Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; Alexandra Werth, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

Conference Session

Track 1: Technical Session 4: "An examination of the gender gap among Middle Eastern students in Engineering: A systematized review"

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Narjes Khorsandi Koujel, Rowan University; Justin Charles Major, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

inengineering. Al-Sanad and Koushki [31] and Aswad et al. [24] discuss the importance of policyinterventions in Qatar and the UAE. Mehran [39] highlights how institutional support andeducational reforms help in closing the gender gap. Using these policy interventions on a widerscale, despite creating more fair opportunities for women, will effectively increase the quality anddiversity of the engineering workforce. Implementing measures such as awarding scholarships,creating flexible programs and career promotion plans will encourage and support women topursue and succeed. In addition to achievement, the impact of such actions contributes to broadereconomic growth and innovation, as a diverse workforce is recognized as a key driver of creativityand

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 6: BYOE (Bring Your Own Experiment): Engaging Students with Creative Hands-on Laboratory Experiences

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chidiebere Akudigwe, Oral Roberts University; Mark Baumruk, Oral Roberts University; Glory Hansel, Oral Roberts University; Grant Kaste, Oral Roberts University; Jonathan Ophus, Oral Roberts University; John E Matsson, Oral Roberts University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

material choices and layout plans. This collaboration encouraged peer-to-peer learning and critical thinking. • Each student had the opportunity to operate the hydraulic press. They adjusted the v-die setup, experimented with different order of bending, and observed firsthand how variations in pressure affected the metal’s deformation. • As challenges arose—such as ensuring uniform bends and preventing metal warping— students experimented with adjustments to machine settings and die positions, fostering an iterative approach to problem solving.The taco holder project was more than a fabrication exercise; it was a lesson in the principles ofsheet metal bending: • Students learned how the v-die’s geometry

Conference Session

Persistence, Outcomes and Barriers for Women in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Matthew J Miller, Loyola University Chicago; Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago; Andrea Hércules, Loyola University Chicago; Erika Esmeralda de la Riva, Loyola University Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

Conference Session

Engaging and Empowering K-12 Students through Collaborative STEM Projects and Inclusive Outreach

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine H. McDonnell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE); Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Greg J Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Tamara J Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Israa Azzam, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Khalid Bello, University of Louisville; Farid Breidi, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

] and Microsoft HoloLens [32], whichenables holographic MR experiences by projecting virtual content directly into the user’s field ofview. This technology is valuable for teaching complex manufacturing tasks such as assemblyprocedures, design validation, and collaborative production planning. It allows educators toprovide their learners with advanced training environments that mirror the complexities ofmodern manufacturing, preparing them for future industry-specific roles.Therefore, the features of both VR and MR offer significant advantages over AR, particularly formanufacturing training. Both technologies provide a higher level of immersion compared to AR,which has been proven to enhance information retention and skill acquisition [33

Conference Session

Thinking, Reasoning, and Engineering in Elementary School

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly Bolger, Vanderbilt University; Marta Kobiela, Vanderbilt University; Paul Weinberg, Vanderbilt University; Richard Lehrer, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Technical Session Session 10

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Student Feedback and Assessment in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University; Cole H. Joslyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

counteract behaviors such as tacit designing with little self-monitoring or not being open or willing to reflecting on past.PROCESS MANAGEMENT COACH ENCOURAGES AND/OR DEMONSTRATES BEHAVIORS TO HELP A STUDENT…CODESCOMPLEXITY Manage complexity such as revisiting or negotiating scope of work, and assessingMANAGEMENT feasibility within a timeline. RISK MANAGEMENT Anticipate and attend to risks associated with planning, communicating, or developing a design.TIME MANAGEMENT Manage time to successfully complete tasks within a prescribed timeframe. MULTIPLE Manage plurality of perspectives to develop own perspective and having a

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

James Masi

McKenneyAlfred E McKenney received his BS in engineering from the US Coast Guard Academy. Afterservice as a line officer, he earned his MBA at Harvard Business School. He was employed byIBM where he specialized in the design of large manufacturing planning and control systems.He was later assigned on a sabbatical to the School of Technology at Norfolk State Universitywhere he taught for four years. He continues to work on NEW:Update and is Project Managerfor the Experiments in Materials Science, Engineering and Technology CD-ROM. Page 6.666.22 Dielectric Behavior of Trichloroethane and Chlorobenzene as a Function of Temperature at 10.1

Conference Session

Improving Student Problem Solving and Performance

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa Powell, University of California, San Diego; Justin Paul Opatkiewicz, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

, as discussed previously. The authors considered attempting acomparison of student learning outcomes between these two cohorts. However, deconvolutingthe effects of the project alone versus other confounding variables (remote instruction versus in-person learning for core courses, transfer versus 4-year students, and instructor differences)would not have been possible. Given the overwhelmingly positive student response to theprojects, the authors have no plans to remove the project from the curriculum in the future toperform such a comparison, as doing so may negatively impact the cohort not assigned the groupproject. A more extensive survey of the cohort of students completing the project in all 6courses, however, is a subject of ongoing