record of service. As a result, engineers and engineering educators may beunfamiliar with or misperceive the principles of leadership within the Army because 1) they haveno affiliation with the Army or 2) they have gained a perception of military leadership throughwhat they see in Hollywood.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of Army leadership throughthe lens of the United States Military Academy at West Point (West Point). Leadershipprinciples, education, and training are reviewed from guiding doctrinal principles through aninstitution-level leader development system, and into specific coursework that focuses on leaderdevelopment. Finally, the paper situates these leadership principles in the capstone
Paper ID #29255Women in Engineering: Promoting Identity Exploration and ProfessionalDevelopmentDr. Maureen C Smith, San Jose State University Dr. Smith received her BA in Psychology from U.C. Davis and her Ph.D in Developmental Psychology from Cornell University. Dr. Smith is a Professor of Child and Adolescent Development in the Lurie College of Education at San Jose State University. She has significant experience with curriculum and program development, including the development of a combined BA-Credential for her department and a First Year Experience program for the university. Her research interests include development
persevering in engineering [11], [20].The development of identity is a social process. People’s thoughts and behaviors are shapedthrough relationships and reflected appraisals with others [4], [16], [21]. Identities are furtherderived through associations, affiliations, and identifications with groups [17], [22]. Tonso [23]observes that identity development is an enculturated process where identities are acquiredthrough "community-based interactions" and Beam et al. [20] concur that social contexts affectidentity. In engineering education, situated learning is central to identity development [23].Therefore, this social process of identity development can be realized through the culture of anengineering program. Cultivating a culture of doing
Paper ID #29338CAREER: Actualizing Latent Diversity in Undergraduate EngineeringEducationDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science
identity and belonging. This qualitative analysis will be reported in future publications.The URES tool developed in this study represents a preliminary effort to collect and analyzeperceptions of undergraduate research experiences across all class years. Items were drawnfrom constructs associated with assessment of research training programs that overlappedwith constructs of engineering identity. Responses suggest that students build their definitionsof engineering based primarily on didactic training and do not necessarily view high-impactextracurricular research experiences as part of what it means to be an engineer. Future workwill examine the overlap among measures of engineering identity and research skills and willmap the qualitative
RPPmodel, this partnership might best be described as a Community of Practice in which equal valueis placed on in-service teachers, Ph.D. students in CS and engineering majors, and students with ahistory of robotics learning experiences in elementary schools, all supported by the staff,infrastructure, and grants of the K-12 STEM Center. External independent assessment has beenprovided by STEM Program Evaluation, Assessment, and Research (SPEAR) consultants withsubstantial experience in evaluating education interventions such as BOTS.Called Building Opportunities with Teachers in Schools (BOTS), the collaborators aimed todesign a low-cost, scalable solution that focuses on improving the teachers’ confidence inteaching computer science through
University Dr. Jeffrey Harris is an assistant professor (teaching stream) in mechanical engineering at York University in Toronto, Canada. He currently serves at the Director of Common Engineering and Science within the Lassonde School of Engineering. He has a PhD in mechanical engineering from the University of Toronto and is completing a M.Ed. from York University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development of Employability Skills in Engineering Disciplines through Co-op1. Introduction This study aims to understand the varying levels of the development of skills vital tothe success of a cooperative experience, per each engineering
QuestionsGiven the success of the WP program in other disciplines, the beneficial aspects of servicelearning that address some of the identified causes of attrition, and the need to providemeaningful STEM education experiences to K-6 students, the WP program was implemented inan engineering course at Sacramento State. Through this service learning experience, collegestudents (1) gain more knowledge about what civil engineers do, (2) engage with the communityand embrace their identity as college students and future civil engineers, and (3) practice theirtechnical communication skills with a non-technical audience. Elementary students (1) areexposed to civil engineering, (2) practice their writing skills, and (3) interact with a diversegroup of college
Paper ID #29250Career Development Impacts of a Research Program on Graduate Studentand Postdoc MentorsNicole McIntyre, University of California, Berkeley Nicole McIntyre serves as the Education Director of the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF funded Science and Technology Center. She is also the Director of the Transfer-to-Excellence program, a summer research program for community college students. Nicole holds degrees in Psychol- ogy and Social Welfare from the University of California, Berkeley, and a graduate degree in Educational Leadership from the University of San Francisco. She is committed
broad range of clients from the healthcare to medical device manufacturing industries. Over the last 30 years, Dr. Nowak has led product and technology development programs spanning ideation through commercialization; field use and application in areas including robotic systems, au- tonomous underwater vehicles and medical devices; and entrepreneurial ventures in formation, pre-seed, and seed stages that have been successfully transitioned to industry. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: The Community-Engaged College: Grand Valley State University’s Industry and Community Partnership ModelBackgroundThis Work-In-Progress
computing And engineering ed- ucation researcher through his professional activities in the ACM, and IEEE. Other appointments include Board of Governors of the IEEE Computer Society, steering committee of the Frontiers in Education Conference and as Chair of the Special Technical Community (STC) for Education. He is a Director of CeTUSS (The Swedish National Center for Pedagogical Development of Technology Education in a Societal and Student Oriented Context, www.cetuss.se) and the IEEE Education Society Nordic Chapter. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Determinants of initial training for engineering educatorsIntroduction and backgroundThe beginning of the twenty
engineering and the profession. Throughmakerspace activities and the perception of feeling included and developing a sense ofbelonging, students can determine if they are perceived as being part of the engineeringcommunity [12] and therefore, are or can be perceived as being professional engineers. Wemaintain that students who do not feel they belong or included in makerspaces may also feel theyare not perceived to be future engineers, influencing their identity as being members of theprofession and the community of engineers. Thus, gender, ethnicity, and culture may beassociated with feeling of belonging in makerspaces, and an indicator of students’ feeling ofbelonging in engineering and developing and engineering identity. Given students are likely
Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy
as pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education, and curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Michael A Soltys, University of Colorado, Boulder Mike Soltys is an Instructor for the Engineering Plus degree program at at the University of Colorado. Mike is passionate about engineering education, and teaches engineering design in First-Year Engineering Projects (GEEN 1400), Engineering Projects for the Community (GEEN 2400), Statics (GEEN 3851), Thermodynamics (GEEN 3852) and Theoretical Fluid Mechanics (CVEN 3313). Mike is the co-PI for TeachEngineering, a curricular digital library with the
enrichment programs. With the wireless communications research experience for teachers, she coordi- nated logistics during the summer and provided day-to-day curriculum development and implementation support for teacher participants throughout the year. Having extensive experience in working with both rural and urban education settings, her current responsibilities at Columbia’s School of Engineering in- clude building partnerships between educational institutions, industry partners, and community schools in an effort to create greater access to high-quality STEM education opportunities for all.Dr. Jonatan Ostrometzky, Electrical Engineering, Columbia University Jonatan Ostrometzky received his B.Sc. degree (Magna Cum Laude
South Korea. She currently works as graduate research assistant in engineering education department. Her research interests are assessment for learners in diverse settings, and teacher education in multicultural settings.Prof. Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University at West Lafayette Jeffrey F. Rhoads is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same insti- tution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research interests include the predictive design, analysis, and
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on
working in a team setting,they recognized the relevance and connection of the project to real-world engineering practice,and they could “see themselves as engineers or at least becoming engineers” [2]. In surveyingfirst-year engineering undergraduates as well as high school students exposed to servicelearning, Zarske found positive impacts in identity and attitudes towards community service,especially in underrepresented populations, that may help in recruitment and retention of thosegroups [3].There are a variety of definitions of service learning that are employed in education. For thepurposes of this paper, we will use the definition adopted by Kennesaw State University’squality enhancement plan (QEP) for regional accreditation review
Paper ID #29475Developing Technical Self-efficacy through a Maker-inspired DesignProjectDr. Jennifer S Mullin, UC Davis Jennifer S. Mullin is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at UC Davis. Her work concerns the intersection between design, communication and prob- lem solving skills in engineering by enhancing all three through informed instructional choices using a ”learn-by-doing,” hands-on approach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Developing Technical Self-efficacy through a Maker-inspired Design ProjectAbstract:This
: A review of the literature AbstractGraduates from aviation and aerospace technical and engineering disciplines emerge withcertifications and academic coursework to fulfill the respective degree requirements, but maystill lack fluency in key non-technical competencies to fully leverage their professionalcredentials and academic preparation. Due to the applied nature of the aviation and aerospacedisciplines, problem-based learning approaches implicitly seek to incorporate and develop suchskills as part of the educational experience. Individual resilience is one example of a non-technical competency sought by employers across high consequence, technology-basedindustries. However, a stronger shift from
