usability.”The ABET student outcomes (General Criterion 3) include: - An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. - An ability to apply the engineering design process to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration for public health and safety, and global, cultural, social, environmental, economic, and other factors as appropriate to the discipline. - An ability to function effectively as a member or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates a collaborative and inclusive environment.MethodsDocumentation analysisTo identify common and distinguishing elements across courses
participatingin and delivering high-performance sustainable infrastructure projects. Finally, this study wouldbe valuable for implementing SI and enhancing the project management skills of the future AECworkforce.BackgroundSustainable infrastructures (SI) must be planned, built, and maintained carefully to fulfill theirintended function due to their complex design and construction. Such complex projects typicallyinvolve a wide range of stakeholders. These stakeholders hold diverse roles and responsibilitiesincluding setting the project's parameters and performance standards to running and maintainingthe finished infrastructure, all of which vary as the project progresses [1]. The path to sustainablegoals, which might include zero energy, zero carbon, and
the active involvement of others: direct reports, other managers, other team members, other department employees, and those above them on the organizational chart. Sometimes even their suppliers or customers! In this course, you will learn about teamwork and people management, and gain an introduction to strategy, finance, and project management. You will practice writing concise, persuasive analyses and action plans and verbally defending your ideas.ABET student outcomes are listed below in Table 1 [3]. Outcomes that are taught and assessedin EML are denoted in the table:Table 1. Student Outcomes taught in EML: ABET # Student Outcome Taught in EML course 1 an
, 2023 Robotics Empowered Convergence Engineering Education He Shen, Aren Petrossian, Joseph Vizcarra, Eva Schiorring, Mark TufenkjianAbstract: This paper presents the design and first-time offering of a convergence engineering course,“Introduction to Autonomous Robotic Systems,” where students from four engineering majors worked ininterdisciplinary teams to create submarine robots and accomplish complex autonomous missions. Thetechnical knowledge covered in the course included: robot design, mechanical analysis, sensing andactuation, electrical system design, guidance, navigation, control, robot operating system, computer vision,object recognition, and mission planning. The students are engaged in a whole project cycle within
bachelordegree program within the four year timeframe and a lower likelihood of taking more than fouryears to complete the degree, female minority STEM students had the highest percentage of dropor stop attending rates. These findings offer some initial insight into the challenges faced by female minoritystudents in STEM fields in terms of degree completion and retention. This analysis marks thebeginning of a journey to understand their experiences, and plans are in progress for the nextphase of this study, which is scheduled for the fall 2023 semester. The next phase will focus onidentifying the barriers that these students face and will include activities aimed at improvingtheir confidence, preparedness and sense of belonging. Section 6.0
parallel with the new program presented here.As a liberal arts college, an engineering degree would need to have some flexibility to fit theoverall college culture. Initially planned to fit within the college’s BA footprint, a degree neededto provide some formal engineering training while still pursuing external interests such as varsitysports and musical ensembles. Many students come into college still exploring their interests, soa program with flexibility to discover engineering while in college would serve them better thanprograms at other institutions in the greater geographic area that provide specialized engineeringdegrees.Pilot ProgramThe engineering program started in the physics department, with a proposal for an EngineeringScience major
’ assessment of the climatewithin the first-year engineering experience. In this paper, findings from the second year ofpiloting our workshops are described. In this second iteration of training, new teaching assistantsparticipated in our foundational training in GIDBEA, and returning ones built on theirintroductory knowledge to learn about social justice and principles of inclusive leadership. Thedata shows that most of the teaching assistants found the workshop content and activitiesrelevant to them as peer educators. Several teaching assistants shared inclusive leadershipstrategies that they planned to implement in the coming semester. The goal of this study is toinform plans for implementing solutions into training that address deficiencies
presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3317Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO approach, 302(2), 60-62.cDettman, M. A. (2000, June), Industrial Partnerships At Western Kentucky University Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8453Dobrowski, T. (2008, June), Building Industry Relationships Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3797Foltz, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors that contribute to the persistence of minority students in STEM Fields. Planning
resultsshowed higher student success with writing-intensive courses in developing critical writing skillsin a construction management course [2]. Challenges of developing writing skills amongundergraduate STEM curricula are addressed by Mayo and Wheaton [3] who state that writingassignments can be developed such that they assist students in connecting their technical work toreal-world applications. In their lesson plan, the students were expected to post their work on apublic platform encouraging students to produce quality work. Richards and Milanovicestablished partnerships with professional writing faculty, industry members and technicalcourse instructors to mentor senior design project students in effective writing through pairedteaching [4]. In a
. ➢ Integrate ethical considerations from the outset. 3.4 Ethical implications ➢ Collaborate with ethics committees and external experts. Legal and regulatory ➢ Work closely with legal experts to ensure compliance. 3.5 compliance ➢ Conduct legal reviews and obtain necessary approvals. ➢ Ensure effective resource allocation. 3.6 Resource constraints ➢ Prioritize tasks to meet project goals within constraints. Performance and ➢ Manage computational resources efficiently. 3.7 scalability ➢ Plan for scalability to handle large volumes of data. Team
Technical Managers2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Abstract This work in progress (WIP) paper aims at demonstrating the innovative design ofintegrating a communication course with the Capstone course, which is part of the Master ofEngineering Technical Management (METM), a 21-month online graduate program for workingprofessionals in the engineering technical management fields. As the culmination of theirgraduate study, students must identify an organizational/technical challenge, formulate a feasibleproject plan to address the issue to bring impact to the organization. During this process, theywill conduct research, create a strong business case for their industry sponsors
accrediting agencies, institutional influences of college missionsand resources, and unit-level influences of faculty, discipline, and student characteristics. Starkalso created the Contextual Filters Model that provides an overview of the various contexts thatinfluence course planning for college faculty (Lattuca & Stark, 2011; Stark, 2000; Stark et al.,1988). A study by Lund and Stains examines unique environments and contexts of departmentsin influencing STEM faculty’s teaching practices and finds that disciplinary differences exist andhave shown potential associations to level of adoption of evidence-based instructional practices(2015). Another study shows similar findings where faculty’s teaching practices differ based onthe contexts they
research on workload assess- ment. Dr. Pennathur has also been recently awarded two grants from the National Science Foundation in Engineering Education. In one of the grants, he is modeling how engineering faculty plan for their instruction. In a second grant, he is developing a model for institutional transformation in engineering which balances access and excellence. Dr. Pennathur is the author/co-author of over 100 publications in industrial engineering and human factors engineering. He is on the editorial board of the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, among other journals.Priyadarshini PennathurProf. Nicholas A Bowman, University of Iowa Nicholas A. Bowman is the Mary Louise Petersen Chair in Higher
to the stages of self-regulated learning,i.e., planning, performance, and self-reflection.Results: Results indicate that students had prior knowledge of project management but lackedfamiliarity with the research process. Students encountered project management challenges, buteffective communication and clear goal setting were key strategies in meeting deadlines andcompleting coursework. Students valued collaboration and continuous mentoring, and the coursehad a positive impact on students' understanding and interest in research, as well as theirdevelopment of transferable skills for future practice. Overall, this study highlights theimportance of project management skills and mentorship in promoting self-regulated learningand research skills
the first-year experience.Backward Design and the CAP modelThe backward design of curricular development starts with the basic idea of starting from the end, wherewe envision our students to be after the learning experience we are designing [4]. Its central premise isthat once the educational purposes (i.e., the learning outcomes) of a learning experience areconscientiously selected, the rest of the elements of the experience (i.e., the pedagogical activities, andcorresponding assessments) should be designed toward the achievement of those identified outcomes [5].Therefore, the three main stages of backward design are: (1) identifying desired results, (2) determiningacceptable evidence, and (3) planning learning experiences and instruction
