and engineering projects. She also co-directs the Welcome Project (welcomeproject.valpo.edu), a first-person story collection about identity and inclusion.Dr. Jeffrey Dale Will, Valparaiso University Will completed his B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and has been a full-time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering De- partment at Valparaiso University since August of 2001. He teaches courses in senior design, computer architecture, digital signal processing, freshman topics, and circuits laboratories and is heavily involved in working with students in undergraduate research. Will is also a 2013 recipient of the Illinois-Indiana ASEE
theprogram level, i.e., outcomes expected at graduation time, and others at the course level, i.e.,outcomes expected at the time of clearing a course. Unfortunately, still, the terminology can beconflicting here with some acronyms having more than one usage and different terms being usedfor the same idea. We introduce the main terms next. • Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)—Program learning outcomes are statements that de- scribe what the knowledge, skills and attitudes students should have at the time of graduation from an engineering program. PLOs are discipline agnostic. These are also referred to as Graduate Attributes (GA) (see Table VI for the Washington Accord’s recommended GAs). The term PLO also has synonyms
undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22967Dr. Jeremiah SullinsDr. Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia Shari E. Miller is an Associate Professor and the Associate Dean of the School of Social Work at the Uni- versity
Paper ID #33704Research-practitioner Partnerships Supported by the Computer Science forAll Program: A Systematic EvaluationRahman AdekunleMr. John Kofi Eshirow Jr., University of Virginia John Eshirow is a first-generation fourth-year student at the University of Virginia majoring in Systems Engineering with a concentration in Economic Systems and a minor in Engineering Business. Originally from the Bronx, he grew to have a passion for understanding and developing the intersection of business, engineering, and technology. In the future, John hopes to be an investor and strategic advisor to companies whose mission is
Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. Her research centers the intersection identity formation, engineering culture, and dis- ability studies. Her work has received several awards including best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education and the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. She holds a Ph.D. in En- gineering Education from Virginia Tech as well as M.S. and B.S. degrees in civil engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.Gabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University Gabriel Van Dyke is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. His current research interests are engineering culture and applying
"correct."MethodsThe research team invited conversations with professors and graduate students from Women,Gender, and Sexuality Studies (WGSS) who are scholars in the area of oppression and privilege.Through these brainstorming sessions, possible subjects for the vignette were generated, most ofwhich had to do with the treatment of individuals with identities outside of the dominantparadigm (e.g., women’s experiences in engineering, racial or cultural insensitivity in a socialsetting, and gender as a social construct). A vignette format was chosen because it could beeasily constructed to elicit responses around several different underlying concepts believed to beimportant indicators of an understanding of oppression and privilege. The input from
; Neville, 2015). Other scales have been written to capture theexperiences of only one intersectional group such as Keum et al. (2018) who designed theGendered Racial Microaggression Scale for Asian American Women (GRMSAAW). Oneexception to this approach of examining only one or two intersectional identities was Torres-Harding et al. (2012) who included several racial and ethnic identities in the design in the RacialMicroaggression Scale (RMS). None of these previous scales have been designed to capturemicroaggression experiences among engineering undergraduate students across severalintersectional identities. This study proposes the creation of a novel Engineering GenderedRacial Microaggression Scale (EGRMS) to capture the unique experiences and
students’ scores in a mathcompetition (Hangen et al, 2019b). I also am currently working on projects examining the role ofstereotypes for the motivation and math performance of female students and students of Asian heritage.Dr. Drazan (Biomedical Engineering): In addition to my technical training, engineering outreach andeducation has been a major theme in my scholarly development. As an undergraduate, I was a varsitybasketball player and one of my teammates, John Scott, created a non-profit called 4th Family Inc in 2011after he lost one of youth basketball players to gun violence. I became involved with the non-profit in2012 during my first year of graduate school. John Scott was coaching high school basketball and heasked if I was interested in
