outcomes that correspond to the undergraduate pathway (i.e., receiving andresponding). Table 2. SEE course: Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive student outcomes (Q: video quiz, WS: in-class worksheet, HW: weekly homework). Student Assessment type Assessment type Demonstrated ability (Comprehension) outcomes (Knowledge) Identify basic concepts and methods in solving civil and environmental Knowledge engineering problems from a systems
Experience, Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition,” 2019.[8] S. Luryi et al., “Entrepreneurship in engineering education,” in 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, 2007, pp. T2E-10.[9] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, p. 425, 2012.[10] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial career choice and characteristics of engineering and business students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[11] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E
over the 11 subject matter expert presentations. Students were guided in career and degreediscovery as well as their exploration of: • How is COVID affecting major industries and the media? • How do we separate space fact from fiction? • What are the directives for NASA’s Human Exploration Missions? • How are meteorite samples curated and classified? • What is NASA’s Moon to Mars mission? • How do meteors provide clues to Earth’s past? • What are basic star formations and how are they formed?The internship concluded with student research teams presenting their projects to an audience of UT scientists andengineers, as well as other interns and their guests via a live Zoom webinar and Q&A. Over the
percent 1Extroverts 18 51 percent Thinking 18 51 percentIntroverts 17 49 percent Feeling 17 49 percentSensing 17 49 percent Judging 6 17 percentIntuitive 18 51 percent Perceiving 29 83 percentTask 4: Analyze and Interpret the DataRe e ac ed f de e e Q e I f eQ e a e e ad e -line KTS-IItest result of personality type of each student in the
gender in engineering," Social studies of science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[18] W. Faulkner, "Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities," Social studies of science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, 2007.[19] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd. ed ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.[20] "Essential Project Design Elements Checklist." https://cpb-us- w2.wpmucdn.com/wp.wpi.edu/dist/e/220/files/2017/06/Essential-Project-Design- Elements-Checklist.pdf (accessed July 2, 2020).[21] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, "Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote
. 144–152, 2013.[10] I. Drewelow, “Exploring graduate teaching assistants’ perspectives on their roles in a foreign language hybrid course,” System, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1006–1022, 2013.[11] J. Paulsen and A. C. McCormick, “Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020.[12] K. Sobel, S. Avery, and I. J. Ferrer-Vinent, “Teaching Them to Teach: Programmatic Evaluation of Graduate Assistants’ Teaching Performance,” Public Serv. Q., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–213, 2016.[13] B. C. O. Neal, M. Wright, T. Perorazio, and J. Purkiss, “The Impact of Teaching on Student Retention in the Sciences,” 2002.[14] B. Melton and Y. Bodur, “Effects of a
, M.H. Cho, C.L. Tsai, and R. Marra, “Unpacking online learning experiences:Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 19,no. 2013, pp. 10-17, 2013, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001[10] Q. Kreth, M.E. Spirou, S. Budenstein, and J. Melkers, “How prior experience and self-efficacy shape graduate student perceptions of an online learning environment in computing,”Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 357-381, 2019.[11] B.H. Chaney, J.M. Eddy, S.M. Dorman, L. Glessner, B. L. Green, and R. Lara-Alecio,“Development of an instrument to assess student opinions of the quality of distance educationcourses. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 145–164, 2007,doi.org/10.1080
, and T. Aila, “Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04958, 2019.[19] Z. Wu, G. Lin, Q. Tao, and J. Cai, “M2e-try on net: Fashion from model to everyone,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019, pp. 293–301.[20] A. Siarohin, S. Lathuilière, S. Tulyakov, E. Ricci, and N. Sebe, “First order motion model for image animation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00196, 2020.[21] D. A. Scheufele and N. M. Krause, “Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 16, pp. 7662–7669, 2019.[22] R. A. Nash, “Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored
be ideal for exploring the various effects on education at TAMU, such as Q-drops during theSpring 2020 semester, retention and matriculation data of students, and choices of remote coursesover face-to-face courses during the subsequent semesters of the pandemic.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on everyone in the United States, many have lost friendsand family to the virus, and even today, we cannot see an end to the pandemic-centric world welive in. Despite the circumstances dealt with, it seems that our faculty at TAMU are carrying onas best they can. Even as we write this an author’s student lost a family member to COVID thisweekend. Faculty continue to put their best effort in to adapt to this remote online world in
. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 1997.[6] S. G. Brainard and L. Carlin, “A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 369–375, 1998.[7] S. S. Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E., & Peng, “Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education,” Educ. Stat. Q., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 59–60, 2000.[8] E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, “Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol
. Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, 2018, p. 7.[8] M. V Svyantek, “Missing from the Classroom: Current Representations of Disability in Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, p. 7.[9] M. F. Olney and K. F. Brockelman, “The impact of visibility of disability and gender on the self-concept of university students with disabilities,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2005.[10] M. H. Fitzgerald, “‘You Look So Well’ The Multiple Facets of Hidden Disabilities,” Disabil. Stud. Q., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 254
to feel confident and valuedwithin academic spaces, giving them a sense of reprieve and a greater capacity to persist in theiracademic and career goals.EMPOWERING STEM PERSISTENCE AMONG GRADUATE WOMEN 17 ReferencesAlexander, Q. R., & Hermann, M. A. (2015). African-American women's experiences in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at a Predominantly White University: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039705Anderson, A. J., Sánchez, B., Reyna, C., & Rasgado-Flores, H. (2020). "It just weighs in the
& Exposition Proceedings, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Jun. 2008, p. 13.1199.1-13.1199.6. doi: 10.18260/1-2--3148.[7] A. J. Jaeger, M. K. Eagan, and L. G. Wirt, “Retaining Students in Science, Math, and Engineering Majors: Rediscovering Cooperative Education.,” J. Coop. Educ. Internsh., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 20–32, 2008.[8] D. Jeske and C. M. Axtell, “The Nature of Relationships in e-Internships: A Matter of the Psychological Contract, Communication and Relational Investment,” J. Work Organ. Psychol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2018.[9] Q. Liu, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, and E. Moore, “Examining Workplace Affordance and Student Engagement in Engineering Co-op and Internship Literature.,” Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ., vol
Mental Illness,” Stigma Res Action, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Jan. 2011, doi:10.5463/sra.v1i1.9.[24] O. Eylem et al., “Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematicreview and meta-analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 879, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3.[25] F. Gary, “Stigma: Barrier to mental health care among ethnic minorities.,” Issues in mental health nursing,vol. 26, pp. 979–99, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1080/01612840500280638.[26] E. C. Wong, R. L. Collins, J. Cerully, R. Seelam, and B. Roth, “Racial and Ethnic Differences in MentalIllness Stigma and Discrimination Among Californians Experiencing Mental Health Challenges,” Rand Health Q,vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2017, Accessed
, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1185[28] Goonatilake, R., & Bachnak, R. (2012). Promoting Engineering Education among High School and Middle School Students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and …, 13(1), 15–21. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Promoting+Engineering+ Education+Among+High+School+and+Middle+School+Students#0[29] Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2020). Project-based learning for middle school students monitoring standby power: replication of impact on stem knowledge and dispositions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09674-3[30] Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M
Expert Practitioners,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 359–379, 2007.[4] N. J. McNeill, E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, D. J. Therriault, and I. Krause, “Undergraduate Students’ Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 560– 584, 2016.[5] C. J. Atman and K. M. Bursic, “Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference?,” Res. Eng. Des., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 240–250, 1996.[6] G. Rowland, “What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice,” Performace Improv. Q., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 65–86, 1992.[7] D. C. Wynn and P. J. Clarkson, “Process models in design and development,” Res. Eng. Des., vol. 29, no. 2, pp
of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1967.[3] L. L. Putnam and C. Stohl, "Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context," Communication Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 248-265, 1990.[4] J. R. Wieselmann, E. A. Dare, E. A. Ring-Whalen and G. H. Roehrig, ""I just do what the boys tell me": Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, pp. 112-144, 11 July 2019.[5] M. A. Peeters, C. G. Rutte, H. F. J. M. van Tuijl and I. M. M. J. Reymen, "Designing in Teams; Does Personality Matter?," Small Group Research, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 438-467, 2008.[6] M.-É. Roberge, Q. J. Xu and D. M. Rousseau, "Collective
engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[3] C. Garibay and R. M. Teasdale, “Equity and Evaluation in Informal STEM Education,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2019, no. 161, pp. 87–106, 2019.[4] B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, Engineering Practice in a Global Context. 2013.[5] R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere, “The ‘new environmental paradigm,’” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 1978.[6] A. Byars-Winston, “Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2014.[7] C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, p
