teaching with engineers and scientists has been geared towards encouraging them to think about the broader social, ethical and political dimensions of their research and training.Dr. Michael R. Caplan, Arizona State University Michael Caplan earned his undergraduate degrees from The University of Texas at Austin and his PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Following post-doctoral research at Duke University Medical Center in Cell Biology, Michael joined the faculty of Arizona State University in 2003, and he is now an Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering. Dr. Caplan’s research focuses on molecular cooperativity in drug targeting, bio-sensing, and cell sig- naling. Current projects align along
Criterion 3: Student Outcomes: an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams an ability to communicate effectively the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextIn addition, it met several of the course objectives. Examine current automotive and robotic manufacturing methods used in the United States and Europe. Identify current and future trends in manufacturing and technology. Analyze the global impact manufacturing and technology has on society and the environment. Identify technology-based ethical issues and conflicts. Evaluate the impacts of a discipline-specific technology observed
generations to do the same2. Therefore,undergraduate civil engineering education should provide instruction in how to consider theaspects of environment, society and economy in design. For instance, the first canon of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) code of ethics was updated in 1996 to includesustainable development3. ASCE’s Body of Knowledge4 recommends that upon completion of anundergraduate degree, engineers should have knowledge and comprehension of sustainability, andunderstand applications of sustainability.In 1996, ABET revised its accreditation criteria from being a set of detailed prescriptiveguidelines to focusing more on student outcomes in attaining certain technical and professionalskills5. ABET’s accreditation Criterion 3
individual colleges with designing their own plans to alignwith the institution’s broader goals. Change agents must be able to read their institutions’ culture,Kezar and Eckel concluded, in order to develop effective strategies for empowering stakeholderswithin their specific contexts. Empowerment can take different dimensions, and there are nobounds to what it looks like. The crux of empowerment is its result, not its process.Why empower stakeholders to develop a shared vision for change?Stakeholder empowerment is not a strategy to eliminate resistance, although it may have thateffect. Its real goal is to preempt ethical issues in a change process. In an age when “most of thecurrent ethical frameworks for organizations, as well as in society
Organization’s Lisa Tabor Award for Community Service. Using deep insights from a fourteen-year industry career and her strengths as a systems thinker, she is now developing and disseminating empirically-grounded models and strategies for improved human competence, motivation, and learning as it relates to the civil engineering profession and the construction industry. She is a discipline-based education researcher who passionately pursues research to develop an agile, ethical, diverse construction workforce enabled to lead, design, and build sustainable, intelligent infrastructure. Her mission is to transform the construction workforce and sustain change. To this end, she undertakes research that enables her to influence
develop a large range of the skills that arecurrently being underdeveloped. Maker spaces go beyond the traditional machine shopenvironment familiar to the undergraduate curriculum offering access to rapid prototypingequipment and conceptual design spaces coupled with a unique culture that can betransformative to its users.”In their synthesis on the humanitarian engineering literature, Campbell and Wilson suggest thathumanitarian engineering “provides a broader context than is found in mainstream engineeringcourses” and therefore can better address ABET learning outcomes F (professional and ethicalresponsibility), H (understanding the impact of solutions), and C (design within realisticconstraints), with a particular emphasis on ethics (Cambell
designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project
technical professional.2 - Global I am aware of regional variations in technical standards, code, etc.3 - Global I can make ethical decisions in the context of a different culture.4 - Global I am familiar with cultural differences in professional ethics.5 - Global I understand how my technical perspective is different from those in other regions.6 - Global I am prepared to work with people who define and solve problems differently.7 - Global I am aware of how culture influences technical work.8 - Global I can adapt my technical knowledge and skills to different local conditions.9 - Global I can coordinate technical work that spans multiple countries.10 - Global I can function effectively as a member of multinational
Genomics Working with genomic databases 3 Measuring genomic data Visit to on-campus sequencing and flow cytometry facilities 4 Data Carpentry Workshop Basics of using R, a statistical computing language 5 Plant development and basic plant Macro- and micro-dissection of major plant research anatomy species 6 Research Ethics and Field trip to local company Communications 7 Data Mining Finding, downloading, and cleaning data sets 8 Machine Learning Making inferences using data sets 9 Plant Physiology Trip to
literature review and what 3 Support table & Map for topic must it contain? Support & Map Topic Devel. & Readings. Fine tune literature map, What possible research structure(s) & ethical issues 4 identify research discipline or genre should be consider for your thesis topic? Ethics Philosophy & K & R Ch. 1 & 7, Bring journal article How do research philosophy, scientific theory & 5 with methodology you might use methodology impact research outcome? Methodologies
