processInstitute How to integrate biomimicry into design and bring nature’s genius to the design table How to work in interdisciplinary teams How to integrate biomimicry into an engineer’s process How to communicate biomimicry with engineers and business people How biologists gather and research information and how that information can inform other disciplines What considerations go into a successful business plan What are the fundamentals of business design and decision-making Understanding intellectual property issues Applying biomimicry methodology
Mathematics and Family EngineeringMathematics and engineering situated within family’s decision making and activities allow forthe development of unique mathematical skills for the child. Families serve as effective learningsettings for students. Goldman and Booker posit that “parents are the primary, most committedand effective educators of their children”22. It is in this environment students may gain initialexposure to mathematics, engineering and problems solving in out-of-school settings throughbudgeting, grocery shopping, and family cell phone plan shopping22. Problem solving andtrouble-shooting that is situated in the family setting provides mathematically relevant problemsthat that each member can connect with22. Depending on the structure of
planning the transfer process, withthe resulting smoother transitions. Our future qualitative analysis will allow us to explore this Page 23.39.12relationship in more depth.Finally, the students in our sample show moderate evidence of GPA shock. Fifty percent of thosesurveyed experienced a decline in their GPA using our broad measurement categories. However,many of the students in the sample remained in the same GPA bracket, demonstrating at leastthat their academic transition, as measured by GPA, was somewhat smooth. Additionally, only6% reported transfer ecstasy, or an increase in GPA from the sending institution to the receivinginstitution
efficient day productive and everything; and the – the other side says that, you know, after the first hour I’ll probab – I’ll there’s a chance that I’ll get an email that will make me upset or there will be other tasks to do, within – with my, umm, planned day that will bother me ‘cause I’ll have leave what I'm doing and, umm, it’s – it’s a – it’s a change in the mood, or change in the tasks, or change in the people I see, or I dunno’ things – things that – that change from one to another throughout the day.” [Kyra] The picture of the black and white face which Kyra supplied is not literal, butmetaphorical. The photo allows her to speak of her disposition, in that she starts her days
passes the challenge, then it is shared with the other groups what they have done and which method they have used to do so. I think I have a good relation with my partner and the organization team members. I worked with my partner over night to solve the challenges as friends. Meantime, the atmosphere at the camp was warm enough to develop friendship with other participants and even with undergraduate students. Elif: I did not see such competition either. Instead, we developed friendship although we came from different school at different locations across the country. We talked about ourselves, our schools and our future plans after high school.Robotics activities as a means to nurture student interest in
research. In a subsequent reflective question response, she describesthe working environment she creates with Annie: I’d like to keep the experience positive and manageable but sometimes I feel like I have trouble determining the right balance…when we have a short meeting things don’t go quite as planned I get concerned that the student is having a discouraging research experience…I try to welcome and explain all my student’s questions.Mia’s consideration for Annie is clear in the importance she places on keeping her experiencebalanced and not too boring or too complex. The focus is on Annie’s interest in the research, noton the research itself. Mia continues: She [Annie] has been doing good work and I feel like
than a minor change from the existing standards, and will require trial,assessment, and revision before it is ready for adoption. We plan to work with a number ofpartnering institutions to perform the requisite tests and assessment.While it is clear that there are two parts to making education attractive – content and pedagogy –our effort is aimed at only the content part of the equation. We do not wish to minimize theimportance of pedagogical innovation in making education attractive and accessible, but we notethat content has received far less scrutiny than the delivery methods, and thus we believeimprovements are more critical at this juncture.Our approach to revision of the undergraduate engineering curriculum involves six steps:1
. • Objectives should be appropriate to the instructional area and the philosophy of the school.The next step in understanding learning objectives is to realize their purpose and importance tothe many people they affect. The next section discusses the functions of learning objectives andtheir importance to education.The Importance of Learning ObjectivesWhen learning objectives are properly stated, they serve many purposes and assist many groupsof people.10 Some of the functions of learning objectives are as follows: • Provide a focus for instruction. Learning objectives provide a focus for instruction at both program and course levels in education.10 Clearly stated learning objectives create a framework for planning a successful
of the detailed design phase of the design process, including: a. Develop a product information package containing the detailed information necessary for producing the final project, including assembly drawings for the final product and subassemblies; part drawings for custom parts; purchase information for vendor supplied parts; schematic, piping and/or wiring diagrams for electrical, pneumatic, or hydraulic systems; block and/or logic diagrams for software systems; and similar materials necessary for unique projects. b. Develop and carry out statistically-based experimental plans for
, utilitypatents and intellectual property protection.The countries that consistently rank highly in the Global Competitiveness Report all haveexcellent higher education systems with a strong focus on technology and innovation. In 2011,the top ten ranked countries in order were Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden, Finland, UnitedStates, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Japan and the United Kingdom. Other notables includeIsrael (22nd), China (26th) and Ireland (29th).Barack Obama spoke to the issue of US innovation in his State of the Union Speech on 25January 2011. In this speech he outlined his plan: …to help the United States win the future by out-innovating, out-educating, and out-building our global competition....What America does better than