twenty-eight undergraduateagricultural and biological engineering students’ self-ratings of their proficiency level withlearning objectives following weekly assignments in a process engineering course. Theseresponses, in conjunction with results from the learning-objective based grading of students’work by the teaching assistant were analyzed to determine patterns in students’ learning needs asthe semester progressed. Examples of inferences about students’ struggles that the instructordrew from the results of students' self-ratings and actions that the instructor made or plans to takeare discussed.I. IntroductionUniversity instructors write course learning objectives, and they may even use these as a guide todesigning their instruction as
test board served as key component in making hands-on experiments of the course in a remote setting possible. The remote experiments, testing, and evaluations were done following a formal and methodic approach, instead of ad hoc practices. In general, this approach led to effective and efficient experiments, and also served as a model to think creatively and methodically for solving engineering problems and planning prototype development. Overall, the design and use of the test board proved instrumental in the successful remote delivery of our digital laboratory course such that all the previous in person course experiments were completed in the online course without any limitations and the course’s educational outcomes were
Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including: developing course offering plan, chairing the undergrad- uate curriculum committee, reviewing and approving course articulations for study abroad, serving as Chief Advisor, and representing the department at the college level meetings. She is
second, morein-depth, course to the curriculum. This response reveals a need for further investigation intodifferent aspects of transportation engineering curricula, specifically looking into the degree towhich secondary courses are present in civil engineering programs seven years down the road.Aside from course structure, specific concepts covered in transportation engineering is anothertopic of interest among researchers. Transportation engineering is a large field encompassingmany different sub-fields; e.g., transportation planning, roadway design, travel behavior, policy,and traffic operations, among others. Recent work aimed to uncover how different professionalsprioritize what topics students cover in their transportation engineering
. However, in recent years, many of the manufacturing-related machines haveevolved to be non-hands-on. Consequently, more time is spend planning the process, for instancein CAD/CAM environments. The analysis of data is becoming more important in recent years aswell. Not just since the rise of Industry 4.0 is the number of sensors steadily increasing,generating an ever bigger amount of data. Along with this trend, the learning goals of laboratorycourses shift accordingly – from manual operation of machines towards process planning,observation and data analysis. This enables to use of so-called remote laboratories as part offlipped laboratory concepts, given their shifted focus of achievable learning outcomes [2], [6].Such remote laboratories are
at least they have a limitedunderstanding) what surveying engineering is. This has created enrollment challenges in manysurveying programs e.g., [4], [12], [27], [28]. It is worth mentioning that some surveyingprograms (undergraduate and/or graduate) that have developed online programs haveexperienced great success [29]-[31]. In our previous work we surveyed current students andalumni, focusing on the reasons why they selected surveying as a career and how they learnedabout surveying [12]. While the survey provided many insights that are useful in refining ourrecruitment plans, current surveying students and alumni provide half of the picture, becausethey have already selected surveying as a career. They were able to learn about surveying
moment delivered in one of multiple formats, including presentations, a discussion, videos, orinteractive content. Sometimes we select topics that are relevant to the class session, e.g., cement burnswhen discussing concrete or crane safety when discussing construction site planning. But other times weselect general safety, health or wellbeing topics of importance to the students. Examples include CPR, activeshooter safety, bicycle safety, drowsy driving, and stress management, to name a few. Figure 1 includessample slides from two safety moments. The top slides are focused on a building industry related topic, laddersafety, while the bottom slides are a more personal topic, cooking safety and fire hazards associated withcooking on a stove, a
|10⟩ state in a 2-qubit space. At the top is thequantum circuit, and below is the histogram of measurement outcomes for 1024 runs of thismeasurement.CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKThis paper summarizes the creation of a new quantum computer engineering course using anopen access quantum computer to facilitate learning. Based on the results from teaching the firstsemester of this course, I plan to refine and improve the overall course. One key goal is toincorporate more hands-on exercises with quantum computers. The graduate-level students wererequired to complete more computing exercises compared to the senior-level students, and thefeedback from the graduate students was that they understood the concepts better afterperforming the exercises. My
