understanding involved the creation of concept maps(cmaps). A concept map is a technique of graphically organizing information to show howvarious items are related to each other. There has been significant research into the creation ofconcept maps as well as their use in assessing student learning [5], [6], [7]. Concept maps havealso been used to assess student learning in the specific area of sustainability [8], [9], [10].For one of the sustainability problems on the final exam, the students were asked to describe theinteraction between the earth and the sun. Specifically, they were instructed to use only four tofive sentences and to include the following terms: {reflect, absorb, atmosphere, surface,greenhouse gas, radiation, ultraviolet (UV) light
been found in related work.Background and Theoretical FrameworkIn his social cognitive theory, psychologist Albert Bandura put forth a framework of humanfunctioning that accorded a central role to individuals as determinants of the course of their ownlives. This perspective countered dominant behavioristic theories, which viewed human behavioras the product of external stimuli and reinforcements. According to Bandura, the capacity to planahead, to reflect, and to self-regulate enables humans to exercise a large degree of control overtheir environments and behavior. People originate thoughts, ideas, and actions, all of which makethem agents in their own lives. Central to human agency is a belief that one can bring about theoutcomes one is
the movie followedby discussion of various elements of corruption and unethical behavior portrayed in the movie.Students are assigned specific topics to reflect and write about and then lead an in-classdiscussion based on the findings. The video is streamed for repeated viewing through the securecourse Blackboard site and the students complete a fairly lengthy discussion memo submittedonline prior to the course meeting.Civil Engineering Profession and LicensureCivil engineers must focus on becoming experts in their field and exercise their leadershipabilities to benefit themselves, their families and society as a whole. To reinforce our role as aprofessional, students are asked to interview a civil/construction engineer with a PE license
activities, demonstrations, and labtours. This instructor model allowed continuity for the students while bringing in experts for thevarious modules.Program LogisticsThe one-week camp was held from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm Monday through Friday on the UWcampus. Each day was divided into morning and afternoon sessions of approximately 2.5 hours.At the end of the day, the students reflected on what they learned and participated in small groupdiscussions. A brief schedule of the program is shown in Table 1.Throughout the camp, students were exposed to “college life” at UW. During the 1.5-hour lunchbreak, students and camp staff walked through campus to the student center and purchased lunchwith UW meal cards provided by the camp. Students were encouraged to
development. Reflection and reciprocity are keyconcepts of service-learning” (p. 5). This reference also comes from a field outside of STEM, and acknowledges student engagementin activities to address human needs, while listing reciprocity as a key component. Furthermore, acknowledging the reference ofexperiential learning and its connection to John Dewey13, Paulo Freire, and social justice/change8,32,14,43, which further contribute tothe human aspect that is embedded in service learning9. These components directly connect to support of underrepresented studentpopulations, and need to be highlighted in STEM service-learning programs in order to alter current concerns as it relates to retainingthese student populations. The service-learning
scores of each of the five constructs (e.g., CONTENT, QUES,etc.) each reside near the midpoint of the scale, to avoid construct measures that are not overlyskewed. The second parameter, validity, takes many forms, but they each indicate, in differentways, the degree to which the instrument accurately measured the intended underlying construct.Content validity for this survey is exhibited by showing that this instrument reflects all of thedimensions of interest described by the FPMID, including: independent content engagement(CONTENT), independent questioning (QUES), positive feelings (FEEL), use of feedback(FEED), and perseverance (PERSEVERE). As a way to establish construct validity, we examinethe degree to which all items on the FIDES
with increasedglobal preparedness. Further, students’ performance on the instruments was found to becorrelated with particular programmatic elements of the experiences such as duration of studyabroad, the number of non-engineering courses students took with global foci, number of timestraveled abroad, and the amount of student reflection that occurred during or after travellingabroad. The study broadens the knowledge base about contextual factors associated withengineering global preparedness.IntroductionThe engineering workplace is becoming increasingly multinational because of technologicaladvances and global economic integration. Companies now seek graduates who are able towork in multinational teams that may cross temporal, geographical
