Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 4 results

The Logic of Decision Making in Engineering Design: An Examination of Design Theories From A Logical Point of View

Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
processin which proponents of a thesis (T ) seek to specify grounds (Gi ) that respond to refutations ofopponents (Rij ). The inquiry is contingent on a set of shared presumptions (a cognitive status quo)as the foundation, as well as a set of criteria for plausibility and adequacy. The third actor in theprocess is determiner (individual or collective) concerned with termination or adjudication of therational debate.Figure 3 shows possible moves or types of arguments that each party can employ as the dialecticprocess evolves. Disputation begins with proponent claiming one of the fundamental moves. Thiscould be either a categorical assertion (!P ) for “P is the case” or a provisoed assertion (P/Q&!Q)for “P generally (or ordinarily) holds provided
Relevance Score: 0.051981486

The Historical Mandate for the Open-Source Community

Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University; Mark Blair, Gannon University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
incapable of learning or discerningfact from fiction without the assistance of an intellectually superior individual to teach them ordumb-down the material through parables or simplified rules. Patrick Quin describes Aquinas’Super de Trin.2.4 “that theological truth is best transmitted to the faithful in parabolic form… itmight, he thinks, confuse the uneducated who would misunderstand it and be ridiculed byunbelievers who detest it anyway” [10]. Aquinas states: “…it is said in Luke 8:10, ‘To you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables.’ Therefore one ought by obscurity in speech conceal the sacred truths from the multitude” (Pars 1 q. 2 a. 4 s. c. 3). “…the words of a teacher ought
Relevance Score: 0.024705285

Don’t Let the Computer Take Your Job – a Framework for Rethinking Curriculum

Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
, DC, 2018.[3] Q. Bui, “40 Years Of Income Inequality In America, In Graphs,” Planet Money, National Public Radio, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/02/349863761/40-years-of-income- inequality-in-america-in-graphs. [Accessed: 12-Aug-2017].[4] M. S. McPherson and M. O. Schapiro, Keeping College Affordable: Government and Educational Opportunity. The Brookings Institution, 1991.[5] S. Kemp-King, “The Graduate Premium: manna, myth or plain mis-selling?”, Intergenerational Publications, London, 2016.[6] ibid p 11 for a list of digital learning formats and definitions. “Fully online programs conduct all courses-including class lectures and discussion sessions
Relevance Score: 0.015128835

Human Rights as a Lens for Engineering Ethics?

Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
://48ba3m4eh2bf2sksp43rq8kk-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/12/UDHR70_AI.pdf [Accessed Jan. 30, 2019][50] H. Sloan, Human Rights and IoT: The Right to Fair and Decent Work. Dec. 13, 2018. Available at: https://medium.com/iotforall/human-rights-and-iot-the-right-to-fair-and-decent-work-23a97bab25d4 [Accessed Jan. 20, 2019][51] R. Rincon, “What’s the gender pay gap in engineering?” All Together - SWE Blog. April 20 2018. https://alltogether.swe.org/2018/04/pay-gap-in-engineering/ [Accessed October 20, 2018].[52] E.A. Cech, “Ideological wage inequalities?: the technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering,” Social Forces, vol. 91 (4), pp. 1147-1182, June 2013.[53] J.R. Mihelcic, C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q
Relevance Score: 0.015128835