AC 2007-1602: FEMALE STUDENT VIEWS ABOUT IT CAREERS IN HIGHSCHOOL AND COLLEGECarol Burger, Virginia Tech Carol J. Burger, Associate Professor, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Virginia Tech, USA. She is the coordinator for the Science and Gender Equity Program at Virginia Tech. She is the founder and editor of the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, now in its 10th year of publication. She served as Senior Program Director, Program for Women and Girls, National Science Foundation in 1996. She has published over 50 immunology and SET equity research papers, book chapters, and monographs, and she is the co-investigator on several NSF-funded
of Wisconsin-Stout DR. PETER D. HEIMDAHL is the “STEPS for Girls” Camp Executive Director and Associate Dean of the College of Technology, Engineering, and Management. He joined the UW-Stout faculty in 1992 after retiring from the U. S. Army in the rank of Brigadier General. Sixteen years of his military career were spent on the faculty of the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, where he ultimately held the position of Professor and Head of the Department of Mechanics and later the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Heimdahl’s undergraduate degree is from the United States Military Academy. He completed his M.S. and Ph.D. in Theoretical and
AC 2007-355: WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENTS THAT HINDER AND ASSIST THECAREER PROGRESSION OF WOMEN IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYRose Mary Cordova-Wentling, University of Illinois-Urbana ChampaignSteven Thomas, Lockheed Martin Corporation Page 12.1616.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 1 Workplace Environments that Assist and Hinder the Career Progression of Women in Information Technology AbstractThe purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of the workplace environmentcharacteristics that hinder and
-track faculty position at a largeresearch university would give me the necessary flexibility to balance my career with my familylife.My husband and I were the proverbial “two-body” problem when searching for academicpositions in engineering. We were fortunate to land tenure-track positions in engineering at thesame large research university. We both successfully built research labs and were awardedtenure. Fifteen years and three children later, however, we both left to teach at an ETI that doesnot award tenure, but instead awards one-year contracts to faculty. This school, however, hasexcellent students and facilities, and an administration that is genuinely interested in improvingthe academic quality of the institution. Since I was looking for
in the number ofapplications and enrollments into engineering careers of female students as compared to theirmale counterparts. The latest statistics in the US talk of a 60% gap (i.e. 20% vs 80% female andmale enrollments respectively). Curiously enough, Puerto Rico is the one location in the Westernworld where a very rigorous 5-year engineering school attracts roughly the same female andmale enrollments to any engineering area, and significantly more females than males toIndustrial Engineering in particular. While attrition and retention issues continue to besimilar to those in other parts of the United States, the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüezstill graduates more females than males basically due to the initial enrollment numbers
professional fields. Since 2003, with a seed grant from TheWomen in Technology (WIT) Project (a statewide workforce development initiative funded in partby the U.S. Departments of Labor, Agriculture and Education), isisHawaii’s One+One eMentoringProgram has provided support early in the education process, targeting pre-college female studentsseeking non-traditional careers in science and technology.This paper will discuss how isisHawaii and WIT effectively built upon available eMentoring models,including presidential award-winning MentorNet, to develop community-based, culturallyappropriate and cost-effective programming that would have positive career implications forHawaii’s girls and women. As it follows the One+One program from inception through
AC 2007-233: CAN A MEDIA STRATEGY BE AN EFFECTIVE RECRUITMENTAND RETENTION TOOL FOR WOMEN IN ENGINEERING ANDTECHNOLOGY? A PILOT STUDYMara Wasburn, Purdue University Page 12.338.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Can a Media Strategy be an Effective Recruitment and Retention Tool for Women in Engineering and Technology? A Pilot StudyAbstractDespite the fact that many Western nations face a critical shortage of skilled professionals inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and despite abundant jobopportunities in STEM disciplines, few women still prepare themselves for careers in thesefields. Recently, there have been suggestions that
imminentshortage of scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematicians; further, female high-schoolstudents show little interest in pursuing careers related to engineering.1 This lack of interest maybe a significant factor in understanding the “Extraordinary Woman Engineers Project” whichreported that currently fewer than 10% of the nation's engineers are women in spite of the factthat girls do not lag behind boys in grades or test scores in either math or science.2 The program presented by this paper represents perhaps part of the solution to thisparadox by investing in the female youth of today through proven hands-on learning techniques.3This paper reports on a local initiative by the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to investin
