site is guided by two of the grand challenges of the National Academy of Engineering:personalized learning and scientific discovery. Specifically, this project trains students toconduct cutting-edge research as well as how to communicate their research findings to thebroader community. The project focuses on recruiting students who are currentlyunderrepresented in the STEM workforce.The focus of our REU-PATHWAYS Site is to provide not only appropriate and exciting researchexperiences for community college students planning to continue their academic studies inengineering, but additional learning opportunities for students to expand their career thinking andskills. These supporting activities enhance the research experience of participants
for Engineering Education, 2023 Building Interest in Technology Careers through a Five-Week Saturday ProgramThe goal of the “Building Career Interest in Computer Science through Advanced Real-WorldTechnology Projects” (CICSTART) program, funded by the National Science FoundationAdvanced Technological Education (NSF ATE) program (DUE#2113261), is to provideadditional professional and technical skills to cohorts of high school students through a five-week Saturday Program. The curriculum is continuously reviewed and modified to addresscurrent skills needed by the technician workforce. While this program was originally proposedand planned as in-person, the leadership team decided to shift to a virtual
, including Institutions with LSAMP and McNair programs. In addition to local campus visits, the CIE plans recruitment “circuits” in other parts of the country, including Maryland (University of Maryland, Baltimore County, College Park, and Eastern Shore campuses; Morgan State University) and Puerto Rico (University of Puerto Rico university system). These visits include a CIE staff member, a University faculty member, and a graduate scholar. The teams are assembled based on the majors/research interests of the students to whom we will present, which not only increases attendance but also enthusiasm for applying to the REU program. ● Dissemination of Electronic Recruitment Materials: The CIE REU Program Manager
actual mini-projectsconducting secondary data analysis over the summer. This work kicked off in a virtualworkshop in February 2022. Following the workshop, two mini-projects were scoped out andthese researchers (Zastavker and Kajfez on one project and Delaine, Jordan, and Young onanother), together with the project team (Case, Paretti and Matusovich) and other expertresearchers (Benson and Lord) came together in-person for two days in May 2022 to plan out themini-project work, as well as emerging collaborative outputs. The project work and article write-up took place over the Summer 2022, and was reported out at a check-in meeting in September2022. During January 2023, the researchers met in-person to focus on writing up findings andinsights
engineering researchers in February of 2001. TheManifesto staked out distinction with the prevailing software development approach at the time,called planned development and otherwise known as waterfall. The Agile Manifesto states, We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value: Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.Agile has been called
benefits of engaging with engineering technologies.ContextIn Fall 2020, we worked with two western US rural mountain middle schools. Due to schooldistrict pandemic regulations, teachers Eva and Sean (Pseudonyms) taught four days in-person(one-hour long sessions) with one day for asynchronous learning and lesson planning. Membersof the research team provided remote/virtual curriculum resources, research instruments, andongoing support in the form of weekly video calls and other communication. We designed a 3Dprinting curriculum using an instructional design approach called storylining [6], to promotecoherence, relevance, and meaning from the students’ perspectives by using students’ questionsto drive the lessons. Students solved the question: “How
Publications & Workshops Future Plans Key Future RQs: Local & National Impact 1. How is engineering intuition 1. Home Institution and Engineering developed among different Program disciplines? 2. Local Communities (e.g., Introduce a 2. What game-changing classroom Girl to Engineering and Girls RockIt interventions can we create that days) improve students’ ability to develop, 3. Affiliated societies (e.g., AIChE, recognize, and improve upon their ASEE
obtain original construction documents, including architectural andstructural plans. At least five school construction documents were available. The selectedbuilding had a typical structural system observed in many local schools and it was known thatthis school was affected by the seismic activity in the south area of Puerto Rico on January 7,2020. Table 4: Conference case study outline.Case Study OutlineTitle: Seismic Vulnerability in Puerto RicoDescription: Seismic hazard in PR including Tsunami and Liquefaction risksParticipants: All the teamsLocation: Puerto RicoEnvironmental condition studied: earthquake risks, building fragility, code compliance,tsunami risks, liquefaction maps, power plants risks, methods for
