Asee peer logo
Displaying all 9 results
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
university engineering programs since the release of ChatGPT by OpenAI inNovember 2022 is notable [1]. The integration of generative AI in teaching and educationalresearch within engineering disciplines includes analyzing how educators and learnersunderstand and utilize these tools, examining the potential benefits and challenges, andidentifying educators' perceptions of these technologies [1].AI methodologies support educational praxis and teacher metacognition, aiding teachers'professional development through detailed, context-specific reflection and adaptive decision-making [4]. Generative AI, as an advanced innovative tool, can transform engineering educationby creating content, enhancing personalized learning, and updating curricula efficiently
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Sarah Appelhans, Lafayette College; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Stu Thompson, Bucknell University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
drawn arose in the 1980’s due to concerns aboutcompetitiveness of the US economy and is adapted from industrial continual quality management(CQM) methods such as ISO 9000, Six Sigma, and Kaizen which themselves have roots in 19thcentury industrialization. Another aspect of outcomes-based education is that the unit of analysisis the program or sub-elements of it. This focus on the program can emphasize the intendedcurriculum rather than the received curriculum. The intended curriculum is what programsbelieve that students learn rather than what is actually experienced (received) by students.Continual quality management (and outcomes-based education) has an implicit assumption thatquality can be defined sufficiently well to make some sort of
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mitchell Gerhardt, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Michael Robinson, Saint Vincent College; Brian E Faulkner, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
“technical competencies” alone, engineeringjudgment emerges from interactions between an engineer and others. Although a simplisticdistinction, this helps clarify the cognitive emphasis following section that examine how theoriesof judgment, critical thinking, and epistemic cognition can enhance our understanding ofengineering judgment and inform more effective approaches to developing students’ judgmentcapabilities.The Role of Cognition in Engineering JudgmentWhile multiple frameworks acknowledge the cognitive dimensions of engineering judgment,their treatment of these psychological processes remains underdeveloped. Complex cognitivecapabilities like evidence synthesis, data interpretation, and knowledge integration are describedby broad “cognitive
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 4
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sayyad Zahid Qamar, Sultan Qaboos University; Tasneem Pervez; Nasra Al-Maskari, Sultan Qaboos University; Sayyad Basim Qamar, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
aresource-constrained world and to ensure future engineers are not only technically skilled but alsoinnovative problem-solvers.This paper’s novel contributions lie in its AI-driven perspective on engineering creativity, the structuredframework of creativity techniques, a curriculum-wide implementation strategy, direct connections tocreativity psychology, an accreditation policy perspective, and expanded active learning methodologies.These elements distinguish it from prior research and provide actionable, interdisciplinary insights forreshaping engineering education.Torrance View of CreativityE. Paul Torrance is a mammoth of a figure in the field of creativity research. The famous Torrance tests[Torrance 1966] have long been held as the standard
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Poster Session
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qixian Zhao, Nanyang Technological University; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
dispositions (reciprocity, community orientation) 3. design propositions that embed trust “by construction” in AI artefacts; and 4. a research agenda for formal verification, large-scale simulation, and cross-cultural validation.By positioning PD reasoning at the heart of AI literacy, we shift pedagogy from ethics byexhortation to trust by design, equipping the next generation of developers to build AIsystems that cooperate reliably with both humans and machines. 2. Conceptual Background 2.1 Trust in AI DevelopmentWe distinguish two mutually reinforcing facets of trust: • Cognitive trust—reasoned beliefs about an agent’s competence, integrity, and predictability (McAllister, 1995). Developers foster it through
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 3
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Robinson, Saint Vincent College; Brian E Faulkner, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
apply the chain rule and where to look it up when needed? Some professors have advocated breaking calculus’ grip on the engineering curriculum. (In current curricula, it is often faculty in the mathematics department who determine who gets to be an engineer) [2].The Grinter Report essentially agrees, stating: Engineering judgment is more and more often guided by mathematical analysis, and such analysis is rapidly expanding the demands it places upon advanced areas of mathematics. At the undergraduate level, competence is the theory and use of simple, ordinary differential equations and their application to the solution of physical problems lies close to the boundary of minimum
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cristian Eduardo Vargas-Ordonez, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Hector Enrique Rodríguez-Simmonds, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
these barriers gain access to the power and authority to shapeengineering discourse, design processes, and technological solutions. This disparity in participation anddecision-making reinforces power imbalances in knowledge production, often leading to epistemicinjustices that limit the diversity of voices in engineering problem-solving. An epistemic justice approachin engineering seeks to disrupt these power imbalances by fostering inclusive and diverse knowledgeecosystems that value multiple epistemic contributions, irrespective of disciplinary boundaries or socialhierarchies (Walker, 2019). By integrating different perspectives, lived experiences, and alternativemethodologies, engineering can move toward a more equitable and socially
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 4
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Albertus Retnanto, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Mohamed Fadlelmula, Texas A&M University at Qatar; ROMMEL DUAVE YRAC
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
, students must present the findings clearlyand with sufficient support and successfully integrate written and visual representations. In theconclusion section, students need to provide the main findings and state whether the resultssupport or contradict the hypothesis being tested.In this paper, we will demonstrate the program's experience with lab reports writing and rubricdevelopment over the last ten years, which includes three different phases. The first is when therewas no standard lab report rubric with guidelines (before 2018), the second is when the firstgeneration of standard lab report rubric and guidelines was introduced (2018-2022), and the thirdone is when an augmented versions of the standard lab report rubric were used (2023-2024
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 3
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Wessel, Franciscan University of Steubenville (FUS)
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
” [12]. As such engineers are a primary stakeholder toinfluence product quality improvement. The design methods they employ greatly affect thequality of experience for the users of delivered apps globally.Culture is “An integrated pattern of human behavior that includes thoughts, communications,languages, practices, beliefs, values, customs, courtesies, rituals, manners of interacting, roles,relationships, and expected behaviors of a racial, ethnic, religious or social group; the ability totransmit the above to succeeding generations; is dynamic in nature.” [13]. The digital culture “isthe relationship between people and the use of technology. It describes how digital media andtechnology have shaped our everyday lives and interactions with