Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University; Catherine F Pieronek, University of Notre Dame; Leo H McWilliams, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

in the fall of 2012 of 2,833 students, including 184 graduate and doctoral students,and 36 non-resident aliens. Engineering disciplines available at the urban, public institutionstudied include: chemical, civil, electrical, industrial, and mechanical.Structure of Pathway to Engineering Disciplines for Both SchoolsNeither school uses admission criteria other than completion of the First-Year EngineeringCurriculum (including: an Introductory Engineering Course Sequence, mathematics, chemistry,physics, and English prerequisites) and student interest for entry into any of the majors. Formost students, during the spring of their first-year, students select which discipline they plan topursue starting in the fall of the next year. The students

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Lorelle A Meadows, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of design projects in first-year engineering courses, little research to dateexamines the effect of such courses on student motivation. Broad studies of retention inengineering education show promising results for women and other under-represented studentsin project-based courses2; however, engineering educators need a richer understanding of howspecific project-oriented pedagogies affect students’, and in particular women’s, motivations forengineering and their intended career plans. This study focuses on women because of theircontinued underrepresentation in engineering3, 4 and the need to ensure effective retention effortsin the midst of a movement to enact large-scale curricular transformation in engineering.To address this need, this

Conference Session

Institutional Transformations

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen J. Horton PE, University of Maine; Amy Fried, University of Maine ; Mary Madden, University of Maine

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

departments to change underlyingassumptions about how institutional processes impacted people differently based on their gender.The team would need to connect with the whole institution.Formation of the Advancement Initiatives CouncilEight months before the proposal was due, to secure early support for institutional change, theProvost announced the creation of the Advancement Initiatives Council (AIC), an internaladvisory board of faculty and high-level administrative staff in the position of implementingchanges in policies and practices. Whether or not the proposal was funded, this body was tocreate an ongoing and sustainable infrastructure for examining institutional policies and practicesand planning strategies to further gender equity based on

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Culture

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas E. Pinelli, NASA Langley Research Center; Cathy W. Hall, East Carolina University; Kimberly Marie Brush, NASA Langley Research Center; Jeannine B. Perry, Continental Research Associates, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Education at the NASA Langley Research Center. She is completing her PhD in Educational Policy, Planning, and Leadership with a focus on Higher Edu- cation Administration at the College of William and Mary. Her dissertation is focused on the preferences of women in an engineering internship as compared to those of men, specifically focusing on the elements and skills that support women’s persistence into an engineering field.Ms. Jeannine B. Perry, Continental Research Associates, Inc. Jeannine Perry joined Continental Research in 1984. As Sr. Project Director, she meets with each client to discuss their needs and outline the research project goals. She is then responsible for planning and monitoring all phases of the

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Moriarty, National Science Foundation; Susannah Howe, Smith College; Elena Rose Yasinski, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

College created a pilot job shadow program for women in engineering. Job shadowing is aworkplace-based learning experience that introduces students to career areas and provides theopportunity to spend a day or two observing a professional in the field. The overarching goal ofthe project was to explore the effectiveness of job shadowing by undergraduate womenengineering students as a means of improving interest and persistence in engineering. Shadowparticipants created reflective interest statements, spent a day observing engineeringprofessionals, and reported on their experiences at a panel presentation for their engineeringclassmates. A mixed methods research plan was developed and implemented in order to assessthe impact of the job shadow

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Culture

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Courtney S Smith-Orr, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

-efficacy. In 2010, Joneset al. found mixed results in a study of first-year engineering students, with no statisticallysignificant differences associated with attainment, interest, utility, identification, or career-plans;although men did score higher with respect to self-efficacy and expectancy, the difference wassignificant only for expectancy10.In a related study, Jones et al. found few differences between men and women with respect toengineering identification, gender identification, GPA, or likelihood of changing major, andwomen reported higher perceptions of engineering ability11. The analysis also indicated noeffects for stereotype threat; notably, however, although both men and women scored relativelylow with respect to endorsing negative

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadia M Alhasani, The Petroelum Institute

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

% 73 45% 69 50% Senior - 0% - 0% - 0% 9 4% 73 31% 86 44% 94 44% Total 104 11% 211 20% 283 26% 335 33% 375 35% 382 36% 423 35% StudentsThe Context of the UAETo better assess the level of conviction the founders and supporters of this Program have, it isnecessary to study the context within which it was planned, developed, and supported. Over thepast decade, the United Arab Emirates has pushed for a rapid development in both itsinfrastructure and its human capabilities. Two public documents are worth analyzing within thiscontext, the UAE National Charter for 2021, and the Abu Dhabi Economic Vision 2030.The UAE National Charter for 20211

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa A Dagley, University of Central Florida; Nirmala Ramlakhan, Nee-Moh, Inc; Cynthia Y. Young, University of Central Florida; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

for setting goals andchoosing a career path, (3) academic subject knowledge support aimed at advancing a student’sknowledge relevant to their chosen field, and (4) specification of a role model. One approach toaddressing these variables, and potentially closing the gender retention gap, was to create anetwork of mentors where each participant in the women’s mentorship network would receive anumber of mentors at various stages of their college experience including two structuredmentoring opportunities which occur in the freshman and sophomore years. Figure 1 details therelationship to EXCEL as well as the management plans and structure of the mentoring network.Haring57, 58 refered to this type of mentoring model as a networking mentorship

