AC 2011-2251: ”TUNING” ENGINEERING PROGRAMS IN THE CON-TEXT OF ABET ACCREDITATIONMary Eileen Smith, Ph.D., Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Mary E. Smith has been employed with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board since 1987 and now serves as Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Academic Planning and Policy. She is responsible for the administration and management of matters related to the Board’s higher education academic planning and policy functions, and she provides leadership on key projects, reports, and studies that cut across divisions of the agency. She has taught at The University of Texas at Austin, and she currently is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Communication at St. Edward’s
failure can have long-lasting repercussions. Manycommunities have low levels of literacy, adding additional complexity on top of technicalcommunication issues when planning international projects.Participatory research involves local partners in the design, implementation and evaluation ofresearch projects. It fundamentally seeks to change “the alignment of power within the researchprocess2. Participatory action research (PAR) is defined as investigations that focus on “theinformation and analytical needs of society’s most economically, politically, and sociallymarginalized groups and communities, and pursues research on issues determined by leaders ofthese group11.” PAR should develop and maintain relationships that build social equity
, mathematics, operations research, and physics); Year-round Internship Program,9 which is also held at this DOD institution during the school year and is offered to students majoring in engineering and science (the disciplines listed above); Pathways Internship Program, which “provides students with paid opportunities to work and explore Federal careers while still in school. This includes the Summer Hire Program….;”9,10 PALACE Acquire, which “offers [students] the opportunity to occupy a permanent full- time position during a 2-4 year, formal training plan design to let [the student] experience both personal and professional growth while dealing effectively and ethically with change
” to thefollowing 2 questions from each subscale. “I think this class is going to be boring” and “Ithink this class is going to be enjoyable”, “I think that I am going to be pretty good at thisclass” and “This is a class that I cannot do very well in”, “I plan to put a lot of effort intothis class” and “It is important to me to do well in this class”, “I am anxious about thisclass” and “I feel very relaxed about this class”, “I feel like it is not my own choice to do thisclass” and “I feel like I am taking this class because I have to”, “I believe this class could beof some value to me” and “I believe doing this class is important”.The Index of Learning Styles [13] is a survey instrument used to assess preferences onfour dimensions (active
an instructor talk for hours on an engineering topic, especiallywith so many distractions readily available to students on the computer that are simply one clickaway. Even video content that includes well-edited animations and graphics can still be boringwhen presented by the voice of an unseen orator. Students want teacher immediacy.The following video documents the adventures of one civil engineering instructor who has soughtto provide amusing and informative classroom experiences and online educational videos. Thevideo will describe planning the content, delivering the content (including how to develop scriptsand costumes), using real-world examples in the content when possible, and implementing thelessons.As online video content
curiosity 12. Ability to assess financial value 13. Data driven decision making 14. Career plan There is no single definition of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) but there is commonalityin the attributes and skills associated with an EM by various sources. Among the mostemphasized elements are creativity, curiosity, critical thinking, flexibility, adaptability,communication, collaboration, comfort with risk, resilience, initiative, future focus, opportunityrecognition, innovation, reflection, independence, and value focus [20-24]. The factors identifiedby the survey questions used in our study align with these elements. As explained earlier, a two-sample t-test was selected for analysis
undergraduate students, we began theUNdergraduates Improving TEamwork Skills (UNITES) Module 3: Understandingproject. We are in the process of developing lecture and Managing SENIORmodules to integrate into our undergraduate curriculum Conflicts In avertically. We planned to cover this broad topic in three Teamlecture modules. Each curriculum level, starting fromsophomore, would have one lecture module discussingseveral relevant issues, as shown in Figure 2. Although Module 2
skills of Self-Advocacy within the client/student structure was found to help minoritizedstudents reach academic success. This practice has been used extensively within the learning disability (LD) communities to helpstudents advocate for themselves in the creation and implementation of their IndividualEducational Plans (IEPs). A comprehensive review of evidence-based practices for teaching self-advocacy within the LD communities found that there are three critical factors that, whencombined result in increased academic success: empowerment or a sense of agency (havingcontrol over decisions and life events), strong self-awareness (knowing what is right for oneselfand setting goals based on this criteria), and social justice (knowing how to
