easilyextend to several hours for the remote student.Changes could include breaking down an exercise procedure into smaller, less overwhelmingparts, that can be completed in fifteen to twenty minutes. Alternatively, a shorter introduction andexercise procedure video, with additional short videos explaining specific parts of the procedurefor more involved or complicated procedures. Finally having a scheduled meeting or recitationfor the students to work on their labs and have immediate access to assistance could be part ofthe course schedule in future iterations.References[1] Alexander, D. G., Anderson, T. J., Beyerlein, S. W., Blackketter, D. M., Crepeau, J. C., andSmelser, R. E., “Online Instrumentation and Engineering Laboratories For Distance
. Walker, "Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program in Engineering on Student Retention and Graduation," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018.[4] D. Wood, A. Gura, and J. Brockman, "Critical Findings in the Development of the Community- Engaged Educational Ecosystem," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2020.[5] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, A. Rayna Carolan-Silva, S. Boukdad, and J. C. Alarcon, "Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings, A. Genau Ed.: ASEE, 2019.[6] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, and S. Alptekin, "Student Outcomes in Academic Community Engaged STEM projects with
views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] S. M. Lord et al., “MIDFIELD: A Resource for Longitudinal Student Record Research,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 245–256, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TE.2021.3137086.[2] G. L. Heileman, C. T. Abdallah, A. Slim, and M. Hickman, “Curricular Analytics: A Framework for Quantifying the Impact of Curricular Reforms and Pedagogical Innovations,” ArXiv181109676 Phys., Nov. 2018, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09676[3] R. Layton, R. Long, M. Ohland, M. Orr, and S. Lord, “midfielddata: MIDFIELD data sample.” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://midfieldr.github.io
include the EnvE discipline itself (cross-disciplinary but faculty largely embedded indepartments where their work is at the edge); challenges of race, ethnicity, gender (e.g.,Misogynoir [40]); parenting (e.g., [41], [42]); and those who engage in CER. In this time whenDEI activities are under particular scrutiny and attacks, the work is especially critical.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the following individuals for their contributions to our ADVANCE project:Gabriela Chavira, David Sul, and Lilia Abron. This material is based upon work supported bythe National Science Foundation under Award No. 2204550, 2204099, 2204552, and 2245181.Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s
: 10.3991/ijoe.v16i03.12849. [9] V. S. Katz, A. B. Jordan, and K. Ognyanova. Digital inequality, faculty communication, and remote learning experiences during the covid-19 pandemic: A survey of us undergraduates. Plos one, 16(2):e0246641, 2021.[10] Marcos Inonan, Pablo Ordu˜na, and Rania Hussein. Adapting a remote sdr lab to analyze digital inequalities in radiofrequency education in latin america. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 2023. In press.[11] L. M. Cerd´a-Su´arez, K. N´un˜ ez-Vald´es, and S. Quir´os y Alpera. A systemic perspective for understanding digital transformation in higher education: Overview and subregional context in latin america as evidence. Sustainability, 13(23):12956, 2021. doi: 10.3390
3. Students submit first two assignments 3rd year (Individual) (ME) semester) as part of a design team and submit 4. Revision of Design Proposal last two assignments as individuals (Individual) 4. Seven senior ME mentors help cri que dra s and mark submissions*Assignment with heaviest
, facilitating the sharing ofinformation between faculty, and for bringing the authors together to work on this project.References[1] K. L. Sanford, P. J. Parker, M. W. Roberts, C. M. D. Wilson, M. R. Penn, R. Valdes- Vasquez and F. Paige, "Infrastructure Education in Unprecedented Times: Strengthening a Community of Practice," American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2021.[2] J. Lucena, Ed., Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, Springer Netherlands, 2013.[3] P. Hancock and S. Turner, "Actioning social justice into the engineering curriculum," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1-37, 22 August 2023.[4] ABET
, designing it to institutionalize the lessons learned as a diversity practitioner and engineering professor. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and has been recognized with the PAESMEM award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Toward a theoretical model of a successful WMEP programWith the emergence of engineering education programs, there is at last a structure and approachto train engineering professors for the university and college levels. But engineering diversityadministrators generally learn their job as they do it. The first women in engineering programwas founded at Purdue in 1969, and programs for minority engineers or multiculturalengineering in the 1970’s. The leaders of
Education Theory & Practice, vol. 21, no. 9, 2021.[2] S. Kulturel-Konak, "Overview of Student Innovation Competitions and Their Roles in STEM Education," in 2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/38445.[3] D. Smith, J. Muldoon, and G. S. Lakshmikanth, "The need for modification: The impact of COVID-19 on pitch competitions," Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 686-702, 2022.[4] A. Konak, S. Kulturel-Konak, D. R. Schneider, and K. Mehta, "Best Practices for Cultivating Innovative Thinking Skills in Innovation Competitions and Programs," in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, USA
Education, vol. 32, no. 3(A), pp. 1194-1207, 2016.[2] A. Schüler-Meyer, M. Hendrickx, C. Verhoosel, “The intended and unintended impacts on student ownership when realizing CBL in mechanical engineering,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 48, pp. 340-357, 2023.[3] D. Dounas-Frazer, L. Ríos, H. J. Lewandowski, “Preliminary model for student ownership of projects” in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference (PERC), Provo, Utah, USA, July 24-25, 2019, Y. Cao, S. Wolf, M. Bennett, pp. 141-146, 2020.[4] A. H. Jamal, M. Essawi, T. Oleg, “Accountability for project-based collaborative learning,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 127-135, 2014.[5] T. Bauer, B
