, Boston, 2015.[4] B. Walukevich, Assessing the Impact of Mentoring Underserved Youth through Service Learning, Education Student Publications. Paper 12, 2016.[5] C. Herrera, J. Baldwin Grossman, T. Kauh and J. McMaken, " Raising healthy children," Child Development, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 346-361, 2011.[6] R. McIntyre, B. Lord, C. G. Gresky, L. L. Eyck, G. D. Frye and C. F. Bond, "A social impact trend in the effects of role models on alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat," Current Research in Social Psychology, no. 10, Article 9, 2005.[7] R. Robnett, P. Nelson, E. Zurbriggen, F. J. Crosby and M. M. Chemers, "Research mentoring and scientist identity: insights from undergraduates and their mentors," IJ STEM, no. Ed 5, 41
building strategies The weekends are reserved for working on the team project,prior to the beginning of the academic year and an opportunity social development activities and free time. Ideally, theto network with college of engineering faculty and HOME Program is designed to model the activities of a typi-staff. Fourth, HOME Program students work on developing cal semester.and enhancing their study and time management skills andparticipate in seminars on career preparation topics such as RETENTION RATESinterviewing skills, resume writing and communicationskills. The retention and graduation of STEM students is
question: How do the curricular, advising, and cohort-building elements of the RedShirt program impact the students’ experiences in the sophomore orjunior year at their university and in engineering? RedShirt students in the sophomore and junioryears responded to a semi-structured list of questions through focus group participation, withsome individual follow-up interviews.The thematic findings from sophomores and juniors include: academic strategies for respondingto more challenging classes; adjusting to new peer groups; developing identity as a minoritizedstudent; effects of advising interactions; and, dealing with living arrangements and other externalfactors. Additionally, themes from 2019-2020 include how students adapted to the
with industry, providing students with hands-onexperience in this specialized field, but not in an international environment [4], [9], [21] .This study focuses specifically on a subset of the 2023 IRiKA cohort, examining how theirinvolvement in microelectronics research abroad contributed to developing their globalengineering competencies. This study seeks to explore the intricate processes through which globalcompetencies are developed among engineering students at both undergraduate and graduate levelswho possess varying levels of research experience in microelectronics. Through the lens of threeresearch questions, the study examines the influence of the International Research Initiative inKnowledge and Academia (IRiKA) on the global
in engineering, and applying their ownwriting and communication skills.Keywords—writing; writing studio; writing centerIntroductionThe call for engineering students to develop skills as writers and communicators has becomecommonplace. Engineering programs hear from their advisory boards and professionalorganizations of the importance of improving the written communication of their graduates[1], [2]. Educating students to become engineering writers, however, cannot happen in anyone course. Given the complexities of disciplinary writing and the number of audiences astudent will be communicating with once they enter the profession, a single course in writingis not adequate for students to develop as writers. Instead, research in writing studies
interests transfer students who first enroll in community colleges, as well as developing broader and more nuanced engineering performance indicators.Dr. Haiying Long, University of KansasMs. Anna Teresa CaringellaIng. Andrea Pinto American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Understanding Nontraditional Students in Engineering and Computing (Work in Progress)When post-secondary schools design academic and co-curricular programs and student performance goals,they often frame them around traditional student populations (Chen, 2017). Traditional students aregenerally full-time, live on campus, are 18-24 years old, and are financially supported by parents (Figure1). Chen
each year. The programs she leads include sum- mer camps for K-12 students; programs that send undergraduates and graduate students into schools to work with elementary and middle school students; training sessions for NC State engineering alumni who want to be volunteer teachers in their communities; and professional development and classroom support for K-12 teachers who want to introduce engineering concepts to their young students. In addition, she co-authored statewide engineering standards for K-12 and delivers teacher professional development in integrated STEM. Bottomley also directs NC State’s Women in Engineering program, which works to boost the number of women engineers in academia and industry. The NC
improvementstrategy may already be in use and examine through a linguistic and cultural lens the rhetoricalstrategies instructional faculty use to communicate technical concepts to students with the hopethat we can increase utilization of these strategies to benefit students and simplifyrecommendations for instructional faculty who are striving to be compliant with ABET and otheraccreditation bodies and manage their workload within realistic constraints put on educationalinstitutions.Purpose: We believe that by explicitly articulating the applications of coursework to society,learning objectives to social service, and faculty commitment to advocacy for equitable practicesin engineering education and practice we can lay a foundation for a learning space
-minority, counter-parts. There arechallenges related to broadening participation in engineering that can be considered “blackholes” in the metaphorical space-time continuum that constitutes the “ivory tower.”Experiences of underrepresented scholars in engineering (undergraduates, graduate students,faculty) have been wrought with problems that have affected recruitment, retention, degreecompletion, and transition to careers. In this section, we will briefly discuss the three socialscience theories that can be used to develop an overarching construct for developing STEMcommunity: 1) Psychological Sense of Community, 2) Counter Spaces and Cultural Capital, and3) STEM Identity.4.1 Sense of CommunityThe theory of Psychological Sense of Community has
