. 4, Pp. 369–375, 1998.[7] S. S. Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E., & Peng, “Entry and Persistence Of Women and Minorities In College Science and Engineering Education,” Educ. Stat. Q., Vol. 2, No. 3, Pp. 59–60, 2000.[8] E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, “Who Succeeds In Stem Studies? An Analysis Of Binghamton University Undergraduate Students,” Econ. Educ. Rev., Vol. 29, Pp. 935–946, 2010.[9] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition From Engineering Majors,” This Artic. Is From Int. J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 29, No. 4, Pp. 1–12, 2013.[10] L. J. Everett, P. Imbrie, and J. Morgan, “Integrated Curricula: Purpose and Design,” J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 89, No. 2, Pp. 167–175
semester.Following examination of student responses to the sociotechnical thinking survey, only certainquestions pointed towards potential delineations in responses based on gender. The fullsociotechnical thinking survey is attached in Appendix B. Questions (Q) that showed gender-based differences and were thus most relevant to our research questions in this paper include Q1, 7Q2, Q4, Q9, and Q10. Additional quantitative and qualitative results from this survey that are notspecific to gender differentiation appear in [35].Q1, Q2, and Q4 were analyzed by scaling student responses. Most questions allowed for fourdifferent responses, which were assigned a value of