Conference Session

Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Fu, MIT; Tahira N Reid, Purdue University; Janis P. Terpenny, Iowa State University; Deborah L. Thurston, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Judy M. Vance, Iowa State University; Susan Finger, Carnegie Mellon University; Gloria J. Wiens, University of Florida; Kazem Kazerounian, University of Connecticut; Janet Katherine Allen, University of Oklahoma; Kathy Jacobson

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

and design of MEMS devices; and design, path-planning, dynamics and control of reconfigurable, cooperative multi-robotic systems. Her research is/has been supported by Lockheed Martin Corporation, DARPA, NSF, NASA, SNL, Hammond Machinery, Inc., Harris Corpo- ration, PhaseSpace Corp., and others. In 2010, Professor Wiens served as a National Research Council supported Senior Research Associate at the AFRL/RVSV-Kirtland AFB conducting research on small satellite telescopes integrating the design of the deployable structures (mechanisms) with the optics. Pro- fessor Wiens has held/holds numerous positions in ASME including Manufacturing Engineering Division (MED) Executive Committee Chair (1998-99) and member (1994

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan C Pollock, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

shown in Figure 2. Firstidentify desired results, then determine acceptable evidence, and finally plan learningexperiences and instruction. This process is an alignment of content, assessment, and pedagogy. Page 23.544.6Figure 2 Wiggins & McTighe Stages of Backwards Design • Iden&fy  Desired   2   • Plan  Learning   Results   • Determine   Experiences  and   Acceptable   Instruc&on   Evidence

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen B. Coletti, Northeastern University; Melinda Covert, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Lauren Gianino, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Emily Wisniewski, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Figure 1aProjected Use of Supplemental Instruction in College Page 23.1281.6 Figure 1bFigure 1a is a graph of student feedback from the pre-survey regarding their usage of threedifferent types of supplemental instruction in high school. These three types of supplementalinstruction are one-on-one tutoring, instructor office hours, and group tutoring. Figure 1b is agraph of student feedback also from the pre-survey on their projected usage of these same threeadditional resources in college during the Fall 2012 semester. For all three types of supplementalinstruction, a larger percentage of females used these resources in high school and planned tocontinue to use them in

Conference Session

Women in Engineering (WIED) Division Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Svetlana Vasilievna Barabanova, Kazan National Research Technological University; Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Julia Ziyatdinova, Kazan National Research Technological University; Anastasia Sokolova, Kazan National Research Technological University; Vasiliy G. Ivanov, Kazan National Research Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

), and a reduced time in employment is needed tobecome eligible for the retirement pension (5 years less of the work record) .However, there are issues that stand in the way of true societal equality between men and womenin Russia. First, even though no one is surprised to see a female design-and-planning engineer ora female director of the metallurgical complex, such jobs generally don't come easy for womendue to the their physiological and psycho-emotional. Certain professions simply weren'tdesigned for them.Secondly women do not choose the engineering profession due to a lack of confidence and beliefthat this career is right for them and they can become professionals in it. In addition they prefer a

Conference Session

Panel: Opportunities & Methods to Encourage More Women Toward Research Commercialization

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Babs Carryer, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA); Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; Abby Thompson, Mississippi State University ; Louise C. Dunlap, DunlapBrowder

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, Women in Engineering

and innovation among faculty, staff, and students. Thomp- son assists faculty and student start-up companies with developing strategic business and marketing plans. Thompson manages the MSU Business Incubator and the MSU Entrepreneurship Center. Thompson also manages the Jack Hatcher Engineering Entrepreneurship Certificate program in the Bagley College of En- Page 23.955.1 gineering at MSU to enhance business skills in engineering students. Thompson received her Bachelors Degree in Industrial & Systems Engineering and a M.B.A. from Mississippi State University.Ms. Louise C. Dunlap, DunlapBrowder

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Sandrin, Arizona State University; Connie M Borror, Arizona State University West

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

to major in physicalsciences and computer sciences at these campuses, but they could not major in engineeringwithout planning to transfer to a different university later in their college career. This populationhad a larger percentage of female students (57% female, 34% male and 9% unspecified). Thispopulation skew by gender is consistent with enrollment trends at these institutions (overallenrollment was 58% female and 42% male, and 59% female versus 41% male for the twoinstitutions in 2012, according to College Portrait of Undergraduate Education,http://www.collegeportraits.org/). During the second phase of survey administration, more than 6,000 middle and highschool students were surveyed from November 2007 to January of 2008. This

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. Skaggs, American University in Cairo

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Formulas. This iswhen students believe they should follow the plans that have been laid out for them by externalvoices of authority. They allow others to define who they are, including parents, teachers, socialnorms and expectations, peers, etc. The second phase is Crossroads. This is when studentsrealize that following the plans others have set before them may not necessarily match their owninterests and desires and they become discontented with allowing others to define who they are,and they begin to create their own sense of self that is preferably more authentic. Yet, whilestudents want to become more true to themselves, at this phase, they are exceedingly concernedwith how others will react to their decisions and the effects on their