system as a whole—is going to be necessary for making sustainableand significant impacts on human health going forward [1,4,10-11].The application of multi-scale systems bioengineering approaches to biomedical researchrequires knowledge of human physiology/pathology, in addition to quantitative skills in mathand engineering [4,12-14]. More importantly, however, it requires the ability to integrate thesesubjects in a meaningful way [15]. Within both the biotechnology sector and in academia, thedemand for graduates who possess expertise in the generation of high-throughput data—as wellas the modeling skills needed to analyze/predict pathological states and identify viabletherapies—has increased dramatically [2,4,16].In terms of STEM pipeline
intervention aimed at exposing underrepresented fourth and fifth grade boys to hands-on, inquiry based STEM experiments and activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23043 Henderson is a part of the first year engineering experience team and he was recently appointed by the Dean of the College as the Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES), a program aimed at increasing engineering student achievement, engagement, and graduation rates. His research interests are in engineering identity formation and persistence among underrepresented students
(Zambia). The EWB Challenge has been piloted at Colorado State University for the past two years [4]and has been successfully undertaken by students across Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdomand Ireland since 2007 [5, 6]. The other two curricular groups studied are engineering students who willbe studying engineering abroad with a partner university for a semester or more, and engineering studentsundertaking a short term (3 week) sustainable design and construction three credit study abroad programin Costa Rica over the winter break. Finally, two co-curricular groups of students will be investigated,members of the universities Engineers Without Borders USA chapter will be looked at as two differentgroups. Those involved in the design
migrators faced the sameproblems as students who dropped out of STEM majors (leavers) but chose another STEMmajor. A qualitative study [15] on students migrating to industrial engineering (IE) showedthat students left their initial engineering major because of negative experiences with facultyand classes, very low interaction with faculty, and change in career goals to an industrialengineer. The other studies which have researched migrators are quantitative [10, 13] anddescribe metrics such as major stickiness (percentage of students that enroll and subsequentlygraduate in a major) and odds of graduation in the major. Quantitative studies into whystudents drop a major cannot provide the rich description obtained from a qualitative studythat is
program where they designed virtual creatures while considering biomechanics [14].ENA allowed researchers in these projects to quantitatively analyze how components ofKnowledge, Skills, Identity, Values, and Epistemology were related within the communities ofpractice – even in complex learning spaces. This success illustrates the potential of using ENA inpractice-based learning contexts as well.Study ContextTo assess the potential for using ENA and the five epistemic frame elements to analyzepractice-based learning, a preliminary study was carried out at Iron Range Engineering – anABET-accredited upper division engineering program that implements practice-based learning.After completing lower division coursework at a community college, students
school’s premises.EmbodimentParticipant Structures. Participating youth were organized into small groups with clearlyassigned roles, such as UAV pilot, safety officer, and spotter. These roles were rotatedthroughout the semester and every youth had a chance to play each of these roles. Each group ofyouth was supported by a dedicated STEM coach and another adult volunteer from the IHADprogram. Two undergraduate and one graduate student from the engineering program at theUniversity of Colorado were recruited to serve as STEM coaches who facilitated the program.Each coach participated in a professional development program designed to familiarize themwith UAVs, the overall curriculum, the engineering design practices being emphasized in thecurriculum
-employment experience hason students can help engineering education researchers (EER) understand the role that diverseteams, particularly in the capstone environment, can have for engineering students in thedevelopment of their collaborative abilities.In the long term, this study seeks to better understand how the social norms that are present ininterdisciplinary teams influence the development of effective collaborative behaviors. Thesebehaviors can be considered as belonging to a larger grouping of skills, sometimes called “meta-competencies,” that have become an increasingly important part of what employers look for fromengineering graduates [11]. However, this paper will focus directly on the curriculum design ofan interdisciplinary capstone
