2006-1145: WHERE THE GIRLS ARE: APPLYING AN INTEGRATEDMARKETING APPROACH TO ATTRACT GIRLS INTO ENGINEERINGPROGRAMSPat Pyke, Boise State University Patricia Pyke is the Director of Special Programs for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman experience, retention, math support, mentoring, and women’s programs. She earned a B.S.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University and a Master’s degree in journalism from the University of California at Berkeley.Leandra Aburusa-Lete, Boise State University Leandra Aburusa-Lete is the Student Support Coordinator for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She earned a B.S. degree in
company based in Radford, where she held multiple roles of increasing responsibility dur- ing her nine years there. While at Kollmorgen Robin worked with Shingijutsu Global Consulting experts from Japan and earned black belts in the DBS kaizen areas of Standard Work and 5S and traveled globally to qualify suppliers in Asia and Europe. Most recently Robin worked as Senior Director of Project Man- agement for a small bio-tech company, Intrexon, located in the VT Corporate Research Center and had the opportunity to introduce manufacturing principles into a highly specialized DNA production facility. Since joining the faculty at her Alma Mater in 2015, Robin has been coordinating and teaching the Cap- stone Senior Design
binder for students.There are also usually two Team Tech Directors who are also selected via an application andinterview process. They are responsible for finding a corporate partner, selecting the project andstudent team members, managing the scope, schedule and budget of a year long, multi-disciplinary project and presenting the project at the SWE National ConferenceThe last position in this core is the Professional Section Liaison. She is the contact between theSWE student section and the SWE Central Coast Professional Section. She organizesprofessional/student events and works with the professional section to organize events to reachout to the community to educate them about engineering possibilities/disciplines.Campus Relations CoreThe
websites that achieve project and organization objectives.Greta Zornes, Tulane University© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Greta Zornes recently completed her PhD in Environmental Health Sciences at Tulane University in New Orleans. She is active in Engineers Without Borders and is currently involved in a project in the community of Amayo, Nicaragua. Currently a fellow at the National Academy of Engineering, Greta is working with the Diversity in the Engineering Workforce (DEW) program supporting the Engineer Girl and Engineer Your Life projects. Greta is employed as an engineering consultant with CH2M HILL
AC 2009-1712: ASSESSING PEER ATTITUDES AMONG STEM STUDENTS ANDTHEIR POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON THE RETENTION OF FEMALES IN STEMPROGRAMSKristian Trampus, University of Texas, TylerFredericka Brown, University of Texas, TylerMichael Odell, University of Texas, Tyler Page 14.243.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessing Peer Attitudes Among STEM students and The Potential Effects on The Retention of Females in STEM ProgramsIntroductionOne of the major socio-technological changes in the United States is that of a growing diversityof workforce. Demographic projections show the traditional pool that supplies today’stechnological workforce
Engineering Equity Extension Project and served as a curriculum consultant on a National Science Foundation Gender Equity grant. She also co-authored the Engineering Connections to STEM document published by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. She is currently serving on a commit- tee with the National Academy of Engineering, Guiding the Implementation of K-12 Engineering. Page 26.248.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessing the GRIT of Incoming Engineering Students In the fall of 2014, the College of Engineering at NC State University
features. The initiative, a project involving students, faculty, and administration of theUniversity of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS), will be directed bythe Center for Diversity in Engineering (CDE). It is scheduled for launch in AY 2006-7.Keywords: Recruitment, retention, support, female engineering studentsIntroductionThe percentage of undergraduate female engineering students enrolled at the University ofVirginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS) has remained static at or around25% since 1994, regardless of strong recruitment and retention efforts primarily led by theCenter for Diversity in Engineering (CDE), formerly known as the Office of Minority Programs.SEAS also has the lowest
AC 2007-202: ELEMENTS OF THE WORK ENVIRONMENT THATCONTRIBUTE TO THE ABILITY OF ENGINEERING FACULTY TO MANAGEWORK-LIFE TENSIONSElizabeth Creamer, Virginia Tech Elizabeth Creamer is a Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation and Director of Research and Assessment for the ADVANCE VT project at Virginia Tech. She is the co-PI or PI of over $1.5 million in grants from the National Science Foundation that address issues of women's under-representation in science and engineering. She teaches graduate courses in mixed methods and qualitative research methods.Margaret Layne, Virginia Tech Margaret (Peggy) Layne is the Director of the ADVANCE VT Project at Virginia Tech and a doctoral
-gineering coursework, independent studies, research, and extracurricular activities, students areassigned projects and assignments that require or would benefit from makerspace tools. Addition-ally, students use makerspace tools for entrepreneurial, personal, and creative endeavors.There are two parts of this study: an online survey and an interview. Undergraduate engineeringparticipants at Duke University were recruited via email, specifically targeting engineering affinitygroups, engineering extracurricular clubs, and engineering course listservs, as this was an easyway to reach a large population of engineering undergraduate students. Once a student expressedinterest in participating in the study, they completed a survey. This survey was
. Page 14.1111.2Here we should briefly note that there are several different definitions of multidisciplinaryresearch [4], [5], [6]. The terms multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary are often usedinterchangeably, but Borrego & Newswander [3] have provided an excellent discussion of theseterms in the context of engineering education research. They define multidisciplinarycollaborations as those where “collaborators come together to work on a problem, each bringinghis or her own expertise and unique contribution. There is limited exchange of information inthis approach … collaborators leave the project without having learned much about the otherdiscipline(s)” (p.124). On the other hand interdisciplinary collaborations are defined as
