Displaying results 31 - 42 of 42 in total
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →
- Conference Session
- WIED: Medley
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Helene Finger P.E., California Polytechnic State University; Alana Christine Snelling
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Focus on Faculty
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Keisha Walters, Mississippi State University; Soumya Srivastava, Mississippi State University; Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University; Jacqueline Hall, Mississippi State University; Kaela Leonard, Michigan Technological University; Amy Parker, Mississippi State University; Heather Thomas, Mississippi State University
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
ratings of importance do not track the rankings precisely, but still demonstrate thatthe students viewed all topics as beneficial. Page 15.753.14 Figure 1: Average student s Likerrt ratings forr identical prre- (pixeled, grey shorterr columns) and apost-courrse (red talleer columns) assessment a q
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Stephen Secules, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
like a surprise to me that it was kind of like that. I was excited for the class. But what I saw that really what I was spending my time on was just trial and error and making things work. If we had time to like pull apart the fan and be like oh look there's the gear that actually makes the Q run. Or like there's the point that like sends the signal, um. I don't. It doesn't give me any negative connotation on engineering whatsoever. S: You just don't think that this represents R: Engineering S: (Laughs) R: No. No. S: You just think Page 26.1582.13 R: To me it's just kind of one
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ari Turrentine, VentureWell
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Sarah Morton; Nehal I. Abu-lail, Washington State University; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Julie A. Kmec, Washington State University; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Perspectives for Women Faculty
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jennifer Sheridan, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Eve Fine, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jessica Winchell, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Christine Pribbenow, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Molly Carnes, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jo Handelsman, University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
. Page 12.1257.6In evaluation surveys, some participants reported that the discussion and interactionaspects of the workshop had a positive effect on their learning experience. As oneparticipant noted, “I think the conversations and Q&A can be the most valuable parts of aworkshop like this – providing committee members time and opportunity (and direction)to think about key issues.” Others commented that they found the active discussions andinteractions both enjoyable and productive. One respondent noted that, “I liked thelocalizing of facilitators at each table and the back-and-forth between localized discussionand whole-room discussion.” Another commented that, “I found the mix of presentationand discussion … [to be] valuable for me.” A
- Conference Session
- Recruitment and Retention Topics
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rose Mary Cordova-Wentling, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign; Steven Thomas, Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Recruitment & Retention of Women I
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Lois Calian Trautvetter, Northwestern University; Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri, Columbia; Lisa R. Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Katie L. Piacentini, University of Missouri - Columbia; David B. Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Anna M. Zajicek, University of Arkansas; Shauna A. Morimoto, University of Arkansas; Joseph Rencis, University of Arkansas; Valerie H. Hunt, University of Arkansas
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
, Ward12 notes that “[q]ualified women applicants are not given theopportunity to become engineering faculty because it is presumed that women will not have thetime to serve as effective members of the professoriate given their family obligations.” Womenwho do join the faculty ranks experience “bias, lack of professionalism shown toward womenfaculty […], visibility/invisibility, patronization, faculty spouse issues, and other women notacknowledging women engineers.”13 The prevalent cultural norm “assumes a work week of morethan fifty hours a week, which continues to exclude women who have child care obligations,”12further hampering the advancement of women faculty.Over the years, research showing the effects of the institutional culture and
- Conference Session
- PANEL: After #MeToo: What’s next for Women in the Engineering Workplace?
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jennifer J VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Clemson University; Joanna Wright, University of Washington
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →