education leaders: Aconceptual, strategic, and operational approach. Journal of Leadership Education 16:96–114 [13] National Academy of Engineering [NAE] (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020:Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press. [14] Gilmore T. Challenges for physicians in leadership roles: Silos in the mind. OrganSoc Dyn 2010; 10:279–296 [15] Magrane DM, Morahan PS, Ambrose S, Dannels SA. Institutional matchmakers,sponsors, and strategists: Roles of academic STEM executives in developing the nextgeneration of leaders. Open J Leaders 2018; 7:168–186 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345778358_Leadership_programs_for_academic_wom en_Building_self
Paper ID #37306Belongingness of Chilean Engineering Students: A Gender PerspectiveApproachMacarena Becerra-CidProf. Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andr´es Bello, Santiago, Chile Monica Quezada-Espinoza is a professor and researcher at the School of Engineering at the Universi- dad Andres Bello in Santiago, Chile, where currently collaborates with the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit, UNIDA (for its acronym in Spanish), as an instructor in active learning methodologies. Her research interests involve university education in STEM areas, faculty and continuing professional development, research-based
Paper ID #37189A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering Project TeamsDr. Grace J. LiangDr. Rick Evans, Cornell University Sociolinguist and Director of the Engineering Communications Program in the College of Engineering at Cornell UniversityMojdeh AsadollahipajouhDr. Stacey E. Kulesza, P.E., Kansas State University Dr. Stacey Kulesza is an associate professor in the civil engineering department at Texas State University. Dr. Kulesza is a graduate of the American Society of Civil Engineers Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEED). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical
:10/10), oranother who wrote similarly “I use a seal in my work, and sign communications with P.Eng.(WW, IR: 10/10). Other women spoke about licensure in the context of whether it was requiredby their employer for their current roles. Women in this group mentioned both instances wheretheir license was required as well as those where it wasn’t. One woman mentioned her licensehaving value even in a role where it wasn’t required, sharing that “Working in the environmentalfield, the 'engineering' designation carries a certain weight over other enviro professionals, so Ido identify with it and include it in my email signature, etc. It's a requirement for my currentrole, mind you, but [for] my previous position [it] wasn't.” (WW, IR: 7/10).Theme 3
supply chain management. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Are Female Faculty Role Models to Female Students in Higher Education? A study of female faculty’s identity in computer science and engineeringDr. Qian Wang, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University Dr Qian (Sarah) Wang is a fellow of Higher Education Academy (FHEA). She is an assistant professor and the research director at the Academy of Future Education, XJTLU. Since high school, she went to study abroad and lived in the US for 20 years to pursue her bachelor’s degree, double master’s degree, and doctoral degree. She received her master’s and doctoral degrees from Teachers College Columbia University in social-organization psychology
Paper ID #38676How to Make Engineering Programs Worse for Women: A ReverseBrainstorming Session with SWE StudentsMrs. Sandra Furnbach Clavijo, Stevens Institute of Technology Sandra is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering and Science at Stevens Institute of Technolgy. She is responsible for collaboratively working with the Dean, department chairs, associate chairs, faculty and staff to further build and enhance the School of Engineering and Science’s undergraduate academic programs at Stevens. Sandra assists with new program development, monitors enrollment and graduation performance and
exposed to DEI discussions and become aware of unintended inequities suffered byminority populations, feelings of shame or even perceived loss of status/privilege can materializeas disruptions to the discussion that are counterproductive. As noted in the Rottman article, it iscritical that the discussion tone “shift from rational argumentation to respectful dialogue byincluding mindful listening activities”. The cautionary tale described in the Rottman articleserved as guidance in this study's development.To address these issues, an intervention was proposed to reframe DEI as a central tenet of ethicsand professional responsibility for the 21st century engineering workforce. Several professionalengineering organizations (e.g., American Society of
way.Although there is no official data publicly available for comparison, given that we know manyengineering graduates do not become licensed, and even at four years post graduation onlyaround 45 percent of graduates become licensed [6], our sample consisting of 88 percent licensedProfessional Engineers was a large overrepresentation of this group; this suggests our samplewas likely missing those who have exited engineering completely. These characteristics of oursample are all considerations to keep in mind as readers reflect on our findings below.Table 1.Sample Comparison with 2021 Canadian Census Data Engineering Graduates