planning to be?” Other 11 “no one understands us” “I just want a better life...” “math class is like philosophy class for engineers” Table 1. Main findings and example tweets from each category from the first stage data analysis4.2 Second Stage Data AnalysisFrom the first stage of data analysis, we found that the major theme is students’ complaining Page 25.615.12about
impact of a different color roof (e.g., light vs. dark), and we have a two-story house in Texas with a dark roof and a ranch house in Oregon with a light roof, then one could do a two-sample t-test to compare their electricity usage. The team presents to the class their arguments for how to collect appropriate data.“Is Transportation Transportation Junior This module focuses on examining sustainability impactsSustainable?” Engineering associated with transportation planning and facility design. The
or non-use of a reference data card (RDC).The following sections describe the methods used by the authors to evaluate each of the areas.Evaluating PerformancePerformance was evaluated by comparing students’ mean scores on both within-term and finalexaminations from the fall term of 2010 (Term 11-1) for ten sections of students (n=184), all ofwhom were provided an RDC with similar examination data from 11 sections of students(n=201) that were not provided an RDC in the fall of 2011 (Term 12-1). The mean scores wereevaluated using a two-sample t-test assuming unequal variances. To determine whether themean scores were statistically significant, a 95% confidence level was used.Because this study was not a deliberately planned study, but rather
engineering education at31 four-year U.S. institutions. A disproportional, stratified random sampling plan was used toproduce a nationally representative sample of four-year engineering programs that offer two ormore ABET-accredited programs in six engineering disciplines (biomedical/bioengineering,chemical, civil, electrical, industrial, and mechanical). Because the P2P study was also designedto inform analyses of a closely related set of six case studies (one of which offered only abaccalaureate-level general engineering program), the sample was also refined to include threeinstitutions that offered a general engineering program in addition to their discipline-basedprograms. All faculty members, program chairs, and sophomore, junior, and senior
Puerto Rico Seismic Network. She is currently employed as an undergraduate Research Assistant with the Graduate Research and Education for Appro- priate Technology: Inspiring Direct Engagement and Agency (GREAT IDEA) project. Zevallos is a native of Port au Prince, Haiti, and is fluent in Haitian Creole, French, English, and Spanish. She plans to return back to her hometown to share and apply her scientific knowledge in seismology.Denisse Echevarria , University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez Denisse Echevarria is a junior in mechanical engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. Echevarria is currently employed as an Undergraduate Research Assistant with the Graduate Research and Education for Appropriate
don’tconcentrate that much. I go to the lectures and they go through things once and they gothrough it pretty fast. Not like high-school. Where they take one week to explain stuff youcan get it already. And you can get good results. So like I wasn’t that good last semester and Iam going to catch up. I don’t have a plan yet. But I just have to do all the work that they giveus. The work they give us today I will have to do it tonight.” The above comments reflect theimportance of students viewing themselves as their own teachers, building on and extendingtheir pre-existing knowledge, skills and approaches.Peer AssessmentAnother ‘way into’ the subject was through effective feedback from formative assessment. In
4 4 8 2 9 5 3 3 4 2 Antagonistic (A) 1 4 4 4 0 5 1 3 2 3 4 2 Overall Trend S S/A A A S/N A N/A N/A S S A S Positive to Positive to Neutral to Positive to Negative to Summary Over Time Negative Negative Positive 1 Anna experiences extreme positive and negative experiences associated with her plans to change departments making her interview difficult to rate overall. Therefore, her second year interview is
afrequency and time determined by their members.iCheckpoint and iExpoThe iCheckpoint meeting was held at midterm (14 October 2009). After a box-dinner meal, thewhole community assembled briefly and then was broken into two breakout presentationsessions where the teams presented their organization, plans, and progress regarding (1) identityand social networking, academics and advising and (2) the world of work and service. TheiTeams conducted various social and academic events. For example there were skating parties,movie nights, including a gathering to watch TED.com presentations, trips to corporate sponsors,travel to Silicon Valley conferences, international service projects, helping with Habitat forHumanity projects, and more.The iExpo meeting
GPA greater than 3.0 and two students with a cumulative GPA lessthan 3.0. The interview protocol asked students about their short- and long-term career andeducational plans, confidence in solving ill-structured and well-structured problems, problem-solving experience, learning experience, and their development of problem-solving skills. Aspart of the protocol, students were asked to describe how they would solve two think-aloudproblems (a well-structured and ill-structured problem) as well as their approaches to problemssolving. All student names in this paper have been changed to pseudonyms.Findings A comparison of the responses of students with co-op or internship experiences andstudents without these experiences revealed
, a new „abstract‟ format was implemented in orderto incorporate a writing style and inquiry-based approach that will help the student in theirengineering careers.8 The design and planning of this course was based to meet the ABETEC2000 criteria. The foundation for the use of this criteria was to correlate and promote theundergraduate experience to be similar to other courses that have a similar set-up of a laboratoryclass that is mainly used to strengthen the concepts and principles learned in the lecture. Amongthe criteria met, this course included: the application of knowledge of math, science andengineering; the design and execution of experiments and measurements, analysis, andinterpretation of data from living systems; the ability to