engineering majors now have access to virtual desktops with relevant software.Scholarship SelectionTo date, we have supported 54 students in the Fast-Forward Program. Our to-date target is 60.The original proposal sought to support 22 students per summer at a level that would cover full-time tuition and fees, housing, and a meal plan, subject to financial aid eligibility. Due to risingcosts of room, board, tuition, and fees at our institution, we have revised the target to 20 studentsper summer. In the first three years of the program, we have supported 54 students with themedian award size of $6,000 in Year 1 (average $5,762) and $6,500 in Years 2 and 3 (averaging$5,945 and $6,043 in Years 2 and 3, respectively). Across the three years the
group. These are members that are the “regulars” of thecommunity – those who can be counted on to interact and participate on an ongoing basis. In 1PEPS, the active group is comprised of key members from the six partner schools. As shown inTable 1, the active members were identified during the planning stages of PEPS.The outermost circle is comprised of the peripheral group. These are members who pop in andout of the community and who interact less regularly. In PEPS the peripheral group is comprisedof advisors and career center personnel at other engineering institutions. And finally, outside thecircle are outsiders –those who are not yet in the
involvement, and their plans of teaching STEM after graduation.We received a total of 23 applications including one pre-service teacher. Eleven teachers havebeen selected as final candidates to participate in the RET program at Oakland University. Anacceptance letter was sent to the candidates, and all the candidates returned the signed letterwithin a week. Table 1 shows the profile of teachers selected for the 2016 summer program. Table 1: 2016 RET Teachers’ Profile Applicants School District School Level Teaching Years of (F/M) Subject Teaching 1 (F) Avondale High School Math
withfaculty partners from other institutions. For students from SPU and SHU, once students have self-identified as candidates, they will work with a faculty member there, coupled with a mentor fromMSU to transition into their graduate studies at MSU. If students demonstrate interest earlier thantheir senior year, a faculty member at that institution will advise them as they select their computerscience and other courses to facilitate the transition or to increase the value of the MSCS to theircareer plans. Students accepted into this program who come from a non-NECST consortium memberwill be assigned an MSU advisor; such students as well as MSU undergraduates accepted as NECSTscholars, will interact with the SPU and SHU faculty through other
course or multiple courses.For each course that each student receives honors credit, they are required to explain how theproject will enhance the learning outcomes on a proposal.2.3 Tech FridaysTech Fridays are held three times per semester and are designed and facilitated by peer mentorsand faculty. In addition, industry partners and speakers are invited. Activities are scheduled to bethree hours long and consist of lesson plans and a guided lesson. The lesson plans are printed andprovided to help students with formation in case they get lost or stuck during the lesson. Mentorswalk the room and help the students individually to make sure everyone can persevere whilechallenges are issued to advanced students to keep them working. The Tech
Ed.D. in Academic Leadership/Higher Education and an MS degree in Applied Technology/Instructional Design. She has over 10 years of experience teaching, designing instruction, and doing qualitative research both in and outside of a library context. Her research interests focus on library and technology-based instructional planning and course design, assessment and evaluation topics, as well as online teaching and learning.Alyson L. Froehlich, University of Utah c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Teach-Flipped: A Faculty Development MOOC on How to Teach FlippedAbstract: The objective of this NSF project was to help faculty learn to
engineering and its related technical skills. Students responded to 8 items, again using a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree; lower DoingEngineering scores indicate stronger and more frequent prior experiences with engineering. Inaddition to these measures, students completed a demographics survey in which they providedtheir age, gender, race/ethnicity, first generation status, and future plans for college. At the end ofthe academic year, all registered EPICS participants were sent the post-survey via an anonymousQualtrics link. The post-survey mirrored the pre-survey, but with the inclusion of open-endedquestions and the removal of the registration section. TABLE 1