engineering. Thereare practitioners who design and make decisions about events on a daily basis. Some of thejournals/conference venues where work is presented are more linked to academia, like ASEE.Within ASEE, presentations in the Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND) and the Womenin Engineering Division (WIED) may overlap with presentations in the Precollege Division(PCEE) and the divisions aligned with specific disciplines.There are journal /conference venues that engage more industry, like the Institute of Electricaland Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), etc. that also produce recommendations and workrelated to diversity. There are venues more tied
. For example, some male studentsmentioned that maybe there are not as many women in engineering because it does not interestwomen, or that we should not push diversity into STEM fields so much because diversity does notimprove the performance of a group.In a study published by the American Sociological Review, Herring suggests that diversity canhave a positive impact on business performance. Diverse groups can leverage their experiencesand perspectives to solve problems and make decisions in a way that like-minded groups cannot.While some men in our study see this as diversity quotas where women are hired solely based ontheir gender, there is growing research that shows diversity adds value to teams and organizations.Herring’s findings show
, girls only go to civil engineering. That's all you have.” “Everyone questioned my abilities at the first school. It hurt my pride, so I started studying math. I wanted to enter a mathematical lyceum. And atQ22 Int CS.3.2 this lyceum, the second school, I was lucky that my teachers knew how to encourage and support the interest of students.” “High competition and no prior knowledge in CS were an obstacle duringQ23 my studies I even considered changing majors, but then changed my mind, Int CS.3.1 and overcame the challenges.” “It is called imposter syndrome. I came with zero knowledge of programming to
Paper ID #36814Why engineering needs women—insights of female and nonbinary Finnishupper secondary schoolersDr. Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Finland Johanna Naukkarinen received her M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Helsinki University of Technology in 2001, her D.Sc. (Tech) degree in knowledge management from Tampere University of Technology in 2015, and her professional teacher qualification from Tampere University of Applied sci- ences in 2013. She is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher and project manager with the School of Energy Systems at Lappeenranta-Lahti
put, the field extend from the research. in terms of problem of engineering is not definition, particular end designed with them in users fall outside of the mind. Heck, the WORLD specs for this project and isn’t designed with them organization because, in mind. Because simply put, not all end engineers get to design users face this problem. the world, we think more folks who look like us should get to be engineers. In
Paper ID #38208Work In Progress: Multiple Mentor Model for Cross-InstitutionalCollaboration and Undergraduate ResearchDr. Karen Watkins-Lewis, Morgan State University Dr. Watkins-Lewis is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at Morgan State University. She earned her undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering and her Doctorate in Developmental Psychology from Howard University. She completed post-doctoral fellowships at the University of Mary- land and the University of Virginia. Dr. Lewis’s research centers on increasing awareness on the various psychosocial factors that influence academic
Franklin & Marshall College in physics and women and gender studies.Christine Mathilda CummingsLauren Elizabeth DennisDr. Hannah Nolte, Pennsylvania State University Hannah Nolte has recently completed her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University specializing in human factors and ergonomics. Her research investigates the applicability of mindfulness interventions as a stress-management technique for engineering design to improve design outcomes and student well-being. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Physics and Psychological Science from Gustavus Adolphus College and earned her master’s degree in Industrial Engineering at Penn State by researching the impact of practica style
Paper ID #37331Impact of an Emerging Scholars/Peer-Led Team Learning Program on theRecruitment of Undergraduate Women and Underrepresented Minorities intoComputer Science and MathematicsDr. Rita Manco Powell, University of Pennsylvania Rita Manco Powell received her Ed.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in 2005. She has worked for over 20 years in Penn Engineering, first in the Department of Computer and Information Science and recently in the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, to develop programs and initiatives to recruit women and underrepresented minorities into computer science and to retain them. Powell was Co
shares knowledge, teaches, and relates whatwe have learned via metaphors and narratives. Even our own identity in the world can be thoughtof as a narrative in our minds, and to imagine our future selves we must construct a futurenarrative. It is this power of story that we believe needs to be fundamentally embraced bydiversity efforts in engineering and computing to make a significant change in our demographicchallenges. And yet, the power of story is left, mostly, unexplored in engineering as it does not fitwith our STEM-focused fields that sit strongly in the camps of quantitative evidence, testing, anddesign.We will argue in this paper, that there is convincing evidence that leveraging the power of storymight be the “holy grail” for changing
Paper ID #43168Institutional Context Matters: Linking Characteristics of Universities to theGender Composition of Engineering and Computer Science ProgramsRegina Werum, University of Nebraska, LincolnDr. Patricia Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Hill is an applied sociologist, evaluator, and researcher whose primary scholarship is in gender, STEM and broadening participation in K-22 education and in professoriate.Joseph C Jochman, University of North DakotaAndrea JohnsonDr. Lance C. Perez, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Lance C. P´erez received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia
this approach.Program DescriptionThe WiSTEM program provides academic support in mathematics and computerprogramming, gives opportunities for students to practice mathematics andprogramming on real-world project modules that have societal and cultural relevance,provides a cohort experience with other like-minded individuals, and offers a safespace for students to tackle issues they are likely to confront as a marginalized groupin STEM. The program contains a summer bridge experience and academic-yearlearning community for students majoring in the physical sciences, environmentalscience, mathematics, computer science, and engineering. WiSTEM uses evidence-based practices that increase persistence in STEM like incorporating multiple forms
, pp. 1149-1162, 2021.[53] A. E. Slaton, "Body? What body? Considering ability and disability in STEM disciplines," in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013, pp. 23.247. 1-23.247. 16.[54] B. A. Jimenez, G. Croft, J. Twine, and J. Gorey, "Development of engineering habits of mind for students with intellectual disability," The Journal of Special Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 174-185, 2021.[55] C. McCall, A. Shew, D. R. Simmons, M. C. Paretti, and L. D. McNair, "Exploring student disability and professional identity: Navigating sociocultural expectations in US undergraduate civil engineering programs," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79-89, 2020.[56] W. W. M. So, Q. He, Y
Paper ID #38129Exploring Institutional Retention Support Initiatives for RetainingWomen of Color STEM FacultyDr. Tonisha B. Lane, Virginia Tech Dr. Lane’s research agenda broadly examines diversity, equity, and inclusion in postsecondary educa- tion with the objective of advancing inclusive and transformative policies and practices. Her primary research strand investigates the experiences and outcomes of underrepresented groups in science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Using qualitative methodologies, she has explored access and success for underserved students of color in STEM and STEM intervention
Paper ID #41791Navigating Grief in Academia: Prioritizing Supports for Women Scholarsthrough Informed ApproachesMrs. Enas Aref, Western Michigan University Mrs. Enas Aref is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Industrial Engineering Program at Western Michigan University. Mrs. Aref is a certified Associate Ergonomist. She is also a researcher at the HPI and a doctoral Teaching Assistant in the Industrial and Entrepreneurial Engineering and Engineering Management Department at Western Michigan UniversityDina Idriss-Wheeler, University of OttawaJulia Hajjar, University of Ottawa ©American Society for Engineering
United States Department of Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Experience of Women Undergraduates Attending a Trip to a Regional Women in Computing Celebration Mary Villani Ilknur Aydin Lisa M. Cullington Computer Systems Computer Systems Provost’s Office Farmingdale State College Farmingdale State College Sacred Heart University Farmingdale, NY USA Farmingdale, NY USA Fairfield, CT USA villanmv@farmingdale.edu aydini@farmingdale.edu cullingtonl@sacredheart.eduABSTRACTInstitutions, nationally and internationally
who holds true to the social/technical divide and is an able-bodied, cis-gender, and heterosexual man, workplace norms and incentive structures are designedwith these people in mind, systematically disenfranchising queer engineers.Later steps in addressing equity in this space would include engendering gender equity intoengineering culture and ways of doing and considering the ways in which engineering culture’sassumptions about gender are structurally embedded in our education systems and workforce– notonly recognizing the importance of diversity in the field but also ensuring the importantdifferentiation of support structures so that engineering can become a more level playing field. Inother words, in order for all engineers to feel