print, and cast a lifting hook. Using failuretheory and solid modeling simulation, students calculated the maximum force that would resultin their hook’s failure and the location of failure which is then verified by testing to failure. Asurvey of students who have completed this project reveal that adding this project reinforced thelearning experience for the students in a junior level Mechanics of Materials class.1. IntroductionHands-on learning experiences are active learning approaches that are essential for collegestudents to apply the materials learned in the classroom and to stimulate their understanding 1.Several educational set-ups are easily obtainable for such courses and they supplement theconcepts taught in the classroom. Additive
order to ensure participants have an understanding of K-12 engineering education, only respondents that have appropriate background education, are involved in K-12 engineering teaching or research, and use K-12 engineering concepts in classes that they teach were included in the potential participant pool. From this pool, 25 participants were randomly selected from each of the four categories described above yielding a total of 100 participants who were sent the Round 1 questionnaire (See Table 5). Round 1 The first step of the research project was to send a single question to the 100 randomly selected participants from the 428 qualified respondents. Participants were asked to, “Please list all the characteristics of the nature of
is important. Krupczak, et al.,1 discuss how the general populace needs tounderstand technology, including its creation and its impact on society. They also differentiatebetween technological literacy and engineering literacy. The American Association for theAdvancement of Science, and the National Academy of Engineering have weighed in on theimportance of everyone being literate with respect to technology and the role of engineering insociety.2,3 Klein and Balmer4 summarize some of the reasons for increasing technologicalliteracy, particularly among students majoring in the liberal arts. In the preface to itstechnological literacy standards, the International Technology Education Association points outthat while society is increasingly
as opposed to otherforms of renewable ocean energy. The energy available can be measured by the difference in tideheights. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) summarized tidalpatterns in three categories. Figure 1 illustrates those typical tidal patterns. 5 Figure 1: Typical Tidal PatternsDiurnal tide has one high tide and one low tide every 24 hours and can be observed in manyareas within the Gulf of Mexico. Semidiurnal has two high tides and two low tides every 24hours and can be observed along the eastern coast of North America. Mixed Semidiurnal tidesalso experience two high tides and two low tides every 24 hours, however; the amplitude of highare low tides are dependent on the lunar cycle
recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Ten Years Later – Where Are They Now?AbstractThis paper explores the educational and career trajectories of the alumnae of an outreach activityfor girls. The outreach activity was originally developed using an integrated marketing approachto attract girls into engineering programs.1 The program, a two day, overnight experience forrising 9th, 10th and 11th grade girls, focuses on showcasing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity, including activities developed from that perspective. Started in 2005 and held annuallysince then, a total of over 500 girls have
of praxis and concientización. To achieve this goal, we focusedon the contextualized understanding of the critical theoretical frameworks to facilitateconciencia.IntroductionThe plethora of research on underrepresented minorities in engineering education has resulted ina substantial number of articles on the topic. Some of the research studies have tried tounderstand the state of underrepresentation in engineering 1-4, their academic trajectories5-7,factors that impact their retention and participation8-12, and their histories and experiences13-15,among others. These studies have discussed the potential of different initiatives to providesupport to underrepresented students. Due to the recent call for broadening and participation
Science Teacher. This article includes an annotatedlist of all 31 books on the list, additional criteria related to science and engineering practices, alist of all reviewers, and the call for submissions for the 2018 Best STEM Books. See alsohttp://static.nsta.org/pdfs/2017BestSTEMBooks.pdf for a list of all 31 books and review criteria.2017 Best STEM Books in alphabetical order by title. (Title. Authors / Illustrators. Publisher.Age Range.)1. Ada Byron Lovelace and the Thinking Machine. Wallmark / Chu. Creston Books. K-5.2. Ada’s Ideas: The Story of Ada Lovelace, the World’s First Computer Programmer. Robinson. Abrams. 1-5.3. Ada Lovelace, Poet of Science: The First Computer Programmer. Stanley / Hartland. Paula Wiseman Books.4. Ben
knowledge and skills, such as communications and interpersonal skills, businessstrategy and applications, team/organization and management, general problem solving andcritical thinking, as well as self-regulated lifelong learning skills3, 4, 14, 16-18. Employers report thatemployees are not well prepared in terms of global knowledge, writing, critical thinking,adaptability, self-knowledge, oral communication, or quantitative reasoning19. However, thequestion remains: how to effectively design the curriculum to ensure that both discipline-specificand cross-disciplinary skills are sufficiently covered? To address this question, we need toexplore the issue from multiple angles: (1) gaps in education perceived by faculty, (2) gaps ineducation perceived
