Conference Session

WIED Olio

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder; Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder; Wendy C. Chi, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

analysis, we argue FemProf supports inclusion of women into the engineeringcommunity, and makes explicit the pathway to the professoriate.IntroductionScience in United States contexts has historically been the domain of Caucasian/white males.1, 2With declining enrollments in science and engineering fields in higher education acrossdemographic groups, efforts to increase student diversity have become not only an issue ofequity, but also an issue of fulfilling the industry‘s need for qualified candidates. Multipleprogrammatic efforts have formed to address the disparity in science and engineering byattempting to develop inclusive learning communities that support gender and racial diversity.3, 4At the same time, many concerned with equity in science

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie Fabert, Arizona State University; Marilyn Cabay, Ph.D., Argosy University, Phoenix; Melissa B Rivers, Arizona State University; Mary Lee Smith, Arizona State University; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

life narratives.1 Interview questions included“grand” and “mini-tour” questions, eliciting the chronology of events (e.g. “What happened priorto this event?” “What happened next?” “How did you react?”), and focusing on recent incidentsto elicit as much rich, accurate detail as possible and emphasize actions and events (as opposedto interpretations or judgments). Recommendations by Charmaz (2006) for building rapport, Page 22.660.5maintaining the dignity of the participants, and ensuring a positive interviewing experience forthe participants (e.g., appropriate, timely, probing techniques, validating the perspectives of theparticipants) were also

Conference Session

Myths About Gender and Race

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

in engineering educationresearch on underrepresentation. We find it important to remind the engineering educationresearch community of the theoretical and methodological limitations of homogenous reliance onone metaphor to guide research studies. This paper critically explores the discourse of “pipeline”as an aim to (re)introduce to engineering education researchers both the method of discourseanalysis as well as alternative metaphorical frameworks. We use empirical data collected forADVANCE Purdue’s Academic Career Pathways study using oral history and participatoryresearch methods to explore the consequences of pipeline metaphor’s predominance. These dataare the academic stories of STEM faculty and help us explore: 1) what theoretical

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Lauren Marie Glogiewicz, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Page 22.722.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 First-Year Women on the Engineering Pathway: Research Strategies to Support RetentionIntroductionThis research was initiated to address two disturbing trends seen in undergraduate education atthe national level and an equally disturbing trend within our own university, the University ofColorado at Boulder. While women have historically been underrepresented in STEM fields,the number of women in the biological and life sciences has grown to nearly one half, andnearly one third of chemists are women; nevertheless, women compose less than 15% of theengineering population.1 Additionally, the proportion of women over

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria M. Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic University; Martha Elicia Beltran-Martinez, Organization of American States, Office of Science, Technology, and Innovation

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Page 22.737.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Gender and Engineering in the Americas ABSTRACTThe Organization of American States proclaimed the year 2010 as ¨The Inter-American Year of Women¨ 1 tocommemorate the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the Inter-American Program on the Promotion of Women’sHuman Rights and Gender Equity and Equality, as well as the 35th anniversary of the first United Nations’ WorldConference on Women during the International Women’s Year, and the 15th anniversary of the last UnitedNations’ World Conference on Women celebrated in Beijing in 1995. The intent of the proclamation was tobroadly

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Linda Barrington, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Manuel A Heredia, University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

% students said they were muchmore interested, or somewhat more interested, in pursuing engineering/ technology careers.MethodologyThe basic research question addressed is whether service-learning can attract and keepunderrepresented groups in engineering education programs. The population studied is the entireundergraduate student body at a medium-sized college of engineering at a state university. Theenrollment for the 2009-2010 academic year is estimated at 1271 full time students (institutionalresearch department). The “treatment” is the integration of S-L courses into existing requiredcore courses in five departments over the last six years.The number and timing of the courses with S-L projects is summarized in Figure 1, which is bestviewed in

