understanding by exploring engineering students’ researchexperiences through an interweaving of quantitative survey data and connected qualitativeinterviews. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data, we can better understand students’researcher identities and ultimately better support their research academic and career choices.Introduction and BackgroundUndergraduate research experiences (UREs) give students the opportunity to understand what itis like to be a researcher while enhancing their metacognitive and problem-solving skills [1].Exposure to UREs can help prepare students for a thesis-based graduate program and, morebroadly, can help them clarify their career plans and goals. UREs have been shown to increasestudents’ confidence in their
M16A4 external and internalparts and 3D animations for maintenance and troubleshooting procedures. The proposedapproach can be applied to other similar weapons/equipment with minimal changes. The projectwill also conduct preliminary research on software framework, interface, and file structures foreasy integration of different objects under the same AR application.This project contains several major tasks: 1) 3D modeling of the weapon, including all internaland external parts to be displayed in the AR application, 2) 3D printing of the weapon mockupthat only requires the external parts converted from the file format used in Task 1 and furtheroptimization of the model for 3D printing, 3) software development in Unity that utilizes mobiledevices
Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income, Rural STEM Students SucceedIntroductionWhile the STEM-based economy has been an enormous economic boon for some parts of theUnited States, other states, especially those more rural and economically beleaguered states, arefalling further behind economically due in part to their inability to meet engineering labordemands. Ranking 49th in college attendance and 45th in per capita Bachelor of Scienceengineering and science degrees [1], Arkansas is an example of one such state struggling to meetits STEM labor needs. However, the state could close this labor gap in part by recruiting previouslyoverlooked students – low-income and rural students. The University of Arkansas’ Path toGraduation (PTG
Project-based learning (PBL), recognized as a high-impact practice [1, 2], is an increasingly commonfeature in US engineering programs, with implementations ranging from first-year experiences throughcapstone design projects. The Buck Institute of Education, whose work focuses mostly on K-12 education,has articulated a set of essential elements of “Gold Standard PBL” [3] that are readily applicable to thehigher education context: 1. Key Knowledge, Understanding, and Skills: Make clear the learning goals for PBL assignments. Often these are a combination of disciplinary knowledge and transferrable skills and abilities. 2. Challenging Problem or Question: Engage students with a driving problem or question with a suitable level of
at institution #1, targeted for first time in college (FTIC) freshman (F-LEARN)[1]. With the success of this program, the model was implemented at institution #2 and #3, and amodified version was created for transfer students (T-LEARN) who have received theirAssociate degree and are enrolling in a STEM major at a four-year institution. The LEARN®program has three main pillars: 1) Academics/Research, which consists of a two-course, team-taught introduction to research sequence, where the first course focuses on matching students toresearch faculty mentors and preparing students to successfully participate in research, and thesecond course builds upon the research skills foundation from the introductory course to furtherdevelop a research
Work-in-Progress: A Web-Based Tool to Assess Computational ThinkingAbstractWhen President Obama unveiled his plan to give all students in America the opportunity to learncomputer science [1], discussions about Computational Thinking (CT) began in earnest in manyorganizations across a wide range of disciplines. However, Jeannette Wing stated the importanceof CT for everyone a decade earlier in her landmark essay [2]. Since then, several people andorganizations have posted their own definition of CT, which presents a challenge in being able toassess CT understanding and awareness in people. In an effort to build consensus on how to bestassess CT, the authors have developed a web-based tool that will enable CT experts globally
as RX on the Arduino and as TXon the ESP8266. Since the ESP8266 is a 3.3 V device, the signal coming from TX on theESP8266 to RX on the Arduino will never be above this voltage, so this signal is safe to connectto the Arduino powered at 5 V. However, since the Arduino is powered at 5 V, the signalcoming from TX on the Arduino to RX on the ESP8266 will be at this voltage, and this signal istoo high for the ESP8266 powered at 3.3 V. So, a voltage divider must be employed to lower thevoltage of this signal to a value that is safe for the ESP8266 to process. Connecting the TX signalfrom the Arduino to a circuit consisting of a 1 kW resistor in series with a 2 kW resistor willdivide this 5 V signal. The value of the voltage across the 1 kW