implementation of blended learning model in Semiconductor Device course," 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kanazawa, 2015, pp. 176-180.[11] R. Shen, M. Wang, W. Gao, D. Novak, and L. Tang, “Mobile learning in a large blended computer science classroom: System function, pedagogies, and their impact on learning,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 538–546, Nov. 2009.[12] K. Renaud and Q. Cutts, “Teaching human-centered security using nontraditional techniques,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2013.[13] M. Redekopp and G. Ragusa, “Evaluating flipped classroom strategies and tools for computer engineering,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf., 2013.[14] E. F
gets better with time. Virtual experience makes it harder to collaborate (1 mention) o Not able to share opinion with the project members when we need them instead we focus on our part only which is a good thing but it motivates knowing what others thinking. Other challenges (3 items) o Request the data needed to create an accurate model o The most difficult challenge to my research is making sure that the Deep Q learning programs are debugged and properly rebuilt. o Technical difficulties sometimes Not anticipating any challenges (1 mention) o I don't really think anything would be challenging.What differences do
; Simmons, J. L. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative research. Issues in participant observation: A text and reader, 216-228.48. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.49. Hertel, J. D., Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). The roles of engineering notebooks in shaping elementary engineering student discourse and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 39(9), 1194-1217.50. Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2000). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11, 353–40051. Bazerman, C. (2006). Analyzing the multidimensionality
Measurements & Networking (M&N), Catania, Italy, July 8-10, 2019; DOI: 10.1109/IWMN.2019.8805042. [6] P. Sharma et al., “Deep Convolutional Neural Network Design Approach for 3D Object Detection for Robotic Grasping,” 2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 6-8, 2020; DOI: 10.1109/CCWC47524.2020.9031186. [7] Z-Q. Zhao et al., “ Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Review,”arXiv:1807.05511v2 [cs.CV] 16 Apr 2019. [8] N. Baker et al., “Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape,” PLoS Comput Biol 14(12): e1006613, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613. [9] D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, A. Toshev, and D. Anguelov
coursenot all letters will be used.Pa ______ a. (kg-m)/s2 b. 0.75 kWatm ______ c. 0.286 kJ/(kg-K) d. 32.2 lbm-ft/s2Rair _____ e. Btu f. 1 Btu/(lbm-ºR)lbf _____ g. 0.78 Btu/(lbm-ºR) h. 15 kJ/(kmol-K)CP air _____ i. 101 Pa j. 778 ft-lbfR _____ k. lbm-ft/s2 l 0.24 Btu/(lbm-ºR)N _____ m. 2 Btu/(lbm-mole-Rº) n. (g-m)/s2hp _____ o. 10.0 psia p. N/m2kJ _____ q. 5 kW r. 4.4 N1 ft3 _____ s. 7.5 gal
Peterson is Senior Associate Dean in the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington.She was the 1992 recipient of the Robert Q. Lee Award for Excellence in Engineering Education, and in 1997 wasinducted into the UT Arlington Academy of Distinguished Teachers. Dr. Peterson's research focuses on artificialintelligence applications to medicine, specifically on knowledge discovery in medical databases.CARTER TIERNANDr. J. Carter M. Tiernan is the Assistant Dean for Student Affairs in the College of Engineering and a SeniorLecturer in Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. As Assistant Dean, Dr.Tiernan has responsibility for recruiting and K-12 outreach, and coordination of engineering student
, we recognizethere would exist different graphical representations, depending on the users' interpretations, being arestriction to present the data. Finally, we recognize the Social Representations as a worthy frame toanalyze future studies related to understanding the common sense (similarities) of specific populations.However, this study only focused on a synchronic and overall description of the perception rather than adiachronic and detailed perspective of the representation, which could put aside some rich and essentialinformation to understand the phenomenon.References[1] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 4 th. Sage Publications, 2015.[2] 114 U.S.C., Every Student Success Act. 2015.[3] 116 U.S.C
. Figure 3. Custom-fabricated ECG lead wires clip to tab-style electrodes.For the ECG lab, students apply skin surface electrodes (such as Covidien Kendall Q-Trace tabelectrodes or NikoTab #0315 electrodes) and connect them to their amplifier circuit via customfabricated ECG leads (Fig. 3). Leads are fabricated from three 1-m lengths of 26 gauge stranded,silicone-insulated wire in three colors (black – negative; red – positive; green/blue – ground).One end of each wire is crimped to a mini alligator clip (source) and the other to DuPont-stylepins for stable connection to the breadboard. These leads perform better than alternatives, beingmore flexible than solid wire (that can insert directly into a breadboard but tend to pull offelectrodes) and
requirement of did provide room for Q&A in each of the classes.computations. Broadly these two categories of classes (with and However, since the faculties read/listened to thewithout computational requirements) had their unique and questions either in chat inboxes or from audio, theyseveral common challenges. Some of the core issues and could not keep up and address all the question of eachchallenges identified in these categories have been briefly student. Also, students reported that sometimes it wasdescribed below: difficult to understand other students’ question and the