Conference Session

Myths About Gender and Race

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M Riley, Smith College; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

theory have been slow to enter the world ofengineering education, yet they offer some important leaps forward for the engineering educationcommunity. In particular, they bring to light some problematic assumptions or myths thatinfluence our framing of “the problem,” our development of research questions, our studydesigns, and our interpretation of findings.This paper examines three myths of gender and race that operate in engineering education, anduses a review of the literature as well as findings from the authors’ research to address them.Myth 1: Gender Difference and Gender EssentialismWhen engineering education researchers study gender, they often construct studies to look fordifference. Studies reviewing the literature on why women are

Conference Session

WIED Olio

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University; Lori L. Bakken, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

enable women faculty to participate in a supportive andnurturing work environment, thus enhancing job satisfaction, research productivity, andretention. It utilizes Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT [1]) as an underlying theoreticalframework, which suggests that self-efficacious beliefs strongly influence a person’s jobperformance and career persistence and are shaped by 1) personal success experiences, 2)exposure to successful role models, 3) social and verbal persuasive communication, and 4)maintaining a positive work environment. Based on this theoretical framework, an analysis ofinstitutional data and a detailed climate survey, the goals of the ADVANCEing Faculty programare to:1) strengthen the gender-neutrality of the climate by

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elaine R. Millam, University of Saint Thomas; Ronald J. Bennett, Univeristy of Saint Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Page 22.460.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 1 Developing Leadership Capacity in Working Adult Women Technical Graduate Students Research Interview Results with AlumniAbstract While women continue to make progress in their overall representation in the business sector, there are many challenges that keep women from making advances in their careers as science and engineering leaders. Those professions that have long been male dominated are making the slowest gains. Even though female representation in the engineering profession is

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mara R. London, Gonzaga University; Jillian Rae Cadwell, Gonzaga University; Alexander Maxwell, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

toolis three-fold, (1) women in engineering study abroad at approximately twice the rate of men4, (2)a desire to support the university’s mission to provide service in remote parts of Africa5, and (3)the opportunity to incorporate into the curriculum a direct connection between engineering andpublic service.Program DevelopmentDevelopment of a quality study abroad program, let alone one in a remote area, requires asubstantial amount of planning and navigation. During the summer of 2010, two civilengineering faculty, one recent alumnus, and one staff member spent five weeks traveling andresearching in communities throughout Zambia, Africa, to investigate program potential. Anassessment of program feasibility was made at three potential sites: the

Conference Session

Retaining Women Engineering Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology; Suzanne Brainard, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

implemented the following protocol.Quantitative SurveyThe PACE questionnaire included questions in the following categories: Quality of Teaching,Professors, Teaching Assistants, Labs, Resources, Student Interaction, Extracurricular Activities,Personal Experience, Perceptions of Engineering Careers, Perceptions of Engineering Major,Confidence and Demographic Information. In addition, Personal Experience included ninequestions relevant to sensitive issues such as sex and race discrimination and harassment.In recognition of the varying Institutional Review Board rules that regulate the release of studentdata, we created four survey administration options from which each institution could choose.They included 1) school hosts survey, school samples

Conference Session

Retaining Women Engineering Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Stephanie Jaros, University of Washington; Suzanne Brainard, University of Washington; Susan Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the impact of gender for eachrace/ethnicity group? What is the impact of race/ethnicity for each gender group? This analysisexamines four main concept areas which measure student perceptions of their experiences,abilities and likelihood of leaving engineering: professor-student interactions, student-studentinteractions, self-confidence and risk of attrition.These questions are increasingly relevant as a result of expected demographic shifts in the USpopulation. The US Census Bureau projects that by 2050 all ethnic minority groups willcomprise 54 percent of the United States population.1 This will be a major shift from 2008 whenminorities made up one-third of the US population. Another demographic shift is related to thepercentage of women