retirement and other exits.As a result, there is a need for a well-structured unifying platform that can bring together andconnect numerous stakeholders through a common source of information sharing. This can beaccomplished by creating a well-planned timetable for in-person or video conferencingengagements.METHODOLOGYThe study examining the collaborative efforts between secondary (high school) and post-secondary (college or university) education institutions and construction industry professionalswith the aim of boosting construction workforce was designed with a methodology framework(see Figure 2) which uses a teaching platform that enables the instruction of multiple classroomsthrough videoconferencing technology.Figure 2: Methodology Framework
least one filter that takes more than ten minutes to filter enough water to measure turbidity,which makes it challenging to determine a winner before class ends.In the most recent version of the spy gadget challenge, about 75% of the teams had a workingprototype to share with their classmates. Those who did not achieve their desired functionalitystill had made enough progress that they could convey their intentions. Most of the teamswithout a working prototype either did not arrive to class with a plan or had a plan that wasoverly complex. Students greatly enjoy the interactions in the poster format and leave positivefeedback for their classmates.Even with room for improvement (discussed below), the faculty’s informal observations indicatethat
implementation for a solution they didn’tunderstand. This unsurprisingly lead to a jumble of error-riddled code that was as difficult forgraders to decipher as it was for the authors to describe.Future WorkThe pilot and first revision of this course focused on identifying and assembling a reasonablesequence of content, activities, and assessment. In the next revision we plan to make the links tocomputational thinking more explicit and build more synergy between existing physics conceptsand data analysis through complementary lab activities. We hope this provides a balance that canhelp reduce the tension between need for abstraction and motivation that comes more naturallyfrom concrete application. To assess these changes we plan to administer a survey
Paper ID #40594Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment in Engineering CurriculumMs. Madeline Fisher, Ohio Northern UniversityMr. Evan Budnik, Ohio Northern University Evan Budnik is a Civil engineering student planning on studying enviromental engineering. He is focous- ing on water recources and water management engineering.Mr. Brady HarmonDr. Lauren H. Logan, Ohio Northern University Lauren H. Logan is an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Ohio Northern Uni- versity. Her research focuses on the interconnection of water and energy, as well as life cycle assessment within engineering education
Paper ID #36421External review letters for promotion and tenure decisions atresearch-intensive institutions: An analysis of the content of templateletters for bias and recommendations for inclusive languageProf. Cinzia Cervato, Iowa State University Cinzia Cervato is the lead PI of the NSF-funded ADVANCE Midwest Partnership project and Morrill Professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences. She has served as a faculty fellow for early career and term faculty in the Office of the Provost and faculty fellow for strategic planning in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. She earned a doctor of geology degree from the
interactive digital environment in which users try to solve fundamentalproblems in the domain of construction planning and scheduling presented in realistic scenariosthrough guided active explorations. Figure 1 shows a snapshot of the game. The scenario-basedproblems facilitate sense-making and engage students in understanding, analyzing, and solvingopen-ended problems in that field. During the active explorations to solve these fundamentalproblems, the users are exposed to fundamental engineering problems and try to discoversystematic solutions to solve them. The game and the proposed gamified pedagogy are designedbased on the Constructivism learning theory and a framework that consists of six essentialelements: (1) modeling; (2) reflection; (3
in2YCs [1]. The "Capacity Building Workshops for Competitive S-STEM Proposals from Two-Year Colleges in the Western U.S." goal has been to support preparation and submission ofproposals to the NSF S-STEM program from two-year colleges (2YCs).The workshop has been offered during the summers of 2019 (in person), 2020 and 2021 (virtual)and focused on several aspects of proposal preparation, including addressing the NSF MeritReview Criteria, developing, and justifying proposed budgets, incorporating appropriate andmeaningful evidence-based strategies, and evaluation and dissemination plans. A completedescription and evaluation analysis of this project is currently being submitted for publication[2]. The workshop facilitators who were carefully