projectinterventions and the creation or adoption of quantitative instruments. This exploratory studyemploys case study methodology. Case study methodology is appropriate for this research studywhere a contemporary problem is investigated through several sources of data [1]. The specificcase study approach for this research project includes multiple or collective case studies giventhat the researchers have selected several cases of adult learners as a way to examine issues ofmotivation, determination, self-control, and grit among adult learners who are pursuing apostsecondary STEM certificate or degree. Case studies “may be particularistic (focused on aparticular phenomenon, situation or event), descriptive (providing as an end result a thick richdescription
course incorporates content fromthe previous courses in the sequence as well as from a fundamental statistics course in thecontext of experimental design and measurement. We anticipate that SBG will allow forfrequent, formative feedback throughout a single course as well as inform the instruction offaculty teaching subsequent courses building on these standards, including courses beyond thissequence such as Capstone. Our long-term goal will be to identify, align, and assess LO withinand across these courses in the curriculum using SBG. We will also review and assessimplementation of SBG in this context.This preliminary work focuses on implementation of SBG in the culminating course. Wehypothesize that Canvas-mediated SBG will 1) allow for
identification of students likely to complete a graduate degree, we sought tochange our process and the way we evaluate students for admission. For this, we changed theapplication and review process to include an assessment of applicants’ non-cognitive variablesbased on Sedlacek’s work and the Fisk-Vanderbilt MS-PhD Bridge Program admissions model[1-3]. In 2016, our Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) Department piloted theincorporation of these changes. Consequently, MSE increased the enrollment of women andunderrepresented minority students by 19% and 57%, respectively and we will be evaluating theimpact of the changes on performance metrics and completion rates over time. Ahead of thisapplication cycle, we have made changes to the applications of
between the extroverts and introverts. In addition, it givesevery student a purpose and provides accountability to their group to be in attendance.Every phase of the problem-solving path, from initially understanding what the problemis to the termination of the task by presenting its solution to the rest of the class involvesutilizing writing and oral skills to make it a well-rounded educational endeavor.Stepping back from the details of implementation to compare the Carnegie pathway tothe traditional way, consider figure 1 and figure 2 below: Figure 1To clarify the red entries in figure 1; Introductory Algebra would be the actual name ofthe Elementary Algebra directly above it while Pre-Algebra is the initial course and is aterm by itself
recipient of School of Engineering Education Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and the 2018 College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: An Intersectional Conceptual Framework for Understanding How to Measure Socioeconomic Inequality in Engineering EducationIntroductionSince the late 2000s, there has been a surge of research that focuses on the effect of socioeconomicdisadvantage in the American engineering education context [1]–[8]. Through these studies,authors have continued to uncover more about the experiences of socioeconomicallydisadvantaged students in engineering education
classroom, mostfollow this simple formula: events that traditionally take place in the classroom such as lecturingand note taking are done outside of the class and are replaced with more practice exercises andindividual and group-based problem solving [1]. Active learning, where students are engaged inthe learning process through activities such as group-based problem solving or hands-onactivities, has been recognized as an effective means to educating students in comparison totraditional lectures with many independent studies showing improvement in student learninggoals [2]. By shifting the dissemination of class notes to a period outside of the designated classtime, the flipped classroom allows for students to have more meaningful interactions
identifying the kinds of informal reasoning they used. Asnoted in [15], all three of these approaches may coexist in any individual’s reasoning process,and thus the specific questions below are asked in the Think Aloud protocol to aid inidentification of each approach to informal reasoning: 1. Explain the decision you arrived at for the provided scenario. How would you convince a friend of your position? 2. Can you think of an argument that could be made against your decision? How would someone support that argument? 3. If someone confronted you with that argument, how would you respond? How would you defend your position? 4. Did you immediately feel that your decision was right? Did you know your decision before
classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU Tandon’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 62 journal articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and