lecturer.The curriculum was implemented late in the semester, after the class was already comfortablewith each other and with large group discussions. The coursework for this class included severalactivities that are “outside” the typical technical engineering classrooms, such as using Twitter asthe classroom communication tool. Because of this, the students could have been more primed tobe receptive to the curriculum based on class experience so far. When the unconscious biascurriculum is positioned as pertinent to the engineering students’ development in professionalcommunication, the module could theoretically be implemented in any engineering classroom.For the curriculum to be successful, the facilitator must be willing to share their
Christine Stanley Engineering Education Faculty Department of Educational Administration & Human Development Texas A&M University Seth Polsley Sketch Recognition Lab Department of Computer Science & Engineering Texas A&M UniversityAbstractProtests against racial injustice have been increasing in the United States. Universities oftenrapidly respond to acts of injustice through public statements about their position to uphold theequality of all people. To gauge the desires and concerns around discussing events causing socialunrest
advanced courses. She also designed, proposed, and taught two introductory engineering courses for high school students. She currently leads an interdisci- plinary initiative to improve girls’ and women’s math/STEM identity using a social identity framework and a problem-based learning approach.Dr. Rebecca Simmons, Duke University Rebecca Simmons is an Associate Professor of the Practice in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Duke University. She arrived as a freshman to Duke in 1996 and has never left; she completed both her B.S.E and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and Material Sciences. She teaches a variety of design courses and is passionate about helping her students build creative
author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2018 ASEE/IEEE Fron- tiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala.Dr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design & Society Division at the Colorado
Maryland College Park.Dr. Patricia Ordonez, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Hashtag #ThinkBigDiversity: Social Media Hacking Activities as Hybridized Mentoring Mechanisms for Underrepresented Minorities in STEMIn the spirit of “hack-a-thons” that build solutions to develop tools or fill gaps in knowledge, weleveraged resources from the National Science Foundation’s Alliances for Graduate Educationand the Professoriate (AGEP), NSF ADVANCE, and NSF Louis Stokes Alliance for MinorityParticipation’s Bridge to the Doctorate (LSAMP-BD) programs to co-develop “hacking diversityin STEM” events for underrepresented minorities
his tenure from 27% in 2012 to 37% this year. Bruk completed a master’s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a Ph.D. in the Minority and Urban Education Unit of the College of Education at the University of Maryland. His dissertation research focuses on factors that facilitate transfer among Black engineering community college students.Ms. Felicia James Onuma A Phi Beta Kappa graduate, Felicia received her bachelor’s degree in Sociology and a minor in Social Policy from the Johns Hopkins University. During her undergraduate years, Felicia accrued a vast amount of experiences. To name a few, she taught English in Denmark, served as an Admissions Representative
undergraduate student at the University of Virginia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 REU program evaluation: A valuable tool for studying undergraduate socialization in engineering “This [REU experience] is exactly what I envisioned when I was younger and I thought, you know, I want to be a professional scientist.”--REU Intern This Work in Progress paper introduces research into whether and how a summerresearch experience affects undergraduate students’ sense of identity and belonging inengineering, their understanding of research as a process, and their development ofresearch-related academic and professional skills. We draw from
of fostering inclusive, cooperativeenvironments that reduce anxiety and improve skills [21]. Together, these studies support acomprehensive strategy that goes beyond conventional boundaries to address mental health inengineering education and develops students who are resilient, well-rounded, and successful intheir careers. These studies' findings are consistent with the customized interventions, research-based teaching techniques, and community-building initiatives put forth [13][16][19-21].Exemplar Studies: Together, these studies explore the nuanced terrain of mental health amongundergraduate engineering students and social identities. The study conducted in 2021 by Jensenand Cross focuses on self-reported stress, anxiety, depression
. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her research interests include: Teamwork, International Collaborations, Fac- ulty Development, Quality Control/Management and Broadening Participation. She is an honor graduate American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
participating in the summertransition program. The Meyerhoff program is similar to the M-Engin program in that it focuseson improving self-efficacy through social and academic integration. It also offers, as does M-Engin, programmatic elements that include skill development, motivational support and intrusiveadvising. The Meyerhoff study36 found these program elements were linked to student’s self-efficacy and therefore persistence in achieving a STEM degree and pursuing graduate study.Maton et al.37 also concluded that a sense of community contributed to a salient science identityand research self-efficacy. The intentional and ongoing efforts of the M-Engin program to builda student community throughout the summer program might similarly affect self
. Based on the African American Male Theory (AAMT) [4], our research team examinedthe three students’ experiences in the context of the interconnected environmental systems(microsystem, mesosystem, exosystemic, macrosystem, chronosystem). Highlighting theconcepts of “resilience,” “resistance,” and “pursuit of social justice” in AAMT, the authorsexplored the three students’ multiple-layered social and professional identities as emerging Blackmale engineering professionals.Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Bush and Bush’s African American Male Theory [4], which providesan effective analytic framework to understand the unique facets of Black males’ experiencessituated in various educational, academic, and community contexts. Like other
quantitativestudy results, which were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), ledto the development of open-ended, structured questions for two qualitative focus groups thatwere conducted in March 2016. Qualitative data were analyzed using line-by-line hand-codingand NVivo software. Anonymity of all participants was maintained.IntroductionIn 2005, a congressional report addressed growing concern over the United States’ diminishedglobal standing in mathematics, science, and innovation (National Academies of Science,Engineering, & Medicine [NASEM], 2005). Rising Above the Gathering Storm prompted anationwide effort to implement the committee's recommendations for improving science literacyacross K-16 educational settings. In
Bioengineering with the Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) grant at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Cross’ scholarship investigated stu- dent teams in engineering, faculty communities of practice, and the intersectionality of multiple identity dimensions. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in STEM, intersectionality, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student centered approaches such as culturally relevant pedagogy. Dr. Cross’ complimentary professional activities promote inclusive excellence through collaboration.Ms. Grisel Lopez-Alvarez, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paper ID #14744An Exploration into the Impacts of the National Society of Black Engineers(NSBE) on Student PersistenceMrs. Monique S. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monique Ross is a doctoral candidate in the Engineering Education department at Purdue University. Her research focuses are race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace, specifically the experiences of Black women in engineering industry. She also has interest in preparing women and minorities for career advancement through engagement in strategies for navigating the workplace. She has a Bachelors degree in Computer Engineering from
appointment, as a teaching professor (senior SOE) in the Global Arts, Media, and Writing Studies Department and in the Center for Engaged Teaching and Learning. She supports faculty and graduate student pedagogy with specific expertise in developing discipline-based writing instruction (WiD) and in using writing to activate and support student learning (WAC-W2L). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Revising Roles: Enhancing an Engineering Capstone Course to Improve Outcomes for WomenAbstractWomen leave the engineering profession at a high rate, and this attrition is observed both in theuniversity setting and in the workforce. Female students cite negative
) numerical simulations of earthquake source physics, which relates to her graduate work, and (2) developing, imple- menting, and assessing the effectiveness of educational interventions that support student persistence in STEM.Mr. Spencer Edwin Chan, Loyola Marymount University Spencer Chan is an undergraduate student at Loyola Marymount University (LMU), majoring in Mechan- ical Engineering. He is an activist for better understanding the underlying reasons that lead to student success. In addition to engineering education research, he was also involved in research under Dr. Omar Es-Said at LMU to improve the mechanical properties of MGAz31-B through cold rolling and heat treat- ments.Dr. Julian K. Saint Clair, Loyola
students from underrepresentedpopulations face in engineering learning spaces. Having these discussions during lecture or in thecontext of the course can also address the issue of stereotype threat [4] faced by certain culturalstudent groups, which is known to impact student success. Further, intentionally incorporatingthese exercises into the course design communicates to students a strong desire to create aninclusive learning environment. Walden et al. recommended based on research that for creatingan inclusive atmosphere for diversity and equity within engineering education, it is important tohave a positive academic culture for people from excluded identity groups [5]. Additionally,diversity, equity and inclusion within engineering education
. Such experiential transfer is likely differentthan knowledge transfer across disciplinary domains and may be enhanced by supporting thedevelopment of goal-based concepts. Furthermore, although this characteristic is oftendecomposed into discrete educational outcomes such as teamwork or communication, definingand assessing outcomes necessarily emphasizes skill within a domain rather than synthesis acrossdomains. Thus outcomes-based assessment may be counter-productive to developing soughtafter characteristics of graduates.Introduction and BackgroundThis paper examines one of the foundations of modern engineering education, defining andmeasuring educational outcomes, through the lens of philosophy, or “truth estimation” [1]. Thegoal of this
Paper ID #34059What I Wish My Instructor Knew: Navigating COVID-19 as anUnderrepresented Student - Evidence Based ResearchMs. Zaniyah Victoria Sealey, University of Georgia Zaniyah Sealey is an Undergraduate Student majoring in Computer Systems Engineering, at the Uni- versity of Georgia(College of Engineering). She is set to graduate in 2022 with a Bachelors Degree in Computer Systems Engineering along with a certificate in Informatics. She was recruited for the project through the National Society of Black Engineers(NSBE) where she currently serves as Secretary. Her current research and general interests include
community-building and connection-making with engineering faculty and industry partners. More emphasishas been placed on introducing students to engineering in both academic and industrialsettings. In 2016 a change was made to invite all admitted female-identifying engineeringstudents and institute a selection process that values an essay about what the student anticipatesthey would get from participation in the bridge program. The tenth anniversary of the programwas in the summer of 2018, so a more comprehensive longitudinal study of outcomes forparticipants has been undertaken.As a living program that has been evolved based on formative assessment, the same essentialgoals of increasing the retention, success (measured by GPA) and graduation of
students take a rigorous and intensive University course (e.g., chemistry,calculus) with other non-Summer Scholars participants, as well as a cohort-based elective(Engineering Projects, Research, or Professional Development). In addition to their coursework,students are mentored in successful student behaviors such as study skills and participate inactivities that promote community-building and growth as engineers (e.g., local industry visits).While Summer Scholars is open to all students, in-state, underrepresented students (concerningrace/ethnicity, gender, and rural counties) are targeted with special invitations and scholarships.Summer Scholars significantly differs from traditional summer bridge programs, as this programtargets students