of STEM majorsfrom community colleges through relevant initiatives. Such initiatives offer advanced scientificknowledge, and laboratory experiences, and inspire aspirations for graduate school, therebyenabling these graduates to pursue a comprehensive education that opens up numerous careeroptions. However, the review also highlighted the challenges faced by community collegestudents and faculty in participating in these initiatives[1].It was reported that effective transfer strategies were developed to customize researchexperiences for community colleges and establish long-term partnerships with four-yearinstitutions, to improve accessibility and tackle obstacles [2]. These initiatives aim to expandopportunities for community college
have significant implications for future strategies andresearch initiatives to improve transfer student support and success across different regions.1. INTRODUCTIONOver the past few decades, researchers and policymakers have outlined the critical need to broadenparticipation in engineering in order to meet the growing demand for engineering graduates in theengineering workforce [1], [2], [3]. Diversifying the engineering workforce is essential forfostering equity, innovation, and competition in the global market [4]. The National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) has recently emphasized the urgent need to increase the participation ofunderrepresented groups, particularly women and racially minoritized individuals [5]. In highereducation, vertical
PolyPomona). Identifying the CSFs is essential as sociocultural, academic, and environmental factorssignificantly affect transfer students' academic performance. The author composed a series ofquestions that fall into sociocultural, academic, and environmental factors (this survey wasapproved by the CPP IRB 23-003). A total of 41 transfer students responded to the survey, andthe author identified CSFs for transfer students as 1) a sense of belonging, 2) networking withfaculty, staff, and peers, and 3) advising for career development and available resources from theuniversity. The identified factors should be addressed when the university develops a newprogram for transfer students.IntroductionThe State of California, which has the most extensive
Denver-Metro Engineering Consortium),funded by the US Department of Defense1 is a pathways model designed to introduceunderrepresented community college students to engineering bachelor’s degree programs andentry into the engineering workforce. As part of this six-year-long program to encourage studentsinto and through a pathway that prepares them for an engineering career, the EngineeringMomentum initiative incorporates multiple programs that foster engineering awareness, includinga robust summer internship which allows students to gain valuable engineering researchexperience. The program anticipates 425 students will participate in Engineering Momentumthroughout the six years of the grant (see Table 1), with a subset of ~300 of these
, and the Journal of Applied Research in theCommunity College. For this review, the team bound the study and selection criteria to ensure that thescholarship included was relevant to the topical area rather than simply relying on theresearchers’ familiarity or agreement with the available scholarship. Exclusion criteria wereidentified to outline how researchers eliminated studies from consideration and defined thepurpose of the study (DePoy & Gitlin, 1994). For this study, inclusion and exclusion criteriaincluded: 1 1. The study was published between 2013 and 2023. 2. The study was peer-reviewed articles, book chapters
have experience in managing a grant-funded project using industry-standard techniques.Guiding new grantees in applying Project Management skills as they implement NSF ATE-funded grants for the first time holds promise for improving project outcomes, reducing thefrustration of a steep learning curve for new PIs, and encouraging follow-on grant proposals tothe ATE Program.The first two principles of project management, (1) set clear objectives from the start and (2)create a project plan, are required to receive a first grant from NSF. When a grant award isreceived, two-year college faculty are invariably faced with working grant-funded activities intotheir already heavily-scheduled work weeks. Knowing about and employing project managementskills
graduate students and learningto develop professional skills. As the MAE was also conducted with students throughout all ofCECAS (n=1174), we are able to compare the results of SPECTRA students with data fromacross the entire college. Preliminary results show some statistically significant differencesbetween SPECTRA students and all of CECAS in subcategories within student sense ofbelonging and future-oriented motivation. The qualitative data from interviews was used tofurther explore these findings.SPECTRA Background The Student Pathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA) programis a NSF funded (Award#1834081) project which aims to accomplish three goals: (1) to provide scholarship opportunities to low-income
