interests in engineering education focus on project-based learning and service-based pedagogies.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Angela Bielefeldt, PE, is a professor and associate chair for Undergraduate Education in the De- partment of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She began incorporating service-learning projects into the capstone design course for environmental en- gineering in 2001. Her engineering education research interests include attracting and retaining students, sustainable engineering education, engineering ethics, and assessment of learning outcomes.Prof. Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological UniversityProf. David O
Paper ID #6155Methodology for Evaluating Statistical Equivalence in Face Recognition Us-ing Live Subjects with Dissimilar Skin TonesDr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Rigoberto Chinchilla, PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University, is an Associate Professor of Ap- plied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interests include Quality Design, Biometric and Computer Security, Clean Technologies, Au- tomation and Technology-Ethics. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright and a United Nations scholar, serves in numerous departmental and
to theories of personal epistemologydevelopment throughout a Civil Engineering program. Page 23.963.10Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1025205. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.2. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986
andapplication of leadership. Leadership I includes topics such as leadership theories, styles,practices, and challenges as well as practice-based case studies. Leadership II continues withvisionary leadership and leadership development while focusing on empowerment, integrity, andintegration. This course includes practice-based case studies involving leadership andengineering design, and it prepares students for their first professional summer engagement.Leadership III builds on the foundation of Leadership I & II. It includes case studies in integrityand character, and it includes topics on opportunities, limitations, constraints and consequences(ethics), and principles of assessment and evaluation.Professional Practice I & II are summer
education and ethics. He wasAssociate Editor for the ASCE’s Journal of Hydraulic Engineering from 1993 to 2005. He has writtenor co-written numerous journal papers and articles, including the book titled ”Comprehensive Water Dis-tribution Systems Analysis Handbooks for Engineers and Planners, published by MWH Soft. Bryan haswon a number of teaching awards and recognitions including being a finalist in the TVO’s best lecturercompetition and received the American Water Works Association’s (AWWA) award for the Best Engi-neering and Construction Publication Article for 2008. Dr. Karney was awarded the Northrop Frye awardfor excellence in teaching and research in 2009
tracked. This program has proven to be successful in the ECE department forimproving female and minority enrollment and it would serve as a great model for the institute tomeet its diversity goals. Therefore, the primary purpose of this action plan is to grow the highlysuccessful ROSE-BUD program into an institution-wide ROSE-BUD MAPS program. As part of the professional development program, students will be taught professionalskills, including communication, teamwork, understanding ethics and professionalism. Theseactivities will provide an additional benefit for female and URM students because they can beginto develop social networks as soon as they arrive on campus. Some of the key activities willinvolve one of the three annual career
analysistechniques to introduce the topic of engineering systems.28 Page 23.1129.6Pierrakos, et al. at James Madison University teach a series of six design courses using problem-based learning (PBL) experiences that reiterate the design process and expose students to designtheory and practice, qualitative and quantitative reasoning, sustainability, systems thinking,ethics, and professional skills.29Gandhi, et al. at the Stevens Institute of Technology propose that the use of case studies can bevaluable in engineering education.30 They propose using systems thinking techniques, such asstrategic assumption surface testing, soft systems methodology, critical
such as economics, environmental, social, regulatory, health & safety, constructability, and sustainability analyze real world situations to determine design needs, design requirements, and compare treatment strategies for site remediation know where to find information on chemical toxicity and site remediation methods understand the larger framework of site remediation, including ethical considerations, public involvement, cost/benefit analyses work effectively in teams and communicate technical information via both written and oral formatsOver the 15-weeks of the semester, the class met twice each week for 75-minutes per class.Class time was used primarily for lectures with a few
be able to “design a system, component, or process to meet desired needswithin realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health andsafety, manufacturability, and sustainability.”Various methods2 have been discussed by educators to develop student’s conceptions of designthrough undergraduate engineering curriculums. A project-based approach3-11 has beenconsidered as one of the most effective ways and has been implemented in different courses.More specifically, capstone design courses8-11 were notably preferred among these courses. Thiswas because engineering students were required to synthesize their knowledge learned through awhole undergraduate curriculum, and apply their skills in senior designs
theoretical courses. Therefore, there iscurrently no agreement on the appropriate number or frequency of engineering designcourses for a curriculum and there is a wide variety of engineering design curriculum acrossinstitutions10.The same is also true for the methods used and content of engineering design courses1,10.Some institutions teach the design process using a traditional lecture format. Others prefer touse case studies to teach some aspects of the design process such as ethics, legalconsiderations, and safety. Still others adopt experiential teaching methods such as problem-based learning or service learning activities to teach engineering design courses3-4. In theinstitutions that still have only one capstone experience, the engineering
