Paper ID #13280Engineering Rome: Assessing Outcomes from a Study Abroad Program De-signed to Overcome Barriers to ParticipationDr. Steve Muench P.E., University of Washington Steve Muench is an Associate Professor in the University of Washington’s Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering. His interests include sustainability, construction, roads, pavements, web tools and education. He is a licensed professional engineer in Washington State. Before his academic career, Steve spent 2 years as a transportation design engineer and 7 years as a U.S. Navy submarine officer. Steve lives in Seattle but likes neither
curriculum should emphasize their value and reinforce theirimportance in students’ future engineering careers4. Instructors who teach team skills, or whointegrate effective team practices into the design of projects, can set student teams up forsuccess, maximize their learning, and enhance students’ ability to work on teams in the future.Teaching these skills can be challenging however, which led us to create a brief research-basedvideo that integrates research and theory relevant to engineering student teams, from the fields ofengineering education and Industrial/Organizational (I/O) Psychology, a field that studiesbehavior at work. The purpose of this paper is to provide a resource to educators who want tolearn more about the practices
Tulsa, also in Mechanical Engineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as various courses in Mechanical Engineering, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exploring Impacts of a Flipped
, especially those associated with the instructors’ personal research/consulting experience, received highly positive feedback and students would often approach the instructor to ask follow up questions. These types of case-studies should be more fully integrated throughout the semester, rather than concentrated at the end as they were in the Fall 2015 semester. Students enjoyed the creativity associated with the final design project and the fact that each team’s problem statement was unique. Many requested that some of the experiment- based activities from earlier in the semester be replaced with small design challenges. Instructors would have to be selective to insure curriculum topics are still addressed if this
integrating the variables that matter to them is a step thatwe can take to increase the number of women and underrepresented minority graduates inengineering. This paper shares an evaluative case study as we report findings from data gatheringtools guiding our continuous improvement process. The findings illuminate students’ perceptionsof their engineering design course and curriculum. We conclude by discussing the pedagogicaldecisions the teaching team is making as a result of listening to our students’ voices.IntroductionAccording to a 2012 report from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology, the U.S. needs approximately one million additional science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) college graduates in order to
. • Demonstrate flexibility in thinking. • Independently pursue learning. • Students will build team work skills (brainstorming, integrate independent work in a team environment, respect and appreciate other opinions, share learning)We did an ad-hoc assessment of the above-mentioned learning outcomes as we could not haveour own surveys. Assessing informally their level of interest and engagement, all 15 girls were100% engaged in every activity and enjoyed their time. Students were asked questions such as: 1. Do you find a connection between what you learn in school and the real engineering world? What specific connection did you find in doing this activity? (both activities) 2. What mathematics concepts did you apply here
Pharmacy. Most of Kate’s publication history revolves around how health and technology interact, and her primary research focus is on how people are accessing, understanding and disseminating information.Ms. Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo Kari D. Weaver holds a B.A. from Indiana University, an M.L.I.S. from the University of Rhode Island, and is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Instruction & Teacher Education, School of Education at the University of South Carolina. Currently, she works as the Instructional Design Librarian at the University of Waterloo Library in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Her research interests include co-teaching, information literacy perceptions and behaviors of students across
Japan and Norway. The results of this survey were then compared to the resultsof a similar survey taken by domestic engineering graduate students and international engineeringgraduate students studying in the U.S. Findings indicate that there are statistically significantdifferences between U.S. domestic engineering graduate students with international engineeringgraduate students for most of the engineering writing attitudinal factors studied, indicating thatinstructors should begin to tailor approaches differently for individual students. From a researchperspective, we will continue to use these findings to investigate and illuminate cultural variationsthat can influence the writing process.IntroductionWriting is an integral aspect of
different institutions with interest in applying EM approaches to career development haveteamed for this initiative. The three private institutions vary in size from 1,200 to 10,000. One isreligiously affiliated, and one is PhD granting. All three are members of the KEEN network andall have spent considerable time and resources weaving EM learning into their curriculums. Thenext step is to encourage their faculty to apply an EM approach to their own careers. All threeprovide mentors to new faculty and teaching load reductions for tenure-track faculty. The careerplanning support at these three institutions varies as does the position and rank of the faculty(Table 2). It is understood that titles for nontenure track faculty vary widely across the
worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Dr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Ann F. McKenna is the Vice Dean of Strategic Advancement for the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University, and is a professor of engineering in the Polytechnic School, one of the seven Fulton Schools. Prior to joining ASU, she served as a program director at the National Science Founda- tion in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was the director of education improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern
. Tooran Emami, United States Coast Guard Academy Tooran Emami is an associate professor of Electrical Engineering at the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. She received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Wichita State University in 2006 and 2009, respectively. Dr. Emami was an adjunct faculty member of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Wichita State University for three semesters. Her research interests are Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controllers, robust control, time delay, compensator design, and filter design applications, for continuous-time and discrete-time systems.Mr. David Fournier, United States Coast Guard Academy Holds a BA and MS from Southern New
lead teacher and mathematics curriculum coordinator for the Tri County Technical College’s Upward Bound program. Renee also is an experienced virtual educator and has taught undergraduate statistics courses online. Renee holds a B.S. Industrial Engineering and M.A.T in Middle Grades Mathematics Education from Clemson University. She is currently pursuing a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction at Purdue.Dr. Carol S Stwalley P.E., Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Carol S. Stwalley, PE joined the Minority Engineering Program team in the fall of 2007 as Recruitment and Retention Analyst. She earned her Bachelor of Science in Agriculture and Biological Engineering (ABE), MSABE, and PhD ABE from Purdue
; and Curriculum and Teaching. He also serves in multiple service capacities locally, institutionally, nationally, and internationally—including faculty mentoring programs; community organizations; ad-hoc reviewing for the National Science Foundation, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Amer- ican Educational Research Journal, The Urban Review (among others); and an invited member of the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics Research Committee and the American Educational Re- search Journal editorial board. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Increasing Academic Success for Historically Minoritized Graduate Students
Paper ID #34487Exploring Values and Norms of Engineering Through Responsible Innova-tionand Critiques of Engineering CulturesDr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster
for manystudents. Especially as experiential learning becomes increasingly prevalent in curriculum designand further emphasized as an important educational tool, engineering technology is beginning togain traction as both a career path and a field of study, particularly among those seeking to spendless time in the classroom. For instance, in 2014, there were over 34,000 students who graduatedwith 2-year engineering technology degrees, versus 4,409 students who graduated with 2-yearengineering degrees, even though the number of graduates with 4-year engineering degreesremained substantially higher than those with 4-year engineering technology degrees [1].As this growth continues, it is increasingly evident that more research needs to be done
innovations are clear to theirintended audience [6]. In other words, the technical specifications and capabilities of aninnovation must be communicated in a way that explains and justifies its use. One method ofcommunication is through a pitch, a brief speech that encapsulates the value of an innovation. Inpractice, pitches take on many forms and are dependent on the allotted timeframe, audience, andoverall purpose (i.e., what is being asked of the audience).Though there are examples of embedding entrepreneurial mindset into undergraduateengineering education, both in Bioengineering (from introductory courses [7] to capstone design[8]) as well as other technical fields such as computing [9], it is not well integrated into manyexperiential learning
CISD 2023 • Topic-based vs. Cohort-based LCs Borrego et al 2011, Whittaker et al 2014, Cox 2004, Hord 2008 10Sources: Borrego et al 2011, Whittaker et al 2014, Cox 2004, Hord 2008LCs sit at the integration of research and teachingParticipation in faculty LCs have promoted productive outcomes and sustainedfaculty commitment as well (Borrego 2011, Cox 2004)Cohort-based LCs focus on addressing the teaching, learning, anddevelopmental needs of a group of instructors impacted by something in theacademy and the participants shape the LC curriculumTopic-based LCs have a curriculum designed to address a specified campusteaching and learning need, issue, or opportunity and offer membership acrossdepartments and instructor
the Global Freshman Academy. Her Ph.D. research focuses on multi-scale multiphase modeling and numerical analysis of coupled large viscoelastic deformation and fluid transport in swelling porous materials, but she is currently interested in various topics in the field of engineering education, such as innovative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student moti- vation; innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, incorporation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the engineering curriculum and its impact.Mr. Ian Derk, Arizona State University Mr. Ian Derk is an instructor in the College of Integrative Sciences and Arts and PhD student in com- munication at the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication
program that includes credit-bearing courses in chemistry,math, and engineering fundamentals; along with professional, social, and academicprogramming to support the transition from high school to college. Hypatia andGalileo are Integrated Living and Learning Communities for first year women and menin engineering, respectively. CEED also provides peer mentoring and an academicrecovery program called Jump Start to serve students with diverse academic needs.In addition to major initiatives and other K12 and undergraduate programming andoutreach, two CEED graduate programs focus on mentoring for first year graduatestudents. The New Horizon Graduate Scholars are nominated by their departmentsand this program is focused on providing professional
mechatronics engineering throughthis hands-on project as an assessment of the design project presented.I. IntroductionA ball-and-beam system is one of the challenging control bench-marking systems integrated intomany practices and techniques [1]. This project will resolve in taking the ball-and-beam conceptand develop a ball-and-plate balancing system. The system will utilize sensors, actuators, andcontrol law to manipulate the servos in a feedback stabilization using three-degree-of-freedomcompensation. This is essentially implementing two ball-and-beam experiments in parallel toconstructing a ball-and-plate prototype.The concept of the ball-and-beam system is a simple system that is an unstable open-loop.Without an active feedback control system
