internship programs, and provide a roadmap for highereducation institutions and industry partners to collaboratively design internship programs that arerelevant, effective, and aligned with the evolving needs of both the industry and its futureprofessionals.KEYWORDSInternship program, Construction industry, Comparative analysisINTRODUCTIONInternships have been widely recognized as an important learning method in higher engineeringeducation. It can expose students in real-life work environment, and help them to integrate thetheoretical knowledge learned in the classroom with best practices in the industry [1]. This isparticularly necessary in practical fields like construction [2]. The complexity of projects and thedynamic nature of the work
intelligent complex machines. Many of the AIMS courses provide hands-on projects designed to aid students indeveloping a deeper understanding of the material, contributing to improved retention ofknowledge gained, and encouraging collaboration amongst students. An example project fromthe course “Artificial Intelligence in Engineering” presented groups of students with thechallenge of identifying general ship types with the use of computer vision and ConvolutionalNeural Networks (CNN). Students selected ships from an online source to form their dataset onwhich the CNN was initially trained. The dataset was subsequently expanded through dataaugmentation, which was used to improve the CNN’s accuracy. In this project, students hadsome freedom in
-D dimensioned 2-D sketches and fully dimensioned 3-Dparts. Through various projects, students practice parts. Through various projects, students practicecreating 3-D models and focus on using and creating 3-D models and focus on using andmodifying 2-D sketch tools such as line, circle, arcs, modifying 2-D sketch tools such as line, circle, arcs,rectangle, offset, fillet, chamfer, trim, mirror, move, rectangle, offset, fillet, chamfer, trim, mirror, move,rotate, copy, scale, stretch, and other commands. They rotate, copy, scale, stretch, and other commands. Theyalso learn feature commands including extrude, also learn feature commands including extrude,extrude cut, loft, revolve, wrap
Paper ID #36796Identifying the Needs of Electric Power Industry through Online Job Ads:A Mixed-methods ApproachHuiye Yu, UNSW Sydney Huiye Yu received her Bachelor of Electrical Engineering from North China Electric Power University, China, in 2021. She is studying a Master of Electrical Engineering at UNSW Sydney. She is currently working as a student Electrical Engineer at Aurecon.Mr. Hua Chai, University of New South Wales Hua Chai received his dual Bachelor’s Degrees in both Electrical Engineering and Project Management from North China Electric Power University, China, in 2014. He received his Master’s degree (Master
research. In the Center, she also supports other research projects and undergraduate labs on topics of high school science pedagogy and student engagement in science.Dr. Gina Navoa Svarovsky, University of Notre Dame Gina Navoa Svarovsky is an Associate Professor of Practice at the University of Notre Dame’s Center for STEM Education and the Faculty Director of the University’s Center for Broader Impacts. She has studied how young people learn engineering for nearly two decades.Mia Lettau, University of Notre DameKimberly MarfoAndrea Lorena Ortiz, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Andrea is an Engineering MSc student with a major in Engineering, Design & Innovation and a PE Diploma in Information
designed to address this training gap and transcendcommunication barriers between disciplines while promoting team science through creation ofan integrated inter-disciplinary educational model that reflects rapid advances in microbiomeresearch and the need for both interdisciplinary research and professional skills to address thesechallenges [6]. This paper reports on the evaluation of this project over five years with a focuson challenges identified in training graduate students with different entry level skills and acrossdisciplines. Strategies and training elements implemented to successfully address thesechallenges were made possible through close collaboration between the evaluation team andproject leadership who were highly responsive to
background in infrastructure design and management, and project management. Her con- sulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a focus in Water Resources. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts target ways to support and encourage diversity among students and how to create an inclusive learning environment. Professional interests include undergraduate research opportunities, service learn- ing, STEM outreach, team
affiliations were also counted,but most (65%) did not identify with a research center. Information about gender identity wasalso collected with 61% identifying as men, 31% identifying as women and 8% preferred not toanswer. No participants selected non-binary person. While not the focus of this study, rank andgender as seen in Tables 3 and 4 [Appendix A] may reflect the shifting demographics inengineering.Research Data ManagementIn the survey’s Research Data section participants were asked questions about how they workwith data, document them, and store them. Research data was found to be predominantlynumerical in nature (84%) followed by text (76%) and software data (64%). For the averageresearch project, UBC engineering researchers work with
).Dr. Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University Ibrahim H. Yeter, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is an affiliated faculty member of the NTU Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE) and the NTU Institute for Science and Technology for Humanity (NISTH). Additionally, he is the Director of the World MOON Project, the Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and the upcoming Program Chair-Elect of the PCEE Division at ASEE. His current research interests include STEM+C education, specifically artificial intelligence literacy, computational thinking, and engineering.Shamita
Paper ID #33209The Endeavour S-STEM Program: A Multi-College Collaboration to In-creaseEngagement and Retention in STEMDr. Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston Diana de la Rosa-Pohl is an Instructional Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Houston (UH). She has developed first-year experience programs for multiple STEM organizations and also teaches project-based hands-on courses for those programs. She currently directs the NSF-supported Endeavour S-STEM program which serves students across three UH STEM colleges. Her research interests include
