguished Professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan. His researches include control, image signal processing, and intelligent system design.Prof. Sunny S. J. Lin, National Chiao Tung
definition of mission engineering is the deliberate planning, analyzing,organizing, and integrating of current and emerging operational and system capabilities toachieve desired mission effects.Mission engineering applies the mission context to complicated and complex system(s) ofsystems [2]. Most current systems engineering practices do not fully address the uniquecharacteristics of mission engineering, addressing the end-to-end mission as the ‘system’ andextending further beyond data exchange between the individual systems for cross-cuttingfunctions, controls, and trades across the systems.Mission engineering differs from the established term of mission analysis in that the latter onlyaddresses examination of current operational and system
, conference proceedings, magazine articles, presentations, and two handbooks. She has also received numerous prestigious teaching and research awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Systems Thinking in Interdisciplinary Education Programs: A Systems Integration Approach Adedeji B. Badiru Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio LeeAnn Racz st US Air Force, 1 Special Operations Aerospace Medicine Squadron U. S. Air
convergent validity testing between the results and the systems thinking construct.Reflective NarrativeDescription: Students will provide open-ended reflections after each Think Aloud activity and onereport on systems thinking and its implications on project management and engineered systems atthe end of the course. A. The open-ended reflections focus on how the student engaged and learned in the course. It encourages students to recognize positive, negative and neutral aspects of the task(s). B. The report challenges students to determine whether they perceive a benefit of systems thinking in engineering and must support their position. Any individual adjustments made between the pre- and post- knowledge survey is
settings to generalize our findings, identifyingwhich SE principles may be most effective, and investigating the role of previous SE education inmultidisciplinary course outcomes.References [1] George Vachtsevanos [et. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2006. [2] Armando Rugarcia, Richard M Felder, Donald R Woods, and James E Stice. The future of engineering education i. a vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1):16–25, 2000. [3] Tim King. Millwrights to mechatronics: The merits of multi-disciplinary engineering. Mechatronics, 5(2): 95–115, March 1995. [4] M B Manju, K S Nikhil, D Nishanth, K S Sai Vignesh, B S Anupama, and Madhav Murthy
Systems Engineering Failures Finding(s) Causal Action Discussion/Explanation The mine operator Pike River Mine explosion: “The original mine plan specified decided to change an two main fans located on the mountainside next to a ventilation aspect of the ventilation shaft. Two planning changes were made. Pike decided to relocate system design
requirements’ list for the project. The instructortypically shows a case study project example explaining Step 1 tasks, generally in an in-classworkshop, so that each team can take the following actions:1. Break down the project description, recognize and highlight key words and form a list of high-level requirements.2. Share the list with other teams for peer review to refine the list.3. Prepare a list of questions to obtain the instructor/s’ and sponsor’s assistance.The high-level requirement list after this step generally captures key system behavioral featuresand main system functions. Table 2 (page 8) shows the input and output of Step 1 for a casestudy exercise conducted in class.Objectives achieved during this step: 1. Team gets an easy
to Designing Courses for Significant Learning,” University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, 2003. [Online] Available: http://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2011/06/selfdirected1.pdf.[10] A. B. Badiru, “Quality Insights: The DEJI Model for Quality Design, Evaluation, Justification, and Integration,” International Journal of Quality Engineering and Technology, vol. 4(4), pp. 369- 378, 2014[11] A. B. Badiru and S. C. Bommer, Work Design: A Systematic Approach. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, 2017.[12] A. June, “A Helping Hand for Young Faculty Members,” Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 55(3), pp. A10, 2008.
the US and even around the world. This accreditation certainly ensures highquality of the engineering education that is provided to the students. However, with ABET’sapproach of accrediting individual programs, universities (and departments) tend to develop theirengineering programs largely in isolation. There is likely to be a strong overlap between thecollege-level math and basic sciences courses that are required by ABET, but the courses onengineering topics may or may not be common across multiple programs. There could certainlybe overlap based on the history of how these courses were initially designed, the programs theywere initially offered under, the faculty member(s) who designed and/or taught them, scheduling,etc. Universities and
Jing Guo, "A Systems Engineering Approach for Implementing An Electrical or Computer Engineering Master’s Capstone Course," in ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference, Cedar City, Utah, 2016.[2] S. B. Blachard and W. Frabrycky, Systems engineering and Analysis” (Fifth Edition), New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[3] D. Buede, The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods (Second Edition), Wiley, 2009.[4] A. P. Sage and J. James E. Armstrong, Introduction to Systems Engineering, Wiley, 2009.[5] yyy, Information retrieved from student deliverables for EE 692, Electrical Engineering Capstone,, 2015.[6] ASPCA, "Shelter Intake and Surrender," 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.aspca.org/animal- homelessness/shelter-intake-and
. Select or design specific graded events as assessment artifacts that directly evaluate the student expectations defined by PC, minimizing artifacts of coarse granularity such as semester average or course grade(s). d. Conduct a review process to down-select candidate assessment artifacts to a manageable and ABET review-tenable subset that adequately evaluates the program student population. e. Ensure alignment among the new assessment artifacts, individual course learning objectives, learning experiences, revised PCs, and institutional and ABET outcomes. [9, pp. 39-53]4. Evaluation, Reporting, and Analysis: Revise or create a comprehensive evaluation