Conference Session

How to Get Published: Tips from Journal Editors

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bevlee Watford, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Education will be a catalyst for the scholarship ofteaching and learning in support of the efforts of the Process Education Academy to transformhigher education. The mission of the Journal are to provide a forum for, and an archivalrecord of, scholarly research in process education, to elevate skills in the discipline of thescholarship of teaching and learning, to explore promising new research areas in processeducation and to foster classroom-based research. The guiding principles of the Journal are (1)all faculty, staff, administrators and students can contribute to classroom research, (2) everyresearcher’s methods can be continuously improved, (3) the term “classroom” is a metaphor forall learning environments (4) mentorship can accelerate the

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna M. Zajicek, University of Arkansas; Shauna A. Morimoto, University of Arkansas; Joseph Rencis, University of Arkansas; Valerie H. Hunt, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

supporting the groundwork necessary to transforminstitutional practices systemically, the Institutional Transformation Awards seek to createpositive, sustainable, and permanent change in academic climates.”15The NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation (IT) program was initiated in 2001 with theobjectives 1) to increase the representation of women in STEM; and, 2) to encourageorganizations to implement institutional changes that would empower women scientists to fullyparticipate in STEM disciplines. Since 2001, 37 institutions of higher education have receivedthe NSF ADVANCE IT awards totaling over $130M,i and 19 have completed their five-yearprojects. Although the nature of ADVANCE IT projects varies among universities, theircommon purpose is to

Conference Session

Effective Methods for Recruiting Women to Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleanor M. Jaffee, Smith College; Donna Riley, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

three sections: 1) Identity, which explored students‟ conceptions of themselves andtheir fields of study; 2) Path, which asked students to describe their academic choices andinfluences; and, 3) Process, which focused on students‟ experiences of learning. For the presentproject, we used data from the Identity and Path sections only.Student researchers conducted interviews with student participants from the Fall 2005 throughthe Spring 2009 semesters. Interviews were then transcribed in electronic form, and linked to anAtlas.ti database (known as a Hermeneutic Unit or HU) for qualitative analysis. In addition, toprovide context for the study, demographic information collected from participants was enteredinto an SPSS database to generate

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keisha Walters, Mississippi State University; Soumya Srivastava, Mississippi State University; Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University; Jacqueline Hall, Mississippi State University; Kaela Leonard, Michigan Technological University; Amy Parker, Mississippi State University; Heather Thomas, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

colleges.IntroductionIn 2006, total U.S. graduate school enrollment in engineering was 123,041 students with 27,944(22.71%) female students1. A National Science Foundation (NSF) survey showed that thenumber of doctoral degrees earned annually by men in engineering fields almost tripled from2,370 in 1978 to 6,164 in 2008. The number of doctoral degrees earned by women increasedfrom 53 (2.2%) to 1,688 (21.5%) over the same time period, a 10-fold change over 30 years2.These numbers lag dramatically behind the life sciences where females earned 52.9% of doctoraldegrees in 20083. For chemical engineering, in 2006 there were 7,261 graduate students in 2006of which 2,159 (29.73%)1. A slightly lower percentage of graduated female Ph.D. chemicalengineers was recorded at

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Grant, North Carolina State University; Jessica Decuir-Gunby, North Carolina State University; Barbara Smith, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Page 15.129.4Engineering Faculty” concluded that: “Faculty diversity at post-secondary institutions can be 3achieved with thoughtfully conceived and executed programs for recruiting and retainingscience and engineering faculty from underrepresented minority groups.” (National ScienceBoard, 2004).The following table summarizes the updated data found in the aforementioned Nelson reports in2005 and 2007:Table 1: Female URM Faculty at “Top 50”* Science and Engineering Departments (FY2002/ FY 2007)). Native American Hispanic Black females

Conference Session

Research and Funding Opportunities

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of questions for the panelists have also been formulated and responses were requestedfrom the panelists but due to time constraints and other commitments by the panelists, noresponses have been received.Panelists and Possible QuestionsThe panelists who have already confirmed attendance at the panel are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Panelists who will be attending the panel Name Agency Represented Larry Weber or another Office of International Science and representative Engineering National Science Foundation Jennifer Keller Jackson or National Collegiate Inventors and

