staying compatible with current ABET accreditation criteria. This effort resulted ina total of thirteen program outcomes, which cover the breadth of the principles included in theBOK2.In 2011 two external forces have resulted in changes to the BSCE program. The University ofArkansas is strictly enforcing the statewide ‘core curriculum’ for Arkansas institutions of highereducation. Formerly, the engineering programs at the University of Arkansas enjoyed anexception to the state core requirements by specifying humanities and social science (H&S)courses based on an interpretation of ABET EC2000 criteria. This allowed advanced-level H&Scourses in the curriculum. With the enforcement of the statewide core, all H&S courses arelimited to
feedback on issues like aesthetics,ergonomics, and theme, as well as for marketing research and cost analysis. Prototyping is usedby engineers to provide manufacturing and assembly data, to investigate system integrationissues and to develop analysis and testing strategies. In some cases, prototyping is also used inthe concept generation phase of the design process to assist designers to either expand or contractthe set of possible concepts. Clearly prototyping is an important part of most design processes.We define the prototyping strategy as the set of decisions that dictate what actions will be takento accomplish the development of the prototype(s). Prototyping strategies include a variety ofdifferent options. In the broadest sense, prototypes
Page 22.1629.10 The curriculum requires a proficient if not advanced knowledge of certain buildingsimulation strategies to execute the analysis approaches central to the proposed course’sconcepts. There are many software packages and pathways and each have certain strengths andweaknesses when it comes to building performance modeling. This section focuses on thecriteria upon which to select the appropriate tools for the curriculum. The students will need some previous knowledge of a few different performancemodeling software applications. Primarily, they will need proficiency with software(s) capable ofreliable yearly thermodynamic modeling for multiple zone buildings. It is critical that thesoftware be able to compute the load
Student Responses for Q1For Q1 - “Who is the client?”, students are required to identify the direct client. This is theperson(s) who will utilize the written procedure or solution developed by the team. Descriptionsof the types of clients identified by students and sample student responses are shown in Tables 1-3. For each MEA, the types of clients are divided into four categories: 1) the direct client, 2) theindirect client, 3) non-clients, and 4) multiple clients - a combination of 1-3. For MEA 1 (Table1), the direct client is the technical installation team of TLP (a security system company) whowill install the security laser system and ultimately use the written procedure developed by theteam. The indirect clients include the CEO of TLP and
, Annual Conference,2006.7. Fortenberry, N., Sullivan, J., Jordan, P., and Knight, D., “Engineering Education Research Aids Instruction,” Page 24.882.17Science, Vol. 317, 2007.8.French, J., Leiffer, P., “The Genesis of Transformation: A First Course in Engineering with a focus on Retentionand Developing Professionalism” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering EducationConference& Exposition, Annual Conference, 2012.9. Bradley, W., and Bradley, S., “Increasing Retention by Incorporating Time Management and Study Skills into aFreshman Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
American Society For Engineering Education Spring 2010 Middle-Atlantic Section Conference ENGINEERING EDUCATION:GLOBAL CHALLENGES, LOCAL SOLUTIONS April 16-17 2010 , ACOPIAN ENGINEERING CENTER LAFAYETTE COLLEGE Easton, Pennsylvania Leading Engineering Technologies, LLC1BIOGRAPHIES OF KEYNOTE SPEAKERSAlexander W. Masetti Renata S. EngelVice President, Continuous Improvement Professor & Associate Dean Undergraduate StudiesAlexander W. Masetti was appointed vicepresident, continuous improvement, in Renata S. Engel is associate dean for
American Society For Engineering Education Spring 2010 Middle-Atlantic Section Conference ENGINEERING EDUCATION:GLOBAL CHALLENGES, LOCAL SOLUTIONS April 16-17, 2010 ACOPIAN ENGINEERING CENTER LAFAYETTE COLLEGE Easton, Pennsylvania Leading Engineering Technologies, LLC1BIOGRAPHIES OF KEYNOTE SPEAKERSAlexander W. Masetti Renata S. EngelVice President, Continuous Improvement Professor & Associate Dean Undergraduate StudiesAlexander W. Masetti was appointed vicepresident, continuous improvement, in Renata S. Engel is associate dean for academicOctober 2009. In this
other people the pr ofessional engineer1 as a complex as a complex and negotiation, critically reflecting on the social process, layered social diplomacy and analyzing roles of engineers in rules understood institution capable argumentation in a ways other s the organization and and utilized (?) of organizational wider context (?) use to be the wider learning (?) effective community, finding a professional voice
focused on K-12 CS education in which girls are participants in the studies?. We chose to use an existing, publicly-available dataset of 800+ articles and examined studies in which only girls were participants (n=51), then examined each of the 51 articles to determine which key CAPE component(s) each covers. Our pilot results show that CSER among girls covers areas related to Experience (92%) and Capacity (59%), but little to no coverage in the areas of Access (0%) and Participation (2%) of girls. To answer the primary research question and determine the feasibility of using CAPE for analyzing the entire corpus of 800+ articles (which is the next step in our research plan), we evaluated feasibility
andscience in their degree programs, connections with local artists and community members, andconnections with local, state and federal legislatures.Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the University of New Mexico Grand Challengeon Sustainable Water Resources.References[1] D. Buffalari et al., “Integrating Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: 1. Early Research Experiences and Training,” J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. A52–A63, Dec. 2020.[2] S. Pierszalowski, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, and L. Marlow, “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under- Researched Factors for Students of Color,” Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, Art. no. 9
.[26] M. C. Jadud, “An exploration of novice compilation behaviour in BlueJ,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 15:1, pp. 25–40, 2005, doi: 10.1080/08993400500056530.[27] J. M. Allen, F. Vahid, A. Edgcomb, K. Downey, and K. Miller, “An Analysis of Using Many Small Programs in CS1,” in Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2019, pp. 585–591. doi: 10.1145/3287324.3287466.[28] “Stepik.” https://stepik.org/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[29] S. H. Edwards and K. P. Murali, “CodeWorkout: Short Programming Exercises with Built-in Data Collection,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2017, pp. 188–193. doi: 10.1145
, D. (2020). “Building Emotional Safety for Students in School Environments: Challenges and Opportunities.” In Health and Education Interdependence: Thriving from Birth to Adulthood, R. Midford, G. Nutton, B. Hyndman, and S. Silburn, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 225–248. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3959-6_12.[8] Wang, M.-T. & Degol, J.L. (2016). “School Climate: A Review of the Construct, Measurement, and Impact on Student Outcomes,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 315–352, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1.[9] Wright, C.J., Hargis, L.E., Usher, E.L., Hammer, J.H., Wilson, S.A., & Miller, M.E. (2021). “Identifying Engineering Students’ Beliefs About Seeking Help for Mental Health Concerns
institution is relatively small, these young scholars arealmost invisible when compared to students, staff, and faculty at an institution [2]. There is alsono one size fits all solution for postdocs to improve in all the ways needed to becomecompetitive candidates in the highly competitive market for the tenure-track jobs less than 20%of them will eventually obtain [3]. Nowell et al.’s [3] systematic review of professional development (PD) of postdocsthoroughly examined what was and was not working for post doctoral PD. One of the areas theyidentified as an important skill postdocs wanted to learn or further develop were “grant,manuscript, and proposal writing” and improving their presentation skills. Teaching skills sawthe greatest
School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State Uni- versity. Dr. Gambateseˆa C™s educational background includes Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of California aDr. Jake Smithwick, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Jake Smithwick is an associate professor at the University of North Carolina in Charlotte. His re- search focuses on organizational performance benchmarking within facility management, construction, and business services. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Identifying the “Static” and “Dynamic” Nature of Course Content: Focus on ConstructionAbstractThere is a variety of academic programs in the United
science professors: A large scale analysis on ratemyprofessor data. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 980–986, 2021.[14] Andrew S Rosen. Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: a large-scale study of ratemyprofessors. com data. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1):31–44, 2018.[15] Yanan Fan, Laura J Shepherd, Eve Slavich, David Waters, M Stone, Rachel Abel, and Emma L Johnston. Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters. PloS one, 14(2):e0209749, 2019.[16] Kenneth M Cramer and Louise R Alexitch. Student Evaluations of College Professors
, checklists and other resources, and a HelpDesk.The hypothesis is that if first-time PIs feel less overwhelmed when implementing their firstgrant-funded projects, they will be able to attain better outcomes from those projects and will bemore likely to seek additional ATE grants in the future.References[1] S.1146 - Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992 102nd Congress (1991-1992)102 Congress (1991-1992): SATA legislation[2] https://nsf.gov, Awards, Award Search[3] https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?WT.z_pims_id=5464&ods_key=nsf21598,NSF Program Solicitation 21-598, Advanced Technological Education[4] Murrell, Audrey J, Forte-Trammell, Sheila and Bing, Diana A. (2009). Intelligent Mentoring:How IBM Creates Value Through People
of Maryland at College Park. Her research focus is on coupled aero-hydrodynamics of vehicle systems and novel vessel design.Dr. Paul H. Miller, P.E., United States Coast Guard Academy PAUL H. MILLER is a Professor in the Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department at the USCGA and received a B. S. M. E. from Tufts University in 1985 and a M. E. in Ocean Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1987. From 1987 to 1999 he worked in shipyards and design offices while attending the University of California at Berkeley part time and earning a M. E. in Naval Architecture and a D. Eng. in Civil Engineering. He is a licensed P.E. in Maryland and a Fellow in RINA and SNAME. His research includes marine
engineering is often the best teacher. While this research was done in anaerospace engineering experimental projects capstone sequence, many design capstonesequences in other engineering majors incorporate the experiential learning component aerospaceoften lacks, so many of the lessons learned here should transfer well to those capstones.References[1] KEEN Framework, https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework[2] Grzybowski, D. M., & Tang, X., & Park, E., & Leonard, A., & DeLano, J., & Zhao, K.(2020, June), Integration of Entrepreneurial-minded Learning. Paper presented at 2020 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2--34852[3] Carnasciali, M., & Harichandran, R. S., & Erdil, N. O., &
completes tasks like welding that could be dangerous to bystanders. Similar to the interlocked barrier guard, a fixed barrier guard will physically restrict accessto an area from all directions [11]. However, fixed guards require tools to remove. A fixed guardacts as a shield between the robot and the operators(s) or bystanders. They are a permanent part ofthe machine. For this reason, they are constructed of materials that can withstand the impacts ofprolonged usage. It is the simplest type of guard, but the least flexible. They do not allow for quickmodifications to the robotic technology and greatly limit collaboration prospects, so they arereserved for the most dangerous robotic operations. The last type of physical guard is the
interventions could be a useful considerationfor similar first-year introductions. The limitations of this study include the lack of a controlsemester before the interventions were introduced. Future research on additional coursesperforming the pre and post surveys in a semester with and without the design interventionwould help to identify the direct impact of the design interventions. References[1] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, (2010). “Measuring Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x[2] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and Leifer, L. J. (2005). “Engineering design
postgraduate students [J]. Degrees and Graduate Education, 2016(2):12 -- 17.15 Zhang Donghai. Research on the Cultivation System of Practical Ability of Professional DegreePostgraduates and its Effectiveness -- Based on the survey of traditional graduate schools [J]. ChinaHigher Education Research, 2017(6):82 -- 89.16 Pan Mianzhen&Mao Jiye (2009). Rethinking the normative issues of case studies - China EnterpriseManagement Case Forum (2008) summary and model analysis Management World (02), 92-100+169.17 Edmondson, A. C. , & Mcmanus, S. E. . (2007). Methodological fit in management field research.The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179.18 Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy
Look at the Employment and Educational Experiences of College Graduates, 1 Year Later. First Look. NCES 2019- 241.,” Washington, DC, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019241[7] J. Bound, M. F. Lovenheim, and S. Turner, “Why have college completion rates declined? an analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources,” Am Econ J Appl Econ, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–157, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1257/app.2.3.129.[8] Florida International University (FIU), “Accountability Dashboards.” https://aim.fiu.edu/dash/index.html (accessed Mar. 31, 2023).[9] Y. Chen, A. Johri, and H. Rangwala, “Running out of STEM: A Comparative Study across STEM Majors of
." National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, 2009, pp2 -7.2. J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, (2019, June), “A System Approach to Instructional Change in Academia” Paper presented ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, (Florida), USA: 2019. https://peer.asee.org/320053. M. C. Wright, “Measuring teaching effectiveness” in Advancing the Culture of Teaching on Campus: How a Teaching Center Can Make a Difference, ed. C. Cook and M. Kaplan, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2011, ch. 2, pp34-42.4. C. E. Cook and M. Marincovich. "Effective practices at research universities: the productive pairing of research and teaching," in A Guide to Faculty Development. 2nd ed. K. J. Gillespie and D. L. Robertson, San
informationabout CREATE/STS activities as they unfold.References[1] Seabrook, B. E., & Neeley, K. A., & Zacharias, K., & Caron, B. R., Teaching STS toEngineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2020.[2] Marshall, W., & Tang, M., & Durham, S. A. Integration of Science, Technology, and Society(STS) Courses into the Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, 2012.[3] Tomblin, D., & Mogul, N. “STS Postures: Changing How Undergraduate EngineeringStudents Move Through the World “Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,2022.[4] ABET, Accreditation Criteria 2023-2024 https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria
; Jaugietis, Z., Developing peer mentoring through evaluation. Innovative HigherEducation, 36(1). 41-52 (2011).[8] Astin, A. W., Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of CollegeStudent Development, 40(5), 518-529 (1999).[9] Chester, A., Burton, L. J., Xenos, S., & Elgar, K. Peer mentoring: Supporting successful transition forfirst year undergraduate psychology students. Australian Journal Of Psychology, 65(1), 30-37 (2013).
program.References1. Holland, S.; Gaston, K.; Gomes, J. Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2000, 2, 231–259, doi:10.1111/1468- 2370.00040.2. Mengoni, M.; Germani, M.; Peruzzini, M.; Mandolini, M. Supporting virtual teamwork in Collaborative Product Development. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2011, 15, 90–114, doi:10.1504/IJPD.2011.043663.3. Glick, N.D. The relationship between cross cultural experience and training, and leader effectiveness in the US Foreign Service. Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag. 2002, 2, 339–356, doi:10.1177/147059580223004.4. Culture at Work, The value of intercultural skills in the workplace; 2013;5. What is COIL Available online: https
the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, J. C. Smart, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006, pp. 397–456.[9] A. K. Bragg, “The socialization process in higher education,” Am. Assoc. for Higher Ed., Washington, DC, ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7, 1976.[10] S. K. Gardner, “Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines,” International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 5, pp. 39–53, 2010.[11] J. C. Weidman, D. J. Twale, and E. L. Stein, Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education: A Perilous Passage? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2001.[12] J. C. Weidman and E. L. Stein