, professional development, and networking.Dr. Eric Holloway, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Eric Holloway currently serves as the Sr. Director of Industry Research in the College of Engineering at Purdue, where he focuses on industry research in the College of Engineering. He also holds a courtesy faculty appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the School of Mechanical Engineering.Emily Marie Haluschak, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Emily M. Haluschak is an undergraduate student in Chemical Engineering working within INSPIRE In- stitute at Purdue University. She primarily focuses on data analysis for K-2 STEM integration while also editing STEM curriculum.Evelyn Shana MarxMs. Breejha
specifically looked at algorithm bias instruction, we did not find recent publishedwork in the field. However, compared to when we began our research in 2018, we find thatmany computer science programs now recognize and incorporate courses on algorithm bias intothe curriculum. An article published in 2019, “Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics Across CSEducation” by Grosz et al. [14] outlines efforts at Harvard University to create amultidisciplinary approach to teaching ethics to CS students, utilizing instructors fromphilosophy and computer science to teach courses that address various ethical issues that facecomputer scientists.The Embedded EthiCS approach is being embraced at other institutions as well. StanfordUniversity [15] is one of the
sustainability and its incorporation into engineering curricula and engineeringdesign are of paramount importance across all engineering disciplines due to several factors,such as environmental protection, resource management, economic benefits, innovation/competitiveness, and social responsibility. Furthermore, with the increased focus onaccreditation criteria emphasizing engineering ethics and professional responsibilities across allfour ABET commissions, the topic of sustainability has been considered an essential addition tothe engineering technology curriculum. The engineering department at Cuyahoga CommunityCollege (Tri-C) initiated the process to determine how sustainability can be included in thecurriculum. The process was executed in the
; kinematics, kinetics of particles, rigid bodies inone, two, and three dimensions, Newton-Euler equations, as well as Work-energy and impulse-momentumprinciples. The primary textbook is a custom edition of Engineering Mechanics, an Introduction toDynamics [16]. A syllabus prepared for ABET accreditation purposes is hosted on the department website[17]. The course is a part of the required ME curriculum and a prerequisite for multiple later courses. Theexisting course used a flipped classroom design wherein students watch video lectures before coming toclass and then use class time to complete problem worksheets.The motivation for this project was the lead author’s emergent dissatisfaction with grading in their course- with the experience of that
learning scientists in twouniversities has been working on a collaborative grant project funded by the Department ofEducation for the purpose to enhance the student diversity in STEM fields. In this project, weaimed at (1) contextualizing the student learning experience in STEM fields, and (2)implementing an integrated STEM education approach to teach the skills and knowledge that arenecessary to be competent in engineering and technology careers in 21st century. The researchobjective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based instructionalstrategies and the integration of the maker culture on students’ problem solving and life-longlearning skills. Specifically, we introduce evidence based pedagogy together with
Paper ID #27029Board 70: Development and Implementation of a Non-Intrusive Load Moni-toring AlgorithmDr. Robert J Kerestes, University of Pittsburgh Robert Kerestes, PhD, is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering. Robert was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He got his B.S. (2010), his M.S (2012). and his PhD (2014) from the University of Pittsburgh, all with a concen- tration in electric power systems. Robert’s academic focus is in education as it applies to engineering at the collegiate level. His areas of interest are in electric
Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success.Dr
engineering. Taking action as an ambassador might in turn impact her beliefs about how and whyindividuals decide to stay or leave the STEM pipeline in school. Actions might also impact herself-perceptions about her capacity to influence and lead others, thus strengthening herprofessional goals of achieving a leadership and mentorship position in engineering career. Thismight lead to further action possibilities of becoming a senior ambassador, and perhaps lookinginto engineering management as a future career goal. In this hypothetical case, all of these roleidentity components are in alignment. Moreover, different other roles, such as that ofundergraduate student (and the imagined role of future engineer) are integrated with the role ofthe
difficult to sustain in engineering education? 2015 Organizing Non-traditional Sessions on Current Topics 2016 The Proposed Changes to ABET Accreditation Criteria 2017 The Culture of Teaching 2018 Who's in the Driver's Seat in Engineering Education? Stop lecturing about active learning! Integrating Good Teaching Practices 2019 into ASEE Conference Sessions 2020 Engineers of the 2030s 2021 No Interdivisional Town Hall due to virtual platform 2022 Engineers of the 2030s 2023 Preparing Engineering Students for an Ever-Changing Planet Table 1: ITH Titles
for Engineering Education, 2024 Linking First-year Courses to Engage Commuter StudentsAbstractCommuter students face unique challenges in integrating into college learning communities.Engaging with first-year commuter students became incredibly challenging after the pandemicforced learning communities to transform into virtual or hybrid environments. To address thischallenge, we developed an approach to engage first-year commuter students in our departmentallearning community. We linked two introductory courses, Computer Science I (CS I) andFoundations of Computing, with joint-curricular and extracurricular activities offered bysophomores, juniors, and seniors from student clubs and a service-learning program. Informedby the