the ability to work together while solving an open-ended designproblem, and being able to overcome any obstacles that arise. These obstacles involve differingwork ethics, personalities, and communication styles. Inevitably, these differences can lead toconflict, and a need to resolve disagreements within the team. These ever-present emotionalaspects to working in a team are found not only in student projects, but also on the projects theywill be working on once they graduate. Finding the skills as a student to successfully navigatethe myriad of issues that may arise when working with others, sets student up for success in theirengineering careers after graduation, as shown by Jones (1996) [1] and Seat et al. (1996) [2].Often students who are
relationships reported amongst respondents? 2. How do the results obtained from the previous study compare to the findings of this cross- university study?Study DesignTo further examine the role of familial influence on student engineering major choice, this studyemploys a multi-methods approach facilitated through a survey with both quantitative andqualitative components. Data obtained from elements of the survey were first analyzedindependently from each other. These independent analyses were followed by a combinedinterpretation phase that sought to understand the results in reflection of one another. To aid inthe analysis and interpretation of results, Social Cognitive Career Theory is used as a theoreticalframework for this
understanding of otherdisciplines early in their educational career? While this study offers an overview and assessmentof immersing first-year Architectural Engineering students into a beginning architecture designstudio, the intention is for programs with similarly related majors to have the ability to also applyconcepts presented.For the purpose of this paper, interdisciplinary is defined as integrating knowledge and methodsfrom different majors using a synthesis of approaches, multidisciplinary is defined as studentsfrom different majors working together where they each draw on their knowledge from theirchosen major, and cross-disciplinary is defined as viewing a major from the perspective ofanother.Overview of the School of Architecture at Oklahoma
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to graduate studies, Erica joined Teach for America and taught high school chemistry in Las Vegas. While her primary research involves water and wastewater, she has strong interests in engineering education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Cory Budischak, Temple University Cory is a teacher and researcher who
. Broadly categorized, students’understandings of success related to career preparation and opportunities—an expected theme forthose in technical degree programs, happiness or enjoyment in life, and living a life of purpose—what some might call “the good life.” Edwin’s response to our questions related to successreveals such understandings of success are not necessarily exclusive: “To me, [success] meansbeing able to fulfill your own personal purpose, while at the same time, enjoying it and making agood living out of it, I would say. That’d be success.”Though student participation in specific majors clearly shapes notions of success, students’insistence that the profitability of a future career is not the only—and sometimes not even theprimary
benefits to their career advancement [10]. Increasedretention has been reported within engineering engagement [11-13]. Improved diversity, especiallyin regard to gender, has also been documented within engagement [14-16].This paper presents an approach that builds on the prior literature to create an alternate pathwaythrough the first year in engineering that includes community-engaged learning community (LC)classes. Evidence from the experience is shared along with lessons learned.Context: First-Year CurriculumPurdue University has had a dedicated department or school responsible for the first-year ofengineering for more than 60 years [17]. All engineering students at Purdue University are requiredto complete a common first year core of classes
feels they have in the relevant environment), and relatedness (sense of social connection and support within the relevant environment). In sum, research regarding the self-determination theory would suggest that both perceived success and the sense of support in the form of a caring instructor would predict overall motivation or empowerment as described in the MUSIC model. The usefulness factor in the MUSIC model suggests that motivation increases when students perceive the utility of their academic work toward earning their degree or their future career. The utility of their work can be in the short term, such as needing to pass a required course, or in the longer term, such as the value of learning information relevant
more connections and partnerships across the state with public, private, and career tech high schools as well as clearer Figure 1. Graphical representation of the OU College 2+2 or 2+3 programs with of Engineering Strategic Goals for 2020-2025. community colleges. We are heavily investing in visitingprospective college students in their home communities
Boulder. 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30 Full Paper: Where’s the Math? A Case for Reconsidering Math in K-12 EngineeringIntroduction“[We wanted them to] experience the fun side of engineering, and we weren’t selling what all ofengineering actually requires.” – administrator about his high school’s STEM curriculum [1]It is indeed important for students to have “fun” in engineering, particularly those in lowergrades who have yet to cross engineering off their potential career pathway list. Yetmisrepresenting the significance of mathematics in K-12 engineering may give students a falsesense of what engineering
projects integrated with the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Dr. Surupa Shaw | Texas A&M University | Higher Education Center at McAllen TX I. INTRODUCTION The undergraduate engineering curriculum forms the fundamental knowledge base for our future engineerswho would be serving the global society. It is imperative for the undergraduate engineers to get a reality checkon the utility of their classroom knowledge that would help them shape their career path and would providethem a valuable appreciation of the course content. Phylis Blumenfeld et al. [1] emphasized on the compellingargument of making projects an integral part of the learning process, as they promote student
students take the traditional path consisting of two 2-credit introductory engineeringcourses. The first course, ENGR 131, focuses on design, teaming and career exploration usingExcel as a computer tool to model systems and analyze data. The second course, ENGR 132,introduces students to MATLAB and more formal constructs associated with computation.Two other pathways are offered to students to meet the first-year engineering requirements. Onepathway combines the traditional introductory courses into one 4-credit course, ENGR 130. Thispathway is ideal for students who have some or most of the first-year requirements met throughAP credit.The other pathway leverages Learning Communities(LC), where students participate onvertically integrated project