. Page 12.762.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Four Years of Helping Underrepresented Students Succeed in EngineeringabstractThe Michigan Tech GUIDE (Graduate and Undergraduate Initiative for Development andEnhancement) began in the Fall of 2002. This NSF funded program helps engineering studentsfrom underrepresented groups succeed academically through mentoring, engineering seminars,and career development initiatives. During the grant period, over 70 undergraduate and graduatestudents have participated in the program. From the beginning of the program, the GUIDEundergraduates have out performed the average College of Engineering (COE) student in severalways (See Table below
workforce. She is currently working on research on girls' career and course taking decisions. In addition, she is the evaluator and a collaborator (co-PI) on an NSF Scientific Leadership Scholars grant funding American Indian and first generation college students who study Computer Science, Environmnetal Resource Engineering or Math at HSU.Elizabeth Eschenbach, Humboldt State University Beth Eschenbach is a professor of Environmental Resources Engineering at Humboldt State University. Beth left civil engineering as an undergraduate at UC Santa Cruz, and graduated with honors in mathematics and in psychology. She obtained her MS and PhD at Cornell in Environmental and Water Resources Systems
Ph.D. in Economics and Operations Research from the Colorado School of Mines. Her research has primarily focused on retention of female engineering students, including her dissertation entitled, “Female Retention In Undergraduate Engineering Majors: The Effects Of Individual Characteristics, Career Characteristics, And Demand Discrimination”.Jennifer Harris, United Parcel Service Jennifer Harris graduated from Cal Poly in 2003, receiving a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and a M.S. in Engineering with a Specialization in Integrated Technology Management. She served for five years on the SWE Executive Council at Cal Poly including serving as President in 2001-2002. Ms. Harris is currently
) and weaknesses Administer Felder’s Learning Style Tool Explore career and personal goals Ongoing through workshops, journaling, concept Page 12.221.3 mapping Develop leadership skills Administer Skills Leadership Inventory (pre- and post-) Maintain balance between academic Utilize calendar tools to plan time; compare and personal life actual schedule with plan to adjust as necessary Increase the percentage of freshman
, the critical shortage of IT workers would be non-existent.2 However, despiteabundant career opportunities in IT, women are not preparing themselves for IT careers.3,4“Where are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering, and Technology?” asks a July 2001report released by The National Council for Research on Women.5 The proportion of womenwho earn bachelor's degrees from American colleges and universities has been increasing. Thepast two decades saw the implementation of a variety of programs that succeeded in attractingmore women into the fields of science, engineering, and technology. However, the study alsoreported that much of the progress that women made in these areas had subsequently stalled oreroded. Of further concern is the National
importantengagement strategy to encourage women and girls to pursue STEM education and careers, otherstates can benefit from the story of the Wisconsin and Hawaii collaboration.Hawaii’s Maui Economic Development Board and Wisconsin’s Milwaukee School ofEngineering have partnered under a Women in Technology grant from the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service. This grant is toencourage women and girls in rural areas to pursue STEM education and careers.Because students at the Hawaii and Wisconsin partner campuses were enthusiastic about theirMentorNet experience, the Women in Technology grant funded a two-year contract to waivemembership fees for MentorNet for all four-year and two-year University of
1980s, Hall and Sandler3 observed that the source of women’s relative lack ofrepresentation in high-level academic and faculty positions on college campuses, was rooted intheir higher education experience. They coined the now-famous term "chilly classroom climate"to refer to the effects that male-dominated university campuses have on undergraduate women.They argued that male professors' use of sexist humor, belittling albeit bantering commentsabout women's intellectual abilities, and their use of "he" to refer to scholars in their fields canconsiderably dampen women's career aspirations. Almost twenty years later, Martin4 assertedthat the campus climate remained chilly, resulting in “an under-representation of women in thehighest ranks of the