, the authors present the back story that led to the creation ofthe new major, the design of the curriculum, the articulation with the liberal arts, the difficultiesfaced in implementation, the student outcomes and benefits to Randolph-Macon, and the goalsand plans for the future.History of Engineering Physics at Randolph-Macon CollegeAt the encouragement of a local practicing civil engineer, Randolph-Macon first consideredadding a new department of engineering during the 1980s. During that time, the President of theCollege and the local engineer visited Swarthmore College [13] to learn more about theirprogram. The conclusion at the time was that beginning an engineering program would require afinancial investment far beyond the ability of RMC
develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data,and use engineering judgment to draw conclusionsPerformance Exceeds Meets Expectations Developing UnsatisfactoryIndicators Expectations 3 2 1 06-1: Develops Develops an Develops an Experimental Experimentalexperimentation effective effective procedures address procedures fail toAbility to convert a experimental plan experimental plan; problem, but makes addressdescription of a with all significant
understanding of what is required byeducators to successfully plan, design, implement, and realize the students’ learning process inan ICT-assisted, multi-campus course. Learning activities provide interaction, communityparticipation, collaboration, and communication for stakeholders during training to promotepedagogical, technological, and organizational learning of key themes in course.As implemented, the curriculum includes both self-paced asynchronous and synchronouscomponents and is intended to be offered in conjunction with a learning management system(LMS). A complete course has been developed from the curriculum herein discussed with initialdelivery in 2022. Immediate, measurable improvements to the design and delivery of multi-campus courses
activities at a range of gradelevels, though had not yet used SeaGlide in a camp setting. SeaPerch activities in a number ofcontexts are well documented in ASEE literature, including presentations to the Pre-CollegeEngineering Education, Women in Engineering, Ocean and Marine Engineering, MechanicalEngineering, and Multidisciplinary Engineering Divisions (see, for example: 2-17), though lessinformation is available on implementation of SeaGlide programs. The sections below describethe planning and scheduling aspects of both the SeaPerch and SeaGlide camps, which built offprior experience, and also capture feedback and lessons learned for future camp planning.PlanningPlanning considerations focused on five key areas: venue, working with minors
the organization plans to further utilize it going forward.IntroductionCommunity-engaged learning, also known as service-learning, strives to incorporate service tomeet community needs, academic connection to course material, reciprocal relationships andmutual learning between all stakeholders, and intentional reflection [1]. Within engineering, thepedagogy has been found to be effective in supporting student’s development of coreprofessional competencies [2,3] as well as in serving as a recruitment and retention tool for theprofession among diverse populations [4,5]. Engineering community engagement is often used inproject-based design experiences where there is a project deliverable. Both the project and theengagement process generate and
Collaborating with Preservice Teachers and Fifth Graders on Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Learning during a Robotic Design Process K. Kaipa, J. Kidd, J. Noginova, F. Cima, S. Ringleb, O. Ayala, P. Pazos, K. Gutierrez, and M. J. LeeAbstract.This work-in-progress paper describes engineering students’ experiences in an NSF-fundedproject that partnered undergraduate engineering students with pre-service teachers to plan anddeliver robotics lessons to fifth graders at a local school. This project aims to address an apparentgap between what is taught in academia and industry’s expectations of engineers to integrateperspectives from outside their field to solve modern societal problems requiring amultidisciplinary
undergraduate research team in Summer 2021.Each project involved three parts. First, the instructor described the steps of the engineeringdesign process. Instructors used the nine-step design process described in Goldschmidt andRogers [12]. We acknowledge that there are multiple ways the design process has been presentedin the literature. However, we chose the process from this study because the goals matched ours.Before this project, students had not been trained in the design process during their time in thecourse. We did not collect any information regarding any prior exposure to or training in thedesign process.The nine steps are: 1. Studying the brief 2. Planning the process 3. Collecting information 4. Looking for examples 5. Consulting
-faceted perspectives to their work. NSF’s 2018 Strategic Plan highlighted the importance of engineers incorporating diverse perspectives and drawing on multiple disciplines to solve complex problems. Key to meeting these goals is training future engineers to understand the needs, wants, and perspectives of others —in short, engineers must approach their work with empathy. Research at the post-secondary level underscores the role of empathy in engineering, particularly around improving engineers’ communication and relationships with stakeholders, and ultimately resulting in designs that are more responsive and effective to the end user. For this project, empathy is defined as the ability to
reduce student resistance in theirclassrooms: explanation strategies, and facilitation strategies [9]. Additionally, a literaturereview by Finelli and Borrego suggests that planning strategies can also be effective [10]. Planning strategies are those that an instructor uses to think through an activity and itsimplementation. Some examples of these strategies include using student feedback from aprevious activity or thinking through what did and did not work the last time they usedit. Explanation strategies pertain to how an instructor describes the purpose of the activity aswell as what is expected of students during the activity. This can also refer to how an instructorrelates the activity to the student’s assessments or overall
. We hadintended to have the groups talk about purposes for doing secondary analysis. However,emergent from the prior discussion was the need to focus on several challenges participants sawwith secondary data analysis: 1. Issues of training newer researchers (also involving training into your dataset) 2. How to build collaborations/collaborative communities needed to share data 3. Integrating datasets in a community of researchers who have been researching similar topics (not just a one-way exchange)Participants chose the topic that most interested them. Following group discussion, we hadreport outs to the larger group.The final activity of the day was to revise the plan for the second day considering conversationsand outcomes
Process: The goal under this RED task is to create anovel teaching evaluation process that engages all stakeholders (including industry & students).The new process will be based on developing training materials to prepare students on how toeffectively evaluate teaching and teaching portfolios, and it is intended to become an integralpart of the faculty promotion process. The training will include the fundamental elements ofdesigning a course and delivering content; the initial plans call for the students to observeinstructors in the classroom, review the course syllabus, and other course materials, and preparea report. A similar approach will be developed for TFAB industry members who will also beinvited to evaluate faculty teaching
plan to expand the 3D models in the future to include other types of structures, aswell as horizontal construction projects, such as installation of utilities, bridges, and earthretaining structures.Key words: Construction, 3D printing, Education, Tactile, KinestheticsIntroductionEngineering education is greatly enriched if instructors incorporate a variety of methods,including props and demonstrations, inside and outside the classroom. As such, trainingprograms such as ExCEEd [1] help faculty develop these methods and incorporate them into theclassrooms. Props can be simple and low cost, such as incorporating foam blocks, tubes, anddrinking straws; in some cases, props and teaching technologies can be more intricate, requiringtraining and the
and consultations withconstruction instructors, the authors specified the objective of the VR application. Theapplication will allow students to collaboratively solve problems, such as project safety plans andconstructability assessments. The VR application was developed using the Unity game engine.The VR application was run using the Oculus Quest head-mounted device. To implementcollaborative learning, a cloud platform called Photon server was deployed. Autodesk Revit wasused to create three-dimensional digital models, which were then used to create a variety ofscenarios in the VR environment. The authors plan to assess the usefulness of VR applicationswith construction students in the future. The paper's contribution is documenting the
inductee into the Bouchet Honor Society, and received the prestigious NSF CAREER award. Homero serves as the VT Engineering Education Chair for Equity and Inclusion, and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Incoming Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of Táchira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech.Jordan Jarrett (Assistant Teaching Professor)David B Knight (Associate Professor and Special Assistant to the Dean forStrategic Plan Implementation)Linda Vanasupa (Professor of Materials Engineering) Linda
setup analyzes the flow created by one fan, as this was the preliminary test for the computerengineering team to design a path-planning for drones used for inspection. The more complicated three-fan setupwas designed to experimentally analyze the flight capabilities of drones flying in a turbulent region where themagnitude of airflow is constantly changing. This experiment mimics turbulent regions that would take placebetween several wind turbines as they are rotating. The final experiment dealt with the measurements of airflowsurrounding a small-scale horizontal axis wind turbine in a Lab environment as it is driven by wind generatedfrom a blower. The blower for this setup is simulated using a large floor-drying fan outside the testing area