the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Prac- tice (ISTEP) in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, which serves as a hub for pedagogical innovation and transdisciplinary engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Post-Secondary Work Integrated Learning through STEM OutreachAbstractThis work in progress paper reports on a multi-year project designed to articulate the learningand employability skills gained by a pan-Canadian group of undergraduate students, by way oftheir training and work experience as youth program “instructors” delivering
activity). 1. Conduct research on fundamental engineering principles 2. Draw on science and engineering principles to predict outcomes 3. Analyze a problem and define the constraints 4. Collaborate with others by sharing expertise, ideas, resources etc. to achieve a common goal 5. Test and evaluate potential solutions 6. Manage work process across all stages of a project 7. Incorporate ideas and approaches from other fields of study when appropriate 8. Pitch your ideas and make a case for their value 9. Account for relationships between multiple elements or components of a project 10. Come up with innovative ideas and approaches for addressing a problem 11. Develop details
utilization of such approachesyields limited learning outcomes [1-5]. Broad based active approaches to learning, using, forexample, Problem-Based Learning, Project-Based Learning, POGIL (Process Oriented GuidedInquiry Learning), Collaborative Learning, Flipped Classrooms, as well as techniques as simpleas Think-Pair-Share and Journaling, can be more effective in promoting learning for a broaderspectrum of students not only in the classroom but also throughout an engineering graduate’scareer [6-11]. The emphases within engineering education have also shifted as the need forbroader engagement with diverse populations of learners has been recognized and industry hasexpressed a desire for more engineering employees who bring not only technical skills to
interpretations of experiences and project forward on possible changestowards a growth mindset. Students understood that growth mindset was not an all or nothingswitch to be flipped.These findings are useful for educators interested in promoting productive beliefs about thenature of intelligence. Future work in this area will include an exploration of how these beliefschange over the undergraduate experience and the development of concrete strategies forstudents to begin to implement growth mindset within an engineering education context.BackgroundThe National Academy of Engineering provides us with a particular vision for the Engineer of2020, and these students will be graduating in just a few short years. As engineering educators,we are called to
. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to innovation. She also helps students an- swer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping and then to delivery.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research
United States,very little is known about the experiences of undergraduate engineering students who come fromlow-income backgrounds or are the first in their families to attend college. The scant researchthat does exist about low income, first generation students (LIFGs) is grounded in a deficiencymodel, focusing on what these students lack. Our project breaks with the existing scholarship byidentifying the ways in which LIFG knowledges and experiences outside the classroom,including the practical knowledge they develop in their lives and at work, could offer innovativeways for all students to define, solve and design for pressing engineering problems. Throughethnographic and collaborative research with LIFGs at a public engineering university
Paper ID #13149Understanding the Relationship between Living-Learning Communities andSelf-Efficacy of Women in EngineeringMs. Elaine Zundl, Douglass Residential College, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Elaine Zundl is Assistant Dean at Douglass Residential College and Director of the Douglass Project for Rutgers Women in Math, Science, and Engineering. She specializes in designing programs that pro- mote an inclusive climate for women in STEM at Rutgers. Her experience includes serving on projects that recruit and retain women in engineering and computing especially through co-curricular learning interventions
includes application of AI for project management, sustainability and data center energy.Mr. James Jay Jaurez, National University Dr. Jaurez is a dedicated Academic Program Director and Associate Professor in Information Technology Management at National University where he has served since 2004. Dr. Jaurez is also a FIRST Robotics Head Coach since 2014 and leads outreach in robotiNelson Altamirano, National University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Application of Data Analysis and Visualization Tools for US Renewable SolarEnergy Generation, its Sustainability Benefits, and Teaching In Engineering Curriculum Ben D Radhakrishnan, M.Tech., M.S
education, STEM education, and educational psychology. She has also served as a PI, co-PI, advisory board member, or external evaluator on several NSF-funded projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Intervention Research in Statics Courses: A Systematic Review ofASEE Publications from 2013 to 2023AbstractStatics is a foundational subject for many engineering students, exposing students tomathematics and physics of design and planning settings, which is vital for mechanical, civil,and aerospace engineers. This study systematically collected, analyzed, and reviewed the mostrecent 10-year ASEE conference papers about interventions in Statics courses. A total of 37papers were selected
was a member of the 2016 Frontier of En-gineering Education of the NAE and was elected as member of the Connecticut Academy of Science andEngineering in 2020. He has partnered with over 100 industry professionals and executives in generatingand managing funding for UConn that exceeds $40M leading to joint R&D, technology, patents, and pro-fessional training programs. He manages a portfolio of over $7M in research projects, while his Institutemanages active research funding that totals over $30M. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Applying a Competency-Based Education Approach for Designing a Unique Interdisciplinary Graduate Program: A Case Study for a Systems
