learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Prof. JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder JoAnn Silverstein is a Professor in Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering and Associate Dean for Faculty Advancement at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She has a BA in Psychology (Stanford University), BS, MS, and PhD in Civil Engineering (University of California, Davis) and is a registered Professional Engineer (Colorado). Her research interests are Water and wastewater treatment process analysis
University Chicago American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Engineering Curriculum Rooted in Active Learning: Does It Promote Engagement and Persistence for Women? Leanne M. Kallemeyn, Gail Baura, Francisca Fils-Aime, Jana Grabarek, and Pete Livas Loyola University ChicagoStructured AbstractBackground - Active, problem-based learning is increasingly being used in engineeringeducation. Group projects to design and build devices and ethical case studies sensitize studentsto real world experiences. They also
perceived as “real engineering”, which highlights an historically strong set of beliefs aboutpolitically or socially agnostic technical work coming into conflict with a systems approach [5](see also [11]).Riley et al. [12] point to limitations of service learning education in engineering generally, i.e.,limited student engagement with questions about the social, economic, and political interests metby the service learning framework. Relatedly, while Bielefeldt et al. [13] find that environmentalengineering faculty bring more topics about ethics and societal issues into their courseworkrelative to their peers in such fields as mechanical and civil engineering, they also find thatenvironmental engineering faculty perceive ethics and “broad impacts
. 9[18] C. Flaherty, “Early journal submission data suggest COVID-19 is tanking women’s research productivity,” Inside Higher Education, 21 2020.[19] M. M. King and M. Frederickson, “The Pandemic Penalty: The gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity,” SocArXiv, preprint, Sep. 2020. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/8hp7m.[20] E. Redden, “Scholars confront coronavirus-related racism in the classroom, in research and in community outreach,” Inside Higher Education, 02 2020.[21] R. J. Kreitzer and J. Sweet-Cushman, “Evaluating Student Evaluations of Teaching: a Review of Measurement and Equity Bias in SETs and Recommendations for Ethical Reform,” J. Acad. Ethics, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w.[22] E. B. King
educational tool.Research QuestionsThis study seeks to answer the following two research questions: 1. Are there differences in academic motivation towards the online gamified homework portal based on gender? 2. What effects does gender have on submission behavior in an online gamified homework portal?MethodsThis study was completed using data from the spring 2019 semester of a first-year engineeringdesign course. The first-year engineering design course covers topics including commonly usedengineering tools, statistics, economics, engineering ethics, and product development. Thecourse involves in-person interactive class sessions but has additional coursework that iscompleted outside of class time such as online textbook questions
these differences are irreconcilable,thoughts of leaving may occur [27]. Individuals make decisions based on a screening processthat utilizes specific threshold criteria held in their images for work, family, friends, recreation,ethics/spirituality (for additional details on image theory refer to Beach [45] and Lee & Mitchell[39]. Because this screening process centers around the violation of fit [46], subsuming relevantconcepts from person-environment fit theories into the unfolding model of turnover is warranted.However, I elaborate on aspects of this theory here to further explicate the direct contributions ofthe person-environment fit later.Person-Environment Fit TheoryPerson-environment fit theories assume people seek out and create
support system for her successes: “For me, what has allowed me to be successful I think is hard work ethic, perseverance, I’ve had plenty of good mentors that have walked this journey before me so having them only a phone call away to ask advice; I think a good community has also helped me be successful-- being able to rely on friends and family to help I guess go through any hard times along the path.”Similarly, Daniella shared her experiences with friends and how creating a support systemthrough SHPE really encouraged and helped her persist in her career path: “It became ‘hey I like this. I love this. I have friends…I’ve become really good friends with people within the clubs that I am in’ and that I think really kept me there and
engineering, meaningful work is particularlyimportant and has been likened for women, more than men, to an invested interest inunderstanding not just the technology, but how it can be used [24]. Practices of employeeengagement that promote meaningful work lead to improved performance as well as a highercommitment to the company [25]. Organizations can further supplement engagement andmeaning by fostering a culture of ethics and social responsibility that allows people to connecttheir personal values and work life.Impact of COVID on Women and Work. The survey questions were sent and the answers werecollected in Fall 2019. Therefore, the results presented in this paper do not address the specificchallenges due to the COVID pandemic. However, the
influence on the career decidedness of college students,” College Student Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 109-113, 2002.[30] J. L. Quimby and A. M. De Santis, “The influence of role models on women's career choices,” The Career Development Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 297-306, 2006.[31] T. C. Dennehy and N. Dasgupta, “Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964-5969, 2017.[32] S. K. Gibson, “Being Mentored: The Experience of Women Faculty,” Journal of Career Development, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 173-188, 2004. https://doi:10.1023/B:JOCD.0000015538.41144.2b.[33] E. A. Hoppe, Ethical
of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: An Autoethnographic Account of a Female Engineering InternAbstractThis paper is a work in progress (WIP) that explores the experiences of a female undergraduateengineer, Kayla1, in both professional and academic settings. Studies have found that womenwho persist in engineering describe themselves as having an engineering identity [1]. Accordingto Faulkner, however, the normative engineering culture tends to make working relationshipseasier for men than women, and women are “visible as women, yet invisible as engineers” [2, p.169]. This
Grumman, will evaluate the impact ofnetworking interventions on community college women’s motivation, self-efficacy, confidence,and retention in engineering and computer science majors. SWE will use PVWIS as a model forsimilar networks and research in L.A. and Houston.Keywords: community college women in STEM, women’s STEM network, STEM pipeline,belonging, networking, network, women in engineering, women in STEM, community colleges,community college women, underrepresented women, diversity, equity, inclusionIntroductionOur future depends on a STEM literate population that can ethically apply science andengineering to society’s most pressing challenges. The National Academy of Engineering(NAE) and the National Research Council (NRC) report that
Paper ID #32255Ada Lovelace: First Computer Programmer and Hacker?Dr. Erica Haugtvedt, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology Dr. Erica Haugtvedt is an assistant professor of English and Humanities at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She received her Ph.D. in British nineteenth-century literature from Ohio State Univer- sity in 2015. Erica Haugtvedt works on Victorian popular fiction, transfictionality, seriality, and media history. Her publications include ”The Victorian Serial Novel and Transfictional Character” (Victorian Studies (59.3: 2017)), ”The Ethics of True Crime: Fictionality in Serial Season
. 2019.[5] L. A. Gelles, K. L. Youmans, and I. Villanueva, “Sparking action: How emotions fuel or inhibit advocacy around hidden curriculum in engineering,” in SEFI 47th Annual Conference: Varietas Delectat... Complexity is the New Normality, Proceedings, 2020, pp. 1566–1575.[6] I. Villanueva, T. Carothers, M. Di Stefano, and M. Khan, “‘There is never a break’: The hidden curriculum of professionalization for engineering faculty,” Educ. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 157, Sep. 2018.[7] L. Gelles, I. Villanueva, and M. Di Stefano, “‘Mentoring is ethical, right?’: Women graduate students and faculty in science and engineering speak out,” Int. J. Gender, Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108–133, 2019.[8] American