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Culture

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rosalyn S. Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University; Cindy Jong, University of Kentucky; Donna Joy Dockery; Mary Hermann, Virginia Commonwealth University; Teresa Jones Carter, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

role socialization on girls’ choice topursue STEM careers has been alluded to in the literature [28]. The impact of sociocognitiveinfluences on girls’ interest in STEM careers will be further considered in this study, as well theinfluences of K-16 education and early to mid-career experiences in the workplace.Data Collection Plan Page 23.966.4Based on the review of the literature, an in-depth interview protocol [25] was developed for thepilot study. For the pilot study, the researchers conducted two interviews spaced about a weekapart following an brief introductory conversation to introduce the study to participants. The firstinterview lasted

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ann Sharon Lourens, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) Port Elizabeth South Africa

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

plan of action to address areas that the WES would like todevelop further; and (d) four group workshop sessions which focussed on personal and career-related issues, namely, True Colours, a Team-building exercise, Assertiveness and ConflictManagement, and Portfolio Development 13. External training providers presented workshops onthe choices that women face in their work and personal lives and on how to dress and behaveprofessionally in the workplace 6.The principle was accepted that social support affects course achievement, as proposed by Marraand Brogue 9. Therefore, in an effort to provide social support and create an identity for womenengineering students, the engineering school secured its own WELA homeroom. In addition, inan effort to

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Valle, Georgia Institute of Technology; John D. Leonard II, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ann Marie Blasick, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

at least one D, F or W – all have a tendency to delay graduation, though the effect is much more pronounced for men than for women.Future work includes looking at additional behaviors of interest: students involved in the Greek system or other similar organizations on campus that take a lot of time outside of class, the influence of co-op semesters and internships, the influence of undergraduate research, living in on-campus housing or not, changing majors and/or Colleges.We also plan to look at ethnicity and race, and whether URMs also exhibit the same behavior aswomen and white men (we suspect that is not the case). We also plan to conduct interviews, bothone-on-one and in focus groups, to better uncover the rationales

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cate Samuelson, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

students on both current work and future plans. These Page 23.1058.12connections not only provided female stayers with professionals to turn to for information andsupport, but also connections they could tap in the future when seeking employment. In other   words, these experiences helped them develop the kind of social capital that could be particularlyhelpful in their future engineering pursuits.2 In fact, some stayers reported that they had alreadysecured a job (i.e. post-graduation or additional internship or co-op) as a result of their

Conference Session

Institutional Transformations

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

collect baseline data duringthe first year. They focused on evaluation planning efforts during the first year of the grant;findings from a survey and interviews administered to college faculty and administrators; andinstitutional data related to the goals of the Program. During years two and three, a follow-upsurvey was administered to all college faculty (see Table 1 for completion rates), in addition tofaculty interviews (see Table 2 for completion rates) and collection of institutional data(faculty gender composition by rank, promotion, attrition, time in rank, grant applications andawards, publications, leadership positions, recruitment, awards and worklife policies overtime) related to the goals of the program. Note that project personnel

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University; Anita Grierson, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

intend to be a doctorchange their mind or are not able to get into a medical school. In these cases, an engineeringdegree is a good backup plan. If students are thinking about becoming a lawyer, we inform themthat again engineering is an excellent undergraduate degree for law school. We also point outthat an engineering degree is required for patent law, which is a very good paying career. Wealso caution the students about doing any major that has a “pre” in front of it, such as pre-law,pre-medicine, or pre-business, since if they change their mind or are unable to get into medicalschool, a “pre” degree does not have a lot of value in the marketplace and emphasizes that thestudent was not able to carry through with their intent. We also tell the

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Joshua M Frey, Elizabethtown College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Caucasian males are the majority in the engineering major, but I did not think that we had to try to push others to become engineers to diversify the major. As you can see, I am very skeptical.” “I'm not one for forcing under represented groups to do things strictly for the sake of some statistics. So I don't plan on trying to get more females to be engineers and things like that. I would much rather go somewhere and talk to the kids who want to be engineers whether they be male or female, black or white, whatever. It's not my job to balance that out, nor do I have the power to do it. But what I can do is help the people who really want it. I can show them what I did and how I did. If I one day own my own company I can

Conference Session

Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ziyu Long, Purdue University; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robyn F Wilson, Purdue University; Jennifer C Batra, Purdue University ; Lindsey B. Anderson, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

developmentalnetwork ties, mentor and mentee are linked by several types of ties (e.g., friendship, collaborator,and service on the same committees). These multiplex ties between mentor and mentee can bebeneficial as multiple relationships strengthen the mentor-mentee bond and provide differentvenues for episodic mentoring to emerge naturally. For instance, faculty may engage in multiplementoring episodes through co-teaching courses, working on departmental policies, and sharingcourse plans and grant applications. Furthermore, encouragement of multiplex ties is beneficialfor faculty whose areas of expertise are not redundant with those of their other departmentalmembers. In this regard, our women engineering faculty participants discussed how theirmentoring