Asee peer logo
Displaying all 11 results
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1: Course Design & SE Competencies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kuan-Yu Chou, National Chiao Tung University; Yon-Ping Chen, National Chiao Tung University; Sunny S. J. Lin, National Chiao Tung University; Chao-Yang Cheng, National Chiao Tung University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
sliding mode control, image processing, machine learning and energy management. He won the excellent teaching assistant award in National Chiao Tung university, 2016.Prof. Yon-Ping Chen, National Chiao Tung University Yon-Ping Chen received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from National Taiwan University, Tai- wan, in 1981, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington, USA, in 1986 and 1989, respectively. He is currently a Distinguished Professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan. His researches include control, image signal processing, and intelligent system design.Prof. Sunny S. J. Lin, National Chiao Tung
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2: SE Applications
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicole A.C. Hutchison, Stevens Institute of Technology; Sergio Luna, Stevens Institute of Technology; William D. Miller, Stevens Institute of Technology; Hoong Yan See Tao, Stevens Institute of Technology; Dinesh Verma, Stevens Institute of Technology; Gregg T. Vesonder, Stevens Institute of Technology; Jon Patrick Wade, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
definition of mission engineering is the deliberate planning, analyzing,organizing, and integrating of current and emerging operational and system capabilities toachieve desired mission effects.Mission engineering applies the mission context to complicated and complex system(s) ofsystems [2]. Most current systems engineering practices do not fully address the uniquecharacteristics of mission engineering, addressing the end-to-end mission as the ‘system’ andextending further beyond data exchange between the individual systems for cross-cuttingfunctions, controls, and trades across the systems.Mission engineering differs from the established term of mission analysis in that the latter onlyaddresses examination of current operational and system
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4 – Systems Thinking Integration and Systems Engineering Skills Evaluation
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adedeji B. Badiru P.E., Air Force Institute of Technology; LeeAnn Racz, US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
, conference proceedings, magazine articles, presentations, and two handbooks. She has also received numerous prestigious teaching and research awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Systems Thinking in Interdisciplinary Education Programs: A Systems Integration Approach Adedeji B. Badiru Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio LeeAnn Racz st US Air Force, 1 Special Operations Aerospace Medicine Squadron U. S. Air
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4 – Systems Thinking Integration and Systems Engineering Skills Evaluation
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Federica Robinson-Bryant, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- Worldwide
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
convergent validity testing between the results and the systems thinking construct.Reflective NarrativeDescription: Students will provide open-ended reflections after each Think Aloud activity and onereport on systems thinking and its implications on project management and engineered systems atthe end of the course. A. The open-ended reflections focus on how the student engaged and learned in the course. It encourages students to recognize positive, negative and neutral aspects of the task(s). B. The report challenges students to determine whether they perceive a benefit of systems thinking in engineering and must support their position. Any individual adjustments made between the pre- and post- knowledge survey is
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3 – Course and Program Outcomes
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Zachary David Asher, Colorado State University; Nicole L Ramo, Colorado State University; Thomas H. Bradley, Colorado State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
settings to generalize our findings, identifyingwhich SE principles may be most effective, and investigating the role of previous SE education inmultidisciplinary course outcomes.References [1] George Vachtsevanos [et. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2006. [2] Armando Rugarcia, Richard M Felder, Donald R Woods, and James E Stice. The future of engineering education i. a vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1):16–25, 2000. [3] Tim King. Millwrights to mechatronics: The merits of multi-disciplinary engineering. Mechatronics, 5(2): 95–115, March 1995. [4] M B Manju, K S Nikhil, D Nishanth, K S Sai Vignesh, B S Anupama, and Madhav Murthy
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4 – Systems Thinking Integration and Systems Engineering Skills Evaluation
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diane Constance Aloisio, Purdue University; Karen Marais, Purdue University; Hanxi Sun, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
Systems Engineering Failures Finding(s) Causal Action Discussion/Explanation The mine operator Pike River Mine explosion: “The original mine plan specified decided to change an two main fans located on the mountainside next to a ventilation aspect of the ventilation shaft. Two planning changes were made. Pike decided to relocate system design
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1: Course Design & SE Competencies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University; Greg A. Dunko, NantHealth
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
requirements’ list for the project. The instructortypically shows a case study project example explaining Step 1 tasks, generally in an in-classworkshop, so that each team can take the following actions:1. Break down the project description, recognize and highlight key words and form a list of high-level requirements.2. Share the list with other teams for peer review to refine the list.3. Prepare a list of questions to obtain the instructor/s’ and sponsor’s assistance.The high-level requirement list after this step generally captures key system behavioral featuresand main system functions. Table 2 (page 8) shows the input and output of Step 1 for a casestudy exercise conducted in class.Objectives achieved during this step: 1. Team gets an easy
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2: SE Applications
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sharon Claxton Bommer, KBRwyle; Alice E. Grimes, Air Force Institute of Technology; Adedeji B. Badiru, Air Force Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
to Designing Courses for Significant Learning,” University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, 2003. [Online] Available: http://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2011/06/selfdirected1.pdf.[10] A. B. Badiru, “Quality Insights: The DEJI Model for Quality Design, Evaluation, Justification, and Integration,” International Journal of Quality Engineering and Technology, vol. 4(4), pp. 369- 378, 2014[11] A. B. Badiru and S. C. Bommer, Work Design: A Systematic Approach. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, 2017.[12] A. June, “A Helping Hand for Young Faculty Members,” Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 55(3), pp. A10, 2008.
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3 – Course and Program Outcomes
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Devanandham Henry, Regent University; Charles Daniel Turnitsa, Regent University; Cheryl Beauchamp, Regent University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
the US and even around the world. This accreditation certainly ensures highquality of the engineering education that is provided to the students. However, with ABET’sapproach of accrediting individual programs, universities (and departments) tend to develop theirengineering programs largely in isolation. There is likely to be a strong overlap between thecollege-level math and basic sciences courses that are required by ABET, but the courses onengineering topics may or may not be common across multiple programs. There could certainlybe overlap based on the history of how these courses were initially designed, the programs theywere initially offered under, the faculty member(s) who designed and/or taught them, scheduling,etc. Universities and
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1: Course Design & SE Competencies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
Jing Guo, "A Systems Engineering Approach for Implementing An Electrical or Computer Engineering Master’s Capstone Course," in ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference, Cedar City, Utah, 2016.[2] S. B. Blachard and W. Frabrycky, Systems engineering and Analysis” (Fifth Edition), New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[3] D. Buede, The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods (Second Edition), Wiley, 2009.[4] A. P. Sage and J. James E. Armstrong, Introduction to Systems Engineering, Wiley, 2009.[5] yyy, Information retrieved from student deliverables for EE 692, Electrical Engineering Capstone,, 2015.[6] ASPCA, "Shelter Intake and Surrender," 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.aspca.org/animal- homelessness/shelter-intake-and
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3 – Course and Program Outcomes
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stu Turner, US Air Force Academy Systems Engineering; Kalyn Tung, United States Air Force Academy; Cory Cooper, United States Air Force Academy
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
. Select or design specific graded events as assessment artifacts that directly evaluate the student expectations defined by PC, minimizing artifacts of coarse granularity such as semester average or course grade(s). d. Conduct a review process to down-select candidate assessment artifacts to a manageable and ABET review-tenable subset that adequately evaluates the program student population. e. Ensure alignment among the new assessment artifacts, individual course learning objectives, learning experiences, revised PCs, and institutional and ABET outcomes. [9, pp. 39-53]4. Evaluation, Reporting, and Analysis: Revise or create a comprehensive evaluation