to meet the objective. It was subsequentlycalled a multiple strategy examination.The coursework focused on two abilities for measurement by the examination. The first was theability to carry out an experimental study. The second was to demonstrate ability in the planning,implementation, and evaluation of a project. Coursework included conducting experimentalstudies as well as project planning. Activities covered several weeks.The engineering examination was then taken after completing some of the coursework. Thescales used to evaluate students’ examinations are shown in Appendix 4 parts A and B.Originally all the questions were criterion referenced, that is they required either a ‘Yes’ or a‘No’ for an answer. Subsequently, they were reduced
thinking 4.31 (0.887) 0.678 Having different views on the decision- 4.18 (0.913) 0.788 Innovation and making and planning of the superiors Challenge Ability Willing to accept challenges and get in 4.21 (0.891) 0.681 touch with new things Being equipped with a persevering will 4.35 (0.889) 0.760 Self-Value Shaping Having one’s own life planning and 4.39 (0.863) 0.582 Ability development goalsThrough
in courses; this paper will report on progress to dateand lay out plans for future work.IntroductionTechnological and engineering literacy (TEL) has been recognized as a critical need [1-3], andmuch work has gone into efforts to define and teach these subjects [4-9]. While much of thiseffort at colleges and universities has been focused on non-majors, people graduating fromengineering and engineering technology degree programs cannot just be assumed to have thisliteracy. TEL needs to be incorporated in the engineering curriculum as well [10-14].Classes for majors focus on specific subjects in engineering and technology. The material mustbe covered, and students are to be evaluated based on their ability to demonstrate the use of thespecified
education. In P John Williams, Alister Jones, and Cathy Buntting, editors, The future of technology education, pages 169–185. Springer, Singapore, 2015.[13] Marc J de Vries. Technological knowledge. In Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers, pages 23–38. Springer, Dordrecht, 2016.[14] Per Norstr¨om. How technology teachers understand technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1):19–38, 2014.[15] Eddie Norman. Design epistemology and curriculum planning. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(2):3–5, 2013.[16] P. John Williams. Technological literacy: A multliteracies approach for democracy. International
that Q, and for all we know Q is the case”. Theopponent can respond to either with a cautious denial († ∼ P ) for “∼ P is the case for all thatyou have shown”, or a provisoed denial (∼ P/Q&†Q) for “∼ P obtains in all (or most) ordinarycircumstances when Q does and for all we know Q is the case”.Note that when a provisoed assertion is countered by a provisoed denial, symbol P representsthe same statement for both parties, while Q indeed can not be the same. Consider the followingexcerpt form a group of mechanical engineering students at the earliest stage of planning for thedesign of a mechanism to handle hazardous explosive material. This data belongs to the DesignThinking Research Symposium 24,25 (DTRS 2013) which deposits design review
), as well as department affiliation. With the growth of makerspaces on universitycampuses, some efforts have been made to develop and implement some best practices toestablish new facilities [21] and to create a classification system of academic makerspaces as ameans to compare different makerspaces for planning purposes [27].The tools and equipment available, along with the design and layout of each makerspace, candepend on the community it serves. One of the most common features of any makerspace is theuse of digital tools for the creation of physical artifacts [2], [3], [6], [9], [25]. Along with 3Dprinters, many maker workshops include other rapid prototyping tools that can be used onmaterial like wood, metal and plastics, such as computer
client or profession.” the beneficiary.”Verbal and Nonverbal CommunicationIn the classroom, both the planned content and the way in which it is organically presented areimpactful. It is between these lines, “the space between the official and unofficial… the intendedand the perceived” [2, pp. 35] that hidden curriculum exists. This influence can be manifested inthe verbal and nonverbal communication; not just the lecture or material but the way it ispresented and the way that educators carry themselves in relation to it. Gofton and Regehrexpressed this implicit power of faculty because “we are teaching far more than we know. Everyword we speak, every action we perform, every time we
to allow students to directly generate diagrams and receivefeedback are also needed to more fully realize the potential of automated assessment to improvesystems thinking. Additional testing is planned with both engineering students enrolled inintroduction to engineering and non-engineers in a general education engineering literacy course.References 1. “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE) Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2013. http://tuee.asee.org/phase- i/report/ 2. G. Pearson and A. T. Young, Ed., Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More about Technology, Washington, DC: National Academies Press
neverthelessimportant. Examples of equity and non-discrimination in design relate to transportation planning(civil engineering) [28], assistive technology [29], universal accessibility for people withphysical limitations [30], and artificial intelligence [31]. These design-related issues could bereadily integrated into a number of technical courses for a wide array of engineering disciplines.Right to Life and Security of Person – Article 3Article 3 of the UDHR states, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” [1].Technology is being used to document human rights abuses via tools including satellite imagery,remote sensing, and machine learning. Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents, and machinelearning can also be applied in numerous
other known ways”. “4. Performance prediction Engineers provide sufficiently accurate technical and commercial enterprise performance predictions creating enough confidence for investors to provide the resources needed to make new products or provide new services”. “5. Due diligence By systematically checking designs and plans beforehand, and monitoring technical work for compliance with standards and specifications, engineers reduce both the real and apparent risks for investors, increasing the perceived value of an enterprise”. “6. Community value creation Engineers help enterprises co-create value in their communities through ethical behaviour, improved safety, community capacity building, identifying and conserving resources, reducing or