Paper ID #41572Gender-Based Comparison of Creative Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Perceptionsof Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Christine Michelle Delahanty, National Science Foundation Dr. Delahanty is a Program Director at NSF in the Division of Undergraduate Education (EDU/DUE), and has a background in physics, electrical engineering, and STEM Education, with a concentration in creativity and innovation. Her research focuses on creative self-efficacy, creative mindset, and perceptions of engineering majors, particularly women, to offer insight into why there are so few women in the major and in the profession. She
and co-moderated a Birds of a Feather session at SIGSCE 2022 virtually entitled: Mentoring a Women in Computing Club: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Dr. Villani presented a paper at ASEE 2022 in Minneapolis, MN entitled: Designed A (Re)Orientation Program for Women Computing Students at a Commuter College and Measuring its Effectiveness. Fall 2023 a paper entitled: An Early Measure of Women-Focused Initiatives in Gender-Imbalanced Computing programs were presented at CCSC Eastern Conference. Dr. Villani has been a Grace Hopper Scholarship reviewer, Dr. Villani was awarded the Chancellor’s Award for Teaching Excellence in 2013. Prior to joining FSC, Dr. Villani had a fifteen-year Computer Consulting Career in the
29 8.8 Total 328 100.0B. SurveyThe measurement instrument was built out of other investigations having a similar purpose tothat of this work [6, 22-26]. This version of the instrument included more statements thatenabled further probing on student sense of belonging, in its various aspects, such as social,academic and general interactions within the institution; given that the other investigationsplaced their emphasis on items more related to other factors, such as self-efficacy, identity,attitudes, behavior, among others, and secondly, with fewer probing on items relating to asense of belonging. During the survey validation process, a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.878 wasattained
. 1997, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.15. Kolar, H., A.R. Carberry, and A. Amresh. Measuring computing self-efficacy. in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2013.16. Carberry, A., M. Ohland, and H.S. Lee. Developing an instrument to measure engineering design self-efficacy: A pilot study. in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2009.17. Yildirim, T., M. Besterfield-Sacre, and L. Shuman. Scale development for engineering modeling self efficacy. in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition. 2010.18. Baker, D., S. Krause, and S. Purzer. Developing an instrument to measure tinkering and technical self efficacy in engineering. in 2008 Annual Conference &
pursuit of STEM careers. Example, “I can see myself in a STEM career.” 5. Intent to persist - Student intention to persist is highly indicative of actual persistence. Intent to persist can be examined in a temporal manner, looking at short-term, degree attainment, and long-term commitment [31]. Example, “I intend to attend graduate school in STEM.” 6. Self Awareness - Self Awareness represents the extent to which one can identify and articulate personal values and professional values, accurately assess strengths and limitations, and view challenges with a growth mindset. Self- awareness plays a critical role in how students learn and develop as STEM professionals [32]. 7. Self-Efficacy - Perceived self
work.Comparing the effectiveness of virtual learning events with personal workshops would provideinsights into the advantages and challenges associated with each format as well as their overallimpact.References[1] Stewart, A. J., Malley, J. E., & LaVaque-Manty, D. (Eds.). (2007). Transforming scienceand engineering: Advancing academic women. University of Michigan Press. [2] Ford, A. Y., Dannels, S., Morahan, P., & Magrane, D. (2021). Leadership programs foracademic women: building self-efficacy and organizational leadership capacity. Journal ofWomen’s Health, 30(5), 672-680. [3] Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how womenbecome leaders. Harvard Business Review Press [4] Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L
. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x.[22] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366–395, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20121.[23] G. Orfield and C. Lee, “Why Segregation Matters: Poverty and Educational Inequality,” Civil Rights Project: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Text, 2005.[24] B. A. Nosek, A. G
bondswith the community at an early age.Role models and their representationsThe feeling of isolation, balancing an engineering career with family life, academicdissatisfaction, and lack of minority role models on campuses can reduce representation. Thereis a need for equitable access of students to role models of similar gender and race. Most femalesindicated that encouragement and validation from someone like them can help build theirengineering confidence and level of self-efficacy. College administrators should seek diversefaculty to reflect the student body and to encourage/motivate an increase in femalerepresentation.Quality Teachers with engineering knowledgeThe participating students emphasized the need for early exposure to engineering via
learning is widely accepted as an integral part of engineeringeducation, as these experiences have been shown to improve students’ vocational self-conceptand work self-efficacy, as well as provide higher starting salaries post-graduation [10-11]. In thecontext of this study, enrolment in the program may signal students’ intent to be part of theengineering profession, or at least to obtain some professional experience in the field of theirdegree. However, given that the students are in their first year, we assume that they remain at anearly stage of professional socialization. Therefore, their expectations for the profession and theirown career trajectories may reflect their implicit assumptions about engineering and serve as abaseline for future