improve three-dimensional visualization skills” [1]. The professor’sinnovative instruction included creative ways of learning which targeted students’ spatialreasoning skills. Through the semester, students practiced freehand sketching, learned ComputerAided Design (CAD), designed for additive manufacture, and created 3D printed tangibleobjects. The instructor consistently encouraged the students to freehand sketch objects, as a wayto enhance their ability to see the physical environment and improve their spatial visualizationskills. The instructor employed various exercises throughout the semester to challenge thestudents to think creatively to let their artistic talent shine as well as aiming to instill confidencein their freehand sketching
appointment of five lead engineers to serve as project mentors for theprogram. These project mentors selected ten community college students from a shortlist of 20candidates provided by two members of the RU team (lead principal investigator and graduatestudent researcher) who conducted 34 interviews from an original pool of 58 applicants. Originalapplicants represented a range of individual differences: 26% female, 55% underrepresentedethnic minorities; 57% first generation; 27% veterans; 62% low-income; 5% students with1This research was supported by, or in part by, the U. S. Office of Naval Research under awardnumber N00014-15-1-2438.disabilities2. The final selection of ten from this diverse pool echoed such diversity: two females,five minorities
environment across theprogram.Future plans for BEPI include adding more options to the weekends for students who havealready selected a focus area. We are also currently developing advanced residency courses,which offer students the opportunity to learn the state-of-the art in a specific field taught byleading scientists and working biomedical engineers.BackgroundThe Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that biomedical engineering is expected to be one of thefastest growing occupations from 2014-2024[1]. With a 2015 median pay of almost $90,000 peryear and an expected job growth rate of 23% over the next decade, biomedical engineeringcareers will enjoy a growth rate well above the expected level of 7% for all occupations [2]. Thedata are summarized in
. This goal is achieved throughengaging engineering students in design exercises and experiences throughout their academicundergraduate careers. The CASCADE project provides student support in an innovativeconfiguration of cascaded peer-mentoring. This program exposes freshman students to theengineering design process with vertically aligned design experiences through the sophomore andjunior years. Cascading vertically, undergraduate seniors mentor juniors, juniors mentorsophomores, and sophomores mentor freshmen. The objectives of the CASCADE project are to:1) infuse concepts of the design process across all four levels of the engineering undergraduatecurriculum (i.e., freshman through senior), 2) increase first-year, second-year, and third
. Although traditionalenergy sources (such as fossil fuels) still meet most of our energy demands, the benefits ofrenewable energy have no match of being environmentally friendly while they are virtuallyinexhaustible. Sustainable development includes solving the sustainable energy resourcesproblem[1, 2]. “A sustainable energy system may be regarded as a cost-efficient, reliable, andenvironmentally friendly energy system that effectively utilizes local resources andnetworks.”[3]. The development of renewable and sustainable energy sources will lead to anincrease in energy independence which, in turn, will lead to advancement in local and regionalsustainable manufacturing industries and to promotion of regional development of the workforcespecialized
lower the window panes. The force required to adjust the windowsis often much too large for the nursing home tenants, making it very difficult for them to regulatetheir room temperature.Your team has been tasked with designing a device that will assist the elderly tenants withraising and lowering the building’s windows. You will produce a complete engineering designsolution for the client. Someone should be able to build the device from your solution withoutany questions. Since each window is not guaranteed to be located near an electrical socket, thisdevice should not rely on electric power.The building’s windows are double-hung, Figure 1. The double-hung window consists of anupper and lower sash that slide vertically in separate grooves in
results and describe opportunities forfuture work, encouraging continued involvement in research. Many FIRE students continue toparticipate in research after the program concludes and note that the program influenced theirdecision to attend UT Austin and confirmed their interest in the field of mechanical engineering.The general structure of the FIRE program is documented in this paper, along with investigationsof its impact on participants’ GPA, retention within the major, rate of participation in undergraduateresearch, and intention to pursue higher education. Student perceptions of the program andopportunities for improving it are also discussed. 1. Introduction Participation in undergraduate research provides students with
