track, ● support networking of these and other members, ● development of a STEM pipeline of female STEM academics.SWE, like other professional societies, recognizes the significance of mentoring, relationships,and retention of like-minded engineers. In the case of this discussion, it has been recognized fordecades that female STEM faculty benefit from mentoring due to their unique position inacademia.1 Not only are there issues based on gender, but female STEM faculty are often part ofa non-traditional group, which may include older, minority, and disabled women. Due to thenature of this paper, we will consider these topics as appropriate, but will focus on retention ofwomen in academia, support from other professional societies, networking
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship be- tween educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co-developer of the Re- formed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1500 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen
Paper ID #15411Connectivity at RIT - Developing & Delivering an Effective Professional De-velopment Workshop Series for Women Faculty in STEMProf. Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Dell is an associate professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired
Paper ID #16882Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive,and Otherwise Chilly ConditionsRachel Yonemura , University of Washington Rachel Yonemura is currently working on her B.S. in Environmental Science and Resource Management at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. She has been working at the University as a Re- search Assistant under Dr. Denise Wilson on projects regarding the Engineering Workplace as well as E-waste Sustainability. Motivation for these projects stem from an interest in public discourse and the interrelationships that occur among people of different
Paper ID #14763Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and the Policies and Pro-grams that Support ThemDr. Deborah Ilana Karpman, University of California San Diego Deborah Karpman currently works as an administrator at the University of California San Diego in the Office of Research Affairs coordinating limited submission opportunities. Prior to that, she directed the planning and coordination of efforts to increase the external recognition of faculty in the Viterbi School of Engineering at the University of Southern California. Her dissertation (UCLA, 2015), ”Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and
Paper ID #19212Minority Women in the Workplace: Early Career Challenges and Strategiesfor Overcoming ObstaclesNicole Yates, National Society of Black Engineers Nicole Yates currently serves as the Senior Research Analyst for the National Society of Black Engineers. She graduated from Stanford University with a Master’s degree in Psychology and completed a thesis that focused on gender differences in reasons for switching from STEM to non-STEM majors. Her background is in research and academia.Ms. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Rincon joined the Society of Women Engineers in February 2016 as the Manager of
technologydesigns. As with the engineering education researchers, both groups see a dearth of intentionalefforts to change dominant discourses in the rhetoric and practice of technology cultures, andwere working to establish alternative spaces, practices, and cultures to counteract the dominantframe. A lesson for engineering education researchers to take from this recurring narrative thatsurfaced in interviews, might be to celebrate collectivist instincts, the need and desire forcommunity, and to revisit the passion that brought them to the field of engineering education inthe first place. Further, as the discipline and its researchers establish their own dominantdiscourses and practices, we should be mindful not to lose the connection to doing what
? What are the key features of MEP and WIE offices? To what extent do institutional/contextual factors affect the representation of women? At institutions with relatively high numbers of women of color, how are these student services structured? Does institutional type impact these organizations and outcomes related to women of color in engineering? (E.g., private/public, research-intensive or bachelor’s granting, engineering specialty and minority, etc.) What role can scholarship programs that target minority engineering students play in leveling the field for women of color in engineering? How can such programs keep in mind the double-bind for women of color within colleges of engineering?The
allowed for themes to emerge from the data in a ‘bottom-up’ inductive approach. When approaching the interviews inductively, themes were drawn fromthe data without a theoretical reference in mind, similar to grounded theory research methods.8Therefore, we sought to find descriptions related to our participants’ perceptions of women inengineering without using existing general theories for women in engineering. Thesedescriptions were then formed into general themes that captured the essence of our participants’perceptions of being a woman in engineering. Nelson interpreted the interviews with knowledgeof the engineering culture, whereas Shapcott, who is pursuing a Ph.D. in educational psychology,framed it with a gendered motivational lens
not change their minds, 3 of the 20 covered by this study did. Two who were initially intent on majoring in engineering decided not to pursue an engineering major while one who was initially not intent on majoring in engineering switched to engineering. This was not an entirely unexpected outcome as students gained greater understanding of what possibilities engineering provides and greater understanding of the level and nature of the effort required to succeed in the discipline. In an attempt to evaluate the efficacy of the ECIE approach, the 2012 students were asked the