explores new ways to supportfreshmen engineering students and understand the changing needs of current students in thehopes of increasing retention rates and fostering student academic and professional success.However, many factors play into the academic success of individual students. Numerous studieshave identified factors that influence whether a student will persist in engineering includingclassroom climate, academic success (i.e., grades and conceptual knowledge), self-confidence/self-efficacy, academic preparedness, career interests and race and gender [1]. Timemanagement and study skills are key areas with which most new freshmen engineering studentsstruggle. Effective time management strategies increase academic performance [2], as well
. Kristina has a BS and MS in civil engineering from Brigham Young University. She began her career as a structural engineer in the aerospace industry where she worked on the Space Shuttle booster rockets and other solid rocket motors. For 10 years she owned and operated an engineering consulting business. After transitioning to academia, she worked for the NSF-funded National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.Dr. Christian R. Bolander, Utah State University Department of Engineering Education Christian recently joined the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University (USU) as a Professor of Practice in Engineering Mathematics. He just graduated with his doctorate from Utah State in Mechanical
-classUTAs indicated ways that they believed they supported inclusive teaching practices in theclassroom. Below are excerpts from UTAs responses:…I like to promote multiple resources around campus, such as libraries, career centers, andacademic counseling. … I feel like when a student is struggling it's helpful to hear that othershave struggles too, and it's helpful to be given these resources.…the best way .. is to not only create a nurturing environment but by listening and being awelcoming TAUTAs indicated ways they believed that they fostered a sense of belonging as described below:...I would offer my experience with the course to make them feel like they are not alone. …I have been trying to learn all of the students' names. I find that showing
lost time and tuition fees since leaving the engineering field costs studentsapproximately $500k over the course of their careers [4].Factors that contribute to students leaving engineering programs include lack of belonging, quality ofadvising and instruction, and performance in first-year courses. Research shows that a lack of sense ofbelonging is one of the biggest reasons a student leaves engineering [5]. In addition, the quality of advisingand course instruction has a significant impact on student persistence in an engineering program [6,7].Students’ persistence can be greatly improved if there is a culture of collaboration in their academicenvironment [8]. It has been shown that fostering a community environment, both in and out of
a drill section while enrolling in GNEGcourses. The drills are primarily used for outside speakers including each of the departments,career services, multicultural center, and other student support services such as academiccoaching. During drills, students learn about all engineering majors, and go through series oftalks that foster transition from high school to becoming a quality engineering student. Lastly, asa part of GNEG courses, students meet once a week with a peer mentor. Peer mentors helpstudents to build an understanding of the campus resources and guide their mentees throughtopics such as time management, interacting with faculty, and effective study habits.In March 2020, when classes transitioned to remote learning, the hands
engineering such asthe impacts on society, career opportunities, along with the need for strong communication andcreativity skills, have been shown to be important to students entering the field of engineering[18].References[1] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 2020. Criteria For AccreditingEngineering Programs, 2017 – 2018 | ABET. [online] Available at: [Accessed 6 May 2020].[2] Bennett, D., Kapoor, K., Rajinder, K., & Maynard, N. (2015) “First Year Engineeringstudents: Perceptions of Engineers, Engineering Work Amongst Domestic and InternationalStudents.” The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education. ISSN: 1838-2959,vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 89-105.[3] Compeau, S. “The Calling of an Engineer: High School Students
Paper ID #36388Lessons Learned from COVID That Have Been Transferred to Post-COVIDTeaching and LearningDr. Michael Cross, Norwich University Michael Cross is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering teaching classes in the areas of circuits, electronics, energy systems, and engineering design. Cross received degrees from the Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of Vermont and began his academic career at UVM where he taught courses in the areas of analog and digital circuits, electronics, semiconductor physics, power electronics, and engineering design.Dr. David M. Feinauer P.E
presentation about something we've created and give a pitch about it, as it is something that a lot of us will be doing throughout our careers. 6. ConclusionThis paper delves into an approach to engaging first-year engineering students through a combination ofteam-based design projects, peer-review strategies, and a service-learning approach. By incorporating theTeam Design Project and numerous mini projects into the curriculum, we have successfully facilitated adynamic and interactive learning environment that emphasizes key principles of engineering design,teamwork, and project management. The survey results revealed substantial student appreciation for theteam-based design project and brought to light potential areas for further
engineeringstudents, with approximately 1,000 students taking the course each year. The course consists ofan intensive semester-long collaborative project where teams of eight students construct anautonomous over-terrain vehicle (OTV) from scratch. The aim of the course is to give students awide variety of foundational skills and knowledge that will be useful throughout the rest of theirengineering career, including 3D modeling, prototyping, manufacturing, troubleshooting, projectmanagement, coding, electronics, and teamwork. Each team of eight is assigned a differentoverarching mission that involves both sensing and actuation. The five existing missions include1) water sampling (testing for pollution and/or salinity), 2) data collection (measuring