Universities. The consortium is a strategic priority of eachinstitution. In Year 1, 42 students participated in the scholarship program at the three institutions (16 FIU;14 UCF; 11 USF).Rationale:The NSF considers areas such as Data Science, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity,and Quantum Computing as among the highest impact and growth fields going forward. Student demandfor computing programs is at an all-time high, including large numbers of students who change majors aftertheir freshman year (and would thus not be considered for scholarships that target first-year CS majors).Meanwhile, there is a significant shortage of both computing professionals and qualified faculty to teach atuniversities and a lag in computing graduation
engineering design process. The value of amindful design process is a newly discovered curiosity.The second author is a faculty member in the Mines Mechanical Engineering department with abackground in user-centered design and an interest in better understanding the learning ofstudents as they navigate design courses and activities. He and the third author have a personaland professional stake in the propagation of design throughout the curriculum.Overview and Context: Learning By Product Development Project SpineA formal product development set of project-based learning courses have been developed andinfused throughout the four years of the curriculum. Throughout their studies, students areassigned team projects to conceptualize, design, prototype
engineering and product design.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle University, and a B.S. in general engineering from Gonzaga University.William J. Schell William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering aˆ C” Engineering
area and not general or introductory engineering. These, among otherfactors, make designing an effective introduction to engineering courses challenging. Landis [1]recommends five course objectives for introduction to engineering courses: community building,professional development, academic development, personal development and orientation.Design projects apply to many of these. In community building, the team aspects of numerousprojects help students develop professional skills and build a support network for their collegeexperience. Teaching the engineering design process and engineering’s role in a better society isexcellent professional development. Productive interactions with peers and faculty, as well aslearning to prioritize important
students who are underprepared”),then invited different topics, “Let’s move onto the second one (pause) then” into which anotherparticipant animatedly (eye contact around the room and to the Facilitator, gestures) jumped in: You have diverse faculty, this is the case where there are lady professors… the impact is going to be for the students to see an example, a person, a guide, and see that, not as a given, but if that situation exists it’s going to bring down a lot of the comments that people say. Um (pause)The Facilitator immediately filled the pause such that any other potential comments by thespeaker or other participants would be discouraged. The Facilitator’s action enabled him tointerject a reorienting remark to
Paper ID #38814Preparing the manufacturing workforce for Industry 4.0 technologyimplementationDr. Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Indus- trial Distribution and a member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University. His research interests include automation, robotics, cyber-manufacturing and Industry 4.0; optical/infrared imaging and instru- mentation; micro/nano manufacturing; and design of technology for engineering education. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M University
from the survey instrument (more than 200 respondents). ● 90% talked with family before changing majors. ● 73% of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their decision to change majors. ● 68% had taken an Introduction to Engineering course and indicated it was helpful in deciding to change their major. ● 67% chose their major before they chose the institution. ● 56% changed their major because it no longer aligned with their interest and another major suited them better. ● 25% changed their major within two (2) semesters, with 30% changing their major after one semester. Very few students changed their major after 3 semesters. ● 16% had one bad experience with a faculty member, where 19
alongside faculty mentors. Claudine has also co-facilitated multiple Conversations about Race and Ethnicity (C.A.R.E.) Circles and C.A.R.E. Speaks through the Office of Multicultural Affairs (OMA) to undergraduate students across the SU colleges and departments including RAs in an effort to impact demonstrative change in diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility on campus. Claudine is a licensed Social Worker (LMSW). She graduated from Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY) with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology and a minor in Communications, and later went on to pursue a Master’s degree in Social Work from Fordham University. Claudine began her social work career in the field of child
COVID-related issues as well. These workshops were followed in 2021 by another series focused onsocial justice: Anti-Racism Practice in Engineering: Exploring, Learning & Solutions (ARPELS)[3]. A key outcome of the ARPELS workshops was the concept of the equitable partnership.The mission of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC) is to enable MSI ECE programs toproduce more and better prepared graduates from groups that have been historicallyunderrepresented in ECE careers. We hypothesize that key to achieving this goal is more fullyengaging the students, staff and faculty at HBCUs, HSIs and TCUs in the broad ECE educationand research enterprise by building partnerships with PWIs, industry, government labs, etc.These partnerships must be
during Fall Semester, the last Monday of the month during SpringSemester). In the Fall Semester, attendees participated in a fun activity (origami, outdoorgames, 3D puzzles, and Christmas cookie decorating) and enjoyed a snack. Faculty and staffwere welcome to attend and a number of them stopped by. Activities were planned and staffedby two graduate assistants, under the supervision of the Director of Student Success. In theSpring Semester, in addition to an activity (crafts, meditation and reflection, scavenger hunt,outdoor games) and snack, students were provided with a wellness resource (emotionalwellness, spiritual wellness, intellectual wellness, and physical wellness), targeting a differentdimension of wellness each month. Use of posters