especially engineering despite benefits of diversity 1-3. Barriersthat prevent more diverse students participating and persisting in STEM include lack of interestand campus climate 4.Campus climate and issues around race, class, and gender are critical components that shape thelearning environment in higher education. Issues around race, class, and gender often make thelearning environment hostile and unwelcoming, particularly in science, technology andmathematics or STEM fields. Aspects of the hostility include racial microaggressions which aresubtle messages that are insulting or demeaning to people of color 5-7. Research suggests hostilecampus climates are associated with students of color leaving STEM fields before graduating.For instance
focuses on evaluating methods of effective practice of an engineering design summerprogram for middle school students. The paper reflects on findings and observations regardinggender groupings in STEM, and how they affect student learning and confidence. In 2009,President Obama's Administration implemented the "Educate to Innovate" program to emphasizeSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) education. Women and men hold nearlyequal professional positions in the biological sciences, and close to that in math, yet womencomprise less than 30% of the science and engineering workforce as a whole.1 Students as youngas kindergarten express the belief that fields of study such as science and math are “boysubjects.”2 The societal norm that males
factoranalyses (CFA) will be conducted. The purpose of conducting several CFAs is to determinewhether any level of the theories used to develop the scale are supported: an 11-factor model(figure 1.1), a unidimensional model (figure 1.2), or an 11-factor with 1 higher order factormodel (figure 1.3). These models also reflect how the E-SIS has to this point been scored, as asingle identify factor and 11 subscales, each matching to one of the measurement approachesdescribed above. Three models are examined in this paper (see Figures 1.1 through 1.3 for a visual of thesetheoretically based models). Model 1 (Figure 1.1) represents a combination of the 11 separatetheoretical approaches and supports the scoring of 11 subscales. Model 2 (Figure 1.2
participation by STEM students has increased over the last decade, during the2009/10 academic year, only 3.9% of study abroad came from engineering majors [1]. This isattributed to the heavy course loads required in engineering programs and the highly-structured,sequential curriculum that makes missing a semester problematic, in addition to difficulties infinding equivalent technical courses which can be transferred back to American institutions.When I started teaching at UAB, study abroad options for engineering students were few and farbetween. Because of the transformative role that studying abroad played in my ownundergraduate experience, I wanted to create similar opportunities for my students. Drawing oncontacts made during two years living in
continuesunabated due to years of massive growth in undergraduate CS enrollment, the ability to servestudents is constrained by the limited group of faculty who are qualified and committed toeducation; hiring of these faculty is failing. Demand is so great that Stanford has introduced anew MS in Computer Science Education (which requires a prior PhD in a non-computingdiscipline), and this program began a year earlier than anticipated [1].The field needs to understand those responsible for lighting the fires. This research characterizesrecent hiring of instructional faculty at all levels of higher education through two studies: ananalysis of twenty years of job advertisement messages on a listserv for the CS educationcommunity, and a survey of department or
engineer’s success. Engineering schools strive to prepare their students in both of theseareas through rigorous education and practice. Technical abilities are taught and practicedthroughout the curriculum, and capstone is where students are given the opportunity to gainvaluable “real world” experience on an open-ended, team-based engineering project.The other component to success in engineering, particularly for new college graduates, is theability to master professional or soft skills such as communication, project management andinterpersonal skills. Companies routinely look for and prize individuals that exhibit theseprofessional skills [1-4].Teamwork is an important skill needed for success in engineering capstone courses. A recentnationwide
, the heterogeneity of students and curriculum are foundto positively impact on-line engineering program success. This study isimportant because it empirically identifies specific factors that can improveonline graduate engineering program performance. The paper concludes withimplications for engineering education and recommendations for futureresearch.IntroductionOnline learning is changing the traditional ways of learning for students by attracting greaternumbers of new types of students who live off campus and interact in virtual classes [1]. Theonline education phenomenon is immense with an overall year-to-year growth rate of 3.9%.Nearly 6 million students representing 28% of all students took at least one course online in2016. 2.85 million
