Conference Session

Track 1 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Fabian Zender, Georgia Institute of Technology; Daniel P. Schrage, Georgia Institute of Technology; Greg Jensen, NSF Center for e-Design –BYU Site; Barry McPherson, The Boeing Company; James Fehr, The Boeing Company; Matthew M. Symmonds, The Boeing Company; David E French, The Boeing Company

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

the modeling, analysis and manufacturing of four working Formula-1 type racecar. Dr. Jensen has also conducted research in Engineering Design and Modeling found in the specific areas of Computer Aided Geometric Design, Parametric CAx Modeling, and Multi-discipline CAD-centric Design Optimization. He is currently involved in the development next generation CAx tools, curvature matched machining methods, parametrics and customization of CAx tools for industries like Boeing, GM, Pratt & Whitney, ATK, Ford, Belcan, etc.Mr. Barry McPherson, The Boeing CompanyJames Fehr, The Boeing Company James Fehr is currently the Learning, Training and Development (LTD) Senior Manager responsible for Engineering Learning

Conference Session

Track 1 - Session 2 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Haeseong J. Jee, Hongik University

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

arealso valuable for students in business, design, engineering, science and technology. These aretaught in a modular framework with a hands-on topic each week of the term as shown in table 1.The syllabi of the courses are now briefly explained and discussed with each case of class project.Table 1. A course framework for the new curriculum [Dresselhaus 2011]Course Status Product Design Engineering Foundation CourseCourse Term Spring or Fall semester annuallyCourse Credits 3Class Hours 3(2+1) per weekCourse Type Design Studio2.1 Form & Esthetics for Engineering Design (FEED) This is a foundational overview and discovery course covering the basics of design form andesthetics development

Conference Session

Track 1 - Session 2 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Jennifer DeBoer, SPEED

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

theorists. in engineering in particular (in Australia910, for example). The French system of Grandes Ecoles is seen as highlytheoretical, grown out of the military and civil servicetraditions. Elsewhere in Central Europe, German engineering 5 Lundgreen, P. (1990). Engineering Education in Europetraining grew out of a similar start with high-prestige academic and the USA, 1750-1930: the rise to dominance of schooltraining of state engineers. This then translated to an earlier culture and the engineering professions. Annals of Science, 47(1): 33-75. 6 Lucena, J. &

Conference Session

Track 1 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Hyungsub Choi, Seoul National University

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

Conference Session

Track 1 - Session 2 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Yongming Tang, Southeast University; rong wang, Southeast University; Shen Xu, Southeast University, China

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

, and participation in surveys.References1. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research, Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 2004, 223–31.2. Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.3. Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. M. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 533-568.4. Hsiung, C.-M. (2012). The effectiveness of cooperative learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 119-137.5. Leung, M.-Y., Lu, X., Cheng, D., and Lu, M. (2008). Impacts of teaching approaches on learning approaches of construction

Conference Session

Track 1 - Session 2 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

Engineering Education, 2012 Developing a Cross-Cultural Model of Problem Solving: Comparing U.S. and Indian Engineering UndergraduatesThe process of globalization has changed economies and the workplace worldwide. As thisprocess has evolved, competitiveness has become a central issue. According to a typical metricof competitiveness used by government agencies and the media, which is the number ofengineering graduates, the U.S. has been falling behind emerging economies, most particularlyIndia and China.1 However, in trying to decide who is winning and who is losing, Gereffi et al.1emphasize that it is important to consider quality as well as quantity. But what does “quality”mean in engineering, and how are we to measure it

Conference Session

Track 1 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

D. N. Reddy, Indian Society for Technical Education

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

onwards Teaching, Administration and Research have been his forte. His administrative experience speaks volumes. He has held various positions as Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering from 1996- 99, He became the Head of the Department of Bio-Medical Engineering, Osmania University between 2001-2003 and 2005-2007 and Founder/ Director, Centre for Energy Technology in Osmania University, Hyderabad. Principal, University College of Engineering, Osmania University for nearly 8 years, Dean Faculty of Engineering for 2 years and also the member of the Executive council at Osmania University. Awards and honours have been exemplary to his intellectual. Capability Notable among them are: 1. Eminent Engineer National Award