tool.Presenting the results A discussion of what was found from the literature search and subsequent review ispresented based specifically on how previous work done answers the research questions andwhat future recommendations can be made. The patterns reflected in the data were also discussedto show how the conclusions made from the review are warranted. This paper concludes with adiscussion about gap in the literature that the review uncovered and suggestions for future workor directions.Findings At the first stage of data extraction of the 12 selected studies, eight were found to haveprimarily qualitatively collected data while the other four were quantitative. There were fivecases of the activity being implemented in lecture classes
atmosphere of reflection and individual feedback that formsthe foundation for continuous improvement. Capacity is the various applications of one’s knowledge and the roles it enables one totake on. This is primarily developed in the classroom, first, by encouraging students andproviding them with diverse opportunities to contribute to extracurricular efforts, form part ofdiverse communities, or organizations. Secondly, classes teach students on the importance ofidentifying and assigning distinct roles within projects and team efforts. Students learn about allof the parts and roles required in the process of taking ideas to realities and producing a desiredoutcome. Students are presented with multiple opportunities to develop skills that
participants to educational theory and mentored teaching practice.The intermediate level certificate is achieved upon completion of a course on fundamentaleducation theory (PSPFC 1001) and a mentored teaching practicum (PSPFC 1002): • PSPFC 1001 introduces graduate students to principles of learner-centered teaching and provides opportunities for students to design lesson plans, practice implementing those lesson plans through micro-teaching sessions, self-reflect on those experiences, and give Page 26.741.4 and receive peer feedback. The course size commonly ranges from 16 to 20 students. • For PSPFC 1002, students
andimplement engineering design challenge modules. The key to the program’s success areresource coaches, engineers and master teachers, who guide the teachers through the process ofcreating and implementing lessons incorporating engineering design activities and provideinvaluable feedback as teachers reflect on their own practice. Program evaluation focuses on teacher change in instructional practices, student growth incontent knowledge, and student engagement. By participating in engineering courses andpedagogy workshops, creating and implementing modules incorporating engineering designchallenges unique to their course content, and receiving continual support and guidance from aresource team of engineers and master educators, teachers report
, become inherently about social justice.Interestingly, this separation of institutional locations where engineering science and research areallowed to live (and not to live) is reflected in NSF’s Research Experiences for Undergraduates(REU) program. Of the 640 REU sites currently listed, only 4 include community colleges(nsf.gov).The processes and people involved in this definition also influenced what went in theengineering curriculum and what stayed out. For example, Rolston and Cox argue that by takingthe “mind out of the shop” and into the university, engineering educators throughout the 20thcentury recreated a class division with significant social justice dimensions: “The shift in focus of engineering training from the job
’, ormeeting others’ needs. She did not feel there was anyone in her department she could go tofor help or support. It was not an isolated experience.This story was told to other female faculty members as part of a series of ‘storytellingcircles,’ which were organized in order to gain insight into the careers and experiences offemale faculty members in science and engineering fields. While many stories told during thegroup interviews reflected a lack of consideration for family-related responsibilities, the oneabove reveals clearly the influence of a department head. It reveals a significant lack ofconsideration for the participant immediately after she gave birth to her child.Time and again, we heard stories detailing the ways in which department
further disjointed since the laboratory instructor was not completely “in tune” with what was discussed each day in class. b) The setup and tear down of the lab equipment took up a significant amount of time and the students gained very little insight from those processes. c) During the lab the students suffered from “cookbook syndrome”. It seemed that they were preoccupied with the rote following of instructions rather than intellectual thought. Students would not pause prior to an experiment to predict what might happen nor would they reflect on their results. It was not uncommon to see students collect nonsensical results, write them down, and move on without sensing that something was wrong. d) The primary