40.0% 0 0.0% African-American 2 5.0% 5 12.5% Hispanic 1 2.5% 2 5.0% International 1 2.5% 0 0.0% Asian/Pacific 7 17.5% 3 7.5% Islander Other (Hindu) 1 2.5% 0 0.0% The summer research program was structured such that students were required to meetseveral criteria. The students were to work at least 40 hours per week with a professor and/orgraduate student on a project of choice that corresponded to his/her interests
engineering at nine institutions distributed throughout the U.S. Thepreliminary sample of institutions consisted of nine institutions that supplied a letter fromthe dean of a college or school of engineering to accompany a grant applicationindicating their willingness to participate in the project and to designate an institutionalliaison to work with the project over the course of two years. Using information from2003 Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges16, private and publicinstitutions were selected based on the number and percentage of women completing anundergraduate engineering degree in 2003. From among institutions graduating at least50 female engineers in 2003, we labeled a group of universities as “high” where
women’s roles are alsoaddressed in the course through selection of speakers with a variety of personal/professional lifesolutions as well as supporting materials from the USU ADVANCE Institutional TransformationAward. To overcome the small number of freshmen women interested in engineering, data fromthe Women’s Experiences in College Engineering project is shared to help the studentsunderstand their feelings are typically aligned with a larger body of female students across thecountry. Student reflections acquired through required essay questions and examinations arepresented to help understand whether their career choices are influenced by conservativeattitudes toward family and women’s roles. Preliminary retention data is
Engineering on the Engineering Equity Extension Project and served as a curriculum consultant on a National Science Foundation Gender Equity grant. She also co-authored the Engineering Connections to STEM document published by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. She is currently serving on a commit- tee with the National Academy of Engineering, Guiding the Implementation of K-12 Engineering.Dr. Katherine C Titus-Becker, North Carolina State University Kathy Titus-Becker has worked in Higher Education for the past 20 years. She currently is the Director of the Women in Science and Engineering at NC State University
gain motivation, revitalize interest, and eventually obtain their desired career.One of the most important aspects of the three phase approach is that it facilitated a cycle ofmentorship in which the mentee eventually became the mentor. Additionally, the methodincluded exceptional teachers, opportunities for experience, the chance for women to start earlyin cybersecurity, and a supportive environment that encouraged women to pursue STEM fields.Despite insufficient data regarding this method, it is substantial progress towards successfullyrecruiting and retaining women in cybersecurity.The research project Computer Clubs for Girls also showed promise 11. Created in England,Computer Clubs for Girls is an all-girl environment aimed to
, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research in- terests are dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing.James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of
of robots can attract new female students to computerscience and engineering. As a result of this research, and our experience hosting the BESTRobotics competition, we conducted one-week Robotics Day Camps for young women enteringthe ninth, tenth and eleventh grades; one camp was offered at the North Texas Research Park inDenton and a second at a second UNT campus in south Dallas. The motivation for these campswas to increase the number of women selecting computer engineering as a field of study.The Robotics Camps were organized around team, project-oriented activities that utilize anumber of mobile resources, including laptops and the BOE-BOT (Board of Education BasicStamp Microcontroller Carrier Board produced by Parallax
involvesinterdisciplinary cooperation around a series of projects often with real-world outcomes.Teambuilding skills are taught and evaluated as part of the curriculum. The research reported inthis paper studied the students’ affective responses to the teamwork, their preference for groupover individual learning, the effect of gender composition of their clinic teams on women’sattitudes to group work, and the relationship between their attitudes toward group work and theirevaluation of other aspects of the engineering program and their intentions to persist inengineering in the future. Data were collected as part of an ongoing survey initiated as a NationalScience Foundation funded project and continued under the sponsorship of the College ofEngineering and the
: prejudice and the perceivedtechnocratic image are so deeply rooted that modifications and modernizations are often barelynoticed. Modernization of these studies should therefore be accompanied by the development ofcompletely new models for technology-oriented studies explicitly addressing the interests ofwomen, in particular concerning inter- and multidisciplinary aspects.The project GENESIS, located at Technische Universität Berlin, funded by the European SocialFund, is developing several models of co-educative, gender-sensitive model-courses within thethree major areas of natural sciences, computer sciences and engineering. These courses andtheir underlying concepts will be presented in this talk.1. Introduction: The Image of Technological
Paper ID #13149Understanding the Relationship between Living-Learning Communities andSelf-Efficacy of Women in EngineeringMs. Elaine Zundl, Douglass Residential College, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Elaine Zundl is Assistant Dean at Douglass Residential College and Director of the Douglass Project for Rutgers Women in Math, Science, and Engineering. She specializes in designing programs that pro- mote an inclusive climate for women in STEM at Rutgers. Her experience includes serving on projects that recruit and retain women in engineering and computing especially through co-curricular learning interventions