female mentors, and female engineeringprofessors. Given each survey question resulted in strong positive statistical significance, theresearchers are encouraged to continue and expand this effort.It should be noted that the researchers recognize the sample size is small, and thus, it is notpossible to draw definitive conclusions based on these results. Further analysis is planned tomeasure the impact of this activity on academic performance and retention. Additionally, self-efficacy surveys were given in the engineering course and during the INSPIRE workshop. Thisdata will provide more depth to the analysis of the impact of the workshop experience.References[1] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). 2023. Diversity and
leavedoctoral programs without their intended degrees at higher rates than their peers [4]. As recentreports indicate, women’s enrollment in engineering graduate programs increased by only 4percent from 2014 to 2019 [5]. From observation at Penn State, department-level efforts toimprove the well-being of graduate students and limit attrition often rely on professionaldevelopment or lecture-based approaches to establish community. While these efforts can beuseful, literature shows that feelings of isolation and a lack of sense of community, rather than alack of career preparedness, contribute to attrition from graduate programs [6].Instructors have effectively increased student retention in engineering fields by encouraging self-efficacy and belonging
professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Gender Harassment at Work and in School Seeing it, Solving It (Panel Discussion)AbstractThe landscape of sexual harassment has evolved since #MeToo went viral in 2017. Thankfully,more violent and more egregious forms of sexual harassment, including sexual coercion andunwanted sexual attention, have declined. Unfortunately, gender harassment and discriminationappear to have increased in
. Authoritarian parents prioritize adherence to"rigid rules" and high expectations over open dialog. Permissive parents indulge child autonomyover behavioral regulation, while uninvolved parents provide general neglect and disengagement.Several research studies have examined the relationship between parenting styles and career-decision making and career self-efficacy (Guay et al., 2003; Sovet & Metz, 2014). In another line of research, Kincaid et al. (2012) mentioned that “Bronfenbrenner (1961,1979) was among the first to suggest that parenting behaviors, including parental affection andtenable authority, may have differential effects on boys and girls'' (p. 5). Given the importance ofparents’ role and parenting styles on career decision making
program for WomenComputing Students at a Commuter College and Measuring Its Effectiveness." In 2022 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition. 2022.[4] M. Bong and E. M. Skaalvik, “Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different AreThey Really?”, Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40, 2003.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382[5] Haktanir A, Watson JC, Ermis-Demirtas H, et al. “Resilience, Academic Self-Concept, andCollege Adjustment Among First-Year Students. Journal of College Student Retention:Research, Theory & Practice.” 2021;23(1):161-178. doi:10.1177/1521025118810666[6] A. Sullivan, “Academic self-concept, gender and single-sex schooling”, British EducationalResearch Journal, 35(2), 259–288, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080
, Dr. Tequila Harris, and Dr. Jenny Serpa.References[1] Society of Women Engineers, “SWE Research Update: Women in Engineering by the Numbers (Nov. 2019) - All Together,” 2019. https://alltogether.swe.org/2019/11/swe-research-update-women-in-engineering-by-the-numbers-nov- 2019/#_edn3 (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).[2] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers,” American Society of Engineering Education, 2011.[3] L. O. Flowers, “Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences at HBCUs,” J. Educ. Soc. Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 33, 2021, doi: 10.30845/jesp.v8n1p4.[4] A. Carpi, D. M. Ronan, H. M. Falconer, and N. H. Lents, “Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for
to students'performance in campus environment [7]. Essentially, how students perceive the culture withinSTEM and their belonging within that culture is not contingent but does correlate with facultysupport through interactions during their academic careers [8]. As a result of this correlation,students describe feelings such as hostility and lack of caring when characterizing the instructor-student relationship [9]. Report from previous studies shows that there is still negative form ofinteraction between faculty and students like discrimination from instructors [10]. This reckoninghas allowed scholars to conclude that there is a beneficial connection between facultyrelationships and student’s self-efficacy and their persistence in STEM
”will be tracked and compared with the men in the computing degree programs to demonstrate theimpact of the initiatives of women students’ academic performance in addition to theirperception of ASC.References[1] Borg, A. 50/50 by 2020 [Video]. YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nImg8vPUe4[2] https://anitab.org/braid, Sources: BRAID Beacon school chairs, publicly reported data, andreport on Beacon school rate of change by Kaitlin Splett, UCLA.[3] M. Klawe, “Increasing female participation in computing: The Harvey Mudd Collegestory”. Computer, 2013, 46(3), 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.4[4] M. Bong, E. M. Skaalvik, “Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different AreThey Really?”, Educational Psychology Review, 2003, 15(1), 1
," Quinnipiac Chronicle, 13 February 2018. [Online]. Available: https://quchronicle.com/61954/news/girls-who-code- extends-program-to-university/.[16] Q. Today, "Inspiring the future generation of female coders," Quinnipiac Today, March 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.qu.edu/quinnipiac-today/inspiring-the-future- generation-of-female-coders-2022-03-08/.[17] J. M. Blaney and J. G. Stout, "Examining the Relationship between Introductory Computing Course Experiences, Self-Efficacy, and Belonging among First-Generation College Women," in 48th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Seattle. WA, USA, 2017.