,collecting data from the seminar, rather than a different course in the major, made it less likelythere would be confounds due to differences between instructors across sections. In addition, noother first-year course is mandatory for all first-year engineers (e.g., students with appropriateAdvanced Placement scores do not enroll in Calculus I). Each survey was one of severalassignments that could be completed for credit, and so not every student was required toparticipate. In alignment with the ethical standards required to protect participants in research inpsychology, students were given the option to complete the survey for points toward their grade,but elect to exclude their data from analyses from our research without penalty. Aside from
metacognition during the design process and other relevantengineering activities. Instruction in engineering will also help students develop Conceptions ofEngineers and Engineering (CEE) as they understand the many fields of work withinengineering and engineers roles in society. Becoming adept with the Tools, Techniques, andProcesses (ETools) for successfully accomplishing tasks is a goal of engineering educationoutside of the design process itself. When studying design problems, students should be mindfulof the surrounding Issues, Solutions, and Impact (ISI) and the global systems they affect, whileadopting the Ethical Responsibility (Ethics) of following engineering regulations and standards.Finally, Teamwork (Team) and Communication
have collaborated to achieve research uniformity across both the environments; we are coordinating better in this 3rd year).Research Design:The main goal of this study is to understand how interdisciplinary instruction affects students’ability to identify, formulate, and solve problems, function on multidisciplinary teams, engagewith contemporary issues, communicate effectively in writing, verbally and visually, developappreciation of the impact of planning and engineering solutions in a variety of societal contexts,and develop understanding of their professional and ethical responsibilities. Soft skills, such ascommunication, team spirit, leadership, sociability, time management, documentation,presentation, ethics, negotiation, etc., are
technical areas of civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership analyze issues in professional ethics explain the importance of professional licensureTable 3: Observed Distribution of Hours by B.S. Degree Program Type Math & Basic Science Credit Average Average (% minimum maximum Std. Dev. Program (hours) total hours)1 (hours) (hours) (hours) COV (%) Civil 35.55 27.47 32.00
align with the projects related toengineering education. Candidates were selected from approximately 28 applicants based oninterests, GPA, geographic location and letters of recommendation.Objectives: 1. Define, formulate, and solve problems related to power and energy systems 2. Design a power energy system or some of its components 3. Demonstrate an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 4. Strengthen understanding of innovation and creativity 5. Develop the needed knowledge, skills and experiences in the areas of renewable energy, energy storage, and power semiconductors 6. Expose students to innovation/creativity 7. Problem solving skills 8. Communication skills 9. Design skills 10. Modeling skills 11
) students were not introduced toalgorithmic assessment. We are exploring the correlation design until upper-division courses, and (iv) we needed tobetween this logical-thinking test and student success, and attract and retain undecided and traditionally under-also improvement in students’ logic ability as evidenced represented groups of students. The overall goals were toby pre- and post-test comparisons. include project design and teamwork experience, introduce programming earlier, stress “soft skills” such asIndex Terms - electrical engineering, mentors, problem- communication, ethics and student success, and to
and a set of knowledge concepts they previously learned, and put that body ofand skills that they will need later, including some experience knowledge to work in developing solutions that providewith the design process. For the past several years, the first value, beyond simple feasibility, to others. In preparation forcourse focused on introducing the field of engineering by this course redesign, the second author attended a KEENcovering a broad range of topics, including problem solving, workshop on Innovation Curriculum with Entrepreneurialunits, design, ethics, Excel, circuits, statics, and energy. The Mindset (ICE) [5].second course focused on math and programming, including The pilot course’s
test scores of the value of conversations and talking through problems toengineering student responses to ABET soft skill solve their own problems. As educators, it would beknowledge, explores the possibilities for freshman convenient to ‘bottle’ the wisdom of product creation andengineering students to engage meaningfully in six of the pass it along to students. However, students need explicit11 outcomes for engineering graduates. With a focus on instruction on what engineering researchers andmulti-disciplinary teamwork, professional ethical practitioners implicitly understand and use daily. Thisresponsibility, effective communication, engineering
engineering problems and propose[3] Flemming, L., Engerman, K., and Williams, D. “Why Students Leave alternative solutions, Engineering: the Unexpected Bond,” Proceedings of the 2006 2. participate in a team-work class project to design and American Society for Engineering Education Conference& build a prototype with design constraints, Exposition, Annual Conference.[4] Fortenberry, N., Sullivan, J., Jordan, P., Knight, D., “Engineering 3. learn on engineering ethics, continuing education, Education Research Aids Instruction,” Science, Vol. 317, 2007. contemporary issues, global context, etc.,[5] Welch, R