or modifications to certain active learningactivities are presented where possible. The author of this paper has a severe case of dyslexia andis an Assistant Professor of software engineering and can see the problem through both, the eyesof the student and the eyes of the instructor.1 IntroductionOne of the most important best practices in education is active learning. Last year, the WhiteHouse Office of Science and Technology Policy issued a national Call to Action aimed atimproving STEM education through the use of active learning. Active learning serves to clarify,and solidify the material presented in the lecture as well as to help the students retain theinformation presented in the class. It involves activities generally performed in
datalimitations, research has not yet been able to document LGBTQ inequality relative to theexperiences of non-LGBTQ students at the same institution. In this paper, we utilize new surveydata on over 1700 students (both LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ) from eight engineering collegesacross the U.S. to paint the landscape of inequalities for LGBTQ students. Specifically, we ask,(1) do LGBTQ students experience greater marginalization than their classmates and (2) is theirengineering work more likely to be devalued? (3) Do LGBTQ students experience greaterpersonal consequences than their peers in terms of stress, insomnia, and unhappiness? (4) Dothese LGBTQ inequalities vary by school? We find that LGBTQ students face greatermarginalization, devaluation and personal
in class and during field trips. The course thus helps empower them, helps themgain confidence in the classroom, but also experience a foretaste of being a collegestudent. By the end of the pilot course in Summer 2016, we asked students if they feltthey could be engineers or inventors in the future. A strong majority (91%) agreed theycould. Several aspects of the bootcamp are unique, and we would like to share the keylearnings. They include: 1) The application process, which was based on non-cognitivevariables. No grades were required. Applicants needed to deliver a 2-min video showingtheir motivation and how they would improve their school cafeteria. Students needed tohave a curiosity towards STEM fields and the invention process. A
. To make these objectivesaccessible to K-12 audiences, the IC provides a structured, simplified approach for teachers toguide students through an open-ended design problem within a domain of the students’ choosing.In this paper, we will describe the K-12 InVenture Challenge and the K-16 ecosystem in which itis situated. Then, we will focus on research outcomes related to the following guiding questions:1) To what extent does participation in the IC affect K-12 teachers’ self-efficacy for teachingengineering and entrepreneurship content? 2) What are teachers’ perceptions of the program’simpact on students?Background and OriginsThe IC was originally developed as a high school-level competition with materials created byhigh school science
Psychology from Stanford University. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and en- trepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of ePortfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and 3) redesigning the traditional academic transcript.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the
large vessels. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Need for Measuring Transformative Experiences in Engineering EducationAbstractTransformative experiences (TE) are specific moments when students 1) apply practices and/orknowledge from their coursework to everyday experiences without prompting (also calledmotivated use); 2) view everyday objects or situations through the lens of course content(expanded perception); and 3) express value course content in new ways because it enricheseveryday experience (experiential value, which we also term affective value). This constructdraws heavily on John Dewey’s seminal work in education and experiential learning.Transformative experience has been
; Clase 1, previously documented many of theconsiderations for program content, duration, format and administration. Through aninternational compare and contrast of somewhat similar programs, both credit and non-credit, theaforementioned paper described their methodology as: The methodology employed encompassed a time-phased set of inter-related activities as described below. A compare and contrast was performed by identifying and normalizing categories of cost, availability, and curriculum Program offerings, nationally and internationally, were mapped to the normalized data for cost, availability and curriculum A compare and contrast was performed by characterizing and normalizing best practices
literacy” has a specificmeaning that is not generally found in fiction permits a qualitative view of the rise in use ofthe term over a time frame of decades, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Google NGram word frequency vs. time graph of the terms “technological literacy”, “science literacy”, and “information literacy” (value divided by five) for 2012 dataset of American English with a smoothing of 1 for the time period 1970 - 2008.The term technological literacy seems to have first come into use around the 1950’s where itwas used more by happenstance than deliberately. Before 1980 technological literacy mostoften referred to the benefits of, or need for: vocational education, skills for living in a worldwith rapid technological