, 9497325. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/94973253. Khalili, A. A., & Ahmad, M. R. (2015). A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications. International journal of molecular sciences, 16(8), 18149–18184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1608181494. Bhattacharjee, S. (2016). DLS and Zeta potential – what they are and what they are not? Journal of Controlled Release, 235, 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.0175. Bondar, O. V., Saifullina, D. V., Shakhmaeva, I. I., Mavlyutova, I. I., & Abdullin, T. I. (2012). Monitoring of the zeta potential of human cells upon reduction in their viability and interaction with polymers. Acta Naturae, 4(1
. Lastly, conductingmore interviews with students and instructors will aid in constructing a Lite version that meetshigh educational standards and student requirements.AcknowledgementRELIA project is funded by the National Science Foundation’s division of undergraduateeducation under award number 2141798.References [1] F. Atienza and R. Hussein. Student perspectives on remote hardware labs and equitable access in a post-pandemic era. In 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2022. [2] V. S. Katz, A. B. Jordan, and K. Ognyanova. Digital inequality, faculty communication, and remote learning experiences during the covid-19 pandemic: A survey of us undergraduates. Plos one, 16(2):e0246641, 2021. [3] Pew
). Environmental Justice in the 21st Century: Race Still Matters. Phylon,49(3/4), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3132626Caballero, G. W., Wells, E. C., Echols, S. A., & Peaslee, E. H. (2024). Environmental justicefrom the ground (water) up: coping with contamination in Tallevast, Florida. Local Environment,1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2325080Cutter, S. L. (1995). Race, Class and Environmental Justice. Progress in Human Geography,19(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030913259501900111del Puerto, C. L., Cavallin, H. E., Perdomo, J. L., Barreto, J. M., Suarez, O. M., & Andrade, F.(2019, June). Developing a collaborative undergraduate STEM program in resilient andsustainable infrastructure. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
minoritizedcommunities, SIRI offers a unique opportunity to explore how greater intentionality in programrecruitment and ensuring diversity across all aspects of programming supports the graduatementoring experience.Acknowledgements:The SIRI program and this material are based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under NSF Grant Numbers CNS-1836900 and CNS-1836952. Any opinions,findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We thank all of theundergraduates, graduate mentors, and faculty mentors for participating in the SIRI program andlead PI Meeko Oishi for her leadership on the project.References[1] L. S. Behar
the end, she changes her system to match what theproblem is suggesting, without going back and adjusting her understanding of the physicalsystem.The specific wording she uses during this transition is also significant. The student talks aboutwhat she “can’t” do or what she “should” do in reference to information the problem provides.The problem itself is referred to as both “it” and “they”, demonstrating the fuzziness of theboundary between problem and creator(s).DiscussionIn this moment, the student is using the intentional stance to view the problem as an epistemicagent in the problem solving process. There is full dialogue and shared agency between the twointerlocutors. One represents the student; she is attempting to engage with the
untrained GTAs.Limitations of this study include the lack of pre-assessment data in Cohort 1. Ongoing collectionwith Cohort 2 will include a post evaluation to determine growth in their teaching and learning,to improve test-power. Further, Cohort 1 peers are acting as mentors to Cohort 2. Providinglearned experiences to their peers and additional help with their curriculum development.References[1] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, Eds., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, andAssessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Complete ed. New York:Longman, 2001.[2] National Research Council (U.S.), S. R. Singer, N. Nielsen, and H. A. Schweingruber,Eds., Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving
/su11205742.[12] S. Rajabi, S. El-Sayegh, and L. Romdhane, “Identification and assessment of sustainability performance indicators for construction projects,” Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, vol. 15, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2022.100193.[13] T. Y. M. Lam, “Driving sustainable construction development through post-contract key performance indicators and drivers,” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 483–499, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-07-2020-0111.[14] X. Xiahou, Y. Tang, J. Yuan, T. Chang, P. Liu, and Q. Li, “Evaluating social performance of construction projects: An empirical study,” Sustainability , vol. 10, no. 7, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10072329.[15] R. Y
. 149-158, 2020.[6] J.R. Morelock, M.M. Lester, M.D. Klopfer, A.M. Jardon, R.D. Mullins, E.L. Nicholas andA.S. Alfaydi, '"Power, perceptions, and relationships: A model of co-teaching in highereducation," College Teaching, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 182-191, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1336610[7] M. Chrysochoou, A.E. Zaghi, C.M. Syharat, S. Motaref, S. Jang, A. Bagtzoglou and C.A.Wakeman, '"Redesigning engineering education for neurodiversity: new standards for inclusivecourses," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, July 26 –29, 2021. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37647[8] C.A. Dell, T.F. Dell and T.L. Blackwell, '"Applying universal design for learning in onlinecourses: Pedagogical and practical considerations