students.Cohort BuildingOne of the requirements of the NSF S-STEM Scholarship grant is cohort building. In the firstyear of the award, there were only two students in the program and cohorting was achieved byregular meetings with the program director. In the subsequent years, the group has increased insize and more planned cohorting activities, both in-class and outside-the-class, were developed.To start with, the students were assigned the same academic advisor in order to select classesthey can take together. We will first briefly describe the general process of class selection forengineering freshmen and then the process used for the STEM students to build cohorts. All new students at UM-Dearborn are required to attend orientations and take
to share these developed skill sets within their tribal and urban communities.Activities and presentations the IOU-NA students participate in include 1) Native NationsInstitute: Workshop on Tribal Governance, 2) Laser Radiation Safety Training, 3) Chemical LabSafety Training, 4) Research Ethics Training, 5) Optics Research Workshop, 6) Sloan ScholarSpeaker Series, 7) Research Plan and Lab Notebook Training, 8) Kathryn Kellner PresentationSkill Lecture, 9) Dr. Julius Yellowhair, Sandia National Labs Presentation, 10) Joshua John,Raytheon Presentation, 11) GRE Preparation Course, 12) GRE Tutoring Sessions 13) GRE FinalReview, 14) Graduate School Symposium, 15) Don Asher’s “Getting into Grad School”Seminar, 16) Performing Research on
conduct research projects within a thematic engineering or scienceresearch area. The faculty administrators for these sites are often responsible for recruitingparticipants, providing a high-quality research experience, and facilitating workshops to helpparticipants develop professional and research skills. When administering a REU program site, itmay also be suggested, or even required, that a plan be developed to evaluate the effectiveness ofthe site’s programming. Past and present REU administrators have used variety of routes fordeveloping their evaluation plans, including: using published engineering education articles todevelop an evaluation plan or integrating a social-science researcher who can advise onevaluation. The role of the social
a Professor and Senior Associate Dean in the College of Computing and Informatics at Drexel University. His scholarly interests span computing education research, information technology for teaching and learning, and software engineering. Prior to coming to Drexel, Dr. Hislop spent 18 years working in government and industry, where his efforts included software development and support, technology planning and evaluation, and development and delivery of technical education.Lori Postner, Nassau Community CollegeDarci Burdge, Nassau Community College Darci Burdge is Assistant Chair and Professor of Computer Science at Nassau Community College. She has worked to increase students understanding of software development and
, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social
, the bridgeprogram is optional, meaning group assignment is not completely random. Bridge students wereless prepared than comparison students on number of high school calculus AP (or equivalent)credits received. We analyzed group differences in final class grades from 2012-2017 among thecomparison group, the bridge group, and the rest of the class (i.e. non-comparison and non-bridge), standardizing grades using Z-scores. Planned contrasts found that bridge studentsperformed slightly better than, but not significantly different from, comparison students in first-semester math. Conversely, planned contrasts found that the bridge group significantlyoutperformed the comparison group in second-semester math. These results suggest that bridgeprogram
data. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Examining Choice in Self-directed Tiered Homework Assignments in College-Level Engineering CoursesIntroductionThe term “differentiated instruction” 1,2 has been used in the context of K-12 education in orderto describe a set of strategies aiming at providing individualized instruction for students atdifferent readiness levels. It describes an instructional design in which, while the class as a wholestill follows a common instruction plan, the incorporation of activities that students perform,either individually or in groups, allows for an additional component that the student and theteacher have the opportunity to adjust to the ability
Director for Strategic Partnerships for the School of Engineering and Computing Sciences at New York Institute of Technology. Panero received her Ph.D. in economics from the New School for Social Research with a concentration in economic development and sustainable and environmental eco- nomics. She graduated Summa Cum Laude from Fordham University, with a B.A. in Social Sciences. Besides her responsibilities in developing strategic partnerships that support the mission of the School of Engineering and Computing Sciences, Panero serves as a resource to faculty and students on economics and market plans, including student design projects and special topics courses; developing strategic part- nerships with industry and