shouldbe noted that the conclusions of this paper are based solely on the researchers’ interactions withChatGPT and analysis of the transcripts generated through these interactions. The transcripts ofall relevant ChatGPT conversations are available at https://go.umd.edu/GPT_FYEE.Results and DiscussionRQ1: In what ways might ChatGPT impact the teaching and assessment of ENES100?When considering the impact of ChatGPT on the teaching and assessment of ENES100, theauthors identified multiple benefits that aid with faculty time-savings. A key benefit to usingChatGPT as an instructor is assistance in lesson-planning. For example, when prompted toidentify a possible hands-on group activity for the first day of the course, ChatGPT’srecommendation was to
their community and to local tribalcommunities.Throughout the summer PD, many resources were shared, including: 1) science and engineeringstandards websites [2], [10], [11] for help navigating NGSS, state standards, and supportingmaterials; 2) the North Dakota Native American Essential Understandings (NDNAEU) [12],which describe elements critical to Native American ways of knowing to guide the learning of allstudents across the state; and 3) North Dakota’s Teachings of our Elders website [13] withNative American Elder video interviews, lesson plans, and other materials to help integrate theNDNAEU into classrooms, curricula, and engineering design. Similar information is availablefor other states and tribal communities, e.g., [14]-[16]. By the
welcomed; (ii) engage students from different backgroundsto learn about each other and come together to solve computational problems; (iii) to strengthenthe communication between students early on in their computing experience and student who arerelatively new to the field of computing. This paper will discuss the design of inclusively themedHackathons, the logistics involved during planning, the execution, the challenges faced, and theimpact it created to broaden the participation of underrepresented, underserved, andunderprepared community college students in computing related activities.IntroductionHackathons have grown in popularity as a venue for computer enthusiasts and aspiring inventorsto network and realize their ideas. Hackathons are
pilotstudy indicates our curriculum’s potential to introduce students to engineering and its related careerpaths. The pilot also provided insight to the method of surveying used and justified for us the use of aretrospective survey in a full scale planned study. This program may serve as a pathway to engage adiversity of students in robotics and engineering leveraging new materials and applications.IntroductionGender disparities persist across engineering disciplines. This is especially true in traditional disciplinessuch as mechanical engineering (MechE) and electrical engineering (EE) [1]. Nationwide, ~15% and~14% of undergraduate MechE and EE degrees are awarded to women, respectively [2]. Alternatively,bioengineering and biomedical engineering
while alsomaking enough time to study for this class.The ApproachAn immediate recognition of my own situation from a few years prior came back to me. Iremembered how I felt in the office of my former advisor, and I remember what I wished wouldhave happened when I was under similar circumstances. I could have just nodded sagely, a lookof disappointment but understanding in my eye, and wished the student well in their academicendeavors, saying it was for the best. But I did not. Instead, I asked the student how they plannedon meeting their goals. What was their study plan? How did they study for exams or classregularly? How do they know how much time to put aside for studying? What I learned was thatthis student did not have a clear plan to meet
the number/percent of students who have taken the adapted CS course for eachparticipating school, as well as challenges and how project personnel adapted the project to address thesechallenges. The RPP approach and our results can benefit anyone working to increase access to high-qualityCS education at the K-12 levels.Background: Senate Bill 267 charged the WV Department of Education with creating a plan to make CSavailable to all K-12 students. Bill 267 makes WV one of the first states to require all students be exposedto a variety of CS experiences throughout their K-12 career. In addition, in 2017, the state Board ofEducation mandated College and Career Readiness Standards for Student Success for grades K-12 toprepare students for seamless
extensioneducators, and capstone instructors. After making an initial commitment to partner, the chamberof commerce representatives assembled a list of potential community partners, including thelocal public power districts, local industries as well as public works departments such as waterand wastewater treatment, planning, emergency management, and parks. Each of the potentialcommunity partners shared ideas of what types of projects they thought would be interestingprojects for students to work on. The projects ranged from cybersecurity, logistics, datacollection, roadway design, flood protection, drinking water quality, structural integrity analysis,efficiency and quality engineering, and park and recreation design. Based on these candidateprojects, the