in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at
Paper ID #33351Engineering Curriculum Rooted in Active Learning: Does It PromoteEngagement and Persistence for Women?Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago Leanne Kallemeyn, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in Research Methodologies at Loyola University Chicago. She teaches graduate-level courses in program evaluation, qualitative research methods, and mixed methods. She has been the PI on seven major evaluation projects that ranged from one to five years in length. Her scholarship focuses on practitioners’ data use and evaluation capacity building within non-profits through coaching. She received a Bachelors in
-technical work and lose the opportunity to gaintechnical skills.9 Second, marginalization can occur when the contributions of underrepresentedteam members are overlooked by instructors or peers. Third, students might feel marginalizedwhen their ideas and input are only accepted when they are proposed or validated by a senior ordominant member from the team.10 Fourth, students from non-dominant groups may experiencemarginalization when projects are not relevant to their culture, community, or lived experiences.Several strategies were proposed to improve the experiences of marginalized students on teams,including changing personal beliefs by recognizing biases and how an individual’s experience isshaped by factors such as ethnicity, gender and socio
butthere are differences. Sustainability of a program can be achieved with external funding and noinstitutional support. Institutionalization is achieved when the university makes a “permanent”financial commitment (i.e. line item) to a project or some aspect thereof. Ideally, a college oruniversity could and would fully fund and completely institutionalize a project like ADVANCE.However given budget constraints, it is most likely that a combination of sustainability andinstitutionalization is necessary for ADVANCE and projects like it to continue at the institutionallevel.In this preliminary study, the authors draw on conceptual frameworks of institutionalization andinstitutional theory to analyze issues of sustainability and institutionalization
are underrepresented, inthe exploding new nanotechnology field under the direction of faculty at UVa who bringexpertise from a wide variety of scientific and technological disciplines. This paper reviews themotivations behind the program’s development, discusses the objectives and structure of theprogram, and finally analyzes the program’s impact on the participants’ future aspirations.Background on Engineering Study in the U.S.:According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the top four projected fastest growingprofessional occupations in the U.S. through 2008 require training in engineering and science. Ofthe remaining top ten, only two do not require technological training.1 However, the overallpercentage of science and engineering
, practices, and cultures that reflect expandedperspectives on gender, diversity, and intersectional identities. In order to better understand the role(s) of such a course in an engineering student'seducation and how engineering education considers these issues, the instructor team invited twoundergraduate researchers to undertake projects in support of these goals. One of these students(Amber Levine) was tasked with identifying other courses across the U.S. with similar subjectmatter and learning objectives (“EEL Related Courses Study”); she found 13 courses acrosstwelve institutions that connected issues of diversity and culture to engineering and were targetedto engineering students (Levine, 2016). The other student (Chloe Wiggins, who is
institutions including Rice University in Houston, the University of Edinburgh in Scotland and the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. While at MCPHS Shelley was awarded the National Association of College Student Personnel 2004 Best Practices in International Education and Learning award.Stephanie Blaisdell, Independent Consultant STEPHANIE BLAISDELL is a consultant for women in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematic) projects, based in Memphis, TN. She directed women in engineering programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and Arizona State University and has authored over 30 publications on the topic of girls and women and STEM. Stephanie co-directed
. Susan served as principal investigator or co-principal investigator of several national projects including: Project to Assess Climate in Engineering (PACE), a current study involving 25 universities; FacultyfortheFuture.org, a website designed to support women and underrepresented minorities interested in pursuing faculty positions in the STEM fields; Achieving Success in Academia, a program to assist junior women faculty to navigate the tenure system; Making the Connection, an initiative designed to increase awareness of engineering among students in grades 3-12; and Increasing Access for Women in Engineering, a curriculum and technical assistance project to establish or
way. I can never see you doing that, and I took that as an insult. Like, it hurt my feelings because … he's, like, I picture you going into fashion design or something like that. [92208_430]In other cases, biases manifest themselves in subtle ways as women find themselves workingwith men who don’t seem to quite trust them or have confidence in their abilities, but don’t makeovert comments: I just got a lot of felling a lot of times, like, I did a good bit of that project, and I feel like a lot of times the stuff I did was, like, second guessed, like a lot of them went back and checked it. There was one guy in the group particularly that never took any of my ideas…..[In another group] we had to come up with a list of solutions
Page 26.616.2more as a metaphor for conveying students’ experience of disappointment than to insinuatemalicious intent.(i)In K-12 engineering programs, the overwhelming curricular emphasis is on engaging, design-based classroom activities: open-ended, hands-on projects requiring creative synthesis acrossmultiple domains of knowledge on the part of the student.1 In university engineering programs,students confront an educational philosophy that can be characterized as exclusionary and builtupon a “fundamentals first” approach to learning:2 analytically rigorous, rote learning of basicprinciples in math and science (e.g., calculus, chemistry, physics) followed by engineeringsciences (e.g. statics, fluid dynamics) followed by engineering analysis