formal courses that teach students how to manufacture prototypes via low fidelity prototyping, iterative design, and the use of advanced manufac- turing tools to produce high quality functioning devices. Matthew received his Ph.D. from Rice University in Bioengineering.Zoe Roberts, Rice University Zoe Roberts is in her third year of studying mechanical engineering at Rice University. She plans to graduate in May of 2017 and work in the field to gain first-hand experience before heading to graduate school. Zoe is interested in education, product design, and sustainability. Zoe became involved with the Flipped Classroom teaching model last summer and is currently helping to implement it at Rice University
towards the learning objectives of the laboratoryrather than on “how to do the laboratory.”This paper presents the overall integrative approach of advancement, development andimplementation of our state-of-the-art offline and online learning environment to supportand enhance students’ learning and training as they use simulated systems to design andconduct virtual and real-time machining experiments and calibration of precision machinetools.In the sections to follow, we present a comprehensive assessment and evaluation plan and itsoutcomes, guided by five foundational evaluation questions, designed to focus data collectionand analysis on a) the project’s stated objectives and outcomes, b) broader issues such asdissemination of project information
learning styles as assessed by the Myers-‐Briggs Inventory [3]. Additionally, when considering the external obstacles and characteristics of NT students, it cannot be assumed that students are largely isolated from worldly concerns. Students may have learned to recognize “A” level mastery of the subject matter, and have a good idea of how long it will take to achieve it, but still have their plans interrupted by externally imposed changes in work schedules, by sick children (especially in single parent households) or other non-‐academic factors. These constraints are less severe with traditional students however divergent constraints are greater
. Page 26.352.2The Green-BIM teaching method developed by the author with the support of the NSF TUESprogram provides students with building models containing integrated architectural informationto implement sustainability practices that goes beyond both conventional 2D solutions usingelectronic drafting board and 3D modeling for purely visualization purposes. Students areexpected to enhance their learning ability of sustainability practices through an innovative virtualapproach using BIM. The course taught using the Green-BIM teaching method seeks to deepenthe knowledge and skills for BIM technology in order to deliver the state-of-art skills andknowledge of sustainability. As one of the assessment plans, there is a need to assess the impactof
first-year cohort again in the Spring to map outa four-year graduation plan. This plan is not set in stone and students of-ten deviate somewhat from the plan. However, it serves to reinforce theircommitment to the program and shows them what is required to graduatein four years. The PI and co-PI continue to serve as advisors to the CS/MScholars through graduation.1.5 Conference ParticipationOur experience has shown us that conferences have been one of the mosttransformative experiences for the scholars. Conferences can be expensive toattend and while we devoted some of the budget from our current NSF grantto support conference travel, in retrospect we didn’t include enough. Ournew proposal to NSF includes more money for conference travel
present our future plans to further improve and facilitate cyber security learning. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents an explanatory and detailed overview of some efforts thatwere done in the past to integrate GENI and SDN in order to facilitate and boost cyber security learning experience. Section 3.2then presents our research efforts towards the integration of GENI and SDN in our teaching curriculum and development ofa broad range of cyber security labs and experimental modules. Finally, in Section 4 we present our future plans along withconcluding remarks of our paper.2 RELATED WORKIn cyber security for Higher Education (HE), curriculums encompass topics including secure software development, websecurity
, 100% of the responding indicated they were extremely (94%) or somewhat (6%) satisfied with their overall experience in the S-STEM program. All students indicated their meetings with the S-STEM Student Success Coach were extremely or somewhat informative. Also, success rate of S-STEM students is higher than the other students in all STEM courses (e.g. calculus I, engineering statics, physics I). At the present, the actual impact of the Student Success Coach on academic success remains to be determined as incoming ACT scores indicate that the S-STEM cohort is academically better prepared. Further analysis is planned to investigate this. Additional updated and detailed information will be provided on our poster.Introduction