would be designedwith the following goals in mind: 1. to introduce young women to the field of engineering and to thus encourage them to continue their pursuit of advanced math and science courses 2. to provide female role models to the program participants by including panels of both female engineering students and female professional engineers as discussants. Page 13.500.2 3. to provide high school teachers and counselors with additional information about the admissions process, financial aid, and cooperative education opportunities at the University of Louisville, particularly in engineering. 4. to encourage
science classes in high school, but the physics was a little bit different and it pushed me towards engineering more than anything else.”Still another participant reported, “My freshmen year in high school I took a class called Engineering Exploration and it was then that I decided I was going to be an engineer. From that time forward there never was any questioning or debating whatsoever that I was going to be an engineer. It’s kind of strange, but there was never really any doubt in my mind that it was what I wanted to be”Many of the participants indicated having teachers in high school who were supportive andencouraged them to pursue their interest in math, science, and technology. Some of theseteachers
AC 2011-1837: EVOLVING IDENTITIES: UNDERGRADUATE WOMENPURSUING THE ENGINEERING PROFESSORIATESarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Sarah Hug is Research Associate at the Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society (ATLAS) Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities of practice, creativity, and experiences of underrepresented groups in these fields across multiple contexts.A. Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder A. Susan Jurow is an Assistant Professor and Co
inengineering education focusing on women in engineering. We considered the context ofinclusive curriculum and showed the importance of a sense of belonging in developingengineering identity. Sense of belonging is a salient factor that enhances in-group feelingsthat confirm group membership and help develop stronger identity with the group [19]. Whileplanning and designing an intervention for empowering women in engineering classrooms, itshould be kept in mind whether the intervention is able to foster a sense of belonging in away that women feel they are a part of the engineering community. Strengthening groupdynamics can help minimize climate effects. So, interventions should be designed aroundincreasing women students’ belongingness in an
. C. (2005). The persistence of traditional gender roles in the information technology sector: A study of female engineers in India. Information Technologies and International Development, 2(3), 29-46. 2. Corbett, C. & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. 3. AISHE. (2018). All India Survey on Higher Education 2017-2018. Government of India: Ministry of Human Resource Development. Department of Higher Education. New Delhi, India. 4. Aspiring Minds. (2018). Women in engineering: A comparative study of barriers across nations. 5. Chandra, V. (2014, August). What India
Paper ID #18748An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in theContext of First-year Engineering CoursesMiss Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University Juebei Chen is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. She obtained a B.Admin in business administration from Minzu University. Her current interest focuses on the cognitive development of engineering graduate and undergraduate students, the assessment of teaching and learning in graduate education.Dr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
Australiaand Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 101-134.20. Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-actionrepertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.21. Pink, D. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. Bob Land:Amazon Remainders Account.22. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1),57-72.23. Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking Stock: Where We've Been, Where We Are, Where We'reGoing. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 255-284.24. Watson, K., & Froyd, J. (2007). Diversifying the U.S. Engineering Workforce: A
AC 2009-1031: COMPETENCE IN ENGINEERING: A TALE OF TWO WOMENHolly Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich recently joined Virginia Tech after completing her doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science with a concentration in Metallurgy. Additionally Dr. Matusovich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experience in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Dr. Matusovich’s research interests include the role of
women,encouraging women to persist, and mentoring. With the many factors in mind, it is important toidentify the problem under investigations.Problem Statement Page 12.1614.3Stated simply, the problem is a lack of engineers to fill an increasing number of positions. Morespecifically, the problem is that the number of women engineers continues to fall short incomparison to the gender ratio of women to men in the population in the U.S.1 and worldwide 2.More women engineers are needed in general and in proportion to male engineers. The obvioussolution is to attract more women into engineering programs, and this task has been undertakenadmirably by
Paper ID #14975Barriers to Broadening Participation in Engineering Competition TeamsRui (Celia) Pan, Toyota Financial Services Dr. Pan is currently working as a sales, product and remarketing analyst at Toyota Financial Services. She received her Ph.D in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She hold a M.S. in Statistics and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education