addressing initial mathematics course placement and initial mathematics course outcomes,particularly among students from minoritized populations, low SES backgrounds, and rural areas.The launch pilot focuses on elucidating the pathways that lead students into college math courses FTbelow calculus and on testing interventions at points of maximal theoretical impact. Although thedata we collect is specific to South Carolina, the framework for the study (Figure 1) is groundedin engineering identity theory and draws on national research on engineering identity andengineering pathways [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Each critical decision point isaffected by a range of inputs that are not unique to South Carolina
Education, 2015 The Business Case for Engineering Skills-based Volunteerism in K-12 EducationAbstractSkills-based volunteerism programs can provide technical employees effective and meaningfulopportunities to utilize, develop, and transfer their skills while contributing to their companies’community engagement objectives in K-12 education. While many companies encourage theiremployees to engage in education-related volunteerism, these efforts are often one-off eventsrelated to student outreach or recruiting, rather than opportunities for employees to utilize theirskills to not only give back to community, but also develop professionally and personally. Thisstudy focuses on assessing the impact of a pilot
Competency-Based Curriculum in Orthogeriatric”, JCEHP, 2014, 34 (2),123-130.Hansen, Rebecca A. “Impact of Study Abroad on Ethnocultural Empathy and Global-Mindedness”, Doctoral Dissertation, Ball State University, 2010.Klein-Gardner, S. S., Walker, A. “Defining Global Competence for Engineering Students”,Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society forEngineering Education, 2011.Jesiek, B. K., Woo, S. E., Parrigon, S., Porter, C. M. “Development of a Situational JudgmentTest for Global Engineering Competency”, JEE, 2020, 109, 470-490.Leap, “Assessing Underserved Students’ Engagement in High-Impact Practices”, AAC&U, 2013.[Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582014.pdf [Accessed November
the second set of interviews will focus on cultural adjustments(for Moroccan participants), member-checking, and clarification. We also piloted interviewswith existing Moroccan students from older cohorts. We examined existing survey instrumentssuch as [20], [21] to develop our interview protocol. For example, using the survey in theBlumenfeld study as a guide, we are asking expectancy-value specific questions such as: “Doyou feel that you are giving up anything by choosing the engineering path?” For an affirmativeanswer, the follow-up question is: “What things could you be doing instead?” For a negativeresponse, the follow-up question is “Perhaps giving up time spent on your hobbies? Or timespent with family?”[20].ConclusionThis research
undergraduate studies, including computer science. Some 90% of thestudents in this project were Hispanic. The course was piloted over four semesters, whichallowed the instructional team to perfect the approaches that were most successful for studentsuccess. The leadership course integrated two primary approaches: 1) a relational model ofleadership used to examine complexities that arise when technology professionals encountermultiple perspectives and diverse ideas; and 2) cooperative learning approaches, includingconstructive academic controversy model, used to develop leadership skills whilecontextualizing the role of ethics in computing. The course culminated in an academiccontroversy exercise where student teams examined the Facebook /Whistleblower
as a Teaching Professor in BME and the Director of the Office of Multicultural Affairs at WPI. Dr. Butler fosters a student community at WPI that respects and celebrates diversity in all its dimensions, including but not limited the many intersectional identities of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, and physical ability.Mrs. Ryan Meadows, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Ryan Meadows holds a B.S. in Mathematics and Business from Fitchburg State University and an M.A. in Teaching from Sacred Heart University. She is currently the Associate Director of Pre-collegiate Outreach Programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Meadows works with K-12 S STEM outreach programs
, become an even smaller group ofindividuals who are able to move on in the engineering major after the course is over.Data collection and analysisThe study follows a quasi-experimental, multi-method design to answer the research question.We utilize two quantitative measures along with semi-structured interviews of a sub-sample ofparticipants in order to triangulate the results of the quantitative measures. The two quantitativemeasures consist of an observational protocol to measure instruction and student participation,and a survey instrument designed to measure students’ sense of community in the classroom.First, the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) [9] is a protocoldesigned for use in university settings to generate
) the NSF Pathway Fellowsprogram, 2) work published in a 2016 ASEE Paper, 3) redefinition of the programgoals to include retention of underrepresented students and exposure to globalengagement and 4) the evolution & connection to the Penn State Clark ScholarsProgram 8U NITED S TATES F ULBRIGHT S CHOLAR 2015 AT U NIVERSIDADN ACIONAL DE INGENIERIA (UNI) – L IMA , P ERU• PILOT: NSF PATHWAY FELLOWS TRIP TO PERUPilot 2015: The research question in this project was: While conventional retentionprograms for underrepresented students have shown to achieve graduation ratesequal to or surpassing those of the majority male population over an extendedperiod, could
system models, whichare the core skills that engineers and scientists develop. The Mobile Studio I/O Board, a personalelectronic instrument, was used as the technology to support the ECP. It is a portable,inexpensive, but highly useful hardware platform, which recreated a classroom or laboratoryenvironment e.g. at home. When coupled with the Mobile Studio Desktop software, the systemduplicated a large amount of the hardware often used to teach electrical engineering, computerengineering, physics and K-12 technology-oriented courses.There was a lot of refinement of the project through pilot studies and subsequent results showedthat the use of personal electronic instruments increases the level of student engagement andmotivation [2], [3]. Prior
Dec. 9, 2017].[11] J. A. Fredricks and S. D. Simpkins, “Promoting positive youth development through organized after-school activities: Taking a closer look at participation of ethnic minority youth,” Child Development Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 280–287, Sep. 2012.[12] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “The marginalized identities of sense-makers: reframing engineering student retention,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S1H–1–S1H–6.[13] R.M. Marra, K.A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self- efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no
identify potential users, wesurveyed first-year undergraduate engineering students to capture their intention to participate inacademic makerspaces. This study reports on work done as part of a larger study that follows thepaths of first-year students at two academic institutions, tracking their participation andperceptions of makerspaces over four years. Quantitative data were collected from two onlinesurveys that were distributed at the beginning of the Fall 2022 semester and the end of theWinter/Spring 2023 semester. Each survey took approximately 10 minutes to complete andconsisted of a series of Likert-type and single-selection questions about theirattitudes/motivations toward makerspaces and psychosocial assessments of their
diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Redesigning engineering education in Chile: How selective institutions respond to an ambitious national reformIntroductionIn 2012, the Chilean government launched the “Nueva Ingeniería para el 2030” program, whichaims to redesign engineering education, enhance applied research, technology development,innovation and entrepreneurship around engineering campuses.1
Assistant Professor in Mathematics at Navajo Technical University (NTU) as well as the Program Advisor for the Mathematics Program at NTU. His current research focuses on technology-enhanced active learning in college mathematics for tribal students. He works developing lessons and curriculum to promote students’ interests in learning mathematics. He teaches both graduate and undergraduate courses about mathematics. He received his doctoral degree in the Science, Technol- ogy, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Strand of Teaching Learning and Culture Program at The University of Texas at El Paso in 2014 under the mentoring of Dr. Judith Munter.Alice Carron, Blue Marble Institute of Space Science Alice Carron is a Science
, educators and policy makers have expressed growing concerns over thelevels of math and science achievement among American students and the gradual decline in thenumbers of young people moving into science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)careers [1], [2], [3]. These concerns have led to the development of new standards for scienceand technology education [4], [5], [6], policy initiatives aimed at promoting science andtechnology education [7], [8],[9], and to a growing body of research on math and sciencelearning and the pathways leading to STEM-related careers [10], [11]. While the picture oflooming shortages of scientists and engineers has been challenged and recent studies haveindicated that American students are taking more science and
that included engagement analytics. She holds a US Patent # 7904323, Multi-Team Immersive Integrated Collaboration Workspace awarded 3/8/2011. She also has twenty-seven peer-reviewed publications.Ms. Elaine L. Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College Elaine L. Craft (Florence-Darlington Technical College, Florence, SC-retired) holds a baccalaureate de- gree in chemical engineering from the University of Mississippi and a MBA from the University of South Carolina with additional graduate studies in mathematics. Her experience includes working as an engineer in industry as well as teaching and administration at community college and state levels. She served as Director of the South Carolina Advanced Technological (SC