Conference Session

Myths About Gender and Race

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carroll Suzanne Seron, University of California, Irvine; Erin A. Cech, University of California, San Diego; Susan S. Silbey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Brian Rubineau, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

Science in Cognitive Science from MIT. Professor Rubineau’s research focuses on the informal social dynamics that generate and perpetuate in- equalities in organizations. This focus has yielded three primary research streams: (1) referral dynamics and job segregation, (2) social network effects and sex segregation in engineering, and (3) professional socialization of physicians and racial disparities in patient care. The first stream, referral dynamics and job segregation, explores practices and policies organizations can implement to reduce the segregating effects of recruitment using word-of-mouth referrals. The second stream, social networks and sex segregation in engineering, scrutinizes the role of a person’s

Conference Session

Reports from ADVANCE Institutions

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan Rinehart, Rice University; Eden B. King, George Mason University; Mikki Hebl, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, Perspectives of IO Psychology, and Group and Organization Management, integrates organizational and social psychological theories in conceptualizing social stigma and the work-life interface. This research addresses three primary themes: 1) current manifestations of discrimination and barriers to work-life bal- ance in organizations, 2) consequences of such challenges for its targets and their workplaces, and 3) individual and organizational strategies for reducing discrimination and increasing support for families. In addition to her academic positions, Dr. King has consulted on applied projects related to climate ini- tiatives, selection systems, and diversity training programs, and has worked as a trial consultant. She is

Conference Session

Reports from ADVANCE Institutions

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Susan Ruth Geier, Purdue University; Chris Sahley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

ADVANCE-Purdue, focuses on developing programming andimplementing activities for the success of all faculty designed around three goals: 1) to increasethe number of women of color in STEM faculty positions, 2) to improve the success of allwomen STEM faculty, and 3) to engage all faculty in transforming the institution. ADVANCE-Purdue continually provides the campus leadership with evidence of program effectiveness thatwill offer a basis for campus-wide changes to policy and practice.Ultimately, PCFS seeks to support all women faculty in their career paths and hence developedthe Leadership Institute (LI). The goal of the LI is to provide leadership developmentopportunities and enhance the success for post-tenure faculty, with a focus on STEM

Conference Session

Survival Tips from the Trenches

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lantz, Trine University; Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University; Donna Reese, Mississippi State University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

habits!2. For important initiatives, do your research and practice your pitch so that you can sell the idea to the appropriate individuals. If that person is a #3, don’t accept ‘no’ for an answer; look for other solutions and talk to other administrators (see #3).1. Enjoy your chosen profession. Be as efficient as possible during the time you have set aside for work. Rate each day according to #5 and compliment yourself for the productive items accomplished that day. During the times you have set aside for family, don’t spend time worrying about work. When you are out on a date with your husband/significant other, put 100 percent of your attention into being in love. When you

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Katie Corner, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Amber Shoals, University of Colorado, Boulder; Cindy Cabrales, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

women; nevertheless, women compose less than 15% of theengineering population.1 Additionally, the proportion of women over the last 20 years hasmerely grown 5%, despite numerous efforts including scholarships, curriculum improvements,and mentorship programs across the country.2 The declining retention rates in universities andslow growth occurs in spite of the fact that overall, the qualifications of women tend to be equalor slightly better than their male counterparts.3The university tracks undergraduate student six-year graduation rate by gender. Upon enteringa degree program in the College of Engineering and Applied Science, student progress ismonitored for up to six years. The figure below illustrates a concerning trend within thecollege

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erika Murguia, Arizona State University; Erin Kube, Arizona State University; Jennifer Bekki, Arizona State University Polytechnic; Bianca Bernstein, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, P.T., Volkwein, J.F., Peterson, G.D. (2001). The changing face of engineering education. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. 36(2).11. Latucca, L.R., Voigt, L.J.(2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23-48.12. Ali, F. (2009). Psychologists without borders: a graduate student perspective on interdisciplinary research. APS Observer. 22(10).13. Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary learning: process and outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27(2), 95-111

