Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra M Birrenkott, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Hannah Benes, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Annelise Larson, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was onDr. Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Texas State University Dr. Karim Muci-Kuchler is a Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator at the Ingram School of Engineering of Texas State University. Before joining Texas State University, he was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Experimental and Computational Mechanics Laboratory at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amin Azad, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

has worked as a consultant and researcher in tech companies. Amin’s hobbies include exploring the outdoors, trying new food, and traveling.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Professor Emily Moore is the Director of Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. She leads research and teaches on topics such as how engineers lead and learn to lead both as students and in practice. She has published on engineering leadership, equity in engineering, and incorporating systems thinking into complex decision making. Emily was appointed as Director of ILead in October, 2018 after more than twenty years in industry. Emily started her career at the Xerox Research

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rafic Bachnak, Marymount University; Abhilasha Mishra, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

with industry-standard tools in their future careers. Providing students with hands-on experience using these tools helps prepare them for the practical challenges they'll face in the workplace.ConclusionThe course described in this paper accomplished its goal of teaching systems thinking conceptsand skills to engineering students using a control system model and relevant applications.Feeback from students shows that the course was well-received and they enjoyed their learningexperience. While there was not a required textbook, the supplemental materials provided by theinstructor, including handouts, videos, and PPT presentation were considered as sufficient forlearning the course material. Key highlights of the course include: 1

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garrett Goodman, Miami University; Suman Bhunia, Miami University; Peter Jamieson, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

4 20% 91% PR: CoT; zero-shot In-class Participation N/A 2.5% (assumed) 100% N/A Career Assignments N/A 2.5% (assumed) 100% N/A Final Score 88.56% (Letter Grade B+)5.2 Benchmarking CSE 274Table 2 provides the breakdown of grades for different CSE 274 assessments. ChatGPT-4excelled in both the Final Exam and Midterm Exam, scoring 90% in each. Then, for Labs,ChatGPT-4 achieved a score of 97.2%. Next, in Quizzes, ChatGPT-4 scored 92.14%. Finally, thehighest performance was observed in Homework Projects scoring 98.40%. The tool consistentlydemonstrated high performance across various course components, achieving an overall score of93