-profit and secondary education sectors, and currently serves on multiple community-based environmental boards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Environmental and Ecological Engineering in Context: A Foundational Graduate CourseIntroduction Many contemporary global challenges are dependent on maintaining environmentalquality, and this motivates professional training and higher educational degree programdevelopment. In the United States (U.S.), the number of ABET accredited environmentalengineering undergraduate degree programs and student enrollments have grown substantiallyover the past 30 years. These students are part of the pipeline into
, launched in 2017. The program, Sustainable EngineeringManagement for International Development (SEM4ID), has enrolled between 8 and 13 studentseach year from both engineering and non-engineering backgrounds, and provides a mix ofclasses in technical engineering and liberal education topics. While the different disciplines worktogether, there are separate learning outcomes for the engineers and non-engineers. Theengineering strand of the program is accredited by the UK Engineering Council.Students engage in experiential, problem-based learning (PBL) through international servicelearning (ISL) projects in Sierra Leone or Zambia, where they are connected to previouslyestablished community-based contacts. Throughout the year-long program, students
2015, she shared her instructional materials, including a scoring system eval- uated for reliability, with over 400 schools from the U.S., Australia, Germany, and South Korea. Dr. Norback has studied communication and other basic skills in the workplace and developed curriculum over the past 30 years—first at Educational Testing Service; then as part of the Center for Skills Enhance- ment, Inc., which she founded, with clients including the U.S. Department of Labor, the National Skill Standards Board, and universities. Since arriving at Georgia Tech in 2000 her work has focused on oral communication for engineering students and engineers. Dr. Norback has published over 20 articles in the past decade alone, in the
Fellow, and an MIT Chemical Engineering Communication Lab Fellow.Mr. Alex Jordan Hanson, University of Texas at AustinJennifer M. SchallDr. Jesse N Dunietz, Massachussetts Institute of Technology Jesse Dunietz is an educational designer for the MIT Communication Lab, an artificial intelligence re- searcher, and a freelance science writer. He develops training materials for the engineering graduate students who join the Communication Lab to serve as communication coaches for their peers. He holds a bachelor’s in computer science from MIT and a Ph.D. in computer science from Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity.Amanda X Chen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Biological EngineeringRohan Chitnis, Massachusetts Institute of
Jones, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication and Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessing Educational Pathways for Manufacturing in Rural Communities: An Investigation of New and Existing Programs in Northwest FloridaAbstractA subset of manufacturing, the advanced manufacturing (AM) sector is defined using twocriteria: high levels of spending for research and development (R&D) and a high share of STEMjobs within companies. In northwest Florida, AM
Paper ID #31340Health Stress and Support System Narratives of Engineering StudentsDr. Greg Rulifson PE, USAID Greg is currently a Science and Technology Policy Fellow at USAID. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineering change
. As a K- 8 pre-service teacher educator, she includes engineering in her elementary and early childhood science methods courses and developed and taught an engineering methods course for middle school teachers. She also developed a graduate-level engineering education course for PreK-6 teachers. Dr. Lottero has provided professional learning experiences in multiple schools and school systems in Maryland. She has co-authored numerous engineering-focused articles for the teacher practitioner journal, Science and Children, and presents her research regularly through the American Society for Engineering Education. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how
, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the
makerspace has developed three mainstrategies for driving a diverse and larger set of students from its engineering, math, and physicalscience majors into the space to serve as a platform for design practice, cross-disciplinaryexploration, and community building. The first strategy aims to introduce the makerspace tostudents as early as possible, hopefully developing an early familiarity and connection to thespace. The second is the development of collaborative and structured learning opportunities thatencourages the teaching of broad skills and sharing of information within the makerspace,whether in the form of for-credit courses or short and accessible Microcourses. The third is toleverage web and social media to create excitement around student
programs as well as programs in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program. Her research interests include topics related to student persistence, STEM doctoral student experiences, faculty mentorship and development, modeling and analysis of complex manufacturing systems, and the development of new discrete event simulation methodologies. Bekki is the co-director of the interdisciplinary, National Science Foundation supported CareerWISE research program, which strives to: 1) understand the experiences of diverse women who are pursuing and leaving doctoral programs in science and engineering and 2) increase women’s persistence in science and engineering doctoral programs through the development and