into a document for submission along withthe final deliverable the team produced. This served to hold individuals accountable within theteam and helped instructors work the team through team issues, should they arise. In addition,two peer evaluations are used to assess individual performance and contribution in teamworkusing CATME SMARTER Teamwork16-17.Engineering Design ProcessThe engineering design process is introduced early in the course. Before the design process isintroduced, students are asked to reflect on their own design experience and discuss the designprocess used by professionals in a discussion board. Then the design process and various designtools (such as brainstorming techniques, concept combination tables, and decision
students to build on their strengths andovercome their weaknesses as they navigate their education.13A guiding principle for the IRE model is that students own the responsibility for their learning.At the beginning of each project cycle, students identify which outcomes will be addressedduring the project. Working with faculty, they determine which learning modes will be appliedand determine what types of evidence they will need to acquire in order to demonstrate outcomeattainment by the end of the project cycle. Learning activities include planning, resourceidentification, self-directed knowledge acquisition, peer conversation, help-seeking, reflection,and evaluation.15 Each project cycle concludes with the presentation of two reports: a
how the student narratives spoke to these two questions: 1)How is SUSTAIN different than the traditional course experience? and 2) How did SUSTAINaffect you?In their interviews, students reported that SUSTAIN SLO was different than traditionalexperiences as it included 1) open assignments and structure, 2) a new look at education andlearning, 3) different relationship with faculty and peers, 4) a recognition of the importance ofspace to be yourself, and 5) significant collaboration and team building. As for the impact ofthese differences, students reported 1) increased capacity for personal reflection, 2) a new senseof ownership in education, 3) a discovery of internal motivation and the joy of learning, and 4)deepened friendships that led to
phrases in the curricula referring to data or evidence withTAP’s data, and warrants included any reasoning beyond data (e.g., explanation, justification,rationale). The results section of this paper reflects both of these types of argumentationlanguage, the terms of TAP and those used by the teachers.Additionally, this work was guided by the Framework for Implementing Quality K-12Engineering Education31. This framework identifies nine key indicators that define thecharacteristics of K-12 engineering. Figure 1 provides a list of the key indicators and a shortdescription of each. When an element of argumentation was identified to be in an engineering
reinforced a meritocracy ideology within the profession. Cech argues that, inorder to accommodate social justice education, that a “cultural space” must be created withinengineering by addressing depoliticization and meritocracy.In a discussion on diversity in engineering, Riley notes that engineering’s lack of significantdiversity may be reflective of fundamental issues within the profession rather than theavailability and use of effective recruitment and retention tools; Lucena [8] has raised this issueas well. Concerns about diversity may at first appear to be political rather than technical innature. Downey et al. [9] has argued that in a global world, engineers need to be able to workwell with people who think differently, and diversity within
; 5-10 minutes of peer review. The facilitator asked the students to break into groups of approximately four in order to discuss figures. The facilitator presented a series of questions related to the previously-revealed design principle, to guide discussion and ensure that students focused on providing meaningful feedback.4. Repeat discussion, uncovering of new principle, and peer review.5. Reflection for figure designers. The facilitator concluded the workshop by asking figure designers to consider the information they’d gained by discussing their figures with their Page 26.1707.4 peers, and reflect upon how that information
learning/project-based learning experience. Thus, thedecision was made to focus assessment on utilizing a combination of attitudinal as well asreflective student pieces. In fact, many aspects of Problem Based Learning (PBL) are inherent inthis type of project. “While each PBL instructional environment is unique, and therefore merits itsown unique assessment strategy, several alternative assessment techniques seem particularlyappropriate for the PBL learning environment.” 2 Page 26.1758.4 The common assessment pieces of service-based learning and PBL (Problem Based Learning)are specifically structured around the personal reflection pieces
) guidancedocuments provided by an advising center are important to effective advising.Some recent advances in advising include various uses of the Internet. Online surveys can beused by faculty to identify students in need of advising.8 Surveys can also be used by students toguide reflection that may lead to greater independence and proactive participation in school.Some colleges are using social media, such as Facebook, to improve advising.9 Various Internet-based automatic advising systems have also been used.10,11 The effectiveness of social media isnot certain. A survey of students in undergraduate teacher education programs at the Universityof West Florida indicated a strong preference for learning about deadlines and other schoolinformation through
majority-minority institution can make for the state andthe nation, a co-enrollment program was developed. At the onset of its development, theengineering co-enrollment program was founded on over a decade of experience gained througha strategic partnership between the general studies department at Texas A&M and Blinn College.This co-enrollment program, known as the Texas A&M Blinn Transfer Enrollment at A&M(TEAM) Program, now fourteen years (2001-2015) in existence, has enrolled a total of 8,122students and graduated 2,846 in 112 different majors across the university. The number ofgraduates does not include the past four years of students admitted to the program(approximately, 3,900 students) which reflects their highest enrollment
; average age 20.9 ± 1.96 years) drew from majorsin engineering (47%), mathematics (10%) and science (41%). Applicants had an average GPAof 3.39 ± 0.45 and were mostly upperclassman: 31% seniors, 31% juniors, 24% sophomores, and2% freshman; 12% did not to report class standing. Six applicants (11.7% response rate) completed the electronic questionnaire. Studentsindicated that they sought teaching experiences to gain experience for their future (either in theirSTEM field or in education), to help others, or for self-development (including self-reflection orincreasing income). Three students did not feel that they had a sense of belonging in theircurrent departments. Students perceived teachers to possess strong social skills and
academic study revealed thatoverall there was a higher level of professional identity among military academy studentscompared to public and private university students, and that military cadets more readily providedexamples of identity development, such as basic training, ROTC, and reflection. The authorsconcluded that providing opportunities for engineering students to work together on challengingtasks is important to develop engineering identity.Recently, Meyers et al(9) used stage theory as a framework for modeling engineering identitydevelopment among engineering students. The study consists of an electronic survey askingengineering students in a medium-sized private university if they consider themselves as engineers,and asking them to
32.41** Extrovert (N=10) > Introvert (N=8)* UoP 20 65.9 87.3 (MBTI; p = 0.034, MWp = .055)during Chip Formation 2013 (p < 0.001) Active (N=14) > Reflective (N=4)* (ILS; p = 0.024, MWp = .061)Power Analysis of Spring
and time management skills, leadership skills and presentation skills. Business attire isrequired for the team presentation at the conclusion of the project.The authentic learning activities embedded in the project reflect the routine activities of today’sworkplace and emphasize many of the same employability skills industry identified in the “superset.” Rubrics have been designed to help bridge the gap for students between project directionsand project outcomes. Additionally, faculty have determined that the project should be assessedintermittently throughout the course of the semester. This has given faculty insight into eachgroup’s management and communication styles, as well as the degree to which the technicalaspects of the course are
developed and administered to the students in the course for self-reported evaluation of competencies. After each assignment a survey was given to the students toexpress their understanding of the new tools and concepts, and development of relatedcompetencies. Some of the items of the instrument were modified to reflect the assignments. Inthis paper we focus on the results of the competencies.Results: The data gathered through the instrument indicate that self-reported level of developedcompetencies fluctuated throughout the semester. Senior students in mechanical engineering inAME 4163, in most instances, perceived to have well-developed competencies from the beginningof the semester. A positive influence was found on competencies related to the
Paper ID #11113Discussions of Engineering Education Learning Advances among WorkingEngineering FacultyProf. Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University BYRON GARRY is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator in the Department of Construction & Operations Management in the College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. He has been a member of ASEE since 1998. As SDSU ASEE Campus Rep., his goal is to help fellow College of Engineering faculty to be reflective teachers.Dr. Suzette R Burckhard, South Dakota State University Dr. Burckhard earned a BS in Engineering Physics, a BS in Civil
observed across the goals was about helpingstudents learn how to be an independent learner. This is shown through statements such as“further engages students in their education”20, “offers students the opportunity to discover”14and develop “the student into an action-driver leader”21. These emphasize the fact that regardlessof how well designed an engineering program is, the responsibility to learn rests with thestudents7. It can also help students understand that they are capable and can succeed, but there isalways room for improvement and they must continue learning and improving3. Recent researchdiscusses the importance of reflection in the continued and independent learning process25,26.Experiential learning. The majority of the program