student happens not to benefit from the goodwill of a faculty or career counselor, then their career trajectories are significantly disrupted.It is proposed to formally document the student-to-workforce pipeline. A formal system like atranscript that tracks student-to-workforce development activities is recommended. Formal STEMpipelines are traditionally academic programs, formal industry internship programs, and on-campusresearch experiences. For example, participation can be tracked and used to identify if a studenthas ”leaked out” (i.e. no graduation, no work placement) of the pipeline. This one student is 100%of an entire demographic at the institution. Historically, the data sets have been limited to 1 or 2students of this demographic. In
. Due to the complex and multidisciplinary nature of their projects, engineeringstudents must learn how to work effectively on a team, as the majority will be expected to workas part of a team after graduation. The projects that they will face during both their academic andpost-academic careers will involve problem-solving and critical thinking, and the unique skillsand perspectives of each team member are necessary to arrive at effective solutions. This paperintroduces a pedagogical boardgame aimed at simulating arguments within an engineeringexercise, as well as the study planned to track the changes.A diverse team has people with different backgrounds, experience, and ways of thinking. Thiscan lead to a wider range of perspectives and ideas
Calculusupon college entrance were significantly more likely to graduate with a degree in engineeringthan students who were not Calculus-eligible [15]. They also noted, however, that there could beother factors acting upon this relationship that could explain more of the variability in persistence[15]. These findings were further evaluated through a follow-up investigation in which Bowenand colleagues [9] explored the impact of Calculus-readiness upon engineering persistence todegree completion along with the potential mediating effect of students’ “at-risk” status. Theresearchers discovered that indeed Calculus-readiness upon college entrance was a significantpredictor of engineering degree completion and accounted for 11% of the overall variance
legislative decisions direct entry into discipline major as a first-year student, bypassing what we had historically offered as a common first-year experience allowing students to explore and discover what might be their best major; this included an Introduction to Engineering course, which was lost from the curriculum university’s adoption of an Introduction to University life course and subsequent abandonment of this course after 10 years of data did not show significant improvement in student retention. Note: Our department experienced constant challenge staffing this one-hour course with ME faculty, so students were never really assured an introduction to the major by an ME faculty.This brings us
on what may be missing from these bins. Thesediscussions provided further insight into the goals of the curriculum. Overall, this process gaveus a good starting point for developing the goals of the curriculum. It allowed us to get a varietyof perspectives from the department without burdening any one person with a lot of time input.However, the large number of inputs from many different people also made it hard to manage.Iterative process to develop curriculum Our next stage of the process involved an iterative process of surveying our department,developing drafts, and editing those drafts. During the summer of 2022, two faculty members (the authors of this paper) volunteeredto be the Q2S leads for the department. We set out
professional background includes twenty-five years of progressively responsible positions in software and systems development, information technology management, and technical leadership. I am a proven technical leader with verifiable results. I have built and led several distributed and off shore technical organizations. My academic experience includes over ten years teaching both in-class and on-line univer- sity level computer science courses, curriculum development and course mentorship. I am currently the C# faculty course mentor. As an educator, a priority for me is to provide a supportive learning environment that promotes student persistence and success. I am safe zoned trained, and I have deep mentoring experience
, individual interviews, focus groups with faculty and capstone clients, and follow-upinterviews with graduated students. An examination of skills and perceived benefits post-graduation would be helpful to understand which topics/content area may need differentemphasis. Additionally, these findings can help inform the development of similar andcomplementary courses. For example, as a model for other universities to help undergraduatestudents acquire and develop interpersonal, professional, and non-technical skills required forearly workplace success. Finally, future research should explore leadership and managementcurriculum and coursework across all U.S. engineering schools for continuous improvement andlearning.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank
artist residency depending on the type of research. Theresearch outcome may include publications, presentations at conferences or workshops, musicalcomposition, exhibitions, etc. The teaching award includes activities like giving guest lectures andteaching a class) at the undergraduate and graduate levels), conducting workshops, seminars, andsimilar activities. The courses may be designed by the scholar or provided by the host institution.It is also possible that the courses are co-taught with the faculty from the host institution. Thenumber of courses that a scholar is supposed to teach is decided between the scholar and the hostinstitution. This award may also include advising graduate students and thesis/dissertation. Finally,the Teaching
historically underserved and underrepresented students interested innuclear science and technology, engineering and DOE specific STEM careers.2. Engage students in hands-on experiential learning and research, using advanced nuclearscience technology, exposure to professionals working in the nuclear energy industry, and3. Provide skills to parents and adult family members to work with and encourage their childrenin STEM activities and nuclear science programs.Our HBCU team will also provide an additional node for the Office of Technology Transfer soas to promote the concept of business application of nuclear reactor technology and research tofaculty, staff and students, encourage and support the development of new and innovativenuclear technology
traditionally marginalized engineering students from an asset-based perspective. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that tra- ditionally marginalized students, bring into the field, and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tool to promote effective and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the
another woman or an acquaintance. It is obvious that the role model fromchildhood in the face of relatives offers obvious advantages, but this is not the only way.People are inspired by the career paths and achievements of various persons. And this instillsin women, especially at the beginning of the career path, a deep conviction that they canachieve similar heights in STEM (Q54).Table 3. Comparison of answers of interviewees with intrinsic ability versus when they had a role model Intrinsic ability Role model “The predisposition to subjects of STEM fields “My role model is a former student of the leading influenced my decision to study at
, factors like campus social climate [9], academicmentoring [9], [10], and racial microaggressions [11] can damage their sense of belonging andaffect their future in engineering.We base our definition of Engineering Identity on Hazari et al.’s [12] definition of physicsidentity as the interaction of Recognition, Performance, Interest and Competence in the field ofEngineering. This concept was further investigated by Kendall et al. [13], who studied factorsinfluencing engineering identity of Latinx students by including personal and social identities tobetter understand the development of Latinx students as engineers. An example of the impact ofpersonal and social identities on engineering identity is the research conducted by Revelo aboutthe
campus, were important in the major selection process.To focus exclusively on which factors affect students’ aspirations to study chemical engineeringneglects the bulk of the process that produces chemical engineering graduates. For example, thereare many points in their academic careers that women may choose to enter or exit a chemicalengineering program. The problem of attrition in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) more broadly has been widely studied. The most famous study is theethnographic study conducted by Seymour and colleagues that investigated reasons why studentschoose to leave STEM. One of the most cited reasons for leaving STEM in the original study waspoor teaching in STEM courses; this remained true in the
Interdisci- plinary Engineering, all from Texas A&M University. With research interests rooted in engineering education, the learning styles of engineering students in par- ticular, Shannon’s tenure at Texas A&M is and has been rooted in the mentoring of both undergraduate and graduate students. Currently an advisor for the Texas A&M National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) Chapter and an active member of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated, a service organiza- tion, Shannon is no stranger to mission and vision of the academic excellence and cultural responsibility.Ahmarlay Myint, Texas A&M University Ahmarlay Myint is a doctoral student in Higher Education Administration.Dr. Maria Claudia Alves
the data" (p.56). However, engineers are often more familiar with quantitative methods and summarizingtheir findings using numbers [2], which substantially limits the use of qualitative methods.According to Jackson, Drummond, & Camara [3], the goal of qualitative research involves"understanding human beings' richly textured experiences and reflections about thoseexperiences" (p. 22). As engineers have become familiar with qualitative methodologies [1-2],researchers have begun to explore different types of approaches to illuminate the humanexperience. It is clear that different engineers, engineering students, and engineering facultyexperience their education and careers differently, which modern studies have only begun todescribe [4-6
regional campuses, nor are they reported to the central campus. The objective of the first-year engineering curriculum is to provide an opportunity for students to explore engineering disciplines so that students can make informed decisions about their careers. So, these two courses achieve the goal of training these students for their second year of the degree program.5. Role of Administration: It was noted earlier that the regional campuses get limited funding to run the campus businesses. However, there is a process of submitting a budget to the central campus. Engineering coordinators submit the budget each year to the fiscal office. The purchases made for the lab supplies and equipment have to go through the university
Paper ID #39294Someone Like You: Theorizing LGBTQ Participation in Engineering throughNetwork Homophily and State AuthenticityDr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University, Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration
students. However, they argue that students are missing critical skills in thesmart grid field, such as hands-on experiences and market knowledge. This work is part of anongoing effort of a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded study to explore a closed-looppower engineering education and learning approach for meeting the nation’s urgent needs for ahighly qualified Smart Grid workforce. The research question guiding this study is: What skillsare required from the ECE graduate students to serve the SG industry better?MethodsTo create a list of learning objectives that will be the stepping stone for an ECE curriculum tobetter serve the smart grid industry, the research team conducted a qualitative research study atRowan University following the
. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that traditionally marginalized students bring into the field and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tools to promote effec- tive and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero aspires to change discourses around broadening participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been rec- ognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for
furtherinvestigated and/or explained in the second stage of qualitative research. However, it is crucial topoint out that contrary to certain misconceptions that view research on a linear path, this researchended up being an iterative use of both quantitative and qualitative instruments. The analyzed datafor this study include surveys, in-person and virtual classroom observations, teacher reflectionjournals, classroom artifacts, school policy documents, and semi-structured interviews with 37engineering faculty members, 2 provosts, 5 engineering college deans, and 2 students.IRBThis study is approved for study by the Purdue Institutional Review Board. This process wasconcluded by July 2022 through the IRB (Institutional Review Board) with approval number