. Christopher D. Pionke has been on the faculty of the University of Tennessee (UT) since 1993 and is an Associate Professor in the Tickle College of Engineering Cook Grand Challenges Honors Program as well as the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering. In this capacity he has developed and taught courses in The Finite Element Method, Engineering Mechanics, Engineering Design, Engineering Fundamentals, Engineering Ethics, and the Chancellors Honors Program. In addi- tion, he is a registered Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the State of Georgia. His professional experiences include jobs with Presearch, Inc. of Oak Ridge, Tennessee (1982-1984) and Optic-Electronic Corp. of Dallas, Texas (1986-1987
AY2017-18 course catalogue.Table 1. Overview of weekly topics for MET321- Changing World of 3D Printing and Rapid Prototyping Week Topics 1 Introduction to the Next Industrial Revolution: The New World of 3D Printing & Rapid Prototyping, Consumer safety, environment, green manufacturing, ethical issues. 2 Introduction to Computer Aided Design: SolidWorks, Google Sketchup, AutoCAD, Generating stl files 3 Personal Fabrication, Do-It-Yourself Product Development, Additive vs Subtractive Manufacturing, Molding, Laser cutting 4 3D Printing Technologies, Materials for 3D Printing 5 Bioprinting /Midterm Exam 6 FDM 3-D
/Factory. Table 2 Schedule for 2016 site program (SDS-Skill Development Seminar, RS-Research Seminar, GL-Group Lecture, PV-Plant Visit, CA-Cultural Activity) Week Action/Event Orientation and Information Week 1. Student registration 2. Walking tour of WSU campus and Midtown Detroit 3. WSU College of Engineering Dean’s and chairs’ overview of the college and 1 participating departments. 6/1-6/7 4. RS 1: Technical and Projects Overview 5. SDS 1: Introduction to Academic Research, Responsibility, and Ethics (by the Office of Undergraduate Research at WSU) 6. GL 1
andsocial validity (Gershenfeld, 2014). Objective parameters include both retention and performancedata, while subjective parameters include feelings of integration to the university environmentand perception of mentoring relationships, which are being gauged through survey instruments.Notably, the size of the population sample is within the range employed in some of the foremoststudies on mentoring in a college setting published to date (Frierson, Hargrove, & Lewis, 1994;Gershenfeld, 2014). This approach offers important advantages over a true randomizedexperiment, which has been associated with ethical concerns (Gershenfeld, 2014).Initial results of assessment: In terms of academic performance, participants in the research-center based
Community Service (Freshman) Field trip/mentoring session (construction & engr) Professional Skills Field trip/mentoring session (humanitarian engr) Professional Skills Spring Assignment to designated on-campus dormitory Learning Community Group sessions on college success and life skills Instruction Strategist College and civil engineering student mentoring Life Mentoring Moral and Ethical Development Educational Professional Skills Seminar Multi-part diversity training
resolving wicked problems. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics, 25, 467-484.SHEPHERD, A. & COSGRIF, B. 1998. Problem-based learning: A bridge between planning education and planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17, 348-357.TOMKINSON, B., TOMKINSON, R., DOBSON, H. & ENGEL, C. 2008. Education for sustainable development– an inter‐disciplinary pilot module for undergraduate engineers and scientists. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1, 69-76. [1]
Paper ID #18735Which ”Me” am I Today? The Many Disciplines and Skill Sets of Engineer-ing EducatorsDr. Jennifer Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor and
students in case they don’t want to access their own devices.Data were collected electronically using checkbox, a survey management online serviceavailable at the University that aligns with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conductof Research. The study secured ethical approval, and participation was voluntary. Studentswere asked to provide consent for his/her data to be used for study purposes in thequestionnaire. Results from the survey were analysed using the Statistical Package for theSocial Sciences (SPSS). SPSS provide researchers with a secure platform to analysequantitative data and conduct different statistical procedures.Sample/PopulationParticipants included 236 undergraduate engineering students enrolled in a third
Organization, 16(4), 411-428.Stets, J.E. & Burke, P.J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Tan, J. (2008). Breaking the “Bamboo Curtain” and the “Glass Ceiling”: The experience of women entrepreneurs in high-tech industries in an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 547-564.Walker, M. (2001). Engineering identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 75- 89.United States Census Bureau. (2014, December). Retrieved January 29, 2017, from http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014
and providing service learning opportunities for first-year programming students through various K-12 educational activities. Dr. Estell is a Member-at-Large of the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony.Dr. Ahmed Abdel-Mohti P.E., Ohio Northern UniversityDr. Firas Hassan, Ohio Northern University Firas Hassan is an associate professor at Ohio Northern University. He got his
rooted in the nexus ofhumanitarian practice, sustainability awareness, social justice, and professional practice. It willemphasize student teamwork, along with greater consideration of social and economic factors,improved communication with diverse constituents, and reflection on an ethical understanding oftheir decisions and solutions. It also requires that faculty members be empowered to mirror thesevalues and skills in their instruction and mentoring. The RED grant connects professional skillsdirectly to the ability to develop and evaluate solutions within these broader contexts.In this work in progress (WIP), we review our progress towards achieving this vision including:• Establishing a foundation for a revised engineering canon that