support from role models (extrinsic) were major factors inhelping participants break barriers to engineering. L4 described how concepts didn’t come easyto her, “I just tend to work harder, but I had to work harder because I didn't come this natural tome as it would come to them” (L4). M5 struggled greatly in her calculus course and overcamethat as a barrier, “I started working really hard… I liked putting in hard work and seeing that Ican, I can get smarter and I can learn things if I put my mind to it” (M5). Barriers included thetraditional male dominated STEM classroom. M5 went on to describe challenges in a maledominated classroom that included both high school and her college experience, “I'm kind of lefton my own. I don't really get a
AC 2009-96: WOMEN ENGINEERS IN ADVANCED ACADEMIC POSITIONS(WEAAP)Priscilla Nelson, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyTheresa Hunt, New Jersey Institute of Technology TBDCherrice Traver, Union CollegePamela Eibeck, Texas TechZulma Toro-Ramos, Wichita State UniversityCheryl Schrader, Boise State UniversityMary Roth, Lafayette Collegedelcie durham, University of South Florida Page 14.1377.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Women Engineers in Advanced Academic Positions (WEAAP): Effecting Change in Higher EducationAbstractContemporary issues plaguing higher education and inhibiting the growth of engineeringcolleges are numerous and
, class, andgender. With the purpose in mind, we have developed a questionnaire. Figure 2. Stages of the construction phase, adapted from Benson and Clark’s guide for instrument development and validation 41 Grounded in the literature on persistence and faculty retention, we identified and adoptedfor our research purpose the constructs relevant to the persistence of women engineering faculty.18,42,43 There are several sub-constructs identified from the literature review 1,36,44. For our survey,the sub-constructs include racial oppression, socioeconomic background impacts, genderoppression, and intersecting challenges. For instance, racial oppression includes culturalassociation, work
working environment. Yes, I decided to as engineering first because, actually in my mind I never think about teaching. But after several month of I worked as engineer, and my mother said, “Your face looks stressed.” And going back late at night and overtime is on that’s all make a little bit difficult for the parents but for me, I think it’s normal…after several months I decided to marry, so my parents said, “You just quit the job and apply for academic.” - Senior Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering, 8 YearsA senior lecturer shared her experience of joining academia once it was time for her to getmarried: “I forgot to answer why I involved in education, the reason was, at that time I worked in a factory and
Paper ID #30292Gender Stereotypes: Historical comparison of female students’ beliefs oncareer, marriage, and children (1935 versus 2019 populations)Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Associate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue Uni- versity. Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer conducts research and leads retention activities including administration of the undergraduate and graduate mentoring programs and the teaching of the Women
troubles with their homeworkand they’ve come to me for suggestions. So, I don’t consider myself as that far below them ifthey’re coming to me for questions. – Latina, Senior (P1)Another student expressed a similar sentiment of having to prove to her peers that she is just ascapable, if not more so, by earning some of the top grades in her engineering classes.Interestingly, while she described how her male, White peers are mostly close-minded, shealigned herself as being closer with them than other women in the program.Being in a major with church going rednecks who think one way, you have to remember, this isan engineering program, so most of the people in the program are kind of close-minded…It’s notreally an issue as far as me being Black. When
aresolely based on quantitative evaluations. Even more unfortunate is the fact that many brightyoung minds still get turned away from these fields by careless comments or erroneousassessments of their intellectual abilities. Our goal is to make reference to experiences asidentified by the authors of a book titled Paths of Discovery: Chicanas in Mathematics, Science,and Engineering. These authors wrote autobiographical essays addressing simple but criticalissues they had to face on the road to their chosen fields. What determine the character of aperson are her experiences. A person able to work and solve problems on her own and withoutdirection, we propose, has the distinctive characteristics that contribute to innovation, learning,and creativity
phrases that come to mind when you hear Engineer? Be honest and don’t over think it.”In an effort to identify if differing secondary student perceptions were a factor in the largediscrepancy in female enrollment between disciplines, this question was repeated three times, butwith Chemical Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, and Civil Engineer specified. For example,“What are the first three descriptive words or phrases that come to mind when you hearMechanical Engineer? Be honest and don’t over think it.” These three disciplines were selectedbecause they are three of the original, long-standing, engineering disciplines with vastly differentfemale enrollments. Chemical engineering had high female enrollment, mechanical engineeringhad low enrollment
Dakota StateUniversity [26] where a network of trained men faculty work with other men faculty to promotegender equity on campus.Inclusive Leadership Cohort Structure (Autumn 2019)Based on the success of the Inclusive Leadership Course, it was decided to offer the course tofirst-year engineering students within the framework of an Inclusive Leadership Cohort. The aimof developing this cohort was to make students aware of concepts such as implicit bias, privilege,positionality, and inclusive minded thinking in their first year as college students so as tomaximize the impact of the course on their experience and on the climate in the COE. The firstInclusive Leadership Cohort (Autumn 2019) consisted of 72 students taking the requiredintroductory