Conference Session

Effective Methods for Recruiting Women to Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna Milgram, Institute for Women in Trades, Technology and Science (IWITTS); Daniella Severs, Institute for Women in Trades, Technology and Science (IWITTS)

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

―Google/online‖ to ―was inspired by my father and theneed to support my daughter‖ and ―looked at a game education magazine.‖ The recruitmentportion is the smallest section of the survey because the larger focus of the survey is to informinstructors and administrators what retention strategies students are experiencing, which theyfind most helpful and which strategies they are not experiencing but would most like toexperience.What follows in Figure 1 is the ―Retention Activity/Strategy‖ portion only of the ―Survey ofFemale Technology Course Students‖ (aggregate across seven colleges of the eight colleges, asCity College of San Francisco did not participate

Conference Session

Women In Engineering Poster Session / WEPAN Knowledge Center / Women in Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

C. Diane Matt, WEPAN Inc.; Jenna Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; Jane Langeman, Langeman Consulting; Lori DuBois, DuBois Information

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, whether directly orindirectly related. The true power of social networking is the reach and depth of communicationin an unforced, timely manner.WEPAN Knowledge Center and Professional CommunityThe WKC was launched in June, 2009, providing an organized and annotated digital venue forselected information resources for women in STEM community. In addition, a professionalcommunity was established providing an arena for professional interactions among like-mindedpeers. Development of the WKC was funded by NSF grant #0648210.(www.wepanknowledgecenter.org/)Figure 1. WEPAN Knowledge Center Homepage Screenshot.From the WKC homepage, a web visitor can locate and view over 800 (as of November 2009)information resources in the WKC information repository

Conference Session

WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cate Samuelson, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Candice L. Staples, University of Maryland; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Amelink, Virginia Tech Page 24.872.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Living, Learning, and Staying: The Impact of a Women in Engineering Living and Learning CommunityAbstractA number of studies highlight living and learning communities (LLCs) as a factor contributing tostudent persistence, particularly in STEM programs.1-3 For several years, the University ofMaryland – College Park has housed Flexus: The Dr. Marilyn Berman Pollans Women inEngineering Living and Learning Community. This LLC is solely for first and second yearwomen, who are in vital years of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janis P. Terpenny, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

from the fictional character Mary Poppinsare used to describe a variety of approaches and methods that have been developed andimplemented for effective leadership in academia by the author, a woman who is an engineeringdepartment chair (head) and director of a large national industry/university cooperative researchcenter. Following an introduction that includes background and motivation, a brief review of theliterature on academic leadership and gender differences in leadership is presented. Threeprimary approaches are then described, including: 1) know your organization, 2) fostercollaboration, a sense of team and community, and 3) serve as an example of excellence. Detailsof several methods and strategies are provided for implementing each

Conference Session

WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Morgan Irvin, Washington University in St. Louis; Elizabeth Hiteshue, University of Pennsylvania; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Sheldon Hochheiser, IEEE History Center; Michael Geselowitz, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, thereby increasing female participation in STEM.The STEM Education Project combines hands-on STEM research with unique mentoring withdistinguished STEM leaders to provide an environment that is supportive of both the researchand career for the participating female undergraduate students. As background, in 2012, YaleUniversity research showed that “science’s subtle gender biases favor male students.”1 Asrecently as July, 2013, three members of the U.S. House of Representatives wrote to theGovernment Accountability Office to express concern about the state of female participation inSTEM fields, since “federal money supports about 60 percent of the research performed atuniversities, at a cost of $36.6 billion in 2011, in addition to more than $40

Conference Session

From Industry to the Academy - Female Faculty Boundary Spanners Offering and Gaining Perspective

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Diana Bairaktarova, The University of Oklahoma; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering