Conference Session

Track: Special Topic - Social Justice and Reform Technical Session I

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Emily Alicia Affolter, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Social Justice & Reform

do your research methods employed tostudy engineering education align with your social justice values? In what ways could you examine orimprove upon your research methods to reflect a critical intersectional frame? How might that framebe relevant to your work and change-making in the field of engineering education? Participants willleave the workshop with an increased awareness of how to do engineering education research thatreflects social justice values, paired with concrete methodological ideas to run with. 1 Aligning your Research Methods with your Social Justice Values Plan for the workshop

Conference Session

Track: Special Topic - Social Justice & Reform Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington; Celina Gunnarsson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Camille Birch, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Social Justice & Reform

Conference Session

Track: Special Topic - Social Justice & Reform Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Leo Ryan Bunyea, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Rozwell Johnson; Zoe Reidinger

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Social Justice & Reform

).EverydayCognition:ItsDevelopmentinSocial Context,Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress. Secules,S.,A.Gupta,A.Elby,E.Tanu,SupportingtheNarrativeAgencyofa MarginalizedEngineeringStudent,JournalofEngineeringEducation107(2),1-33, 2018 Turner,D.W.,III(2010).Qualitativeinterviewdesign:Apracticalguidefornovice investigators.TheQualitativeReport,15(3),754-760 U.S.CentersforDiseaseControl(2016).YouthRisksBehaviorSurvey. Woods,D.R.(1994).Problem-BasedLearning:HowtoGaintheMostinPBL, Waterdown,Ontario:D.R.WoodsPublishing. 17

Conference Session

Track: Special Topic - Social Justice & Reform Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Rachel M. Johnson, University of Minnesota; Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University; Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University; Kali Furman, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Social Justice & Reform

conceptual understanding of oppression and privilege.IntroductionMany engineering departments are seeking to diversify their communities and establish a climateof inclusion and collaboration. College-wide efforts at the authors’ institution have beenpreviously described [1], and include initiatives to enhance students’ and faculty’s capacities toengage issues of inclusivity, equity and social justice. Associated faculty developmentprogramming and curricula reform at both undergraduate- and graduate-student levels arepushing beyond multicultural awareness/cultural diversity, or growth in cultural competency,towards understanding intersections of institutionalized systems of power, privilege, andinequity. These educational opportunities center

Conference Session

Track: Special Topic - Social Justice and Reform Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Ellen Foster, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, ​Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Social Justice & Reform

strategic campaign with and for engineering educators who want to enactstructural change that addresses inequity in engineering. We also hope to foster space andopenness for dialogue with those who might not yet see the need for structural change in thisfield, but who are interested in making engineering education better and more accountable toequity, diversity, and engagements with diverse publics and needs. This work is part of anoverarching Relational Organizing/Action Research (ROAR) project, in which we are interestedin achieving two goals as outcomes of research with and about engineering educators: (1)changing rewards structures in ways that value engineering education research contributions; and(2) enacting structural change that enhances

Conference Session

Track: Special Topics - Social Justice & Reform Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Special Topic: Social Justice & Reform

STEM Education Diversity Scholarship.” The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD), April 30 2018. Pawley, Alice and Donna Riley (2018) “Targeted harassment in EER equity research,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City UT, June 24 2018. Riley, Donna (2019) “Pipelines, Persistence, and Perfidy: Institutional Unknowing and Betrayal Trauma in Engineering.” Feminist Formations, 31(1) 1-19.3 What is “targeted harassment?” How would you define it?4 What is “targeted harassment?” Often virtual (phone, email, social media) Personal Threatening violence Expressing misogyny, homophobia, or racism Coordinated and repeated5 What does it look like in academia