Conference Session

Systems Engineering Programs and Curricula

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna DeFranco, Pennsylvania State University; Colin Neill, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Constituent Committee

,solution planning, and system design tasks during collaboration. The model was initiallydeveloped to improve the effectiveness of engineers performing such tasks in teams and thisstudy posits that the model will be equally effective on student learning.A detailed statistical experiment to study the effect of this model on subjects collaborativelysolving an analysis and design problem was designed and executed. Randomly assigned teams ofstudents were presented with one of four design problems. Half the teams were then exposed tothe CCM while the remaining half was not. The effect on student learning was then measuredusing assessment of team deliverables.1. IntroductionIn a brief survey of the graduate engineering and technology courses offered at

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Programs and Curricula

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Nemes, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Constituent Committee

Page 14.1199.3in the program as practical in order to spread the developmental tasks widely and avoidoverwhelming one or two faculty members. In addition, faculty buy-in is essential forsuccessful implementation of an online program, as described by the Sloan study1. Thus,faculty involvement from the earliest planning stages is essential. The final curriculumselection, as selected by program faculty, is shown in Table 1.Online learning can be either synchronous or asynchronous or some combination of the two.In asynchronous delivery students are separated by time and location, whereas insynchronous delivery students are separated only by location. Midkiff and DaSilva4 havedetailed the differences between these two formats from their experiences