classifications from this taxonomy that align with principlesof social constructivism to create inclusion criteria. Specifically, this review considers socialconstructivist pedagogies in CER as: peer-led team learning (PLTL), process-oriented guided-inquiry (POGIL), pair programming, contributing student pedagogy, project-based learning, peerinstruction, team-based learning, and flipped learning or flipped classrooms. The results are fromthe selected 14 out of 710 papers found in the ACM Digital Library. Only 5 of the 14 papersreviewed provided race/ethnicity data and/or disaggregated their findings based on thesesubgroups, meaning a majority of our findings are related only to gender. Our results found thatPLTL may show promise for improving “soft
in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at
object flying outof the tunnel), making interpretation of what led to design failures difficult. A conclusion fromher work was that “having [design challenge] tests that are straightforward to interpret should bea major consideration in creating design tasks.”27Study Context & Participants Connections to the Parent Project: The E4 Project This study is one part of a larger, multi-year project, the Exploring the Efficacy ofElementary Engineering (E4) Project, discussed in greater detail in the my previous work.9,24Pertinent to the present study, one aspect of the E4 Project was providing three days ofprofessional development (PD) in the summer of 2013 to 135 teachers on the Engineering is
consistently shapes their persistence and success is their advisingrelationship. The way students perceive the support they receive from this relationship caninfluence their self-efficacy concerning the competences needed to finish their dissertation, thesisor applied project report. Understanding the relationship between the student’s self-efficacytowards their culminating tasks and their perception of their advisor’s support is essential, asfrom a motivational standpoint, it can serve as a closer proxy for degree completion.This research paper presents the development and validation of the Advisor Support and Self-efficacy for Thesis completion (ASSET) survey, which measures two constructs: Thesis Self-efficacy and Advisor Support. The former
cartilage health, with a particular focus on pediatric hip disorders and MRI-based methods.Jennifer Pelletier, University of British Columbia Jennifer Pelletier is the Manager, Facilities & Special Projects, for the Department of Mechanical Engi- neering at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver Campus). Her interests in engineering education primarily centre on equity, diversity, and inclusion, and on safety practices. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Structuring equity and inclusion into access to undergraduate research opportunitiesIntroductionResearch skills are central to many aspects of engineering, but are sometimes stereotyped
developed and implemented culturally informed library services, expanded its personnel four-fold, and re-established its physical locations as culturally safe spaces for Indigenous library users. Alex co-authored ASU Li- brary’s first land acknowledgement statement, is the recipient of the Society of American Archivists 2022 Archival Innovator Award, and recently was awarded a $1 million grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for ”Firekeepers: Building Archival Data Sovereignty through Indigenous Memory Keeping,” a three-year project to preserve Indigenous knowledge through community-based participatory archival partnerships with Arizona’s Tribal communities. Alex’s journey to librarianship comes after years of
population in the U.S. butremain under-represented in computer science. The Remezcla project was developed to tackleissues of broadening participation of Latinx students in CS through an informal learningprogram. The current paper describes the program components and provides evaluation resultsfrom the pilot summer program implementation, held virtually in Atlanta and Puerto Ricoduring the COVID pandemic. Preliminary evaluation results suggest these one-week summercamps were effective in impacting pre-post students’ sense of belonging, self-efficacy, andintention to persist in computer science. Results reveal gender differences across severalconstructs with important implications for future studies.Background and rationaleThe word “remezcla”- the
transportation systems is driving a significantly increasing demand forminerals critical to the construction of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) like lithium and cobalt. As thepredominant electrochemical energy storage technology for EVs, the demand for LIBs has tripled from2015 to 2020, and it is expected to grow to “2.2 million tons by 2030” [10]. One means of projecting andlegitimizing the notion that transitioning to electrified transportation systems improves quality of life andis sustainable is through the use of life-cycle assessment (LCA). Yet there are a plethora of crucial factorsLCA either has not or cannot consider [11, 12]. In this paper, we leverage an interwoven framework ofabolition, degrowth, and environmental justice to elucidate nominally
intentionally stratified sample ofdoctoral students four times during the course of an academic year. We present an overview ofour research process and the top 10 most reported stressors from analysis of our interview data.Further, we report on the most frequent coping strategies used by students in our sample,contributing additional coping strategies used by engineering doctoral students. Understandingthe most common factors which contribute to the stresses experienced by doctoral students andthese students effective coping strategies can support students, advisors, and departments todevelop proactive interventions and strategies that support well-being and retention.Research QuestionsThis project is part of a larger, mixed methods project with the
Science and Engineering group, existing within the university. We alsoimplement virtual COVID19 pandemic programming, and then assessed the results and best practices for our mentoring program. 9The Lean Six Sigma DMAIC methodology was applied with many tools that helped tocollect the voice of the customer, or potential mentors and mentees, women in scienceand engineering.In the Define phase, the project charter is developed to understand the problem, thegoals and scope of the project. A stakeholder analysis is performed to understand whohas a stake in the project. The project plan is developed and the working team isformed.In the Measure phase, the