expectations, which limit women’s scientific careers; d. Discrimination, which has compromised the opportunities and needs for scientist women due to the issues related gender, race, ethnicity, etc.; e. Work family balance, which has forced scientist women to balance between work and family; f. Practices and policies, which drive the changes for women in the STEM fields; g. Job design, detailing the job content, supervisor and co-worker support, and women’s roles, etc.; h. Organizational factors, which include different kinds of organizational issues surrounding scientist women’s development; i. Quality of working life, describing job satisfaction; j. Evaluation
Educational institutions are increasing their efforts to integrate females into non-traditional technical programs. Adjustments, such as curriculum and recruitment andretentions efforts, are being made to ensure that females feel welcome and a part of theprogram’s standard regimen. Industrial Technology stands at the vanguard of successfulparadigms that prepare females in such non-traditional areas as managerial and technicaldegree programs. Marshall (2000)26 contended that the common goals of IndustrialTechnology programs are to increase enrollments and to offer a curriculum designed toprepare students for management and technical careers. O’Meara & Carmichael (2004)34added that emphasis should be placed on both recruitment and retention efforts
reviews? • What impact did the camp activities have on the performance of the participants as they return to their secondary school, form both the student and parent perspectives? • What impact did the camp activities have on the higher education and career plans of the participants? • What were the demographic characteristics of students enrolled in each type of activity and how do they compare with demographic characteristics of students in the department as a whole?Specific Evaluation ResultsGeneral TrendsOverall these programs coincided with a rise in our new student and continuing studentpopulations as compared from Fall 2004 thru Fall 2006, as indicated in Table 1, as well as aconcurrent rise in the
AC 2007-751: GENDER GAP IN COMPUTER SCIENCE: STUDYING ITSABSENCE IN ONE FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICHasmik Gharibyan, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Hasmik Gharibyan is a Full Professor in the Computer Science department at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. The first 15 years of her career (1981-1996) she held faculty positions in the Applied Mathematics and Informatics department at Yerevan State University, Republic of Armenia (USSR). Then she moved to San Luis Obispo, USA, and in 1998 joined the faculty of the Computer Science department at Cal Poly. Dr. Gharibyan teaches undergrad and grad courses, including such courses as Theory of Computing, Data
AC 2007-436: IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO CHANGE THE PERCEPTION OFENGINEERINGSusan Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology is Senior Advisor of the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Throughout her career, Susan has worked to increase the participation of women in engineering and science. As the founding executive director of the Lore-El Center for Women in Engineering and Science at Stevens she developed and implemented pre-college and college level programs to increase the representation of women in STEM fields at Stevens and nationally, serving more than 15,000 women. In recognition of this contribution, the Lore-El Center
successof women faculty in science and engineering. Institutions funded by the National ScienceFoundation ADVANCE Program, have been in the vanguard of the movement to transforminstitutional and departmental culture in order to recruit and retain more women and minoritiesas faculty in science and engineering. Among a broad portfolio of initiatives aimed atrecognizing that faculty life extends beyond work performance, the 19 round one and twoADVANCE institutions have promoted such work-family policies as dual-career hiring, stoppingor delaying the tenure clock for childbirth or adoption, on-campus childcare and lactation rooms,and the opportunity for temporary periods of part-time employment to deal with family crises,such as the terminal illness of
support; the STEP UP camp was a success. The majority of youngwomen in attendance were Native American, which presented an opportunity to positivelyinfluence their pre-college decisions and provide an access point to considering career pathstoward science, technology, engineering and math disciplines. Assessment, evaluation andtracking are a part of this initiative.This paper will discuss the successful dynamics used and pedagogical approach toward nurturingthe female participants’ interests in engineering and science through hands-on activities, personaland team dynamics, faculty and current engineering/science student instruction and industryparticipation; the creation of personal connection to the Multicultural Engineering Program andthe
AC 2007-2377: WOMEN: SUPPORT FACTORS AND PERSISTENCE INENGINEERINGYong Zeng, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Yong Zeng is currently a Ph.D. Student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in Human Resource Education department and has completed as Masters in Education (2005) and Bachelor in Engineering (1995). Yong is a doctoral fellow with the National Centre for Engineering Technology Education (NCETE). He has worked as engineer in the field of mechanical engineering and computing engineering since graduation in 1995. Served as co-PI, his proposal of ‘Women, Career Choice, and Persistence in Engineering’ was funded in June 2005 through NCETE. Yong is an active member of