can be used by CareerServices professionals when coaching students (NACE, 2017).The career readiness competencies identified by NACE include critical thinking/problemsolving, oral/written communication, teamwork/collaboration, digital technology, leadership,professionalism/work ethic, and career management (NACE, 2017). In January 2017, an eighthcompetency – global/intercultural fluency – was added (NACE, 2017). They are described inTable 1 on the next page.Table 1: NACE Career Readiness Competencies Defined.Competency Definition Employer Rating Employer Rating of Student Self- Recent Graduate Rating
relationship betweenchanges in perceived and demonstrated creativity between first-year and seniorengineering students’ solutions to an open-ended problem. Previous work by Davis et al.has shown that engineering student’s perception of their creativity increases as they reachgraduation [1], whereas work by Kazerounian and Foley shows that students feel that theylack the element of creativity in the classroom [2]. We ultimately seek to understand howcreativity and the self-perception of creativity may change between the beginning and endof engineering students’ college careers.In this work, we present engineering students at the beginning and end of their universitycareer, first-year and seniors, with an open-ended design challenge. The students
who teach engineering design in project-basedlearning courses in an undergraduate general engineering program were interviewed, listed inTable 1. The instructors were selected both because of their expertise teaching design coursesacross mechanical, electrical, and robotics engineering concentrations and at one or more level inthe curriculum. This enables the capture of these educators’ perspective observing the students’progress through the curriculum. This pilot study builds on related work done by the authors thatpreviously investigated undergraduate engineering students’ conceptions of prototyping activitiesand process (REF). With educators participants, an interview protocol (see Table 2) wasfollowed through semi-structured qualitative
learning experiences within a capstone engineering courseIntroductionComputational modeling and simulation is a skillset that both academics and industryprofessionals desire to see in graduating engineers [1]. Additionally, there have been nationalcalls to increase computation within STEM education at all levels [2]. However, currently thereare multiple barriers for entry to getting computational modeling experiences into engineeringeducation such as lack of time within courses and a bloated engineering curriculum [3]. In thefall of 2018, a designed modeling-based learning experience, intended to be inserted into alreadyexisting curriculum, was piloted in a senior level process design engineering course. This studylooks at how
systems analysis techniques to manipulate microbial biological systems for generating biofuels from wastewater and for combating biofilm-associated pathogens. His BESEL group developed the first model for microbial desalination cells and the first metabolic modeling approach for quantifying the biofilm formation of pathogens. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2019 ASEE Annual ConferenceWork in Progress: Development of MATLAB Instructional Modules for EngineeringStudents Sergey Nersesov1, Dr. Zuyi (Jacky) Huang2* 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA 2. Department of Chemical
time-efficient manner(sparing roughly seven hours of in-class time over the entire semester). While the initial timeinvestment is significant (ca. 2-3 hours for every hour lecture, presented in 10-15 min), the samevideos may be re-used as-is, or with minor modifications, in future years. This affords theinstructor more flexibility to introduce (potentially time-consuming) active learning techniquesduring class time, and to experiment with other didactic interventions.IntroductionThe concept of the Flipped Classroom has become increasingly popular within the context ofapproaches to Active Learning, and its use in early or introductory Thermodynamics courses inundergraduate education is documented in the literature [1]–[3]. While this term is
both the classrooms of U.S. schools and the general workforce is needed tounderstand why this is occurring and what pedagogies can be added, removed, or enhanced toslow the rapid decline of underrepresented students in engineering. The object of this research isto discover pathways of engineering undergraduate students in their first two years in order tobetter understand their engineering identity and the relationship to graduation. Assessment of theengineering identity and mindset during the sophomore year will be done to both understand thegrowing diverse student body and to suggest changes in student and faculty engagement andinstructional activities. In this project, the authors will: (1) identify biases formed by studentswhen they choose
island.Constitution of the ASEE-UPRM:The ASEE-UPRM is a student organization that has served, since its establishment in 2016, as thepremier multidisciplinary society for individuals and organizations committed to advancingexcellence in all aspects of Engineering and Technology education (vision).1 Our mission is toadvance innovation, excellence, and access at all levels of education for the engineeringprofession.1 When initially founded, our chapter only had 15 members from all engineeringdisciplines. By 2017, the chapter increased its membership to 72 students and for the year, 2018,we already have reached 116 members, all of them are undergraduate engineering students. Thisrepresents an increase of 131% and 47%, respectively. Out of those 116 members, 60
University.Joseph C. Tise, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Joseph Tise is a doctoral candidate in the Educational Psychology program at Penn State University. His research interests include self-regulated learning, measurement, and connecting educational research to practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: Embedding a Large Writing Course within Engineering Design—A New Model for Teaching Technical WritingSummary and Introduction A survey of more than 1000 professional engineers reveals that communication is one ofthe top two skills needed in the profession [1]. Not surprising, many engineering colleges haveresponded to such surveys with
Cybermanufacturing EducationAbstractIn the era of Industry 4.0, cybermanufacturing is an emerging technology based on digitalmanufacturing, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), data analytics, and high performancecomputing to drive the manufacturing industry optimizing productivity, product quality, andbusiness feedback. However, the cybermanufacturing education is not addressed in the currentmanufacturing education knowledge model. This work-in-progress (WIP) explores how to enabledigital thread and digital twin cyberlearning environment for cybermanufacturing education atVirginia State University (VSU).1 IntroductionIn the era of Industry 4.0, cybermanufacturing based on digital manufacturing, Industrial Internetof Things (IIoT), data analytics, and high
continuous improvement processesWIP: Engaging engineering teaching staff in continuous improvement processes1. Introduction To demonstrate that future engineers have the skills to succeed in the workplace,many schools have implemented centralized assessment frameworks to collect evidence ofoutcome attainment [1]. However, it is still unknown whether or not the collection ofevidence facilitates the improvement of teaching and learning [2]. Although researchersagree that both outcome assessment tasks and curriculum discussions are key practices ofcontinuous improvement [3], institutions fail at integrating them as part of teachingpractices [3], [5]. This Work-In-Progress (WIP) paper presents a methodological
promoted by policy actions associated with potential outcomes forparticipants [1-2]. There consequently is an emerging body of literature that has examined theimpact of the REU program on students’ early engagement in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM), persistence and retention in a STEM major, and integration into STEMculture [3]. Yet, little is known about how the program supports students and how students learnthrough their research experiences. The extent to which the design of the REU programs haverelied upon existing studies has also been questioned by National Academies of Science,Engineering, and Medicine [2]. A joint report emphasized the need to investigate the mechanismsfor how the REU program works, why they work
the NSF website (https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch). The database search waslimited to two specific programs within the Division of Engineering Education and Centers thatstated a required collaboration with a social scientist. Listservs created within these programswere also used to reach other researchers who may not be listed on the NSF site.A total population of 310 researchers resulted from these processes. Possible participants wereremoved due to a lack of available email information (n=12). Five participants were alsocommon across both programs. The final potential sample of 293 researchers were contactedwith 130 responses received (44.4% response rate). Multiple responses (n=19) were removedfollowing data collection because: 1) role on
engineering undergraduate studentsdevelop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to work across cultural boundaries and toeffectively adapt, integrate, and communicate in new environments. With this comes the need foreducators to begin to develop educational systems and practices that help students cross theseboundaries [1, 2]. There is a growing recognition of the importance to implement and engage students in highereducation in purposeful environments (i.e. study abroad, service experiences, domestic activities)that would allow them to develop global perspectives and cross-cultural skills to help themeffectively adapt to the diverse world market [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. There exist various instruments andscales that aim to measure global
Undergraduate EngineeringEducation.” In particular, Phase I of this project included a multiday workshop heavily reliant onindustry input of the Knowledge, Skills and Abilities traits (KSAs) of engineering students to beready for the workforce in 2023.[1] In particular, the desired educational outcome is “a T-shapedengineering graduate who brings broad knowledge across domains and the ability to collaboratewithin a diverse workforce as well as deep expertise within a single domain [1], pg. 2.” Inparticular, it was found that, “Students also fail in meeting expectations in several skills accordedgrowing importance. These include leadership, decision-making, communication, and the abilityto synthesize engineering, business, and societal priorities [1