identifies undergraduate researchexperiences (UREs) as a high impact practice for increasing student success and retention inSTEM (science, technology, engineering and math) majors [1] [2]. Studies credit undergraduateresearch with benefiting students’ sense of belonging, increasing their interest in graduatestudies, and contributing to their development of attitudes and thinking habits important tosuccess in STEM curricula.The implementation of undergraduate research in a community college engineering transferprogram presents several challenges. Most community college faculty do not lead a technicalresearch program and generally lack the facilities and equipment necessary to do so. Communitycollege students typically have limited availability to
Education, all from the University of Georgia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Quantitative Exploration of Geographic and Demographic Variability in Transfer Student Capital Assets and Supports for Pre-Transfer Engineering Student1. IntroductionStudents beginning their higher education at community colleges transfer and graduate atalarmingly low rates despite the fact that over 80 percent intend to transfer [1]. In fact, onaverage, of every 100 degree seeking community college students only 31 actually transfer to afour-year institution and of those students only 14 earn a bachelor’s degree in six years [1]. Andas alarming as these numbers appear
computable given appropriate relevant informa-tion. Finally, a discussion is provided regarding possible approaches that could be used to ensureessential transfer-related data and information is readily available across the system of higher edu-cation.IntroductionMore than fifty years ago, economist George Akerlof published a paper that explored how thequality of goods exchanged in a market tends to degrade when information asymmetry exists be-tween buyers and sellers.1 Akerlof considered the market for used cars as an example, and hedemonstrated that because buyers are generally not able to distinguish between “cream puffs” and“lemons,” they are only willing to pay a price that corresponds to the average value between thesetwo extremes. This tends
students.Palm Beach State College (PBSC): Serving more than 40,000 students, with 27.5% identifyingas Hispanic and 53% of full-time students eligible for need-based aid. PBSC offers 130 programsand 13 primary areas of study, including Computer Science & Information Technology andScience & Environment. It is a significant producer of Associate degrees and serves as a crucialpathway for students to seamlessly transfer to FAU, a requirement for participation in the presentproject.III. Student Enrollment and Graduation TrendsIII.1 National Trends in 2-Year College Enrollment and Graduation of AA STEM MajorsThe plethora of data and institutional/organizational reports provide clear evidence of the more-than-anticipated impact of Covid-19 not only on
of AI.IntroductionCommunity colleges play a crucial role in advancing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics) education by providing accessible pathways for students from diversebackgrounds to enter and excel in these fields [1]. These institutions offer affordable tuition,flexible scheduling, and a supportive learning environment, making STEM education moreattainable for many individuals who may not have access to traditional four-year universities.Additionally, community colleges often collaborate with local industries to develop specializedprograms tailored to the needs of the regional workforce, ensuring that students graduate withrelevant skills and knowledge. By offering foundational STEM courses, associate degrees
graduation rates. Also, the findings holdthe potential to serve as a benchmark for other MSIs nationwide seeking support and tracking ofBlack transfer students in engineering to promote their educational attainment.IntroductionUpward transfer pathways, which facilitate students' movement from community colleges (CCs)to four-year colleges and universities, are of significant national importance [1]. In science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) programs, the upward transfer pathways increaseSTEM graduates and the capacity of the workforce [2]. In particular, these pathways are pivotalfor 1) Broadening participation in engineering, 2) Increasing the number of future engineers, and3) Promoting educational equity and workforce development in the
specialization in Medical Imaging and Devices. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, engineering pedagogy, and developing career pathways for Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Barriers to Developing Computing Identity in Community College Introductory AI CoursesAs students from diverse backgrounds including different genders, races, socioeconomic status, and agespursue higher education to enter the computing field, community colleges act as a key point of entry totheir education [1], [2]. These programs allow students exposure and experiences relative to thecomputing field to
a four year institution is a well documented challenge forSTEM students [1]. Engineering is a difficult major, and full of systemic barriers for students fromhistorically excluded groups [2,3]. High impact practices have been shown to support students inengineering and STEM disciplines to persist in the major [4,5].Undergraduate research experiences are a type of high impact practice that have consistently been shownto offer benefits to students, including retention. Research experiences for undergraduates are a wellestablished method to support underrepresented students [6–8]. A CURE is a research experience that isincluded in an undergraduate class with the goal of providing an authentic research journey to students[9].Our research team