math activities in high school; AP courses taken in math and science; (b) Role Models: having a sister or brother in engineering, math or science; having a female math or science teacher (role model for women); (c) Support of significant others for the student’s choice of engineering as a major and/or career. Hypothesis 1: Women who enter fields that have lower proportions of women will have stronger academic backgrounds, greater exposure to more role models, and stronger support from significant others for their choice of such a non-traditional major or career. (2) Self-confidence: (a) General academic skills; (b) Math-science academic skills; and (c) Engineering-related skills and subjects
improve this, including mentorship programs, a change in the nature of theengineering workplace to accommodate family needs, and creating a more collaborative andless competitive atmosphere in both the academic and industry sides of engineering.Much of the literature on gender studies in science, technology and engineering suggestsfemales enjoy and connect with these fields when they are placed within a human, social orenvironmental context. This paper demonstrates the why and how of this relationship,drawing ideas from gender roles and gender socialization. This paper looks at how moraldevelopment may impact a woman’s choice to pursue a career in the physical sciences,technology, engineering or math. In particular, the paper draws from
USCCollege of Letters, Arts, and Sciences and the USC Viterbi School of Engineering to recruitoutstanding women scientists and engineers to the university and to retain those who might betempted to move elsewhere. In the 5 years since the program’s inception, WiSE resources havehelped the schools to more than double the number of tenured and tenure-track (T/TT) womenfaculty in S&E fields from 15 to 35.In addition to its primary goal of faculty gender diversity, WiSE has developed a series ofprograms to address pathway (pipeline) and institutional climate issues that remain obstacles toattracting and retaining women in the fields of S&E. While WiSE programs provide targetedfinancial support to scholars at all stages of their careers, the
AC 2007-2185: PROVIDING A SUPPORT COMMUNITY FOR FEMALEENGINEERING STUDENTS THROUGH A PEER COACHING PROGRAMLisa Davids, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-PrescottHeidi Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott Page 12.1211.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Providing a Support Community for Female Engineering Students Through a Peer Coaching ProgramAbstractAlthough women earn 20% of the engineering degrees conferred, only 8.5% of theengineering workforce is comprised of women1. Studies report that stress, travel andthe long hours associated with engineering related careers are among the reasonswomen feel discouraged from
Engineering. She is co-PI of AWE and AWISE. Her research interests include recruitment and retention of women in engineering, assessment and career development.Kelly Rodgers, University of Missouri KELLY A. RODGERS, M. A. is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at the University of Missouri - Columbia. Her research interests include motivational issues in minority student retention and the socio-emotional aspects of gifted minority adolescents.Demei Shen, University of Missouri DEMEI SHEN is a doctoral candidate in Information Science and Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri - Columbia. Her research interests include social computing and motivation in web-based learning
mathematics through calculus in equal numbers to boys, and the differencebetween their relative general mathematics achievements has become insignificant.5 The concernnow is how to motivate girls to enter technological professions, such as engineering, which relyheavily on mathematics and computers, when they seem to have a “we can, but I don’t want to”attitude to such career choices.6 Fortunately, if a girl has an intention in high school to major inengineering, then she is more likely to act on her intention than is her male counterpart.7 Whenasked why they chose their field, most women in computing careers gave several reasons whichincluded: a perceived talent to do the tasks necessary in the field, family or friend support, andbeing introduced to
ResourcesSupporting Future Faculty• Achieving Success in Academia. WEPAN hosted this conference June 27-29, 1997 in Arlington, Virginia, to begin to address the low representation of female faculty in engineering in the U.S. Funded by the National Science Foundation, this conference offered non-tenured, tenure track female faculty and graduate students, strategies to enhance their careers in academia and provide insight into successfully navigating the tenure track. Participants included 34 non-tenured, tenure track female engineering faculty and 28 female engineering graduate students interested in a career in academe. The graduate students who attended did so accompanied by a faculty member from their institution to help initiate or