type ofmotor(s) they will integrate and operate for their system. There are different types of motors tochoose from and knowing the characteristics of each motor type will aide students in sizing theappropriate motor that meet their desired performance requirements, helping students learn howto cooperate in interdisciplinary situations [4]. Allowing students to practice engineeringdecision-making will allow them to digest and absorb scientific knowledge through observationand experimentation [1-3]. For some universities, lab equipment used to showcase experiments,can be expensive and are unable to leave the laboratory, which can be a huge constraint [1], [3].For instance, the Mechatronics Actuators board developed by Quanser features several
Summary (if known) Author Becca First-year engineering Fall 2018 Female, probable first-year, K. Johnson projects course, other data not collected University B Dorothy First-year engineering Fall 2019 Female, first-year, other data J. Blacklock projects course, not collected University B Cleopatra Second-year Spring Female, self-described S. Claussen introduction to 2019 sophomore, probable ME mechanical major, other data not
implementinginclusive design of spaces including the following recommended spaces: improve physicalaccess beyond federal, state, and local requirements, provide amenities like quiet, wellness, ormeditation room(s), all-gender and/or family restrooms, exterior green space, public restrooms,public education areas, publicly-available event space, indoor weather shelters, fitness spaceswith accessible and inclusive activities and equipment, and spaces that encourage frequent,casual social interaction to reduce probability of social isolation [29]. Inclusive Spaces and Cultures in EngineeringPromoting inclusive cultures within engineering environments is of critical importance tosociety, especially considering that these professionals play a key role in
night with underground concertperformances, which provided him with an opportunity to experience the local culture moredeeply.Student 2’s work in the lab required him to collaborate with various individuals, each contributingdifferently to his research and publication efforts. This kind of collaboration was essential forglobal competence, as it involved communicating and working effectively with people fromdiverse backgrounds. His interaction with the Principal Investigator (PI) and another researchexpert for publication guidance indicated his involvement in advanced research activities and thecommunication skills required to navigate these professional relationships.Student 2’s experience encapsulated several dimensions of global competence
of female Middle Eastern engineeringstudents, especially those who are Iranian. In this project, the student aims to explore women'scareer and academic challenges as well as their process of engineering identity formation. Thiswork is expected to offer recommendations for the creation of successful policies and programs toimprove the conditions of Middle Eastern women. These policies can support their success in theengineering field.Reference[1] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape,” Psychol Sci Public Interest, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 75–141, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.[2] O. Bataineh, A. Qablan, S. Belbase, R. Takriti, and H. Tairab, “Gender Disparity in
Skills of Commencing Undergraduate and Postgraduate Information Studies Students at Curtin University,” Australian Academic & Research Libraries, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 121–135, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00048623.2011.10722218.[2] L. N. Lalwani, J. M. Niehof, and P. F. Grochowski, “Engineering Graduate Student Information Literacy: Are We Meeting the Need?,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2018. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30141.[3] L. Saunders, J. Severyn, S. Freundlich, V. Piroli, and J. Shaw-Munderback, “Assessing Graduate Level Information Literacy Instruction With Critical Incident Questionnaires,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 655–663, Nov
understand who girlsselected as role models and how they perceived their OEs. Therefore, we began by asking girlsabout role models in a general sense. Specifically, we asked them “Do you have a role model?”,and if so, we asked them to identify their role model(s) and to explain why they chose thatperson (or people) as a role model (or role models). We then shifted our questioning to focusmore specifically on perceptions of the OEs by asking girls, “Would any of your OEs be a rolemodel for you?” We followed this up the next semester by asking, “Could any of your OEs be arole model for you?” Next, we directly asked girls, “Are any of your OEs a role model for you?”and asked them to explain why or why not. Because we were not convinced that girls
]. Given the critical role of the adviser in a student's academic journeyand the potential consequences of inadequate academic progress for international students, it iscrucial to recognize the unique challenges faced by international students and provide themwith appropriate support.To provide international doctoral students with positive advising experiences, it is essential forSTEM faculty to possess intercultural communication competence (ICC). In this article, weadopt Griffith et al.'s definition of ICC, which refers to an individual's ability to gather,interpret, and effectively respond to culturally diverse cues in a multicultural environment [14].Prior literature demonstrated that international students face particular challenges, such
itself more just and diverse.Additionally, the integration of social and technical aspects of engineering creates a shift towardsmaking engineering more interdisciplinary through the consideration of societal, cultural,historical, political, economic, and environmental implications of design. Engineering alonecannot solve large sociotechnical problems but can contribute towards solutions [8], [31].Similarly, the integration of social and technical aspects of engineering may lead to a shifttowards a more justice-oriented mindset of what it means to be an engineer. Namely, engineeringis not just about solving problems of efficiency for profit but is about solving problems forpeople in ways that bring about equity and improve quality of life.[1] S