findings highlight how S-STEM program elements manifest in the lives of low-incomecommunity college transfer engineering students. The findings underscore the need for increasedsupport for students from low-income backgrounds and demonstrate that financial and co-curricular support positions them for greater success. These insights not only inform scholarshipprograms but should also urge educational institutions to actively provide holistic support forstudents on their academic and professional journeys.1. IntroductionThis paper presents initial findings on the impact of the National Science Foundation (NSF)Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) program on community college transfer students pursuingengineering degrees at a four-year university. Transfer
engineering courses and other STEM programs[1-6]. Furthermore, studies indicate that enhanced 3D visualization abilities contribute tohigher retention and graduation rates, especially among underrepresented groups in thefield of engineering [7-12]. New studies add more details to the growing amount ofinformation demonstrating the need to improve the way STEM subjects are taught inschools [13-17].As a result of these obvious needs, a new program has been developed to help prepareparticipants for STEM careers by enhancing various mental skills. The focus on spatialskills was expanded to 3D visualization, analytical abilities, and pattern recognition. Theprogram has been introduced in a previous paper [18] and has seen successfulimplementation in
Pathway”, NISTS Conference, Portland OR. 1/2023; Onate, P., Bassett, E., De Sousa, D., Innovation Conference, ”Texas A&M – Dallas College: A New Way to an Engineering Degree” (3/2023); Cedor, T., Bassett, E., Onate,P. TRACS Summit, ”Promoting Social Capital and Environmental Citizenship: Partnership between A&M, Dallas College, and Chevron.” Bassett, E., De Sousa, D., TACAC Conference ”Alternative Pathways to Engineering Majors” (9/2022).Dr. Cindy Lawley, Texas A&M University Dr. Cindy Lawley is the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Engineering Academic and Outreach Programs and is responsible for the PK-12 Engineering Education Outreach Program, the Engineering Academies Program, the Professional and
institutions in four states tosubsidize 160 internships for community college students.These structured and supported internships consisted of the following best practices:Financial Support 1 ● Stipends of at least $7,000 were provided to participants. Partners recognize that finances are a major barrier to persistence in STEM undergraduate pathways, and many low- income/first-generation students work simultaneously while attending school. Students need a competitive financial incentive to mirror top internships in the field. ● Leveraging funds to pay for internship positions prioritized for STEM Core students. Growth Sector
recipient of the Paul and Judy Bible Teaching Excellence Award, F. Donald Tibbitt’s Distinguished Teaching Award, The Nevada Women’s Fun Woman of Achievement Award, and the UNR College of Engineering Excellence Award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) Projects in the Two-Year College Context: Best Practices for Preparing a ProposalAbstract According to the National Science Foundation website, the Directorates for Engineering(ENG) and STEM Education (EDU) fund projects through the Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) program to support “revolutionary new approaches to engineering education[1]”. Within the RED Program, funding
their STEM courses and 59% were retained the following year,a 22% gap in 1-year retention compared to the institution overall.Although the retention rate is above average, there is data that shows students in critical coursepairings, such as Physics 1—Calc 1 have a difficult time when taking both courses during thesame semester, which is often the case for many STEM majors. There we investigate howstudents are utilizing support services to increase their academic achievements.Literature Review and Theoretical FrameworkEarly studies on student retention heavily emphasized the role of an individual students’personality, abilities, motivation, and shortcomings (Berger et al, 2012; Habley et al, 2012; Tinto,1993;). Vincent Tinto criticized these
project was developed through a collaboration between two community college faculty atCuesta College in San Luis Obispo, California as part of an LSAMP (Louis Stokes for MinorityParticipation in STEM) NSF grant. The overall goal of the grant is to support traditionallyunderserved students majoring in STEM succeed at the community college and to transfer into afour-year institution as STEM majors. One of the main pillars of the program is to expose studentsat the community college level to undergraduate research so that when they transfer, they have hadequitable access to similar experiences as their university and white student counterparts.The framework presented is supported by research that shows that 1) undergraduate research is ahigh impact