Education, 2023. 24(2),125–138.[16] M. Bong, E.M. Skaalvik, “Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different AreThey Really?”, Educational Psychology Review, 2003, 15(1), 1–40.[17] A. Haktanir, J.C. Watson, H. Ermis-Demirtas, M.A. Karaman, P.D. Freeman, A. Kumaran,A. Streeter, “Resilience, Academic Self-Concept, and College Adjustment Among First-YearStudents,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 2021, 23(1) pp.161-178[18] A. Sullivan, “Academic self-concept, gender and single-sex schooling,” British EducationalResearch Journal, 2009, 35(2), 259–288.[19] L.J. Sax, M.A. Kanny, T. A. Riggers-Piehl, H. Whang, L.N. Paulson, “But I’m Not Good atMath:” The Changing Salience of Mathematical Self-Concept in Shaping
ongoing research, implementing favorable employmentlaws, and ensuring women's voices are heard in decision-making [11]. According to Howe-Walsh et al. [17], women in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) prioritizework prestige in their career choices, regardless of whether they work for a public or privatecompany. This preference for work prestige may challenge women who value balancing theirprofessional and personal goals, as it could limit their career opportunities [17]. Researchers have identified several factors and challenges that affect women's entry,persistence, or departure from STEM fields. For instance, one study found that these factorsincluded the relationship between self-efficacy and competence, religious and personal
Studies."[64] P. Moen, J. Robison, and V. Fields, "Women's work and caregiving roles: A life course approach," Journal of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. S176-S186, 1994.[65] C. Marlow, "Coping with multiple roles: Family configuration and the need for workplace services," Affilia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40-55, 1993.[66] G. H. Coetzer, B. Hanson, and R. Trimble, "The mediating influence of role stress on the relationship between adult attention deficit and self-efficacy," Journal of Business and Management, 2009.[67] G. H. Coetzer and L. Richmond, "An empirical examination of the relationships between adult attention deficit, personal task management systems and role stress," Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, vol
conducted on theother sections of the post-survey to compare the scores of men and women identifyingparticipants. While our analyses of previous cohorts of REU students have shown no genderdifferences in student gains in research-based experience and skills during the REU program[27], it would be interesting to further examine whether correlations exist between studentlearning gains from research experiences with a student’s sense of belonging. By furtheranalyzing the additional sections of the survey based on the reported participant sex, moreinformation can be gathered on whether correlations exist between a student’s sense of belongingand growth mindset, scientific identity, self-efficacy, and likelihood of graduate school. REUbelongingness
. Chemical Engr. Male 41 11 7 Female 14 14 19 Total 55 25 26Our research team wrote survey questions to measure the frequency and severity of overt andcovert sexism, gender biases, microaggressions, and other factors of a chilly cultural climatetoward women, as found in our literature review. Examples and key definitions were provided toparticipants in each survey question (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). The survey questions were vettedthrough a pilot study consisting of five male and five female aerospace students. Faculty at thestudied university
of students is essential for promotingstructural change in STEM disciplines at schools and institutions of higher education.The following paragraphs detail suggestions discussed by all of our panelists regarding necessarychanges in the areas of K-12 education, undergraduate college, graduate school, and theworkforce to promote gender equity.K-12 education: Improving gender equality in engineering starts in elementary, middle, and highschool as this is where people start to get interested in STEM and learn foundational science andmath concepts. By the time these girls enter middle school, they already have lower STEMidentities, self-efficacy, and career aspirations than their male classmates [30]. The panelistsidentified two areas of