Paper ID #6175The Teaching and Evaluation of Technology and Engineering Concepts to Do-minican Junior High and High School StudentsDr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is an assistant Professor of Technology and Engineering Education in the College of Engineering at Brigham Young University.Prof. Ron Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholar- ship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education.Dr. Steven L Shumway
problems. The average coefficient of determination is 0.161. (The first problem of the final exam concernedprofessional ethics question and thus was excluded from the analysis.)DiscussionIt is important to note that our effort features capture only a portion of the effort expended bystudents on studying. Other elements of studying, such as the amount of time spent reading thetextbook or working on scratch paper, are not captured by the digital pens we use. However, webelieve that the amount of time spent problem solving on homework provides a useful measureof a student’s effort in a course.The results of the linear regression analysis of the overall-effort features indicate that students’effort does account for a considerable portion of the
. General access to content is very easy to discuss in the larger context, since most of whatthe students know is that context.A major benefit to discussing software is introducing the ethics and legalities of the current formof file sharing.23 This began in 2000 when Metallica sued Napster and its users for the early andunauthorized release of a new song.1,4 Many of the students in the course were less than 10 yearsold when this occurred, and thus they have no recollection of the event or its significance. Formany students, getting the music for free in one form or another is all they have ever known, andso introducing these topics to them is eye-opening since they have not faced such an ethicaldilemma. It is among the most fascinating discussions
multiple realistic constraints.” [1] Three of the important outcomes ofthis capstone experience involve learning about professional ethics, teamwork skills, and designmethodologies. These courses also provide an invaluable opportunity for students to movebeyond passive absorption of the material and apply these skills to an open ended design project.This paper focuses on efforts to improve the understanding and application of designmethodologies. However, it should be noted that by better understanding and applying thisaspect of the capstone experience students frequently experience beneficial effects in other keyelements of the learning experience.Capstone engineering experiences across the country are typically either one or two semesters
. Page 23.1375.3 WISEngineering is unique in that it supports Figure 1. Silhouette Cameo die-‐cutterstudents through every step of an engineering design process. This support encourages studentsto develop engineering habits of mind as they progress through an authentic design challenge.Engineering habits of mind involve systems thinking, creativity, collaboration, optimism,communication, and taking into account ethical considerations9. Informed engineering designassists in the facilitation of a design process that is more than building for the sake ofconstruction1; the engineering design process is intended to teach students how to organize theirthinking and make informed decisions to
. The course introduces students to the civil andconstruction engineering fields. It includes curriculum information and requirements, careerpaths, and engineering ethics. As part of the requirements for the course in its original format,students worked in teams on a term paper and a presentation that focused on a major engineeringproject. The course satisfies ABET Student Outcomes h –Achievement of the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,environmental, and societal context -, Outcome i - Recognition of the need for, and the ability toengage in life-long learning -, and Outcome j - Knowledge of contemporary issues.Although the selection of a foreign project as topic of the paper
of the project would be incomplete.Since our project was to incorporate Loftin’s conceptual design process into our reverseengineering, we tried to perform similar analysis using parameters and historical trends to sizevarious parts of the aircraft. However, this was sometimes complicated when incorporating itinto every discipline. We realized that some of the disciplines are strictly analysis and otherswould require more resources given in one semester to create complex parameter analysis of theaircraft.The two sided coin of the project was the team dynamic. There were good things and bad thingsthat can be expected when working with a group. Over the weeks, individual work ethics andparticipation became a point of significant concern. The
model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates." Ethics & Behavior 17.3 (2007): 255-279. 18. Meade, J., “Cheating: Is academic dishonesty par for the course?”, ASEE Prism, March 1992, 30-32. 19. Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Montgomery, S. M., & Steneck, N. H. "The current state of research on academic dishonesty among engineering students." Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2001. 20. Moffatt, M., Undergraduate Cheating, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1990. 21. Newstead, S.E., Franklyn-Stokes, A. and Armstead, P., “Individual Differences in Student Cheating,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 1996, 229-241
and Wood, Leigh N. Fremantle, Australia : s.n., 2008.Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Education Research Conference.12. Providing in-depth and personalized feedback to online students using audio recording. Wallace, Ian andMoore, Catherine. Singapore : s.n., 2012. 3rd International Conference on e-education, e-Business, e-Management,and e-Learning.13. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Lage, M., Platt, G. andTreglia., M. 2000, Journal of Economic Education, Vol. Winter, pp. 31-43.14. Psychological Considerations in Engineering Teaching: An Ethical Mandate to Produce Responsible Engineers.Lee, B. Kyun, Leiffer, Paul R. and Graff, R. William. Pittsburgh : s.n
teaching is particularly responsiveto the applications-oriented mission of NYIT and the School of Engineering?6. Did the faculty’s experience with ETIC lead to any technical consulting activities, externalfunding through grants or contracts?7. If students were engaged in completing a project to complete their senior level “capstonesequence”, how did this “course work” affect ABET Student Outcomes (SOs): “c”, “h” and “k”. c. “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”; h. “an understanding of the larger-scale impact of engineering
. However, we are clearly at the start of a large-scaleeducational experiment and longer-term quantitative evaluations are being set up to determine: The depth of understanding behind the increased applications fluency. The level of student accountability in terms of deliverables and data ethics that goes with ownership of a personal lab. Templates for a more rigorous process for student-driven experimental planning and results analysis. How much student-student cooperation is established given that it is an additional burden that they must organize since there are no longer scheduled lab classes where cooperation is imposed through shared use of lab equipment. Whether the
across settings 9. In engineering education, such authenticcontexts have been developed through “problem based” and “project based” activities 10. Amongthe advantages of such approaches are that students have greater opportunity to be mentored andpractice aspects of engineering for development that are often missed in the “core curriculum” oftraditional engineering education. Specifically, through “project based” engineering education,students work to: - formulate and solve ill-defined problems under complex conditions; - understand professional and ethical responsibilities associated with these complex conditions; - communicate with other engineers and with non-engineering professionals and the general public; and
research articles and book chapters about contemporary education analysis in urban contexts in journal such as Curriculum Inquiry, the Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, Educational Studies, The Urban Review, the Review of Educa- tion, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, and co-edited the volumes Unsettling Beliefs: Teaching Theory to Teachers (2008) and Ethics and International Curriculum Work: The Challenges of Culture and Context (2012). In 2008, Dr. Helfenbein served as the Section Chair for Critical Perspectives and Practices of AERA Division B-Curriculum Studies followed by serving as overall Program Chair for Division B in 2009 and was nominated into the Professors of Curriculum at AERA 2011. He is currently Editor of
. Duringmost of that first semester, the course materials were being delivered “just in time” for studentuse.EST104 Topical Syllabus A. Engineering as a Career B. Ethics C. Engineering Design and Teamwork D. Engineering Communication E. EXCEL - Workbooks & Graphs F. MATLAB programming – script files, functions, input/output, plotting, logic and conditionals, logic and relational operators, conditional statements, for loops, while loops.EST104 Schedule of topics for fall 2011 Week 1-5 EXCEL with applications to Ohm‟s Law and the Speed of Sound in air. Week 6 Flowcharting and Procedural Programming Week 7-10 MATLAB – Programming a Stepper Motor in MATLAB
, cultural, ethical, and environmental awareness. Personal skills, such as persistence, imagination, curiosity, risk taking, reading and comprehension, the cultivation of a positive can-do attitude, clarity of thought, goal oriented thinking, as well as life-long, lateral learning and artistic abilities. Social skills, such as teamwork, communication and humor. Students engage in business-like experience apart from the traditional classroomenvironment. They work as a team, take risks, push past failures, interact with prospectivecustomers and are exposed to business, as well as technical issues. As in a typical businessenvironment, the students attend regular meetings and
as a tool to examine complex environmental issues with a spatial context.Kelley notes, regarding the study: “While it can be used as-is with little preparation for anintroductory environmental studies course, other disciplines might want to preface the exercisewith a discussion of partitioning coefficients, remediation technologies, or environmental law,depending on the discipline. For my use, I spend a class period ahead of time discussing the useof chemicals in our society, the economic and political placement of the sites/businesses that usethese chemicals in our midst (often along railroad lines or barge terminals for bulk transport),some ethical considerations regarding where these sites are located (near poorer, or ethnic
internationalSenior Capstone Design projects. It is anticipated that the remaining three outcomes canbe accomplished through program modifications and changes to the assessmentinstruments.It should be noted that 7 out of 8 of the FIPSE-SEAEP anticipated U.S. student outcomesdirectly align with the ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomes (a-k).11 Outcomes d, f, h, iand j are notoriously difficult for engineering programs to implement, and assess, inalready overcrowded curriculums: d. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i. a
training was usually administered by a teaching and learning center. For the “workshopsthroughout year/monthly discussions,” the training was usually administered by someone in theFYEP. This could have been an experienced GTA or a faculty member. Often the topicsdiscussed in either of these trainings related to managing groups of students, facilitatingquestions, teaching ethics, and encouraging participation.Regarding the formal pedagogy training documented in Table 2, Roberto commented that: “You are supposed to go to these like seminars at the beginning. Uh, when you are in your first year, like the first week, but I don’t think they like track your attendance or anything like that…Not everyone goes. Like I went to a couple
students in both semestersreceiving instruction was much higher than their peers. Each spring, the Chemistry librarian speaks to a class in Ethics that all firstyear graduate students must take. The Computer Science department offers a year-long course for first-year PhD students, and theComputer Science librarian spoke to the class both semesters. Department Count Workstation Digital Reference Circulation Instruction Any Library (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Use (%) Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall